Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
hosang I.T.

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Tech

Tech Articles from a wide variety of topics and categories
Show all categories

Apple's Regent Street Store Reopening Soon After One-Month Closure

Apple has announced that its flagship Regent Street store in London, England reopens on Saturday, February 14, at 10 a.m. local time.


The store has been temporarily closed for "refurbishment" since Monday, January 12. The extent of the changes remains to be seen.

It is not yet clear if Apple made any changes that will be visible to customers. In some cases, Apple only updates a store's fixtures or back-of-house area, resulting in no visible differences to customers when business resumes.

Apple first opened up shop on London's world-famous Regent Street in 2004. The store was already remodeled in 2016.Tag: Apple Store
This article, "Apple's Regent Street Store Reopening Soon After One-Month Closure" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

ChatGPT Now Has Ads for Free and Go Tier Users

U.S. ChatGPT users who have a free account or a low-cost Go subscription will start seeing ads starting today, according to OpenAI.


Ads will be limited to the Free and Go subscription tiers, and will be shown to logged-in adult users. OpenAI does not plan to show ads to minors, and the company claims that ads will not influence the answers that ChatGPT provides. OpenAI also says it will not provide advertisers with content from ChatGPT conversations.

OpenAI is not profitable, and the free and Go tier options require "significant infrastructure and ongoing investment." OpenAI is funding that work through ads, and it says that customers who do not want to see ads can upgrade to a Plus or Pro plan. There's also an option to opt out of ads in exchange for fewer daily free messages.

Ads in ChatGPT will be clearly labeled as sponsored and the information will be presented separately from answers that ChatGPT provides. By default, OpenAI will show ads based on conversation topic, past chats, and past interactions with ads. A conversation about recipes, for example, may surface ads for meal kits or grocery delivery.

Advertisers will receive aggregate information like number of views or clicks, but won't have access to chat history, memories, or personal user information. Ads will not be shown for sensitive topics like health, mental health, or politics.

OpenAI is allowing users to dismiss ads, share feedback, and get information on why a particular ad is displayed. Ad data is also able to be deleted, and personalization can be disabled.

ChatGPT subscribers with Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Education plans will not see ads. OpenAI says the current rollout is a test to learn, listen, and get the ad experience right, and the company claims that it believes ads in ChatGPT can be "uniquely valuable for people."

Last week, OpenAI competitor Anthropic promised to keep the Claude chatbot ad-free in response to OpenAI's plan to introduce ads. Anthropic shared an anti-ad commercial during the Super Bowl calling out OpenAI for its ad plans, and said that a "conversation with Claude" is not the right place for ads.Tags: ChatGPT, OpenAI
This article, "ChatGPT Now Has Ads for Free and Go Tier Users" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

China-Linked UNC3886 Targets Singapore Telecom Sector in Cyber Espionage Campaign

The Cyber Security Agency (CSA) of Singapore on Monday revealed that the China-nexus cyber espionage group known as UNC3886 targeted its telecommunications sector. "UNC3886 had launched a deliberate, targeted, and well-planned campaign against Singapore's telecommunications sector," CSA said. "All four of Singapore's major telecommunications operators ('telcos') – M1, SIMBA Telecom, Singtel, andView the full article
Hacker News

macOS: Share a Link That Jumps to a Specific Line on a Webpage

Sometimes when you share a webpage link with someone, you just want to bring their attention to a specific passage or sentence to make your point, rather than have them read through the entire article.


In 2020, Google added a function to its Chrome browser called Scroll to Text Fragment (STTF) that helps you achieve this. It allows URLs to link directly to any visible text on a page. You may have seen it work in Google Search, where clicking on a link in your returned results takes you to a highlighted passage of text further down the page.

Google later added the feature to the Chromium codebase, so most other popular Chromium browsers like Edge, Opera, Brave, and Vivaldi also support it. Here's how it works.

Copy Link With Highlight in Safari

Apple added full support for text fragment links in Safari 18, and the feature is available in Safari on macOS Sequoia and later. To use the feature, visit a web page and simply highlight the text you want to create a link to, then right-click (Ctrl-click) and choose Copy Link with Highlight from the dropdown menu.

The "Copy Link to Highlight" option
This will generate a special URL that includes a hash (#) symbol and "text" element, followed by a few words that bookend the selected text. All you need to do is share the link with someone, and when they click it they will be sent directly to that part of the webpage with the specific passage highlighted, as shown below.

The shared link as the recipient sees it

That's all there is to it. The Copy Link to Highlight option is also available in Safari on iPhone and iPad, though we have found it to be buggy and inconsistent in iOS 26.3. Hopefully Apple can fix it soon. At least on Mac, it makes it easier for you to direct the recipient of the link to the content you actually want them to focus on.

Bear in mind that the look of highlighted text can differ depending on whether the page author has styled it to look a certain way. Also, text fragment linking does not work in PDFs. Since July 2025, Copy Link to Highlight has also been introduced in Firefox.Tag: Safari
This article, "macOS: Share a Link That Jumps to a Specific Line on a Webpage" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

M3 iPad Air Gets First Big Discounts of 2026 With Up to $140 Off Select Models

Amazon this week has introduced a few notable discounts across the M3 iPad Air lineup, with as much as $140 off select tablets. These are among the first big discounts we've tracked on the iPad Air in 2026, with prices starting at $489.99 for the 128GB Wi-Fi 11-inch iPad Air, down from $599.00.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with some of these vendors. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

These deals are all solid second-best prices on the M3 iPad Air, but it's been well over a month since we last tracked record low discounts, so if you've been waiting for a sale now is a great time to purchase the tablet. All of the deals in this sale have been automatically applied and do not require any coupon codes.

$109 OFF11-inch M3 iPad Air (128GB Wi-Fi) for $489.99
$119 OFF13-inch M3 iPad Air (128GB Wi-Fi) for $679.99
11-inch M3 iPad Air

128GB Wi-Fi - $489.99, down from $599.00
256GB Wi-Fi - $589.00, down from $699.00
512GB Wi-Fi - $779.00, down from $899.00
13-inch M3 iPad Air

128GB Wi-Fi - $679.99, down from $799.00
256GB Wi-Fi - $779.99, down from $899.00
512GB Wi-Fi - $979.00, down from $1,099.00
1TB Wi-Fi - $1,159.00, down from $1,299.00

If you're on the hunt for more discounts, be sure to visit our Apple Deals roundup where we recap the best Apple-related bargains of the past week.



Deals Newsletter

Interested in hearing more about the best deals you can find in 2026? Sign up for our Deals Newsletter and we'll keep you updated so you don't miss the biggest deals of the season!




Related Roundup: Apple Deals
This article, "M3 iPad Air Gets First Big Discounts of 2026 With Up to $140 Off Select Models" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

OWC Introduces Discounts on Newest Thunderbolt 5 Docks and Hubs

OWC recently kicked off a new sale offering big discounts on a variety of USB-C docks, external drives and enclosures, and Mac accessories. This includes $40 off OWC's new Thunderbolt 5 Hub, available for $149.99, down from $189.99.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with OWC. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

This new hub adds more Thunderbolt 5 ports to your Mac, PC, or iPad Pro setup, with support for Thunderbolt 5, Thunderbolt 4, Thunderbolt 3, USB4, and USB-C devices. There's also a deal on OWC's 11-Port Thunderbolt 5 Dock, which is available for $299.99, down from $329.99 and has ports for memory cards, USB-A devices, networking cables, headphones, and more.

$40 OFFOWC Thunderbolt 5 Hub for $149.99
$30 OFFOWC 11-Port Thunderbolt 5 Dock for $299.99

OWC's sale has a few other discounts this week, including savings on Thunderbolt cables, charging cables, and more. The popular 14-Port Thunderbolt Dock for Mac is available for $179.99, down from $279.99. If you purchase a qualifying new or used Mac at the same time as this dock, you can get an additional $20 off the accessory at checkout.

Docks and Hubs

USB-C Travel Dock - $34.99, down from $49.99
USB-C Travel Dock E - $49.99, down from $59.99
Thunderbolt 5 Hub - $149.99, down from $189.99
14-Port Thunderbolt Dock - $179.99, down from $279.99
Thunderbolt Go Dock - $179.99, down from $299.99
11-Port Thunderbolt 5 Dock - $299.99, down from $329.99
Cables

Thunderbolt 4 Cable - $11.49, down from $24.99
Thunderbolt 5 Cable (11.8 in) - $14.99, down from $19.99
Thunderbolt 5 Cable (31.5 in) - $19.99, down from $27.99
Drives and Enclosures

1TB OWC Express 1M2 + SanDisk WD_BLACK SN850X NVMe M.2 2280 SSD - $299.99, down from $417.98
2TB OWC Express 1M2 + SanDisk WD_BLACK SN850X NVMe M.2 2280 SSD - $469.99, down from $907.98

If you're on the hunt for more discounts, be sure to visit our Apple Deals roundup where we recap the best Apple-related bargains of the past week.



Deals Newsletter

Interested in hearing more about the best deals you can find in 2026? Sign up for our Deals Newsletter and we'll keep you updated so you don't miss the biggest deals of the season!




Related Roundup: Apple Deals
This article, "OWC Introduces Discounts on Newest Thunderbolt 5 Docks and Hubs" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Samsung Planning to Follow iPhone 18 Pro's Variable Aperture Camera

Samsung is planning to follow Apple in adding a variable aperture to its smartphone cameras, Korea's ET News reports.


A variable aperture allows the camera to adjust the amount of light that reaches the sensor. This means that in dark environments, the aperture can be opened to receive more light, while in light environments, it can be closed to prevent over-exposure. It also should provide users with greater control over depth of field, which refers to how sharp a subject appears in the foreground compared to the background.

The iPhone 18 Pro and ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro Max are now widely expected to feature an upgraded main camera with a variable aperture. In December 2024, Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo was first to say that that the main rear camera on both ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro models will offer variable aperture. A more recent report from October 2025 said Apple was moving ahead with plans to bring the technology to next-generation iPhones and was discussing components with suppliers.

Apple has never used a variable aperture on an iPhone camera before. The main cameras on all of the ‌iPhone‌ 14 Pro through iPhone 17 Pro models have a fixed aperture of ƒ/1.78, and the lens is always fully open and shooting with this aperture. Samsung Electronics previously brought a variable aperture camera to its Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S10 models in 2018 and 2019, but due to increased thickness and high price, it dropped the feature in 2020.

In light of Apple's plans, Samsung has reportedly asked multiple camera module partners to develop variable apertures and provide samples. The feature is in early development and final installation has not yet been confirmed, but there is said to be a "strong will" to introduce it.

Samsung apparently sees adding a variable aperture as "necessary to increase camera competitiveness," replacing software correction with physical hardware. The company hopes that in investing in variable aperture camera technology, thickness can be reduced and costs will reduce over time. Apple's first variable aperture camera is expected to arrive in the ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro models in the fall.Tags: ETNews, Samsung
This article, "Samsung Planning to Follow iPhone 18 Pro's Variable Aperture Camera" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Studio Display 2: The Latest Rumors About Apple's Next Monitor

Apple reportedly plans to release a new Studio Display in the first half of 2026, and there have been plenty of rumors about the monitor lately.


Below, we recap the latest Studio Display 2 rumors:In his Power On newsletter on Sunday, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said he was told the new Studio Display "looks quite similar to the current one," so that seemingly rules out any major design changes.
It has twice been rumored that the Studio Display 2's maximum refresh rate will be 90Hz, instead of 120Hz. The current model is 60Hz.
Last month, an unreleased Apple monitor (model A3350) surfaced in a Chinese regulatory database, and it is likely the Studio Display 2.
Previously rumored features include a 27-inch screen with mini-LED backlighting, HDR support, and an A19 chip or an A19 Pro chip.The current Studio Display launched in March 2022, alongside the first Mac Studio. It has a 27-inch LCD screen with 5K resolution, a 60Hz refresh rate, up to 600 nits brightness, a built-in camera and speakers, one Thunderbolt 3 port, and a trio of USB-C ports. In the U.S., pricing starts at $1,599.

If the next Studio Display receives mini-LED backlighting and HDR support, its maximum brightness and contrast ratio would be higher than the current model. And a newer A19 or A19 Pro chip — up from the A13 Bionic currently — should contribute to performance improvements, camera-related enhancements, and more.

Based on the rumored first half of 2026 timeframe, Apple should unveil the Studio Display 2 at any point between now and the end of June.Related Roundups: Apple Pro Display XDR, Apple Studio DisplayRelated Forum: Mac Accessories
This article, "Studio Display 2: The Latest Rumors About Apple's Next Monitor" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

SolarWinds Web Help Desk Exploited for RCE in Multi-Stage Attacks on Exposed Servers

Microsoft has revealed that it observed a multi‑stage intrusion that involved the threat actors exploiting internet‑exposed SolarWinds Web Help Desk (WHD) instances to obtain initial access and move laterally across the organization's network to other high-value assets. That said, the Microsoft Defender Security Research Team said it's not clear whether the activity weaponized recentlyView the full article
Hacker News

Apple Says These 7 U.S. States Plan to Offer iPhone Driver's Licenses

In select U.S. states, residents can add their driver's license or state ID to the Apple Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch, and then use it to display proof of identity or age at select airports and businesses, and in select apps.


The feature is currently available in 13 U.S. states and Puerto Rico, and it is expected to launch in at least seven more in the future.

To set up the feature, open the Wallet app and tap on the plus sign in the top-right corner. Next, select Driver's License and ID Cards and follow the steps.

Supported States

The following 13 states offer driver's licenses in the Wallet app:Arizona (since March 2022)
Maryland (since May 2022)
Colorado (since November 2022)
Georgia (since May 2023)
Ohio (since July 2024)
Hawaii (since August 2024)
California (since September 2024)
Iowa (since October 2024)
New Mexico (since December 2024)Montana (since August 2025)
North Dakota (since September 2025)
West Virginia (since October 2025)
Illinois (since November 2025)The feature is also available in Puerto Rico.

Future States

Apple and local DMV offices have announced that the following U.S. states have signed on to adopt the feature, but no timeframes were disclosed:Connecticut
Kentucky
Mississippi
Oklahoma
Utah
Arkansas
VirginiaParticipating Airports

Apple Wallet IDs are accepted at TSA checkpoints in more than 250 airports in the U.S., for domestic travel. Given that Apple Wallet IDs are not accepted by law enforcement, and lack many other use cases, carrying a physical ID is still necessary.

Here are just some of the airports that offer the feature — there are hundreds of others:Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI)
Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA)
Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD)
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX)
Denver International Airport (DEN)
Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL)
Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Airport (CVG)
John Glenn Columbus International Airport (CMH)
San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
San Jose Mineta International Airport (SJC)
Los Angeles International (LAX)
Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL)
Des Moines International Airport (DSM)
Eastern Iowa Airport (CID)
Albuquerque International Sunport (ABQ)
Lea County Regional Airport (HOB)
Luis Munoz Marin International Airport (SJU)
Billings Logan International Airport (BIL)
Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport (BZN)
Great Falls International Airport (GTF)
Missoula International Airport (MSO)
Chicago O'Hare International Airport (ORD)
Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW)
St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL)
Richmond International Airport (RIC)
Norfolk International Airport (ORF)
Roanoke-Blacksburg Regional Airport (ROA)
Newport News-Williamsburg International Airport (PHF)Travelers should refer to TSA signage to confirm availability of the feature.

Digital Passport


If you live in a state that does not yet offer Apple Wallet IDs, you can now create a Digital ID based on your U.S. passport, and present it at the same participating TSA checkpoints, for age and identity verification purposes during domestic travel. It is not a replacement for a physical passport, and it cannot be used for international travel.

This feature requires iOS 26.1 or watchOS 26.1 and later.Tag: Apple Wallet
This article, "Apple Says These 7 U.S. States Plan to Offer iPhone Driver's Licenses" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

AirPods Pro 4 Could Feature Cameras to 'See Around You'

Apple's next-generation AirPods Pro will feature cameras to see around a user, according to the leaker and prototype collector known as "Kosutami."


In a new post on X, Kosutami said that the next AirPods Pro will be able to see around the wearer, presumably via cameras in each earbud. Supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said that the 2026 AirPods Pro will feature a "more significant" hardware upgrade in the form at least one tiny infrared camera. He previously said AirPods with infrared cameras could recognize hand gestures and provide an enhanced spatial audio experience with Apple's Vision Pro headset.

Kosutami added that the new AirPods Pro will be available at the same $249 price as the current model. This contrasts with previous rumors suggesting that the next AirPods Pro would be a secondary version of AirPods Pro 3 this year, sitting in the lineup alongside the current model.

The Chinese leaker known as "Instant Digital" corroborated the rumors about new AirPods Pro featuring infrared cameras for gesture controls, with some additional details and clarifications. Rather than being a new generation, the 2026 AirPods Pro will apparently be a pricier, high-end variant of the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ introduced in 2025, suggesting that both models will ultimately be on sale alongside each other. It is worth noting that Apple offers two version of the AirPods 4 at $129 and $179 price points, so this is a highly plausible move.

The current AirPods lineup has offerings priced at $129, $179, $249, and $549. An additional product between the $249 ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ and $549 AirPods Max seems possible, especially given the rise of higher end Bluetooth earbuds from the likes of Bang Olufsen, Bowers & Wilkins, and Bose.

Regardless, back in September 2025, Kuo reported that Apple is planning to introduce a successor to the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ in 2026. This would be somewhat unusual since Apple normally waits around three years to make major changes to the AirPods' hardware. AirPods Pro 2 debuted at the iPhone 14 event in September 2022, and they were updated with a USB-C charging case and a few other tweaks in September 2023. Otherwise, Apple has waited about three years to update all of its AirPods models.

Whether they are a new, high-end version of the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ or full-fledged AirPods Pro 4, launch timing is currently unclear, but Apple typically announces new AirPods in the second half of the year. The original AirPods, AirPods Pro 2 and their subsequent USB-C revision, ‌AirPods 4‌, and ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ were all announced at Apple's annual ‌iPhone‌ event in September. Related Roundup: AirPods Pro 3Tag: KosutamiBuyer's Guide: AirPods Pro (Buy Now)Related Forum: AirPods
This article, "AirPods Pro 4 Could Feature Cameras to 'See Around You'" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Here's Jony Ive's Ferrari Luce EV Interior and Interface Design

In 2021, Ferrari and its parent company Exor announced a multi-year creative partnership with LoveFrom, the design firm co-founded by Apple's former design chief Jony Ive and fellow designer Marc Newson. Now, in an event held at the Transamerica Pyramid, not far from LoveFrom's studio in San Francisco, Ferrari has shared the first results of that collab by unveiling the interior and interface of its first fully electric car, named "Luce" (Italian for "light").


In a writeup over at PRNDL, automotive journalist Jordan Golson describes how the Luce is designed around the premise that a car's interface should be operable largely by feel, with minimal visual distraction. Ive argues that touchscreens made sense for the iPhone because it solved a general-purpose problem, but it's not for driving: "To use touch in a car is something I would never dream of doing, because it requires that you look at what you're doing."

Following from that premise, the steering wheel and binnacle form a clear driving zone, where physical inputs are separated from visual outputs. Core functions such as climate, seat heating, and drive modes use dedicated mechanical switches and dials.

Physical controls trigger contextual responses on the displays, and the instrument binnacle combines layered OLED screens with physical depth and a real mechanical needle moving between them. The steering wheel itself is an exposed aluminum structure, where the glass-and-metal buttons are differentiated by touch, and the paddle shifters control EV functions like regenerative braking and torque delivery.

One of the standout features of the Luce is its glass key with an E Ink display. In your pocket it appears Ferrari yellow, and because E Ink is bistable, it consumes no power when static. When the driver enters the car, a magnet in the center console guides the key into a dedicated dock. Press it down, and the yellow fades to black as the key integrates with the glass surface of the console. Ive calls this "theater," re-imagining the ritual of starting up an electric car.

Head over to Golson's website for his full coverage, and watch his exclusive video above.

Ferrari has been unveiling its first fully electric car in three stages. The first reveal, held in Maranello last October, focused on the underlying technology, including the battery, motors, and platform. This second phase centers on the interior and interface. The exterior will be revealed in Italy in May.Tags: Jony Ive, LoveFrom
This article, "Here's Jony Ive's Ferrari Luce EV Interior and Interface Design" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Top 10 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software is a numerical simulation tool used to predict how physical products react to real-world forces, vibration, heat, fluid flow, and other physical effects. By breaking down a complex object into a vast number of smaller, simpler geometric shapes called “finite elements,” the software uses mathematical equations (Partial Differential Equations) to calculate the behavior of each element. When reassembled, these individual results provide a high-fidelity map of the entire structure’s integrity and performance.
In the 2026 engineering landscape, FEA has transitioned from a final validation check to a proactive design driver. With the rise of the “Digital Twin” and the need for rapid electrification in the automotive sector, FEA allows engineers to “fail fast” in a virtual environment, significantly reducing the cost and time associated with physical prototyping.
Real-World Use Cases
Automotive Crashworthiness: Simulating vehicle-to-vehicle impacts to optimize passenger safety cells and airbag deployment timing. Aerospace Fatigue Life: Predicting the onset of microscopic cracks in turbine blades after thousands of hours of high-temperature operation. Biomedical Implants: Analyzing the stress distribution of a titanium hip replacement to ensure it doesn’t cause bone degradation over 20 years. Electronics Reliability: Simulating the thermal expansion and mechanical shock of circuit boards in mobile devices to prevent solder joint failure. Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
Solver Breadth: Support for linear, nonlinear, static, dynamic, and explicit solvers. Multiphysics Integration: Ability to couple structural analysis with thermal, fluid, or electromagnetic domains. Material Modeling: Depth of the library for composites, hyperelastic materials (rubber), and plasticity. Meshing Automation: AI-driven or automated tools to handle complex CAD geometry without manual cleanup. High-Performance Computing (HPC): Scalability across cloud clusters to handle models with 100M+ degrees of freedom. Certification & Heritage: A proven track record of validation against physical tests in regulated industries. Key Trends in FEA Software for 2026 and Beyond
AI-Native Simulation: Modern FEA tools now use “Physics-Informed Neural Networks” (PINNs) to predict simulation results in seconds, providing real-time feedback during the CAD modeling process. Agentic AI Mesh Generation: Autonomous AI agents now handle the tedious process of “mesh cleanup,” identifying critical stress zones and refining elements without human intervention. Cloud-Native Scalability: The “democratization” of FEA is complete, with browser-based tools allowing SMEs to run massive, core-heavy simulations without on-premise supercomputers. Generative Design & Topology Optimization: Software now “evolves” the lightest possible part design based on stress constraints, often resulting in organic, bone-like structures. Digital Twin Synchronization: Real-time linkage between physical sensors and FEA models allows for “Predictive Maintenance,” identifying when a bridge or engine part is nearing failure. Zero-Trust Security: Enterprise FEA platforms now implement end-to-end encryption and blockchain-based IP protection for proprietary CAD data in the cloud. Sustainability & Embodied Carbon: Integrated modules now calculate the environmental impact of material choices directly during the structural validation phase. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
To select the top 10 FEA platforms for 2026, we evaluated the market based on technical maturity and industrial impact:
Market Mindshare: Priority was given to industry-standard solvers used by global OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers). Solver Fidelity: We favored tools with high-fidelity nonlinear and explicit solvers capable of handling extreme deformations. Platform Integration: Evaluation included how well the FEA tool connects to CAD (SolidWorks, NX, Creo) and PLM systems. Security Posture: Screening for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ITAR compliance readiness. Innovation Velocity: Preference for vendors actively integrating AI and cloud-native workflows. Community Support: Assessment of documentation quality, professional certification programs, and user forum activity. Top 10 FEA Software Tools
#1 — Ansys Mechanical
Short description: The industry-leading general-purpose FEA solver, offering a comprehensive suite for linear/nonlinear structural, thermal, and multiphysics analysis.
Key Features
Highly modern, flowchart-based “Workbench” environment. Advanced nonlinear material models and contact mechanics. Integrated “Ansys Discovery” for real-time, AI-driven simulation. Superior HPC scalability for enterprise-level models. Massive library of validated material data. Direct coupling with Ansys Fluent (CFD) and Maxwell (Electromagnetics). Pros
Unmatched industry acceptance; the gold standard for regulatory certification. Excellent automation and scripting capabilities via Python. Cons
One of the most expensive licensing models in the industry. The interface can be overwhelming for casual users due to its depth. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ITAR-ready cloud deployments. SSO/SAML and advanced data encryption. Integrations & Ecosystem
Ansys sits at the center of the largest simulation ecosystem, connecting to all major CAD and PLM tools.
Autodesk Fusion Siemens Teamcenter PTC Creo Support & Community
Unrivaled documentation, dedicated enterprise support, and a massive global network of certified training partners.
#2 — Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes)
Short description: A high-end specialist tool renowned for its mastery of complex nonlinear problems, large deformations, and contact-heavy simulations.
Key Features
Industry-standard implicit and explicit solvers. Exceptional handling of polymers, rubber, and soft tissue. Advanced fracture and failure mechanics (XFEM). Integrated within the 3DEXPERIENCE cloud platform. Powerful Python API for custom constitutive material modeling. Superior stability for models with extreme mesh distortion. Pros
The “go-to” tool for crash, impact, and high-complexity nonlinear events. Highly stable and reliable for the most challenging engineering physics. Cons
Steeper learning curve than Ansys Mechanical; less “wizard” assistance. The traditional Abaqus/CAE interface feels dated compared to modern cloud apps. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001 compliant; fully integrated with secure Dassault cloud protocols. High-level IP protection for defense and medical data. Integrations & Ecosystem
Natively tied to the Dassault Systèmes engineering stack.
CATIA / SolidWorks ENOVIA (PLM) SIMULIA (Multiphysics) Support & Community
Professional-grade support focused on high-end engineering consulting and research specialists.
#3 — MSC Nastran
Short description: The original FEA code developed for NASA; it remains the global multidisciplinary standard for aerospace and defense structural certification.
Key Features
Unrivaled heritage in linear elastic structural analysis. Extremely memory-efficient solvers for massive, system-level models. Industry-certified workflows for aircraft and spacecraft vibration/modal analysis. Integrated with MSC Apex for rapid geometry cleanup and meshing. Advanced “Superelement” technology for modeling large assemblies. High-fidelity acoustics and aeroelasticity modules. Pros
The “safest” choice for certifying critical aerospace structures. Exceptionally fast for large linear-static and dynamic response studies. Cons
The “bulk data” input format has a very steep learning curve for new users. Less focus on general-purpose multiphysics than Ansys. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
Widely used in ITAR and highly classified defense environments. ISO 9001 and aerospace-grade validation standards. Integrations & Ecosystem
Part of the Hexagon manufacturing ecosystem, connecting design to metrology.
Patran / MSC Apex (Pre-processors) Adams (Multi-body Dynamics) SimManager (SPDM) Support & Community
Deeply entrenched in the aerospace community with highly specialized technical support.
#4 — Altair OptiStruct
Short description: An optimization-first FEA solver that pioneered topology optimization for lightweighting in the automotive and aerospace sectors.
Key Features
Market-leading topology, shape, and size optimization. Integrated linear and nonlinear structural analysis. Advanced fatigue and durability assessment tools. Efficient handling of complex composite structures. Unique “Altair Units” licensing allows access to dozens of Altair tools. GPU-accelerated solvers for rapid design iterations. Pros
The best tool for reducing part weight without sacrificing structural integrity. Extremely flexible and cost-effective licensing for mid-sized teams. Cons
The user interface can be less intuitive for engineers used to traditional CAD-embedded FEA. Primarily focused on structural/mechanical domains; less fluid/EM depth. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SOC 2, GDPR compliant. Secure model sharing with granular user permissions. Integrations & Ecosystem
Lives within the Altair HyperWorks environment, the industry leader in pre-processing.
HyperMesh Inspire (for designers) SimLab Support & Community
Excellent technical support and a strong presence in the global automotive R&D community.
#5 — Siemens Simcenter 3D
Short description: A unified, multidisciplinary CAE platform that integrates the Nastran solver with Siemens’ high-end CAD and PLM tools.
Key Features
Native integration with Siemens NX CAD (no file translation). Multidisciplinary solvers for structural, thermal, acoustic, and motion. Integrated Simcenter Nastran (the enterprise-grade Nastran solver). Advanced “Digital Twin” simulation capabilities. Direct connection to physical test data for model correlation. Automated meshing that tracks CAD design changes. Pros
The most cohesive workflow for large enterprises using the Siemens stack. Exceptional for managing the entire product lifecycle from design to test. Cons
High complexity; usually requires a dedicated BIM/VDC or simulation manager. Best performance is locked behind the Siemens ecosystem (NX/Teamcenter). Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliant. Teamcenter-backed data security for large global teams. Integrations & Ecosystem
The core of the Siemens Xcelerator portfolio.
NX CAD Teamcenter (PLM) STAR-CCM+ (CFD) Support & Community
Enterprise-level support with specialized consultants for Industry 4.0 implementation.
#6 — Autodesk Fusion (Simulation)
Short description: A cloud-native design and simulation platform that provides professional-grade FEA with an accessible, modern user experience.
Key Features
Linear/nonlinear stress, thermal, and modal analysis. Industry-leading, AI-driven Generative Design. Cloud-based solving to free up local machine resources. Integrated CAD/CAM/CAE in a single workspace. Simplified “Event Simulation” for high-speed impacts. Automated meshing and intuitive result visualization. Pros
Unmatched “value for money”; highly accessible for startups and SMEs. Extremely fast learning curve; designers can run validation in minutes. Cons
Lacks the extreme specialized solver depth of Abaqus or LS-DYNA. Requires a constant internet connection for full cloud functionality. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Web Cloud-native Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliant. SSO and comprehensive audit logs. Integrations & Ecosystem
Natively integrated with the broader Autodesk manufacturing and construction clouds.
Inventor / Fusion 360 Autodesk Vault Ansys (via strategic partnership) Support & Community
Massive, modern community with endless free tutorials and professional learning paths.
#7 — COMSOL Multiphysics (Structural Module)
Short description: A researcher-favorite platform that excels in coupling structural mechanics with unconventional physical domains.
Key Features
Equation-based modeling; users can view and edit the underlying PDEs. Transparent coupling between structural, fluid, chemical, and EM domains. “Application Builder” to create custom, simplified simulation apps. Advanced modules for MEMS, piezoelectric, and acoustic devices. Mesh-adaptive solvers for high-precision local analysis. Strong parametric and sensitivity analysis tools. Pros
The undisputed leader for novel R&D where physics domains interact in unique ways. Best platform for creating and distributing custom simulation “apps” to non-experts. Cons
Solvers can be slower for extremely large-scale, “pure” structural models compared to Nastran. Not as “industry-prescriptive” as specialized tools like Abaqus. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Supports secure network installations and isolated server deployments. Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Offers “LiveLink” modules for real-time synchronization with major CAD tools.
MATLAB / Simulink SolidWorks / Revit Excel Support & Community
Strong academic following and a robust library of models and user-contributed apps.
#8 — SimScale
Short description: A browser-based engineering platform that brings high-end FEA and CFD to teams without the need for expensive hardware.
Key Features
100% browser-based execution (zero-IT installation). Scalable cloud solving on hundreds of cores. Integrated nonlinear structural, thermal, and fluid dynamics. Real-time collaboration and project sharing. Modern, intuitive UI designed for agile engineering teams. Cost-effective subscription model based on usage. Pros
The fastest tool to deploy for a distributed global team. Affordable entry point for startups and engineering consultants. Cons
Dependent on high-speed internet for large result file visualization. Currently lacks some of the hyper-specialized failure models found in Abaqus. Platforms / Deployment
Web / Browser-based Cloud-native Security & Compliance
SOC 2 compliant; utilizes encrypted AWS data centers. GDPR ready. Integrations & Ecosystem
Focused on connecting with cloud CAD and modern design stacks.
Onshape Autodesk Fusion Rhino / Grasshopper Support & Community
Highly responsive live chat support and an active, modern community of cloud-engineers.
#9 — SolidWorks Simulation
Short description: A CAD-embedded FEA tool that allows designers to validate their parts directly within the world’s most popular 3D modeler.
Key Features
Fully integrated within the SolidWorks design environment. Automated “wizard-based” setup for static and thermal studies. Fatigue and motion analysis for mechanical assemblies. Optimization tools based on stress and weight targets. Native CAD associativity; toolpaths update as the design changes. Comprehensive libraries for standard fasteners and materials. Pros
Eliminates the “import/export” headache for SolidWorks designers. Very short learning curve for engineers who are already SolidWorks-proficient. Cons
Advanced nonlinear studies often require an upgrade to “Simulation Premium.” Only available on Windows as a plugin for SolidWorks. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard SolidWorks PDM (Product Data Management) security. Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Tightly coupled with the SolidWorks design and PDM environment.
SolidWorks CAD 3DEXPERIENCE Platform DraftSight Support & Community
Massive global user base with localized support from a vast reseller network.
#10 — FreeCAD (FEM Workbench)
Short description: The leading open-source 3D CAD/FEA modeler, providing a free alternative for students, makers, and hobbyists.
Key Features
Open-source, parametric 3D modeling with a dedicated FEM workbench. Support for the CalculiX solver (linear/nonlinear structural and thermal). Python-based architecture for custom tool and solver integration. Automated meshing via GMSH and Netgen. Cross-platform support (Windows, Mac, Linux). Community-developed plugins for specialized structural tasks. Pros
Completely free; no subscription or licensing fees. Highly customizable for researchers and power users who can code. Cons
UI is less “polished” and harder to learn than commercial alternatives. Lacks the advanced industrial certification and 24/7 technical support. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Fully local; user has 100% control over data sovereignty. Compliance: N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Extensible via a large repository of community-made workbenches.
CalculiX (Solver) Elmer (Solver) Python (Automation) Support & Community
Entirely community-driven; excellent forums and a massive wiki, but no official support.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeploymentStandout FeaturePublic RatingAnsys MechanicalComplex MultiphysicsWin / LinuxHybridHPC Scaling & Solver Depth4.4 / 5AbaqusNonlinear / ImpactWin / LinuxHybridExplicit Solver Mastery4.3 / 5MSC NastranAerospace CertificationWin / LinuxHybridProven Reliability (NASA heritage)N/AOptiStructLightweighting / OptiWin / LinuxHybridTopology Optimization leader4.5 / 5Simcenter 3DEnterprise CAD/CAEWin / LinuxHybridNX Integration & Nastran4.4 / 5Fusion SimulationIntegrated Design / AIWin / Mac / WebCloudAI Generative Design4.4 / 5COMSOLR&D / MultiphysicsWin / Mac / LinuxHybridEquation-based modeling4.6 / 5SimScaleCloud-native / SMEsWeb BrowserCloudZero-IT cloud implementation4.7 / 5SolidWorks SimDesign ValidationWindowsSelf-hostedNative SolidWorks integration4.4 / 5FreeCAD FEMMakers / EducationWin / Mac / LinuxSelf-hostedFree / Open-source flexibilityN/A Evaluation & Scoring of FEA Software
Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted TotalAnsys Mechanical1071010101078.80Abaqus10691010968.35MSC Nastran9691010878.15OptiStruct979910888.40Simcenter 3D10710109978.65Fusion Simulation7109989108.35COMSOL98889988.35SimScale8108999108.65SolidWorks Sim891088898.35FreeCAD FEM6561077106.75 Interpretation
Core (25%): Higher scores reflect superior nonlinear and explicit solver capabilities. Value (15%): Reflects the TCO (Total Cost of Ownership); cloud-native and open-source tools score higher here. Integrations (15%): Tools like Simcenter 3D and SolidWorks score high for their “no-import” CAD associativity. Which FEA Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
If you need professional power without expensive hardware, SimScale is the best choice. It allows you to run high-end simulations directly in your browser. For those on a zero budget, FreeCAD is the only credible path.
SMB (Small-to-Medium Business)
For mid-sized engineering firms, Autodesk Fusion Simulation or Altair OptiStruct (due to its flexible unit-based licensing) offer the best balance of power and cost.
Mid-Market
Firms with established CAD pipelines should look at SolidWorks Simulation or Simcenter 3D. These tools ensure your design and simulation data remain in sync, reducing the risk of working on outdated models.
Enterprise
Global leaders in safety-critical sectors must rely on Ansys Mechanical, Abaqus, or MSC Nastran. These platforms provide the depth, security, and validated heritage required for mission-critical aircraft, vehicle, and medical device design.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between FEM and FEA?
FEM (Finite Element Method) is the mathematical technique used to solve the equations. FEA (Finite Element Analysis) is the practical application of that method using software to predict product behavior.
Can FEA replace physical testing?
In 2026, FEA can replace many rounds of prototyping, but final safety-critical certification (like aircraft wing snaps or vehicle crashes) still requires some physical validation to ensure the digital twin is accurate.
Do I need a supercomputer for FEA?
For simple parts, a modern laptop is enough. For complex assemblies or nonlinear studies, most engineers now use cloud-solving (e.g., SimScale or Ansys Cloud) to access massive processing power on-demand.
What is the most important part of an FEA study?
The “Mesh.” If your mesh is too coarse, the results will be inaccurate. If it’s too fine, the study will take too long to solve. Modern AI-meshing tools in Ansys and Fusion help automate this balance.
Is FEA safe for medical device design?
Yes, tools like Abaqus and Ansys are widely validated for FDA and EMA regulatory submissions for everything from heart valves to orthopedic screws.
What is “Nonlinear” analysis?
Linear analysis assumes materials don’t permanently deform and return to their shape. Nonlinear analysis accounts for materials like rubber, plastic deformation (crashing metal), and complex contact between parts.
How long does it take to learn FEA software?
Basic stress analysis can be learned in a week. Becoming a professional analyst capable of handling complex nonlinear dynamics typically takes months of training and a strong background in mechanical physics.
What is the cost of a typical license?
Commercial enterprise licenses can range from $10,000 to $40,000+ per year. Entry-level tools like Fusion 360 are significantly less, often starting under $1,000/year for basic simulation features.
Can I automate my FEA workflows?
Yes. Most professional tools (Ansys, Abaqus, Nastran) allow for extensive Python scripting, enabling you to run hundreds of “What-If” scenarios automatically.
Is cloud-based FEA secure?
Yes, modern cloud platforms use the same level of encryption as financial institutions. For defense-level security, look for “GovCloud” or “ITAR-ready” versions of Ansys or Abaqus.
Conclusion
The engineering landscape of 2026 is governed by speed and precision. Choosing between the industrial power of Ansys, the nonlinear mastery of Abaqus, or the cloud-native accessibility of SimScale depends entirely on your project’s complexity and your team’s existing CAD stack.
View the full article
reporter

⚡ Weekly Recap: AI Skill Malware, 31Tbps DDoS, Notepad++ Hack, LLM Backdoors and More

Cyber threats are no longer coming from just malware or exploits. They’re showing up inside the tools, platforms, and ecosystems organizations use every day. As companies connect AI, cloud apps, developer tools, and communication systems, attackers are following those same paths. A clear pattern this week: attackers are abusing trust. Trusted updates, trusted marketplaces, trusted apps, evenView the full article
Hacker News

Top 10 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Software is a highly specialized engineering toolset used to simulate the behavior of liquids and gases as they interact with surfaces. It works by solving the fundamental Navier-Stokes equations that govern fluid motion, allowing engineers to visualize pressure, temperature, velocity, and turbulence in a virtual environment. In essence, it serves as a “digital wind tunnel” or “virtual laboratory,” enabling the testing of designs that would be too dangerous, expensive, or physically impossible to build in the real world.
As we move deeper into an era of digital twins and sustainable engineering, CFD software has become non-negotiable for industries striving for maximum efficiency. Whether it is optimizing the airflow around a Formula 1 car to shave milliseconds off a lap time or ensuring that a data center’s cooling system doesn’t fail under peak load, CFD provides the high-fidelity data needed to make informed decisions before manufacturing begins.
Real-World Use Cases
External Aerodynamics: Reducing drag on electric vehicles to extend battery range and improve highway stability. Electronics Cooling: Simulating airflow in high-performance servers to prevent thermal throttling and hardware failure. HVAC & Architecture: Designing ventilation systems in stadiums or hospitals to ensure air quality and thermal comfort for occupants. Chemical Processing: Optimizing mixing tanks and reactors to ensure uniform chemical reactions and reduce material waste. Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
Solver Accuracy: Reliability of the numerical methods (e.g., Finite Volume or Lattice Boltzmann) across different flow regimes. Turbulence Modeling: Depth of available models (RANS, LES, DES) for capturing complex eddy behaviors. Meshing Versatility: Efficiency in generating high-quality grids for complex, “dirty” CAD geometry. Multiphysics Integration: The ability to couple fluid flow with structural stress (FSI) or chemical reactions. HPC Scalability: How well the software scales across hundreds or thousands of CPU/GPU cores for large-scale studies. Post-Processing Tools: The quality of visualization tools for interpreting raw data into actionable engineering insights. Key Trends in CFD Software
GPU-Accelerated Solving: A massive shift toward GPU architectures allows solvers to run 10x–40x faster than traditional CPU-only methods, making real-time CFD a reality. AI-Enhanced Meshing: Machine learning algorithms now automatically identify critical regions in a model to refine the mesh, drastically reducing the manual labor of “cleanup.” Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) Growth: Increasing adoption of LBM for transient, highly complex flows where traditional Navier-Stokes solvers struggle with stability. Cloud-Native Democratization: The rise of browser-based CFD platforms is removing the need for local supercomputers, allowing smaller firms to run massive simulations on-demand. Digital Twin Connectivity: CFD models are being linked to live sensor data from physical assets to predict real-time performance and maintenance needs. Sustainability Analytics: Integrated tools now calculate the carbon footprint and energy efficiency of fluid systems during the design phase. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs): Using AI to “learn” physics from sparse data, enabling faster predictions in complex scenarios like rare failure events. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
To identify the top 10 CFD solutions, we applied a rigorous evaluation framework focused on technical excellence and industrial reliability:
Numerical Pedigree: Prioritized tools with decades of validation data and established trust in safety-critical sectors. Solver Breadth: Evaluated if the platform covers a wide range of physics (combustion, multiphase, acoustics, etc.). Automation Levels: Assessed how much the software assists the user through automated meshing and “wizard-based” setups. Licensing Flexibility: Considered the availability of “token-based” or cloud-pay-per-use models for varied business needs. Interoperability: Checked for native CAD import support and compatibility with major PLM ecosystems. Community & Support: Screened for robust documentation, active user forums, and direct professional technical assistance. Top 10 CFD Software Tools
#1 — Ansys Fluent
Short description: The industry gold standard for general-purpose CFD, known for its vast physics library and high-fidelity accuracy across almost every industrial application.
Key Features
Comprehensive models for turbulence, heat transfer, and combustion. Task-based meshing workflows that significantly speed up model preparation. Advanced multiphase flow modeling (VOF, Mixture, Eulerian). Integrated “Mosaic” meshing technology for high-quality transitions. Deep integration within the Ansys Workbench for multiphysics (FSI). Powerful GPU-solver capabilities for faster turnaround. Pros
Extensive validation data makes it the default choice for regulatory certification. Largest ecosystem of third-party plugins and trained professionals. Cons
High licensing costs can be a barrier for small businesses. Learning curve for advanced physics (UDFs) is significant. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SSO/SAML, MFA, and ISO 27001 compliance. SOC 2 Type II certified cloud environment. Integrations & Ecosystem
Natively integrated with the entire Ansys suite for structural and electromagnetic coupling.
Ansys Mechanical Autodesk Fusion Siemens Teamcenter Support & Community
Unparalleled support network with a global community of experts and official university-level training modules.
#2 — Siemens Simcenter STAR-CCM+
Short description: An enterprise-grade multiphysics CFD solution that excels in automated workflows and complex industrial “System-of-Systems” simulations.
Key Features
Automated “Pipeline” approach that allows for rapid design exploration. Integrated CAD and surface wrapping for “dirty” geometry cleanup. Excellent discrete element modeling (DEM) for particle tracking. Advanced aeroacoustics modeling for noise reduction studies. “Power Session” licensing that allows unlimited cores for a flat fee. Built-in design optimization (HEEDS technology). Pros
Superior automation makes it ideal for running large batches of design iterations. The most flexible licensing model for high-core-count HPC usage. Cons
Integrated environment can be resource-heavy for simple studies. User interface has a specific logic that takes time for new users to adapt to. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, GDPR compliant. Strong enterprise security controls for collaborative data management. Integrations & Ecosystem
Part of the Siemens Xcelerator portfolio, bridging the gap between design and factory.
NX CAD Teamcenter (PLM) Amesim (1D System Sim) Support & Community
Premium enterprise support with dedicated account managers and high-end technical consultants.
#3 — OpenFOAM
Short description: The leading open-source CFD platform, offering total transparency and unlimited customization for researchers and specialists.
Key Features
C++ based framework for solving any PDE-based physics. Zero license fees for any number of parallel cores. Extensive library of solvers for laminar, turbulent, and reacting flows. Highly flexible scripting and automation via Python wrappers. Strong community-driven development for niche physics. Integrated with ParaView for powerful open-source visualization. Pros
Completely free and transparent; perfect for academic and novel R&D. No “per-core” costs, making it the most economical for massive HPC runs. Cons
Very steep learning curve (primarily command-line driven). Lacks the “push-button” automation and integrated GUI of commercial tools. Platforms / Deployment
Linux (Native) / Windows / macOS Self-hosted / Cloud (HPC) Security & Compliance
User-managed security; no third-party data tracking. Compliance: N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Supported by various commercial “wrappers” that provide a GUI.
SimScale (Cloud GUI) HELYX / Visual-CFD ParaView Support & Community
Massive global academic community; professional support available through specialized vendors like ESI Group.
#4 — SimScale
Short description: A cloud-native engineering platform that brings high-end CFD, thermal, and structural simulation to a modern web browser.
Key Features
Browser-based execution—no specialized hardware required. Multi-user collaboration with real-time project sharing. Integrated “AI-Powered” simulation assistants. Advanced CFD solvers for HVAC, electronics, and automotive. Parallel solving on up to 96+ cloud cores per job. Extensive library of public simulation templates. Pros
Easiest tool to deploy; zero IT overhead. Pay-as-you-go or affordable subscription models for SMBs. Cons
Requires a constant, high-speed internet connection. Currently lacks some hyper-specialized combustion or metal-casting solvers. Platforms / Deployment
Web Browser Cloud-only Security & Compliance
SSO, SOC 2, and end-to-end data encryption. GDPR compliant. Integrations & Ecosystem
Built to connect with modern cloud CAD ecosystems.
Onshape Autodesk Fusion Rhino / Grasshopper Support & Community
Highly responsive live chat support and an active, modern community of cloud-engineers.
#5 — COMSOL Multiphysics (CFD Module)
Short description: A highly flexible, physics-first environment that excels in coupled problems where fluid flow interacts with other domains like chemistry or electromagnetics.
Key Features
Equation-based modeling where users can directly edit the underlying physics. Superior coupling for microfluidics and MEMS devices. “Application Builder” to turn complex models into simple web-apps. Advanced modules for chemical reactions and battery modeling. Parametric and optimization study tools built-in. Mesh-adaptive solvers for high-precision local studies. Pros
The best tool for unconventional “multiphysics” that commercial suites struggle with. Unique ability to share results as standalone “apps” for non-experts. Cons
Solvers can be slower than specialized CFD codes for large-scale external aerodynamics. Learning the “node-based” interface logic takes significant time. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard enterprise security; local file control. Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Offers “LiveLink” modules for real-time synchronization with CAD.
SolidWorks / Revit MATLAB / Simulink AutoCAD Support & Community
Strong academic following and a robust library of models and user-contributed apps.
#6 — Altair AcuSolve
Short description: A robust, Finite Element (FE)-based CFD solver known for its extreme speed and stability in complex industrial simulations.
Key Features
Fast and reliable steady-state and transient solvers. Excellent performance for moving parts and sliding meshes. Integrated thermal-structural coupling within the Altair ecosystem. Highly automated meshing that requires minimal user intervention. Clean, streamlined architecture optimized for modern hardware. Part of the “Altair Units” licensing system. Pros
Very fast computation times for large, complex models. Extremely stable; rarely crashes even with “poor” quality meshes. Cons
Smaller specialized physics library compared to Fluent or STAR-CCM+. User interface is tied to the broader HyperWorks environment. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SOC 2, ISO 27001. Standard enterprise-grade authentication. Integrations & Ecosystem
Deeply integrated with Altair’s optimization and structural tools.
HyperMesh (Pre-processing) OptiStruct (Optimization) Inspire Support & Community
High-touch technical support through a global network of Altair offices.
#7 — Autodesk CFD
Short description: A design-focused simulation tool that prioritizes ease of use and seamless integration with Autodesk design products.
Key Features
Intuitive, “wizard-based” setup for fluid and thermal studies. Automatic meshing that adapts to design changes. Direct connectivity to Autodesk Inventor and Fusion 360. Cloud-based solver acceleration to free up local resources. Simplified post-processing for quick design comparisons. Integrated conjugate heat transfer (CHT) analysis. Pros
The lowest barrier to entry for CAD designers wanting to validate airflow. Excellent “Value for Money” for general-purpose engineering. Cons
Lacks the high-end turbulence or multiphase models of specialist suites. Not ideal for supersonic or ultra-high-speed aerodynamics. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001. Standard Autodesk enterprise security. Integrations & Ecosystem
Natively integrated with the broader Autodesk manufacturing stack.
Inventor / Fusion 360 Autodesk Vault Revit (for HVAC studies) Support & Community
Massive, friendly community with endless free tutorials and professional learning paths.
#8 — SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Short description: An easy-to-use, “embedded” CFD tool that allows SolidWorks users to test their designs without leaving their CAD environment.
Key Features
Fully integrated within the SolidWorks 3D CAD interface. Automated detection of internal and external flow volumes. Built-in libraries for fans, materials, and electronic components. Easy-to-use parametric studies for design optimization. Goal-driven optimization to find the best design automatically. Simplified visualization of flow lines and heat maps. Pros
Eliminated the “import/export” headache; toolpaths update with design changes. Very intuitive for engineers who are not CFD specialists. Cons
Simplified physics means it is less accurate for high-turbulence or high-speed flows. Only available on Windows as a plugin for SolidWorks. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard SolidWorks data security (PDM). Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Tightly coupled with the SolidWorks design and PDM environment.
SolidWorks CAD SolidWorks Plastics SolidWorks PDM Support & Community
Massive global user base with localized support from a vast reseller network.
#9 — Converge CFD
Short description: A specialized CFD tool that revolutionized the industry with its “Autonomous Meshing,” making it a leader in internal combustion and chemical flows.
Key Features
Autonomous Meshing that creates the grid at runtime based on the physics. Exceptional handling of complex, moving geometries (e.g., valves, pistons). Advanced chemistry and combustion solvers. High-fidelity liquid spray and atomization modeling. Parallel scaling that is highly efficient for transient simulations. Automated Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR). Pros
Eliminates the weeks-long process of manual meshing for complex engines. Unrivaled accuracy for reacting flows and internal combustion studies. Cons
Highly specialized; not always the first choice for simple external aerodynamics. Learning the runtime meshing logic requires specific training. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard enterprise security; local data control. Compliance: Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Focuses on bridging the gap between design and high-end chemical physics.
EnSight (Post-processing) GT-SUITE (System simulation) Major CAD formats Support & Community
High-level professional support with deep expertise in combustion and engine design.
#10 — FLOW-3D
Short description: A specialized CFD tool known for its extreme precision in free-surface and multiphase flow simulations, particularly in casting and hydraulics.
Key Features
TruVOF® technology for high-accuracy free-surface tracking. Advanced solvers for metal casting and solidification. Sediment transport and coastal hydraulics modules. Microfluidics and surface tension modeling. Highly efficient “FAVOR™” method for geometry representation. Integrated post-processing with FlowSight. Pros
The undisputed leader for free-surface flows (water over a dam, metal in a mold). Very stable for transient, high-complexity multiphase events. Cons
Niche focus; less widely used for general automotive or aero-external flow. Premium pricing for specialized industrial modules. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard enterprise security. Compliance: Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrates with specialized casting and hydraulic design tools.
SOLIDWORKS / Inventor (via plugins) ParaView Casting-specific design software Support & Community
Expert technical support with a focus on civil engineering, casting, and microfluidics.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeploymentStandout FeaturePublic RatingAnsys FluentGeneral Industrial / AeroWin / LinuxHybridTask-based meshing / Accuracy4.6 / 5STAR-CCM+Large Industrial FleetsWin / LinuxHybridAutomated workflow pipelineN/AOpenFOAMAcademic / Custom R&DLinux / Win / MacSelf-hostedFree / Open-source flexibilityN/ASimScaleCloud-native / AECWeb BrowserCloudZero-IT cloud implementation4.7 / 5COMSOLMultiphysics / ResearchWin / Mac / LinuxSelf-hostedCustom equation-based solving4.4 / 5AcuSolveHigh-Speed / Stable SimWin / LinuxHybridFinite Element-based stability4.5 / 5Autodesk CFDDesign ValidationWindowsCloud / HybridEase of use / Wizard setup4.4 / 5SolidWorks FlowCAD-Embedded CFDWindowsSelf-hostedNative CAD integrationN/AConverge CFDEngines / CombustionWin / LinuxHybridAutonomous runtime meshingN/AFLOW-3DFree-surface / CastingWin / LinuxHybridTruVOF® free-surface accuracyN/A Evaluation & Scoring of CFD Software
Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted TotalAnsys Fluent1071010101078.80STAR-CCM+108101010978.85OpenFOAM94710107107.40SimScale8108999108.65COMSOL98889988.35AcuSolve979910888.40Autodesk CFD7109989108.35SolidWorks Flow791088898.20Converge CFD1068910878.15FLOW-3D1068910878.15 Interpretation
Weighted Total: Reflects the tool’s overall capability to handle modern engineering challenges in 2026. Ease (15%): Tools like SimScale and Autodesk CFD score highest for removing technical barriers for non-experts. Performance (10%): Higher scores reflect superior scalability on high-performance clusters or GPUs. Which CFD Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
If you are an individual consultant or a small-scale designer, SimScale is your most logical entry point. Its cloud-only nature means you don’t need to buy a $10,000 workstation, and you can pay for exactly what you use. For those with a technical background and no budget, OpenFOAM remains the unbeatable free alternative.
SMB (Small-to-Medium Business)
For mid-sized engineering firms, Autodesk CFD or SolidWorks Flow Simulation offer the best return on investment. They allow your existing design team to run validation studies without needing to hire a Ph.D. in fluid mechanics, keeping project costs down.
Mid-Market
Firms tackling complex industrial problems should look at Altair AcuSolve or Ansys Discovery. These tools offer the solver depth needed for serious engineering while maintaining a modern interface that won’t bog down your production schedule.
Enterprise
Global leaders in aerospace, automotive, or chemical processing must rely on Ansys Fluent or Siemens Simcenter STAR-CCM+. These are the only tools with the industrial certification, automation depth, and global support networks required for mission-critical digital twins.
Budget vs Premium
Budget: OpenFOAM (Free) and SimScale (Cloud-entry) are the leaders in cost-effectiveness. Premium: Ansys and Siemens require significant investment but deliver the highest level of automation and data trust. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between laminar and turbulent flow?
Laminar flow is smooth and predictable, occurring at low speeds. Turbulent flow is chaotic, containing eddies and swirls, and is much more common in real-world industrial applications like car aerodynamics.
Can I run CFD on a standard laptop?
Small studies (e.g., airflow in a simple pipe) can run on a laptop. However, complex professional studies require a high-end workstation with 64GB+ RAM or cloud-based solving like SimScale.
What is “Meshing”?
Meshing is the process of breaking your 3D CAD model into millions of tiny cells. The software then calculates the fluid physics for each of these cells to determine the overall flow behavior.
How accurate is CFD compared to a wind tunnel?
Modern CFD is highly accurate, often matching wind tunnel results within 1-3%. However, CFD is much faster and cheaper, allowing you to test 100 designs in the time it takes to build one wind tunnel model.
Is OpenFOAM really as good as Ansys?
Mathematically, yes. The solvers in OpenFOAM are just as accurate. However, Ansys offers a professional user interface, automated meshing, and technical support that OpenFOAM lacks, which is why most companies pay for the commercial version.
What is “Multiphase Flow”?
Multiphase flow occurs when two or more substances interact—like air bubbles in water, rain hitting a windshield, or metal cooling in a mold. Specialized tools like FLOW-3D excel at this.
Can CFD simulate noise?
Yes, this is called “Aeroacoustics.” It is used to predict the wind noise around car mirrors or the sound of a drone propeller, helping engineers design quieter products.
Does CFD require an engineering degree?
While software is becoming easier to use, interpreting the results accurately still requires a strong background in fluid mechanics and physics to ensure the simulation isn’t producing “pretty but wrong” results.
What is the cost of a typical CFD license?
Commercial licenses (Ansys, Siemens) can range from $15,000 to $50,000+ per user per year. Cloud-based tools like SimScale offer entry points around $2,000–$5,000/year for smaller teams.
Can I automate my CFD studies?
Yes. Most professional tools (Fluent, STAR-CCM+, OpenFOAM) allow for extensive scripting in Python or C++, enabling you to run thousands of design variations automatically.
Conclusion
In 2026, CFD software is no longer a tool for the “elite few” in aerospace. It is a fundamental part of the design process for everything from the smartphones in our pockets to the buildings we inhabit. Choosing between the industrial power of Ansys, the automation of Siemens, or the accessibility of SimScale depends entirely on your team’s expertise and the complexity of your physics.
View the full article
reporter

Top 10 CAE Simulation Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering) Simulation Software is a suite of advanced mathematical tools used to test and validate engineering designs in a virtual environment. While CAD creates the geometry, CAE simulates how that geometry will behave under real-world conditions—such as extreme heat, structural loads, fluid flow, or electromagnetic interference. By using physics-based algorithms, these tools allow engineers to predict failures and optimize performance before a single physical prototype is ever built.
In the current industrial landscape, CAE has shifted from a final validation step to a “front-loaded” design driver. Modern simulation software now utilizes High-Performance Computing (HPC) and AI to run thousands of iterations simultaneously, helping engineers discover unconventional, high-performance designs that human intuition alone might miss. This is essential for achieving the lightweighting, safety, and efficiency standards required in 2026 manufacturing.
Real-World Use Cases
Crashworthiness Testing: Simulating high-speed vehicle impacts to optimize crumple zones and passenger safety without destroying physical cars. Aerodynamic Optimization: Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to reduce drag on aircraft wings or high-speed trains. Electronics Cooling: Predicting heat dissipation in microchips to prevent overheating in compact consumer devices. Biomechanical Modeling: Testing the longevity and stress distribution of orthopedic implants within a virtual human body. Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
Multiphysics Capability: The ability to simulate multiple physical phenomena (e.g., thermal and structural) simultaneously. Solver Accuracy & Speed: The precision of the underlying mathematical engines and their ability to utilize GPU/HPC acceleration. Meshing Automation: How efficiently the software can convert complex CAD geometry into a computable mesh. CAD/PLM Integration: The seamlessness of data flow between design tools and the simulation environment. Post-Processing & Visualization: The quality of the tools used to interpret raw data into actionable visual insights. Scalability: Performance stability when scaling from simple component tests to massive system-level simulations. Key Trends in CAE Simulation Software
AI-Accelerated Solvers: Machine learning models are now used to predict simulation results in seconds, providing near-instant feedback during the early concept phase. Cloud-Native Simulation Platforms: Shifting heavy computational workloads from local workstations to scalable cloud clusters, making high-end CAE accessible to smaller firms. Digital Twin Synchronization: Real-time integration of sensor data from physical products into the CAE model to predict maintenance needs and operational failures. Generative Design Integration: AI-driven optimization that “grows” structural shapes based on physics constraints, often resulting in organic, high-efficiency geometries. Democratization of Simulation: Simplified interfaces and automated “app” builders that allow non-expert designers to run basic validation studies safely. Real-Time Simulation: Leveraging GPU acceleration to provide live simulation results as the designer modifies the CAD geometry. Sustainability & Material Intelligence: Sophisticated libraries that predict the life-cycle impact and carbon footprint of different high-performance materials. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
To select the top 10 CAE platforms, we evaluated the market based on technical maturity and industrial impact:
Solver Depth: Priority was given to platforms with industry-proven, high-fidelity mathematical solvers (FEA, CFD, MBD). Multiphysics Breadth: We favored tools that can handle coupled simulations across different physics domains. Industry Adoption: Selected tools that are standard in safety-critical industries like aerospace and medical. Collaboration Infrastructure: Evaluated the platform’s ability to manage simulation data (SPDM) across distributed teams. Automation Capabilities: Assessed the strength of Python/scripting support and automated meshing workflows. User Feedback & Community: Analyzed signals regarding software stability, support quality, and the size of the professional user base. Top 10 CAE Simulation Software Tools
#1 — Ansys Mechanical / Fluent
Short description: The comprehensive market leader for high-fidelity multiphysics simulation, covering everything from structural mechanics to fluid dynamics and electromagnetics.
Key Features
High-performance FEA (Finite Element Analysis) for complex structural problems. Industry-standard Fluent solver for advanced CFD and heat transfer. Integrated multiphysics coupling for thermal-structural-fluid studies. Extensive material library with nonlinear and composite support. HPC scalability for massive models with millions of degrees of freedom. Ansys Minerva for enterprise-wide simulation data management. Pros
Unmatched solver accuracy and global industry acceptance. The most complete set of tools for every stage of the engineering cycle. Cons
High cost of licensing and hardware requirements. Significant learning curve for new or non-specialist users. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SSO/SAML, MFA, and ISO 27001 compliance. ITAR-ready cloud environments for defense and aerospace. Integrations & Ecosystem
Ansys features an open architecture that integrates with almost all major CAD and PLM systems.
Autodesk Fusion Siemens NX / Teamcenter PTC Creo Support & Community
Massive global ecosystem with thousands of training courses, professional certifications, and specialized consultants.
#2 — Abaqus (Dassault Systèmes)
Short description: A powerful, specialized CAE platform renowned for its superior handling of complex, nonlinear structural and material problems.
Key Features
Best-in-class nonlinear FEA (implicit and explicit solvers). Advanced material modeling, including damage, fracture, and fatigue. Sophisticated contact mechanics and large deformation analysis. Integration with the 3DEXPERIENCE platform for unified modeling. Powerful Python scripting for custom workflow automation. Multi-body dynamics and co-simulation capabilities. Pros
The gold standard for crash, impact, and high-complexity failure analysis. Extremely reliable for safety-critical simulations in automotive and aerospace. Cons
Requires deep technical expertise to set up complex nonlinear studies. Higher hardware demands for explicit high-speed event simulations. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, SOC 2 compliance within the 3DEXPERIENCE ecosystem. Highly secure data vaulting for proprietary engineering data. Integrations & Ecosystem
Deeply integrated into the Dassault Systèmes product lifecycle.
CATIA / SolidWorks ENOVIA (PLM) SIMULIA (Multiphysics) Support & Community
Strong professional community and premium enterprise support focused on high-end engineering consulting.
#3 — COMSOL Multiphysics
Short description: A highly flexible, equation-based simulation environment specifically designed for researchers and engineers tackling coupled multiphysics.
Key Features
Unified interface for all physics domains (Heat, Fluid, EM, Structural). Transparent, equation-based modeling where users can view/edit the PDEs. Application Builder for creating custom simulation apps for non-experts. Advanced electromagnetic and chemical reaction modeling. Mesh-adaptive solvers for high-precision local analysis. Strong parametric and optimization study tools. Pros
Exceptional for innovative R&D where physics domains are unconventional. Best platform for creating simplified, custom-built simulation interfaces. Cons
Solvers can be slower for extremely large-scale structural or CFD models. Less “industry-prescriptive” than specialized tools like Nastran or Fluent. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard enterprise authentication and encrypted data storage. Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Offers LiveLink modules to sync directly with major design tools.
MATLAB / Simulink SolidWorks / Revit Excel (for data driven studies) Support & Community
Large academic following and a robust library of models and user-contributed apps.
#4 — Siemens Simcenter
Short description: An integrated portfolio of simulation and test tools that supports a “Digital Twin” approach from 1D system modeling to 3D CAE.
Key Features
Integrated 3D FEA/CFD (formerly NX CAE). Industry-leading Simcenter STAR-CCM+ for complex fluid and multiphysics. 1D System simulation (Amesim) for early-stage architectural design. Native integration with Siemens Teamcenter PLM. Advanced NVH (Noise, Vibration, Harshness) analysis tools. Digital twin synchronization between physical test and virtual models. Pros
The most cohesive platform for managing the entire “System of Systems.” Excellent for large enterprises requiring full traceability across domains. Cons
Can be overwhelming due to the sheer size of the software portfolio. Integration with non-Siemens ecosystems is less fluid. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus. Widely trusted by global OEMs for secure product lifecycle data. Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed to be the core of a Siemens-centric digital transformation.
NX CAD Teamcenter (PLM) MindSphere (IoT) Support & Community
Premium global support with specialized engineering service teams available for implementation.
#5 — Altair HyperWorks
Short description: An optimization-first CAE platform best known for its industry-leading topology and shape optimization tools.
Key Features
OptiStruct: The benchmark for structural optimization and lightweighting. Radioss: A powerful solver for crash, impact, and safety simulations. Advanced pre-processing (HyperMesh) for high-quality mesh generation. Units-based licensing model (Altair Units) for flexible tool access. Specialized electromagnetics (Feko) and manufacturing (Inspire) tools. Cloud-enabled high-performance computing (HPC) management. Pros
The best tool for reducing part weight while maintaining structural integrity. Unique licensing model offers high value for firms needing multiple tools. Cons
User interface can be complex for casual users. Pre-processing (meshing) requires significant manual input for best results. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SOC 2, GDPR compliant. Secure multi-user access controls. Integrations & Ecosystem
Highly extensible with an open architecture for third-party scripts.
SolidWorks PTC Creo Siemens NX Support & Community
Excellent technical support and a strong presence in the automotive design community.
#6 — MSC Nastran
Short description: The world’s first structural analysis program, originally developed for NASA, remains the trusted standard for linear structural validation.
Key Features
Industry-certified structural solvers for aerospace and defense. Superior modal, dynamic, and frequency response analysis. High-performance handling of massive, large-scale structural models. Automated Structural Optimization (Design Optimization). Integrated with MSC Apex for faster model preparation. Extensive history of regulatory trust (FAA/EASA certified workflows). Pros
Unrivaled legacy and trust; “if Nastran says it works, it works.” Excellent for steady-state structural analysis of massive assemblies. Cons
Less focused on advanced CFD or nonlinear physics than competitors. User interface can feel “traditional” compared to modern cloud apps. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
Highly secure, widely used in classified defense and nuclear sectors. Compliance: ITAR, ISO 9001. Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrates with the Hexagon manufacturing ecosystem.
MSC Apex (Pre/Post) Adams (Multi-body Dynamics) SimManager (SPDM) Support & Community
Highly specialized support network for aerospace and structural specialists.
#7 — SimScale
Short description: A cloud-native CAE platform that brings high-end CFD, FEA, and thermal simulation to the web browser.
Key Features
Browser-based execution (no high-end hardware required). Parallel solving on hundreds of cloud cores. Collaborative simulation sharing and real-time support. Modern CFD solvers for AEC (Architecture, Engineering, Construction). Simple, intuitive UI designed for modern engineering teams. API for automated, data-driven simulation workflows. Pros
Extremely fast to deploy; zero IT overhead. Affordable entry point for startups and SMEs. Cons
Requires a constant, high-speed internet connection. Currently lacks some of the hyper-specialized solvers found in Ansys or Abaqus. Platforms / Deployment
Web / Browser-based Cloud Security & Compliance
SSO, SOC 2, and data encryption. Compliance: GDPR. Integrations & Ecosystem
Focused on connecting with cloud CAD tools.
Onshape Autodesk Fusion Rhino / Grasshopper Support & Community
Highly responsive live chat support and an active, modern community of cloud-engineers.
#8 — LS-DYNA (Ansys)
Short description: The premier explicit simulation solver, specialized in high-speed, transient dynamic events like crashes and blasts.
Key Features
Industry-standard solver for automotive crash simulations. Advanced fluid-structure interaction (FSI) for complex physics. Superior ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian) methods for large deformations. Extensive library of anthropomorphic test devices (crash test dummies). Specialized in blast, impact, and ballistics modeling. Implicit and explicit solver integration. Pros
Unmatched in predicting material behavior during high-speed failure. Essential for any company involved in vehicle safety or defense. Cons
High complexity; requires deep domain expertise in physics. Significant computational cost for high-fidelity studies. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Self-hosted / HPC Hybrid Security & Compliance
Standard Ansys security protocols. Widely used in highly regulated safety and defense industries. Integrations & Ecosystem
Part of the Ansys family, allowing for broader multiphysics coupling.
Ansys Workbench OASYS (Post-processing) LS-PrePost Support & Community
Very strong, specialized community of crash and safety engineers worldwide.
#9 — Autodesk Fusion Simulation
Short description: An accessible, integrated CAE tool built into the Fusion design platform, optimized for designers and mid-market engineers.
Key Features
Integrated linear/nonlinear stress, thermal, and buckling studies. Event simulation for time-dependent impacts and motion. Industry-leading Generative Design (AI-driven optimization). Cloud-based solving to free up local machine resources. Automated meshing and simplified “Design-to-Sim” workflows. Injection molding simulation for plastic part manufacturability. Pros
The most accessible entry point for CAD users into professional simulation. Exceptional “Value for Money” for general-purpose engineering. Cons
Lacks the extreme solver depth of specialized tools like Abaqus or Nastran. Not ideal for ultra-large, system-level aerospace models. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS Cloud-hybrid Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001. SSO and granular user permissions. Integrations & Ecosystem
Natively integrated with the broader Autodesk manufacturing stack.
Fusion CAD/CAM Autodesk Vault Moldflow Support & Community
Massive, friendly community with endless free tutorials and professional learning paths.
#10 — OpenFOAM
Short description: The leading open-source CFD software, used globally by researchers and specialist firms for custom fluid dynamics.
Key Features
Completely free and open-source (C++ based). Unlimited parallel computing (no per-core licensing fees). Extensive library of solvers for turbulence, heat transfer, and chemical reactions. Fully customizable physics and numerical methods. Strong support for polyhedral and unstructured meshes. Command-line driven for high-level automation. Pros
Zero license costs, making it ideal for massive-scale parallel computing. Total flexibility to modify the source code for novel research. Cons
Extremely steep learning curve; no standard GUI (requires pre/post processors). Requires significant technical skill in Linux and C++. Platforms / Deployment
Linux (Native) / Windows / macOS Self-hosted / Cloud (HPC) Security & Compliance
User-managed security; no third-party data access. Compliance: N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Relies on a “best-of-breed” open-source stack.
Paraview (Post-processing) FreeCAD / Salome (Pre-processing) Python (Automation) Support & Community
Strong academic and research community; professional support available through specialized vendors like ESI Group.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeploymentStandout FeaturePublic RatingAnsysGeneral MultiphysicsWin / LinuxHybridComprehensive solver accuracy4.6 / 5AbaqusNonlinear / CrashWin / LinuxHybridAdvanced material damage modelingN/ACOMSOLR&D / Physics CouplingWin / Mac / LinuxSelf-hostedCustom equation-based modeling4.4 / 5SimcenterDigital Twin / SystemsWin / LinuxHybrid1D-3D Integrated system simN/AHyperWorksLightweighting / OptiWin / LinuxHybridTopology Optimization (OptiStruct)4.5 / 5NastranAero Structural ValidationWin / LinuxHybridLegacy trust for large structuresN/ASimScaleAEC / Startups / CFDWeb BrowserCloudZero-IT cloud-native solver4.7 / 5LS-DYNACrash / High-SpeedWin / LinuxSelf-hostedExplicit transient dynamicsN/AFusion SimIntegrated Design / AIWin / MacCloudAI Generative Design4.4 / 5OpenFOAMAcademic / Custom CFDLinuxSelf-hostedFree / Open-source flexibilityN/A Evaluation & Scoring of CAE Simulation Software
Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted TotalAnsys1071010101078.80Abaqus10691010968.35COMSOL98889988.35Simcenter107101010978.65HyperWorks979910888.40Nastran9691010878.15SimScale8108999108.65LS-DYNA10581010867.95Fusion Sim7109989108.35OpenFOAM84710107107.40 Interpretation
Weighted Total: Reflects the software’s ability to drive complex engineering projects in a modern industrial setting. Core (25%): Higher scores go to the most accurate and physics-comprehensive solvers. Value (15%): Cloud-native (SimScale) and Open-Source (OpenFOAM) tools score high for reducing financial barriers. Which CAE Simulation Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
If you are an individual consultant or a small maker, Autodesk Fusion Simulation or SimScale are your best options. They remove the need for massive hardware investments and offer “pay-as-you-go” or affordable entry-level pricing with user-friendly interfaces.
SMB (Small-to-Medium Business)
For mid-sized engineering firms, Ansys (Discovery/Mechanical) or Altair HyperWorks provide the best balance. They allow you to handle a wide range of customer requirements while offering the specialized solvers needed to compete on quality.
Mid-Market
Firms tackling complex product systems should consider Siemens Simcenter. Its ability to integrate 1D system modeling with 3D 3D-CAE ensures that your design works at the architectural level before you dive into the details.
Enterprise
Global OEMs in regulated industries (Aerospace, Auto, Nuclear) must use Ansys, Abaqus, or Nastran. These tools are the only ones with the deep traceability, certification-grade accuracy, and data management required for mission-critical engineering.
Budget vs Premium
Budget: OpenFOAM (Free) and SimScale (Cloud-entry) offer professional-grade physics without high upfront costs. Premium: Ansys and Simcenter represent a massive investment in software and talent but offer the highest ROI through full digital transformation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between FEA and CFD?
FEA (Finite Element Analysis) is primarily used for structural problems—calculating stress, strain, and deformation in solids. CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) is used to analyze the flow of liquids and gases and how they transfer heat.
Can I run CAE simulations on a standard laptop?
Simple linear studies can run on a laptop. However, complex multiphysics or large assemblies require “Workstation” grade hardware (64GB+ RAM) or Cloud-solving tools like SimScale or Fusion.
What is “Topology Optimization”?
It is an AI-driven method where the software removes material from a part in areas where it isn’t carrying a load. This results in the lightest possible part that still meets strength requirements.
Is simulation as accurate as physical testing?
In 2026, high-fidelity CAE is extremely accurate, often matching physical tests within 1-5%. However, it does not replace physical testing; it reduces the number of prototypes needed to reach a final design.
What is a “Mesh” in CAE?
A mesh is a collection of small geometric shapes (elements) that represent the CAD model. The software calculates physics for each element and combines them to predict the behavior of the whole part.
Can I learn CAE without a degree?
Basic validation can be learned via online courses. However, professional CAE—especially for safety-critical parts—requires a deep understanding of physics, material science, and numerical methods (typically an Engineering degree).
What is the cost of Ansys?
Ansys pricing is typically customized for enterprise needs and can range from several thousand to tens of thousands per year depending on the modules and number of users.
How does cloud-solving work?
Instead of your computer working for 10 hours on a study, the data is sent to a supercomputer (the cloud) that uses hundreds of processors to solve the same study in minutes.
What is NVH simulation?
NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) simulation is used to ensure a product isn’t too loud or doesn’t vibrate uncomfortably, which is critical for automotive comfort and machine longevity.
Is OpenFOAM really free?
Yes, the software itself is free. However, the “cost” of OpenFOAM is in the time and talent required to learn it, as it lacks the automated features and support of paid tools.
Conclusion
The engineering landscape of 2026 demands that products are lighter, faster, and safer than ever before. Choosing the right CAE tool is no longer about just “checking the stress”—it’s about choosing an optimization engine like HyperWorks, a multiphysics giant like Ansys, or a cloud-native innovator like SimScale.
View the full article
reporter

Top 10 CAD/CAM Manufacturing Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing) software is the critical bridge between digital imagination and physical production. While CAD allows engineers to create precise 2D or 3D models of a part, CAM translates those digital models into detailed instructions—known as G-code—that drive CNC (Computer Numerical Control) machines, lathes, and mills. In modern manufacturing, these two distinct disciplines are increasingly integrated into single “unified” platforms to ensure data continuity and reduce errors.
In the current industrial landscape, CAD/CAM software has evolved beyond simple toolpath generation. It now serves as a high-fidelity simulation environment where manufacturers can “dry run” a machining process to detect potential tool collisions or material waste before a single piece of metal is cut. This integration is essential for high-precision industries like aerospace, automotive, and medical device manufacturing, where even a microscopic deviation can lead to catastrophic failure or significant financial loss.
Real-World Use Cases
High-Speed Milling: Creating complex automotive engine components with optimized toolpaths that reduce machine wear and cycle time. Mold & Die Design: Using integrated CAD/CAM to design intricate injection molds and immediately generate the machining strategies to produce them. Prototyping & Iteration: Rapidly updating a design in CAD and having the CAM toolpaths automatically update to reflect the changes, enabling agile hardware development. Medical Implants: Producing patient-specific orthopedic implants using 5-axis machining driven by high-fidelity CAM simulations. Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
End-to-End Integration: The seamlessness of the transition from the design environment to the manufacturing workspace. Toolpath Optimization: The efficiency of the algorithms used to calculate cutting paths and minimize “air-cutting” time. Simulation & Collision Detection: The ability to accurately simulate the machine, fixtures, and tools to prevent physical crashes. Post-Processor Library: The availability of high-quality “translators” that format code for specific CNC machine brands (e.g., Haas, Fanuc, Mazak). Multi-Axis Support: Capability to handle advanced 3-axis, 4-axis, and 5-axis machining operations. Automated Feature Recognition (AFR): The software’s ability to automatically identify holes, pockets, and slots to suggest machining strategies. Key Trends in CAD/CAM Manufacturing Software
AI-Powered Machining Strategies: Modern tools now use machine learning to analyze geometry and automatically recommend the fastest, most material-efficient toolpaths based on historical data. Cloud-Native Collaboration: Real-time version control and data sharing allow design teams in one country to collaborate with manufacturing floors in another without file translation errors. Digital Twin Synchronization: The software can now connect directly to live CNC machines, allowing the virtual model to mirror the real-time status and wear of physical tools. Hybrid Manufacturing Workflows: Integration of both additive (3D printing) and subtractive (CNC) processes within a single software environment for complex, part-in-part builds. GPU-Accelerated Simulation: Leveraging high-end graphics cards to provide instant, photorealistic simulations of the material removal process. Edge Computing Integration: Direct communication between the CAD/CAM platform and shop-floor sensors to adjust toolpaths mid-process based on material hardness or temperature. Subscription & Modular Licensing: A shift away from massive upfront costs toward flexible, monthly models that allow shops to add specialized modules (like 5-axis or Nesting) only when needed. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
To determine the top 10 CAD/CAM solutions, we utilized a comprehensive evaluation framework focused on industrial reliability and technical innovation:
Feature Integration: Priority was given to “All-in-One” platforms that minimize data loss between design and manufacturing. Market Share & Reliability: We selected tools with proven track records in high-stakes industries like aerospace and defense. Post-Processor Availability: We evaluated the depth of the vendor’s library for various CNC controller types. Hardware Interoperability: Compatibility with a wide range of industrial machine tools, from desktop mills to multi-million dollar 5-axis centers. Security & IP Protection: Screening for enterprise-grade data handling, especially for cloud-based or hybrid deployments. User Ecosystem: Ensuring there is a robust community and training network available for new users. Top 10 CAD/CAM Manufacturing Software Tools
#1 — Siemens NX
Short description: A high-end, enterprise-grade solution that offers a completely unified environment for advanced design, simulation, and complex multi-axis manufacturing.
Key Features
Integrated CAD, CAM, and CAE (Engineering) on a single data model. Advanced 5-axis machining and high-speed cutting strategies. Digital twin capabilities for full machine tool simulation. Knowledge-based machining (KBM) to automate repetitive programming. Feature-based machining that automatically identifies holes and pockets. Additive manufacturing and robotic programming modules. Pros
Unmatched power for handling massive assemblies and complex geometries. Eliminated data translation errors between design and manufacturing teams. Cons
Very steep learning curve; requires significant professional training. High cost of ownership, typically reserved for large enterprises. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SSO/SAML, MFA, and ISO 27001 compliance. ITAR-ready cloud environments for defense contractors. Integrations & Ecosystem
Siemens NX is the backbone of many “Digital Factories” and integrates natively with PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) tools.
Teamcenter (PLM) MindSphere (IoT) SAP ERP Support & Community
Extensive global support network with dedicated technical account managers and a vast library of professional documentation.
#2 — Mastercam
Short description: The world’s most widely used CAM-focused software, known for its powerful toolpath generation and massive post-processor library.
Key Features
Dynamic Motion technology for faster cutting and longer tool life. Comprehensive milling, turning, and wire EDM support. Advanced multi-axis and mill-turn capabilities. Massive library of verified post-processors for almost any CNC machine. Strong CAD import capabilities for nearly all file types. Specialized modules for woodworking (Mastercam Router) and artistic relief. Pros
The gold standard for CNC programming; easiest to find experienced programmers. Exceptional technical support through a global reseller network. Cons
CAD features are functional but not as robust as dedicated design tools like SolidWorks. Maintenance and update fees can be significant. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard file-based security and hardware dongles/online licensing. Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Mastercam often acts as the manufacturing specialist alongside other design platforms.
Mastercam for SolidWorks (Add-in) Vericut (Simulation) Tool management systems (TDM) Support & Community
The largest community in the CAM world, with endless forums, YouTube tutorials, and local training centers.
#3 — Autodesk Fusion
Short description: A cloud-based platform that has disrupted the industry by making high-end CAD/CAM/CAE accessible to startups and large firms alike.
Key Features
Unified workspace for 3D modeling, electronics, and CNC programming. Cloud-based collaboration with built-in version control. AI-driven generative design to optimize part weight and strength. Integrated 2.5, 3, 4, and 5-axis milling and turning. Automated toolpath updates whenever the CAD model changes. Simulation of waterjet, laser, and plasma cutting. Pros
Extremely cost-effective compared to traditional enterprise software. Seamless collaboration; files are updated in real-time across the team. Cons
Cloud-dependency can be a hurdle for high-security, offline facilities. Can struggle with performance on extremely large, multi-thousand-part assemblies. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Web / iOS / Android Cloud-based Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II, SSO/SAML, and MFA. AES-256 data encryption for cloud storage. Integrations & Ecosystem
As part of the Autodesk portfolio, it connects deeply with the wider construction and design world.
Autodesk Construction Cloud Eagle (Electronics) Microsoft Power BI Support & Community
One of the fastest-growing communities with a wealth of free learning resources and active user forums.
#4 — SolidWorks CAM
Short description: An integrated CAM solution powered by CAMWorks that brings “knowledge-based machining” directly into the SolidWorks design environment.
Key Features
Tightly coupled CAD/CAM integration; no file translation required. Automatic Feature Recognition (AFR) to identify manufacturable features. Rules-based machining to standardize shop-floor practices. Tolerance-based machining (TBM) to adjust toolpaths based on MBD data. Full associativity; toolpaths update instantly when design changes. Support for 2.5-axis and 3-axis milling. Pros
Minimizes the learning curve for existing SolidWorks users. High automation reduces the time spent on repetitive programming tasks. Cons
Advanced 4 and 5-axis features usually require a paid upgrade to “SolidWorks CAM Professional.” Only available on Windows. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
Standard Windows security and SolidWorks PDM (Product Data Management) controls. Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Lives entirely within the Dassault Systèmes ecosystem but connects to many third-party apps.
SolidWorks PDM DelmiaWorks (ERP/MES) 3DEXPERIENCE Platform Support & Community
Massive user base with specialized resellers providing local technical support and certification.
#5 — CATIA (3DEXPERIENCE)
Short description: The “heavyweight” of the aerospace and automotive world, designed for high-end surface modeling and full lifecycle manufacturing.
Key Features
World-class complex surface and solid modeling. High-end 5-axis machining and robotic cell simulation. Integrated PLM for managing global supply chain manufacturing. Virtual twin technology for entire production lines. Support for composite manufacturing and aerospace-specific workflows. Advanced toolpath simulation with collision detection. Pros
The most powerful tool for ultra-complex parts (e.g., turbine blades, aircraft wings). Incredible scalability for organizations with thousands of engineers. Cons
Prohibitively expensive for small machine shops. Extremely complex interface that requires a dedicated BIM/PLM manager. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Web Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, SOC 2, and high-level government security clearances. Extensive audit logging and intellectual property (IP) protection. Integrations & Ecosystem
Deeply integrated into the 3DEXPERIENCE platform.
ENOVIA (PLM) SIMULIA (Analysis) DELMIA (Manufacturing Ops) Support & Community
Enterprise-level support with on-site consulting and specialized training programs for OEMs.
#6 — HyperMill (by OPEN MIND)
Short description: A high-performance CAM specialist known for having some of the best 5-axis machining strategies in the industry.
Key Features
Renowned 5-axis “Automated Feature Recognition” and hole-drilling. High-speed cutting (HSC) and high-performance cutting (HPC) modes. Collision avoidance that automatically tilts the tool away from obstacles. Specialized modules for impellers, blisks, and tire molds. Virtual Machine simulation that uses actual post-processed G-code. Integrated CAD for manufacturing (HyperCAD-S). Pros
Best-in-class toolpaths for extremely complex 5-axis parts. Reliable “clash-free” automation that gives programmers high confidence. Cons
Higher price point than general-purpose CAM software. Specialized focus means it’s less of an “all-around” design tool. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Encrypted file management and standard licensing protocols. Compliance: Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Works both as a standalone product and as an integrated solution for other CAD tools.
SolidWorks (Add-in) Autodesk Inventor (Add-in) Vericut Support & Community
Highly technical support from engineers who specialize in multi-axis machining.
#7 — GibbsCAM
Short description: A flexible, easy-to-use CAM solution designed to handle complex multi-task machining (MTM) and Swiss-style turning.
Key Features
One-screen interface designed for fast navigation. Excellent support for Mill-Turn and multi-tasking machines. Swiss-style machining support for high-volume small parts. Dynamic 3D simulation of the machine and the cutting process. Extensive post-processor library for complex machine configurations. VoluMill integration for high-speed material removal. Pros
Very intuitive for shop-floor programmers; shorter learning curve. Exceptional at managing complex machines with multiple turrets and spindles. Cons
CAD modeling capabilities are limited compared to Revit or NX. The interface can feel dated to those used to modern cloud apps. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard security; local vaulting. Compliance: Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed to be the “engine” for a shop’s CNC fleet.
Adveon Tool Library ThreadBase SolidWorks / Edgecam connectivity Support & Community
Reseller-led support with a focus on practical, shop-floor problem solving.
#8 — Edgecam (by Hexagon)
Short description: A market-leading CAM solution for production machining, offering advanced automation and “Waveform” high-speed milling.
Key Features
Waveform Roughing for high-speed material removal and tool longevity. Intelligent toolpath generation based on part geometry. Full integration with CAD models from all major sources. Specialized modules for turning, milling, and wire EDM. Strategy Manager to capture and reuse best practices. Integration with Hexagon’s metrology and inspection tools. Pros
Excellent at reducing cycle times through optimized toolpaths. Strong “Designer” module specifically for CAD-to-CAM prep. Cons
Part of a large corporate portfolio; can feel less personal. Requires a fairly robust PC to run complex simulations smoothly. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
Enterprise security through Hexagon’s platform. Compliance: Varies / N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Being part of Hexagon means it connects the digital model to physical inspection.
PC-DMIS (Inspection) NCSIMUL (G-code Verification) WorkPLAN (ERP) Support & Community
Global support network with extensive online training through the Hexagon portal.
#9 — SolidCAM
Short description: The “best-in-class” CAM add-on for SolidWorks, featuring the revolutionary “iMachining” technology.
Key Features
iMachining: Patented technology that automatically calculates optimal feed/speeds. Fully integrated within SolidWorks; no external file management. Support for all CNC technologies (Milling, Turning, Mill-Turn, Swiss). Specialized 5-axis Sim-axis machining for complex parts. Advanced hole-recognition and automation. Real-time toolpath simulation with full machine visualization. Pros
iMachining can save up to 70% in machining time. Eliminates the need for users to manually calculate complex cutting parameters. Cons
Only works inside SolidWorks or Inventor; not a standalone design tool. iMachining requires a premium license. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard enterprise security. Compliance: Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Tightest possible integration with the world’s most popular CAD tool.
SolidWorks Autodesk Inventor Tool management systems Support & Community
Very active global community with a focus on “high-speed” manufacturing expertise.
#10 — FreeCAD (Path Workbench)
Short description: The leading open-source 3D CAD/CAM modeler, providing a free alternative for hobbyists, students, and small makers.
Key Features
Parametric 3D modeling with a dedicated “Path” workbench for CAM. Support for 2D and 3D CNC milling toolpaths. Open-source Python-based architecture for custom automation. G-code simulation and verification. Growing library of post-processors for hobbyist and pro-sumer machines. Community-developed plugins for specialized manufacturing. Pros
Completely free and open-source; no subscription fees. Highly customizable for developers and power users. Cons
Steeper learning curve due to a less polished user interface. Lacks advanced 5-axis and high-end industrial automation found in paid tools. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux Self-hosted (Offline) Security & Compliance
Completely local; user has full control over data. Compliance: N/A. Integrations & Ecosystem
Extensible via a large repository of community-made workbenches.
KiCad (for PCBs) OpenSCAD Blender (via plugins) Support & Community
Entirely community-driven; excellent forums and a massive wiki, but no “official” 24/7 technical support.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeploymentStandout FeaturePublic RatingSiemens NXHigh-End EnterpriseWin / LinuxHybridFull Digital Twin Sync4.8 / 5MastercamDedicated Machine ShopsWindowsSelf-hostedDynamic Motion Technology4.5 / 5Autodesk FusionSMBs / StartupsWin / Mac / WebCloudGenerative Design / Collab4.4 / 5SolidWorks CAMSolidWorks DesignersWindowsHybridTolerance-Based MachiningN/ACATIAAero / Auto OEMsWin / WebHybridComplex Surface Detailing4.5 / 5HyperMillComplex 5-AxisWindowsSelf-hosted5-Axis Collision AvoidanceN/AGibbsCAMMill-Turn / SwissWindowsSelf-hostedMulti-Task Machining (MTM)N/AEdgecamProduction MachiningWindowsSelf-hostedWaveform Roughing StrategyN/ASolidCAMHigh-Speed MillingWindowsSelf-hostediMachining feeds/speedsN/AFreeCADMakers / EducationWin / Mac / LinuxSelf-hostedOpen-source / Python-basedN/A Evaluation & Scoring of CAD/CAM Manufacturing Software
Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted TotalSiemens NX106101010968.60Mastercam989891088.70Autodesk Fusion8109989108.85SolidWorks CAM881088988.40CATIA105101010958.20HyperMill1078810878.30GibbsCAM89889888.25Edgecam88889888.10SolidCAM981089888.55FreeCAD6561077106.75 Interpretation
Weighted Total: Represents the software’s ability to handle modern manufacturing demands (AI, speed, collaboration). Core (25%): Measures toolpath intelligence and CAD robustness. Ease (15%): Tools like Fusion 360 and GibbsCAM score higher for being user-friendly, while enterprise tools (NX, CATIA) are lower due to complexity. Which CAD/CAM Manufacturing Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
For the individual maker or freelance engineer, Autodesk Fusion is the clear winner due to its affordable entry point and all-in-one cloud functionality. If budget is zero, FreeCAD is the only credible open-source path.
SMB (Small-to-Medium Business)
Most machine shops will thrive with Mastercam due to the sheer abundance of trained talent and verified post-processors. If your shop already uses SolidWorks for design, SolidCAM (with iMachining) or SolidWorks CAM provide the smoothest workflow.
Mid-Market
Companies with complex multi-axis needs should look at HyperMill or GibbsCAM. These tools excel at the highly technical “middle ground” where 5-axis and Mill-Turn operations are the daily norm.
Enterprise
For OEMs in aerospace, defense, or automotive, Siemens NX or CATIA are mandatory. They offer the global scalability, security, and “Digital Twin” integration that smaller tools simply cannot match.
Budget vs Premium
Budget: Autodesk Fusion and BricsCAD (with CAM plugins) offer high power at lower price points. Premium: Siemens NX and CATIA are multi-year investments that require dedicated IT and engineering teams. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is G-code?
G-code is the alphanumeric language used to tell a CNC machine how to move. CAM software translates your 3D design into this code so the machine understands coordinates, speeds, and tool changes.
Can I run CAD/CAM on a Mac?
Autodesk Fusion is the only major professional CAD/CAM tool with native macOS support. Most others (Mastercam, NX, SolidWorks) require Windows.
What is a “Post-Processor”?
A post-processor is a translator that takes the universal toolpath data from the CAM software and formats it into the specific G-code required by a specific machine controller (like a Haas vs. a Brother).
Do I need a special mouse for CAD/CAM?
While not mandatory, most professionals use a “3D Mouse” (like a 3Dconnexion SpaceMouse) to navigate 3D space with one hand while using a standard mouse with the other.
What is 5-axis machining?
Standard machining is 3-axis (X, Y, Z). 5-axis adds two rotational axes (A and B), allowing the cutting tool to approach a part from any direction, which is essential for complex shapes like turbine blades.
Is cloud-based CAD/CAM secure?
Yes, for most commercial uses. Modern platforms like Fusion use AES-256 encryption. However, for high-security defense work, many firms still prefer “On-premise” or “Air-gapped” installations.
What is iMachining?
iMachining is a proprietary technology from SolidCAM that automatically optimizes the cutting depth and speed based on material hardness and tool geometry, significantly reducing cycle times.
Can CAD/CAM software detect if my tool will crash?
Yes. Professional tools include “Collision Detection” and “Machine Simulation,” which visually show the entire machine moving to ensure the tool doesn’t hit a clamp or the machine table.
How long does it take to learn CAM?
Basic 2D milling can be learned in a few days. Professional 5-axis programming or complex MTM (Mill-Turn) usually takes months or even years of experience on the shop floor to master.
What is generative design?
Generative design is an AI feature (pioneered by Autodesk) where the software “evolves” a part’s shape based on strength requirements and weight constraints, often resulting in organic, alien-looking shapes.
Conclusion
The right CAD/CAM software is no longer just a luxury—it is the operational heart of a modern machine shop. While Autodesk Fusion leads in accessibility and collaboration, Siemens NX and Mastercam remain the industrial benchmarks for power and reliability.
View the full article
reporter

OpenClaw integrates VirusTotal malware scanning as security firms flag enterprise risks

OpenClaw, the viral open-source AI agent that security firms warn is “insecure by default,” has integrated VirusTotal’s malware scanning into its ClawHub skills marketplace following weeks in which security researchers documented malicious extensions and widespread unauthorized deployments in enterprises.
The integration automatically scans all published skills before making them available for download, according to the announcement by OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger, security advisor Jamieson O’Reilly, and VirusTotal’s Bernardo Quintero. Skills receiving a “benign” verdict are automatically approved, while those marked suspicious receive warnings, and malicious skills are immediately blocked, with daily re-scanning of all active skills.
“As the OpenClaw ecosystem grows, so does the attack surface,” the announcement stated. “We’ve already seen documented cases of malicious actors attempting to exploit AI agent platforms. We’re not waiting for this to become a bigger problem.”
Sunil Varkey, advisor at Beagle Security, called the integration “a sensible and welcome step” that filters out known malware. “Most attacks still rely on reusing known malware rather than investing in costly zero-day development, so filtering out known bad artifacts meaningfully raises the bar and improves marketplace hygiene,” Varkey said.
How the scanning works
The system relies on VirusTotal’s Code Insight, powered by Google’s Gemini, which analyzes complete skill packages for malicious behavior.
“It doesn’t just look at what the skill claims to do—it summarizes what the code actually does from a security perspective: whether it downloads and executes external code, accesses sensitive data, performs network operations, or embeds instructions that could coerce the agent into unsafe behavior,” OpenClaw said  in the announcement.
When developers publish skills to ClawHub, the platform creates a SHA-256 hash and checks it against VirusTotal’s database, uploading the complete bundle for Code Insight analysis if not found. The integration uses the same technology VirusTotal provides to Hugging Face’s AI model repository, according to the announcement.
What prompted the response
The scanning initiative follows a series of security incidents documented by multiple firms over the past two weeks. Koi Security’s February 1 audit of all 2,857 ClawHub skills discovered 341 malicious ones in a campaign dubbed “ClawHavoc.”
The professional-looking skills for cryptocurrency tools and YouTube utilities contained fake prerequisites that installed keyloggers and the Atomic macOS Stealer malware capable of harvesting cryptocurrency wallets, browser data, and system credentials. A Cornell University report found that 26% of packages contained vulnerabilities and described OpenClaw as “an absolute nightmare” from a security standpoint. Token Security found 22% of its enterprise customers have employees running the agent without IT approval.
Security vendor Noma reported that 53% of its enterprise customers gave OpenClaw privileged access over a single weekend, according to a January 30 Gartner analysis. Gartner characterized OpenClaw as “a powerful demonstration of autonomous AI for enterprise productivity, but it is an unacceptable cybersecurity liability” and recommended enterprises “block OpenClaw downloads and traffic immediately,” describing shadow deployments as creating “single points of failure, as compromised hosts expose API keys, OAuth tokens, and sensitive conversations to attackers.”
OpenClaw >surpassed 150,000 GitHub stars in late January, gaining viral popularity on social media. The platform, launched in November 2025 and rebranded twice due to trademark disputes, allows community-developed “skills” that run with full access to the agent’s tools and data—the architecture that ClawHavoc exploited.
Limitations of malware scanning
While the VirusTotal integration addresses known malware in the skills marketplace, OpenClaw acknowledged significant limitations in the announcement. “Let’s be clear: this is not a silver bullet,” the announcement stated. “A skill that uses natural language to instruct an agent to do something malicious won’t trigger a virus signature. A carefully crafted prompt injection payload won’t show up in a threat database.”
The primary risk with AI agents involves prompt injection, where malicious instructions embedded in emails or documents can hijack agent behavior without exploiting traditional software vulnerabilities, according to CrowdStrike’s analysis. The Moltbook social network for OpenClaw agents illustrated these risks when it exposed 1.5 million API tokens and 35,000 email addresses after a database misconfiguration.
Varkey cautioned that “threats like prompt injection, logic abuse, and misuse of legitimate tools sit outside the reach of malware scanning,” adding that the integration should be “seen as the foundation for broader governance and technical controls, not the finish line.” The VirusTotal integration is the first step in what Steinberger called a “broader security initiative,” with plans to publish a threat model, security roadmap, and audit results at trust.openclaw.ai.
View the full article
CSOonline

Top 10 Building Information Modeling (BIM) Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
Building Information Modeling (BIM) software is a specialized digital technology that allows architects, engineers, and construction (AEC) professionals to create and manage data-rich, 3D virtual representations of physical places. Unlike traditional 2D CAD drafting, BIM is a process-driven approach where every digital element (walls, pipes, beams) carries “intelligent” information—such as material costs, thermal properties, and maintenance schedules—that persists throughout the building’s entire lifecycle.
BIM has evolved from a “nice-to-have” design tool into a mandatory legal requirement for major infrastructure and public projects globally. Modern BIM software now serves as the “Digital Twin” foundation, enabling teams to simulate energy performance, detect physical clashes before ground is broken, and manage facilities long after the keys are handed over.
Real-World Use Cases
Clash Detection: Identifying if a structural beam intersects with a ventilation duct in the virtual model to avoid million-dollar field errors. 4D/5D Simulation: Adding the dimensions of time (scheduling) and cost (budgeting) to the 3D model to visualize the construction sequence and cash flow. Scan-to-BIM: Converting high-precision laser scans of existing historic buildings into accurate digital models for renovation. Facility Management: Providing owners with a digital manual where clicking a virtual light fixture reveals its model number, warranty, and last service date. Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
Multi-Discipline Support: The ability to handle Architecture, Structure, and MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing) within one environment. Interoperability: Strong support for OpenBIM standards and IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) file formats. Cloud Collaboration: Robust tools for real-time worksharing across distributed global teams. LOD Capability: Support for varying Levels of Development (LOD 100 to LOD 500) for different project phases. Automation & AI: Presence of AI-driven tools for generative design, automated tagging, or predictive analysis. Scalability: Performance stability when handling massive datasets for airports, hospitals, or high-rise developments. Key Trends in BIM Software
AI-Enabled Automation: AI has moved into everyday use, automating repetitive tasks like room tagging, door scheduling, and initial clash resolution. Digital Twin Maturity: BIM models are no longer static; they are live “Digital Twins” that integrate real-time sensor data from the physical building to monitor energy and occupancy. Cloud-First Worksharing: Legacy local-server models have largely been replaced by high-speed cloud platforms like Autodesk Construction Cloud and BIMcloud for real-time co-authoring. Generative Design & Optioneering: Software can now automatically generate hundreds of layout options based on constraints like sunlight hours, wind comfort, and density targets. Reality Capture Integration: Direct, real-time integration of LiDAR and photogrammetry data into the BIM environment for continuous model validation during construction. Sustainability & Carbon Tracking: Modern BIM tools now provide automated EUI (Energy Use Intensity) and embodied carbon calculations directly during the design phase. OpenBIM & IFC 4.3: A massive shift toward software-agnostic workflows, ensuring that data is no longer “locked” within proprietary file formats. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
To select the top 10 BIM software tools, we applied a weighted evaluation framework:
Market Adoption: Prioritized industry-standard platforms with large talent pools and widespread consultant use. Discipline Breadth: Evaluated if the tool supports multiple engineering disciplines or is a “best-of-breed” specialist. Innovation & AI: Looked for early and effective adoption of AI-driven generative design and automation. Cloud Infrastructure: Assessed the reliability and speed of the tool’s collaborative worksharing environment. Standardization: Checked for compliance with international BIM standards and OpenBIM interoperability. Enterprise Readiness: Screened for robust security, user permissions, and deployment flexibility for large firms. Top 10 BIM Software Tools
#1 — Autodesk Revit
Short description: The global industry standard for multidisciplinary BIM, providing unified tools for architecture, structural engineering, and MEP.
Key Features
High-fidelity parametric modeling with “intelligent” families. Integrated worksharing via Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC). Dedicated toolsets for structural analysis and MEP systems. Automated documentation that stays in sync with 3D changes. Support for advanced visualization via Enscape and V-Ray plugins. Deep integration with Autodesk Forma for AI-driven site analysis. Pros
Unmatched industry adoption; easiest to find trained staff. Powerful parametric engine for complex building relationships. Cons
Steep learning curve and rigid “construction” logic. High subscription cost can be prohibitive for small firms. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SSO/SAML, MFA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001. ITAR-compliant hosting available in specific regions. Integrations & Ecosystem
Revit sits at the center of the largest AEC ecosystem in the world.
Autodesk Navisworks Civil 3D Microsoft Teams & Slack Support & Community
Massive global community, official Autodesk University training, and thousands of third-party plugins.
#2 — Graphisoft Archicad
Short description: A design-centric BIM platform built specifically for architects, known for its intuitive UI and high performance.
Key Features
“Virtual Building” concept focused on architectural intent. Real-time Teamwork collaboration via BIMcloud. Built-in CineRender and Redshift for high-quality visualization. Strong OpenBIM and IFC-centric workflow philosophy. Integrated algorithmic design via Rhino-Grasshopper Live Connection. Built-in energy evaluation tools for early-stage sustainability. Pros
Much faster learning curve and more intuitive than Revit. Excellent performance on large models, even on macOS. Cons
Less robust for advanced structural and MEP detailing. Smaller market share in some regions compared to Autodesk. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
GDPR compliant, encrypted data transfer via BIMcloud. Standard enterprise authentication (SSO available). Integrations & Ecosystem
Focused on an open-standards approach to connect with diverse consultants.
Solibri Office Bluebeam Revu McNeel Rhinoceros (Rhino) Support & Community
Highly loyal user base, robust “Graphisoft Learn” platform, and strong presence in Europe and Asia.
#3 — Trimble Tekla Structures
Short description: The industry leader for fabrication-level structural modeling, specializing in steel, concrete, and rebar.
Key Features
Unrivaled precision in steel connection and rebar detailing. Direct integration with CNC machines and shop floor workflows. Automated generation of shop drawings and schedules. Cloud-based collaboration via Trimble Connect. Support for massive infrastructure and high-complexity builds. Real-time structural analysis and design links. Pros
The only choice for “constructible” models ready for fabrication. Handles extremely complex structural data without lag. Cons
Very narrow focus (not for architects or MEP). High technical skill level required to operate. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, SOC 2 compliance. Secure model sharing with granular permissions. Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrates deeply with structural analysis and fabrication hardware.
SAP2000 / ETABS Revit (via IFC) Trimble Field Tools (Hololens) Support & Community
Specialized technical support and a community focused on structural engineering and fabrication.
#4 — Autodesk Navisworks
Short description: The primary project review and coordination tool used to federate models from multiple disciplines for clash detection.
Key Features
Advanced clash detection and interference management. Model federation of over 60 different file formats. 4D construction sequencing and time-based simulation. 5D quantification and cost-estimation support. Real-time navigation and walkthrough for design reviews. Automated issue tracking linked to BIM Collaborate Pro. Pros
Best-in-class tool for pre-construction coordination. Lightweight enough to open massive, multi-gigabyte models. Cons
“Read-only” in nature; you cannot edit the geometry within it. Only available on Windows. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
Standard Autodesk enterprise security (SSO/MFA). Audit logs for clash resolution. Integrations & Ecosystem
The glue that holds together diverse software stacks.
All Autodesk products Bentley Systems Procore Support & Community
Standardized across almost all major general contractors worldwide.
#5 — Bentley OpenBuildings Designer
Short description: A powerful, enterprise-grade BIM tool optimized for complex infrastructure like airports and rail stations.
Key Features
Unified environment for architecture, structure, mechanical, and electrical. Native integration with GIS (Geographic Information Systems) data. Computational design tools for complex façade geometry. Seamless connectivity to the iTwin digital twin ecosystem. Support for extremely large datasets and linear infrastructure. Built-in building performance simulation. Pros
The gold standard for massive public-sector infrastructure projects. Excellent data continuity from design to operations. Cons
Steep learning curve for those coming from CAD. High cost and complex licensing tiers. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus. Widely used by government agencies with strict security needs. Integrations & Ecosystem
Built to live within the larger Bentley infrastructure lifecycle.
OpenRoads / OpenRail ProjectWise AssetWise Support & Community
Enterprise-level support with dedicated consultants for large-scale digital transformation.
#6 — Vectorworks Architect
Short description: A versatile, design-first BIM tool popular for its 2D graphics and flexibility in landscape and stage design.
Key Features
Robust 2D drafting combined with 3D BIM modeling. Advanced site modeling and landscape architecture tools. Integrated Marionette visual scripting for automation. High-quality native rendering (Redshift integration). Native support for Apple Silicon (macOS) performance. Excellent flexible layer and class management system. Pros
Produces the most beautiful 2D drawings out of the box. Very flexible licensing (perpetual licenses still available in some regions). Cons
Can struggle with performance on the largest federated models. Smaller talent pool for specialized BIM management. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS Cloud / Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Standard data encryption and password protection. Compliance: Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Often used in boutique or design-led studios.
Solibri Bluebeam Cinema 4D Support & Community
Strong presence in high-end residential, landscape, and entertainment sectors.
#7 — BricsCAD BIM
Short description: A DWG-native BIM platform that allows a familiar CAD-style workflow to evolve into a full BIM model.
Key Features
Uses the familiar DWG file format as its native core. AI-driven “BIMIFY” tool that automatically classifies 3D geometry. Advanced 3D direct modeling (no parametric constraints required). Scan-to-BIM tools with efficient point cloud management. High-speed performance and low hardware requirements. Full OpenBIM and IFC 4.0 support. Pros
Easiest transition for legacy CAD users. One of the few major tools offering affordable perpetual licenses. Cons
Smaller ecosystem of third-party families/objects. Lacks the multi-discipline depth of Revit or OpenBuildings. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux / macOS Self-hosted Security & Compliance
Local file-based security; no mandatory cloud requirement. GDPR compliant. Integrations & Ecosystem
Focused on maintaining a clean, DWG-centric pipeline.
Rhino / Grasshopper Enscape Leica CloudWorx Support & Community
Growing rapidly among firms looking to escape the high cost of subscriptions.
#8 — Allplan Architecture
Short description: A European powerhouse known for its precision in concrete structures and integrated architecture-engineering workflows.
Key Features
Integrated modeling for architecture and civil engineering. Advanced automated reinforcement detailing (BIM for concrete). Real-time coordination via Allplan Bimplus cloud platform. High-precision 2D drafting and documentation. Support for large-scale, complex construction sites. Built-in visual scripting for custom automation. Pros
Exceptional for reinforced concrete and complex structural shapes. Very stable performance on large-scale infrastructure projects. Cons
Lower market adoption in North America. Complex UI that takes time to master. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, German data security standards. Secure cloud collaboration via Bimplus. Integrations & Ecosystem
Part of the Nemetschek Group, connecting with other specialized tools.
SCIA Engineer Solibri Bluebeam Support & Community
Extensive support in DACH regions (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) and growing globally.
#9 — Solibri Office
Short description: The industry standard for BIM quality assurance, specializing in rule-based model checking and compliance validation.
Key Features
Advanced rule-based checking for code and standards compliance. Sophisticated clash detection and coordination reports. Data mining tools to verify quantity takeoffs. Automated model comparison between different versions. Easy communication of issues via BCF (BIM Collaboration Format). Visual model auditing to ensure data integrity. Pros
Goes beyond simple “clashes” to check for building codes (e.g., ADA compliance). Essential for high-quality, audit-ready BIM data. Cons
Specialized tool; does not create geometry (needs models from Revit/Archicad). High license cost for a specialized QA tool. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
High-level data validation for government and regulated sectors. Supports ITAR-like security environments. Integrations & Ecosystem
Designed to sit atop the BIM stack as the “quality filter.”
Archicad / Revit BIMcollab / Revizto Trimble Connect Support & Community
Niche but highly professional community of BIM Managers and VDC (Virtual Design and Construction) leads.
#10 — Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC)
Short description: A unified platform that connects project data from design through construction and into operations.
Key Features
Centralized document management (Autodesk Docs). Model coordination and automated clash grouping (BIM Collaborate Pro). Real-time issue tracking and RFI management on 3D models. Field management and digital “as-builts” for handover. Asset tracking and lifecycle data management. Executive dashboards for project health and risk analysis. Pros
The most cohesive ecosystem for large-scale project delivery. Seamless real-time sync with Revit models. Cons
Proprietary lock-in to the Autodesk environment. Can be overwhelming for teams without a dedicated BIM manager. Platforms / Deployment
Web / iOS / Android Cloud Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR. FedRAMP Moderate authorization for US government projects. Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrates with nearly every major construction technology platform.
Procore HoloBuilder Microsoft Power BI Support & Community
Extensive enterprise support and a global network of specialized implementation partners.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeploymentStandout FeaturePublic RatingAutodesk RevitMultidisciplinary / EnterpriseWindowsCloud / HybridParametric Family system4.6 / 5ArchicadArchitects / Solo / SMBWin / MacCloud / HybridIntuitive “Virtual Building” UI4.5 / 5Tekla StructuresSteel / Concrete DetailingWindowsCloud / HybridFabrication-level precisionN/ANavisworksClash Detection / ReviewWindowsCloud / HybridLarge-scale model federation4.4 / 5OpenBuildingsInfrastructure / Rail / GISWindowsCloud / HybridGIS and Digital Twin integrationN/AVectorworksLandscape / Design-FirstWin / MacCloud / HybridProfessional 2D/3D graphics4.4 / 5BricsCAD BIMCAD-to-BIM / BudgetWin / Mac / LinuxSelf-hostedAI-driven “BIMIFY” auto-modeling4.4 / 5AllplanReinforced ConcreteWindowsCloud / HybridAutomated rebar detailing4.7 / 5SolibriQA / Model ValidationWin / MacSelf-hostedRule-based code checkingN/AAutodesk ACCConstruction ManagementWeb / MobileCloudUnified lifecycle platformN/A Evaluation & Scoring of BIM Software
Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted TotalAutodesk Revit106101081078.70Archicad9108810988.85Tekla Structures1058910868.05Navisworks989910988.75OpenBuildings1059109868.10Vectorworks89888898.25BricsCAD BIM8988107108.45Allplan96899877.95Solibri97899878.00Autodesk ACC8810109978.55 Which BIM Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
If you are an architect working solo, Archicad or BricsCAD BIM are ideal. They offer high design speed with lower overhead and a more intuitive interface, allowing you to focus on the design rather than software management.
SMB (Small-to-Medium Business)
For architectural or engineering firms with 10–50 employees, Revit is often the safer choice due to its massive talent pool and universal acceptance by consultants. However, if your studio is design-centric and Mac-based, Vectorworks is an excellent alternative.
Mid-Market
Firms tackling large commercial or housing projects need Revit integrated with Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro. This allows your team to work on the same model in real-time from different locations without data loss.
Enterprise
For firms managing national infrastructure or global development portfolios, the combination of OpenBuildings Designer (for complex geometry) and Autodesk Construction Cloud (for management) provides the depth and security required for billion-dollar assets.
Budget vs Premium
Budget: BricsCAD BIM offers a perpetual license that pays for itself in under 2 years compared to subscriptions. Premium: Autodesk Revit and Tekla Structures represent high-end investments that pay off in multi-discipline coordination and fabrication efficiency. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the main difference between CAD and BIM?
CAD (Computer-Aided Design) focuses on drawing lines and arcs to represent shapes. BIM (Building Information Modeling) focuses on creating intelligent 3D objects that contain data (material, cost, schedule) and react to changes parametrically.
Is Revit the same as BIM?
No. Revit is a software application for BIM. BIM is the process and methodology, while Revit is one of many tools used to execute that process.
Can I run Revit on a Mac?
Native Revit is Windows-only. To run it on a Mac, you must use virtualization software like Parallels or Boot Camp, though this often compromises performance for large models.
What is OpenBIM?
OpenBIM is a vendor-neutral approach to collaboration that allows different software tools to exchange data using open standards like IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) and BCF (BIM Collaboration Format).
How does AI improve BIM workflows in 2026?
AI is used for “generative design” (optimizing building layouts for sunlight or wind), automated data validation (checking if all rooms have fire sensors), and predictive maintenance (analyzing when a building system will fail).
What is a Digital Twin?
A Digital Twin is a live digital version of a physical building. Unlike a static BIM model, a Digital Twin connects to real-time IoT sensors in the actual building to monitor performance and predict issues.
Do I need a powerful computer for BIM?
Yes. BIM software requires high-end hardware, specifically multi-core CPUs, at least 32GB–64GB of RAM, and professional-grade GPUs to handle large 3D datasets smoothly.
How much does BIM training cost?
Professional certification and training typically range from $500 to $2,000 per person, depending on the software complexity and the depth of the course (e.g., beginner vs. BIM Manager level).
Is BIM mandatory?
In many countries (including the UK, Singapore, and parts of the EU), BIM is mandatory for all government-funded infrastructure projects and large-scale public buildings.
What is LOD in BIM?
LOD stands for Level of Development. It ranges from LOD 100 (conceptual massing) to LOD 500 (as-built, data-rich models for facility management), defining the amount of detail and certainty in a model.
Conclusion
Selecting a BIM software stack in 2026 is a strategic business decision that dictates how your firm will collaborate, scale, and compete. While Autodesk Revit remains the gravitational center of the industry, alternatives like Archicad for design, Tekla for structural detailing, and BricsCAD for cost-effectiveness offer compelling specialized paths.
View the full article
reporter

Top 10 3D Scan & Photogrammetry Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
3D scanning and photogrammetry software are tools used to capture the physical world and convert it into digital 3D models. 3D scanning involves capturing the shape and appearance of objects or environments, while photogrammetry is the process of creating 3D models from 2D images, often leveraging multiple photos from different angles to reconstruct a highly detailed model. These tools have become essential in fields like product design, architecture, gaming, and heritage preservation, where physical objects or environments need to be accurately recreated in a digital format.
As technology evolves, the accessibility and accuracy of 3D scanning and photogrammetry tools continue to improve, making them available to professionals across industries, from engineering to creative fields. High-quality scanning can be used for reverse engineering, quality control, simulation, and even creating assets for digital environments like video games and virtual reality.
Real-world use cases include:
Product design and prototyping: Scanning objects to create accurate digital models for design, analysis, or replication. Heritage preservation: Digitizing artifacts, monuments, and historical sites to preserve them for future generations. Medical applications: Scanning body parts for prosthetics or orthotics to create customized solutions. Gaming and VR: Capturing real-world objects and environments to create realistic 3D assets for games and virtual worlds. Construction and architecture: Using photogrammetry to scan buildings or landscapes for project planning and design. What buyers should evaluate:
Accuracy and resolution: How well the software captures fine details and the overall precision of the scan or model. Ease of use: The user interface and learning curve, especially for users who may not be specialists in 3D modeling. Compatibility with hardware: Whether the software works with various 3D scanners, cameras, or drones. Processing speed: How quickly the software can turn scans into usable 3D models, especially for large datasets. Export options: The variety of file formats supported and the ability to export the models to other software for further processing. Cloud and network support: Ability to process scans remotely or in the cloud, as well as support for multi-user workflows. Post-processing capabilities: Features like noise reduction, texture mapping, and model repair that can enhance the final result. Cost and licensing: The pricing model, including any subscription or perpetual licensing options, as well as the value for the features offered. Support and community: Availability of tutorials, customer service, and an active user community to help with troubleshooting and learning. Mandatory paragraph
Best for: Engineers, designers, archaeologists, architects, and game developers who need to digitize physical objects or environments for analysis, design, or creation of digital assets. Not ideal for: Casual users or those needing simple photo-based modeling for low-detail assets; simpler 3D modeling tools may suffice in these cases. Key Trends in 3D Scan & Photogrammetry Software and Beyond
Real-time scanning and processing: The ability to process 3D scans in real-time during capture has become a key trend, allowing for faster iterations and on-site decision-making. Increased use of AI for error correction: Artificial intelligence is being integrated into software to detect and correct errors in 3D scans automatically, speeding up the post-processing workflow. Mobile and handheld scanners: The availability of mobile and handheld 3D scanners makes scanning more accessible for on-the-go professionals, providing more flexibility for scanning objects or environments in various settings. Integration with VR/AR: 3D scan data is increasingly used in virtual and augmented reality applications, where highly accurate models can be explored in immersive environments. Automated feature extraction: Software is becoming more efficient at extracting and mapping key features from scanned data, helping users focus on the creative aspects of their work rather than the technical details. Cloud-based processing: As cloud storage and computing become more powerful, more 3D scanning tools are incorporating cloud-based features for processing and storing large datasets remotely. Improved texture mapping: Advances in texture capture and mapping techniques enable photorealistic rendering of scanned objects, providing high-quality visual results. Multi-sensor integration: 3D scanning tools are starting to integrate data from multiple sensors, such as LiDAR, thermal, and photogrammetry, to create richer and more accurate models. Sustainability in scanning workflows: More software options are focusing on optimizing the use of material resources, reducing errors that require re-scan, and implementing cleaner, more efficient workflows. Collaborative scanning and design: New software is enabling teams to collaborate on 3D scanning and modeling projects in real-time, helping to improve project coordination and reduce time to completion. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
Focused on tools with industry recognition in professional settings like product design, engineering, architecture, and cultural heritage preservation. Prioritized accuracy and resolution in scanning and modeling, as high-quality data capture is critical in professional environments. Evaluated ease of use and accessibility for both beginners and experienced professionals. Looked for integration with popular hardware, including handheld scanners, drones, and high-precision 3D scanners. Considered post-processing capabilities, such as mesh repair, texture mapping, and the ability to enhance scan quality. Factored in processing speed and the ability to handle large datasets efficiently, especially in commercial and industrial use cases. Considered cloud support and collaboration features that are increasingly important in multi-user workflows. Examined cost and licensing models, ensuring that the software offers good value for the features provided. Included tools that provide strong support resources and a vibrant user community to help users get the most out of their software. Top 10 3D Scan & Photogrammetry Software Tools
#1 — Agisoft Metashape
Short description: Agisoft Metashape is a powerful photogrammetry software known for its high-precision model reconstruction from photos, used widely in archaeological, architectural, and geospatial applications.
Key Features
Advanced photogrammetry algorithms for high-quality 3D model reconstruction Multi-view stereo vision for increased model accuracy Dense point cloud generation and mesh reconstruction Supports a variety of file formats for export and integration with other software Ability to handle large datasets efficiently Automatic texture mapping and UV unwrapping Cloud-based processing options for faster results Pros
High accuracy and resolution in model creation Great for large-scale outdoor scanning, like landscapes or archaeological sites Supports a variety of scanning methods and camera setups Cons
The learning curve can be steep for new users Expensive for small-scale projects or freelancers Post-processing can be time-consuming for large datasets Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Metashape integrates with many modeling and CAD tools, allowing for seamless transitions from scanning to final design.
Works with drone and handheld scanners Supports cloud-based processing for faster turnarounds Flexible export formats for use in other 3D software Support & Community
Extensive documentation, tutorials, and community forums for troubleshooting and support.
#2 — RealityCapture
Short description: RealityCapture is a state-of-the-art photogrammetry software known for its speed and high-quality output. It’s often used for large-scale scanning, such as cityscapes and industrial projects.
Key Features
Extremely fast photogrammetry processing engine Ability to create 3D models from images and laser scans Supports a wide range of file formats, making it versatile across multiple industries Built-in tools for texture mapping and mesh refinement Scalable for both small and large datasets High compatibility with LiDAR data for detailed modeling Pros
Speedy processing time for large datasets High-quality results with realistic texture mapping Integration with LiDAR for enhanced data accuracy Cons
High computational requirements for complex scans Requires a robust computer system for optimal performance Can be costly for smaller-scale users Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
RealityCapture integrates well with other software packages, such as AutoCAD and Blender, for further modeling and rendering.
Compatible with various scanning methods and formats Strong support for cloud-based processing and collaboration Efficient multi-user setup for larger teams Support & Community
Comprehensive support, including tutorials, forums, and detailed documentation.
#3 — Meshroom
Short description: Meshroom is an open-source photogrammetry software that offers a free solution for 3D scanning. It’s widely used by hobbyists, researchers, and small-scale professionals for creating 3D models from images.
Key Features
Open-source with a modular structure for flexibility Fast photogrammetry processing with a robust algorithm for creating 3D models from photos Supports multiple cameras and scanning setups Texture mapping and mesh refinement tools for high-quality results Free to use, with no licensing fees Cloud-based export options for remote processing Pros
Completely free and open-source Easy to use for beginner-level users Modular, with the ability to customize features through community plugins Cons
Less polished compared to professional-grade paid software Performance and results can vary based on the quality of input images Limited support compared to paid options Platforms / Deployment
Windows / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Meshroom works with other software like Blender for post-processing and refinement of 3D models.
Open-source tools and customizations available for various use cases Compatible with many camera setups and scanning techniques Integrates well with other open-source software Support & Community
A strong community of open-source contributors, though professional support is limited.
#4 — CloudCompare
Short description: CloudCompare is a free and open-source software focused on 3D point cloud processing, including the ability to convert point clouds to 3D meshes.
Key Features
Point cloud processing for 3D model reconstruction Automatic generation of meshes from point clouds Tools for alignment, registration, and comparison of point clouds Compatibility with various scanning systems and file formats High level of control over scan quality and meshing settings Integration with other CAD and 3D software Pros
Fully open-source and free to use Powerful point cloud and mesh editing tools Good for high-precision scanning and processing Cons
Requires technical expertise to fully utilize advanced features User interface is not as intuitive as commercial alternatives Processing can be slower for large datasets Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
CloudCompare is widely used for processing LiDAR and photogrammetry data and integrates well with other software tools like MeshLab and AutoCAD.
Supports a range of file formats and scanning techniques Integrates with other CAD tools for seamless workflows Available for various platforms for easy access Support & Community
Strong community support with tutorials, documentation, and active forums.
#5 — Agisoft PhotoScan
Short description: Agisoft PhotoScan, now known as Metashape, is a powerful photogrammetry software tool widely used in fields such as geospatial surveying, archaeology, and architecture.
Key Features
Multi-view stereo algorithms for high-precision 3D modeling Dense point cloud generation for highly detailed models Multi-layered texture mapping and georeferencing for accurate representation Integration with external scanning tools and camera systems Advanced editing and model refinement tools Cloud processing and automated workflows for large projects Pros
High-quality results with advanced scanning algorithms Great for outdoor and large-scale scanning Seamless integration with geospatial tools Cons
High computational requirements for complex datasets Expensive for casual or small-scale use User interface can be challenging for beginners Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Metashape works well with external scanning equipment like drones and integrates with GIS and CAD tools for geospatial workflows.
Multi-camera and LiDAR compatibility Flexible export options for integration with other modeling tools Cloud-based processing for scalability Support & Community
Extensive user base with professional-level support and active community forums.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid)Standout FeaturePublic RatingAgisoft MetashapeHigh-precision photogrammetryWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedAdvanced stereo vision algorithmsN/ARealityCaptureLarge-scale scanningWindowsSelf-hostedSpeed and scalability for large datasetsN/AMeshroomOpen-source photogrammetryWindows / LinuxSelf-hostedFree and customizableN/ACloudComparePoint cloud processingWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedPoint cloud registration and editingN/AAgisoft PhotoScanGeospatial scanningWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedDense point cloud and georeferencingN/A Evaluation & Scoring of 3D Scan & Photogrammetry Software
The scoring below helps to shortlist the most suitable 3D scanning and photogrammetry software. Each criterion is scored from 1–10, then a weighted total from 0–10 is calculated using the weights listed.
Weights:
Core features – 25% Ease of use – 15% Integrations & ecosystem – 15% Security & compliance – 10% Performance & reliability – 10% Support & community – 10% Price / value – 15% Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted Total (0–10)Agisoft Metashape9.37.58.56.08.78.87.58.05RealityCapture9.58.09.06.09.28.77.28.42Meshroom7.58.56.56.07.87.99.07.62CloudCompare8.56.87.56.08.08.37.17.79Agisoft PhotoScan9.07.28.26.08.58.77.38.04 How to interpret the scores:
The higher the weighted total, the more suitable the tool is for comprehensive scanning and photogrammetry workflows. Lower scores reflect either niche use cases or specific challenges such as ease of use, performance with large datasets, or high hardware demands. Security and compliance reflect data handling capabilities, as certifications are often not publicly available for specialized tools. Which 3D Scan & Photogrammetry Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
You need a flexible, affordable tool for smaller projects with high-quality output.
Choose Meshroom for its free and customizable open-source nature. Choose Agisoft Metashape for high-quality photogrammetry with precise model construction. SMB
Small teams need scalability, fast processing, and ease of use for varied scanning tasks.
Choose RealityCapture for speed and scalability with large datasets. Choose CloudCompare for point cloud processing and large-scale modeling. Mid-Market
Mid-market teams need integration with existing software tools, collaborative features, and reliable performance.
Choose Agisoft PhotoScan for accurate scans and georeferencing. Choose RealityCapture for fast, professional-grade results with scalability. Enterprise
Enterprise environments need high performance, security, and integration with CAD and GIS tools.
Choose Agisoft Metashape for detailed, high-precision modeling. Choose RealityCapture for large-scale, high-quality scanning and robust integration. Budget vs Premium
If budget is tight, Meshroom is the best free alternative with decent performance. For premium workflows, RealityCapture and Agisoft Metashape offer industry-leading accuracy and speed. Feature Depth vs Ease of Use
If advanced features are essential: Agisoft Metashape, RealityCapture If ease of use matters more: Meshroom, CloudCompare Integrations & Scalability
For teams that need strong integrations with modeling or CAD software, Agisoft PhotoScan and RealityCapture are the top choices. Security & Compliance Needs
Ensure data security and project management controls, especially for high-stakes industries like healthcare or manufacturing.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Which 3D scan & photogrammetry tool is best for beginners?
Meshroom is a great starting point due to its open-source nature and easy-to-use interface.
Can I use photogrammetry for large-scale projects?
Yes, tools like RealityCapture and Agisoft Metashape are built for handling large datasets, including large-scale landscapes and architectural models.
What types of cameras work with photogrammetry software?
Most photogrammetry software supports standard DSLR cameras, and some even work with smartphones or drone cameras for aerial scanning.
How long does it take to process a 3D scan?
Processing times can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the scene, resolution of the images, and the software used. Expect longer times for detailed scans.
How do I improve scan accuracy?

Ensure your photos are high quality, overlap sufficiently, and are taken from multiple angles. Proper lighting and focus are also critical for achieving accurate results.
What is the difference between LiDAR and photogrammetry?
LiDAR uses laser scanning to capture 3D data, whereas photogrammetry uses images. LiDAR is better for precise distance measurements, while photogrammetry excels at texture mapping and detail.
Can I use photogrammetry for animation?
Yes, photogrammetry can create realistic 3D models for use in animation, especially when combined with texture mapping and rigging tools.
What is a point cloud in 3D scanning?
A point cloud is a collection of 3D coordinates representing the surface of an object or scene, often used as a precursor to building a 3D model.
Can photogrammetry be used for 3D printing?
Yes, photogrammetry is often used to create accurate models for 3D printing, especially for custom objects, prototypes, or replicas.
How do I share a 3D scan with a team?
Many photogrammetry tools offer cloud-based export and sharing options, making it easy to collaborate on 3D models with team members in different locations.
Conclusion
Selecting the right 3D scanning and photogrammetry software depends on your specific needs, whether it’s high-quality detail, ease of use, or large-scale data processing. RealityCapture and Agisoft Metashape offer excellent results for professionals requiring high precision. Meshroom is a great free tool for newcomers, while CloudCompare is ideal for handling complex point clouds. By understanding the strengths of each software, you can choose the best tool to enhance your 3D scanning and modeling workflows.

View the full article
reporter

YouTube Music Rolling Out Premium Paywall for Song Lyrics

YouTube Music is making users pay for lyrics. Originally introduced in 2020 as a free feature, song lyrics now sit behind a paywall – as part of a YouTube Premium or Music Premium subscription.


As spotted by 9to5Google, in the latest update currently rolling out, the Lyrics tab on the Now Playing screen displays the warning message, "You have [x] views remaining. Unlock lyrics with Premium."

Users get five free lyrics before a subscription is required. After that, users only see the first few lines, while the rest are blurred.

Google has been testing the change with a small subset of users for a few months already, and now it appears to be rolling out globally. Google has yet to confirm the change.

YouTube Music Premium costs $10.99 per month, and includes ad-free playback, offline downloads, and background listening. YouTube Premium, priced at $13.99, brings those benefits to the YouTube app.

It's possible that Google is trying to claw back costs paid to third-party services like LyricFind and MusixMatch, which the app seems to be using to retrieve lyrics. Whether the strategy outlives previous attempts by streamers to make users pay extra for the feature remains to be seen.

Last year, Spotify briefly put lyrics behind a paywall, but it rolled back the move after a user backlash. Tag: YouTube Music
This article, "YouTube Music Rolling Out Premium Paywall for Song Lyrics" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

DKnife targets network gateways in long running AitM campaign

A previously undocumented China-linked adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) framework known as “DKnife” has been identified operating at network gateways, where it intercepts and manipulates in-transit traffic.
According to Cisco Talos’ findings, the framework has been active since at least 2019 and remains operational as of early 2026. Rather than targeting endpoints directly, DKnife is deployed at the network edge, giving operators visibility into and control over the traffic passing through compromised devices.
Talos researchers described it as a modular Linux-based system capable of deep packet inspection, credential interception, and malicious content injection.
“DKnife’s attacks target a wide range of devices, including PCs, mobile devices, and Internet of Things devices,” they said in a blog post. “It delivers and interacts with ShadowPad and DarkNimbus backdoors by hijacking binary downloads and Android application updates.”
Traffic hijacking and malware delivery
The researchers found DKnife having seven Linux ELF components that work together to monitor and manipulate network traffic in real time. Once deployed on a gateway or similar edge device, the framework can inspect unencrypted and decrypted traffic flows to selectively modify responses before they reach their intended destination.
“The seven implants in DKnife serve the purpose of DPI engine, data reporting, reverse proxy for AitM attack, malicious APK download, framework update, traffic forwarding, and building a P2P communication channel with the remote C2,” the researchers said.
The framework was observed being used to redirect legitimate software update requests to attacker-controlled servers, enabling the delivery of secondary payloads posing as trusted updates. This allowed attackers to compromise downstream systems without needing direct access to the endpoints themselves, the researchers noted.
Beyond update hijacking, the framework supports DNS manipulation, binary replacement, and selective traffic forwarding, giving attackers control over how specific requests are handled.
Indicators point to China-Nexus development and targeting
Several aspects of DKnife’s design and operation suggested ties to China-aligned threat actors. Talos identified configuration data and code comments written in Simplified Chinese, as well as handling logic tailored for Chinese-language email providers and mobile applications.
The framework was also found to enable credential collection from services used within China, indicating specific targeting. Talos confirmed linking DKnife’s operations to the delivery of malware families previously associated with China-nexus activity, further reinforcing attribution.
“Based on the language used in the code, configuration files, and the ShadowPad malware delivered in the campaign, we assess with high confidence that China-nexus threat actors operate this tool,” the researchers said without naming any specific threat group.
Shared lineage and detection sabotage
Talos investigation also revealed technical overlaps between DKnife and earlier AitM frameworks used in past campaigns.
“We discovered a link between DKnife and a campaign delivering WizardNet, a modular backdoor known to be delivered by a different AiTM framework, Spellbinder, suggesting a shared development or operational lineage,” the researchers said.
Talos said DKnife includes a traffic inspection module that actively interferes with antivirus and PC-management communications. The module identifies 360 Total Security traffic by inspecting specific HTTP headers, such as DPUname and x-360-ver, and by matching known service domains. When a match is detected, the framework disrupts the connection using crafted TCP reset packets.
Similar behavior targeting Tencent services and other PC management endpoints was also observed, indicating deliberate efforts to weaken security tooling. To strengthen detection, Talos shared a list of indicators of compromise (IoCs), including file hashes, network artifacts, and command and control (c2) infrastructure associated with DKnife. Additionally, the disclosure shared a set of ClamAV signatures for detecting and blocking the threat.
View the full article
CSOonline

Top 10 3D Rendering & Ray Tracing Tools: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
3D rendering and ray tracing tools are at the heart of creating photorealistic images and animations. These tools take digital models and apply complex algorithms to simulate lighting, textures, shadows, and reflections to create highly detailed and realistic visuals. 3D rendering is essential in a variety of industries, including architecture, automotive design, film production, and product visualization. Ray tracing, in particular, is a rendering technique that simulates the way light interacts with objects, offering stunning visual realism by calculating light paths and how they bounce off surfaces.
In today’s competitive market, having the right 3D rendering software with ray tracing capabilities is essential to deliver visually captivating content. Whether you’re rendering for film, advertising, or product development, the quality of the render can make all the difference. Choosing the right tool can dramatically improve render speeds, visual fidelity, and overall production efficiency.
Real-world use cases include:
Architectural visualization: Creating lifelike building interiors and exteriors for real estate and urban planning. Film and VFX: High-quality rendering for special effects, animated features, and virtual cinematography. Product design: Rendering realistic prototypes and products for marketing, presentations, and design iterations. Video games: Ray tracing for next-gen games to produce dynamic lighting, realistic reflections, and shadows. Automotive design: Realistic visualizations of car designs for prototyping, marketing, and client presentations. What buyers should evaluate:
Ray tracing capabilities: The quality and performance of ray tracing, including reflections, refraction, and shadow effects. Rendering speed: How fast the software can produce high-quality renders, especially for complex scenes. Real-time rendering: Whether the tool can deliver real-time rendering for interactive applications or design reviews. Integration with other tools: Compatibility with modeling and simulation tools, as well as ease of export. Material and texture handling: The ability to manage complex textures, shaders, and materials for realism. Light simulation: How accurately the software simulates light sources, including sunlight, artificial lighting, and global illumination. Post-processing support: How well the tool integrates with compositing and post-production workflows. Ease of use: The learning curve and user interface, especially for those not specialized in rendering. Cloud and network rendering: Support for cloud-based rendering or network rendering to speed up the process. Cost and licensing: Considerations for software cost, licensing models, and the availability of free or open-source alternatives. Mandatory paragraph
Best for: 3D artists, VFX professionals, game developers, architects, product designers, and content creators who require high-quality rendering and realistic visualizations. Not ideal for: Beginners or hobbyists who need simple rendering tools for basic projects; simpler software may be sufficient for basic needs. Key Trends in 3D Rendering & Ray Tracing Tools and Beyond
Real-time ray tracing: The integration of ray tracing into real-time engines like Unreal Engine and Unity is becoming a standard, enabling interactive and cinematic-quality experiences. Cloud-based rendering: Cloud computing and distributed rendering are becoming increasingly popular, allowing teams to offload rendering tasks to external servers to improve workflow efficiency and reduce downtime. AI-driven rendering optimizations: Machine learning and AI are being integrated into 3D rendering tools to optimize render settings, reduce noise, and improve performance, especially in ray tracing. Hybrid rendering engines: More tools are adopting hybrid approaches that combine rasterization and ray tracing for optimized speed and quality. Material and texture improvements: Next-generation software now supports more realistic materials, such as subsurface scattering, complex shaders, and photorealistic textures, improving the realism of scenes. Integration with design tools: Improved compatibility with 3D modeling and CAD tools, making it easier for designers to go from modeling to rendering without file conversion issues. Increased use of GPUs: GPU-based rendering is becoming the preferred choice over CPU-based rendering, allowing faster renders and better handling of complex scenes. Virtual production and previsualization: Ray tracing is becoming a key component of virtual production, where directors can see photorealistic renders in real-time, aiding in pre-production decisions. Cross-platform rendering: Tools are being optimized to run efficiently across different hardware configurations, from high-end workstations to cloud servers. Sustainability in rendering: Energy-efficient algorithms and rendering optimization techniques are becoming a priority to reduce the environmental impact of large-scale rendering operations. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
Focused on tools with industry recognition in professional environments such as film, animation, architecture, and gaming. Prioritized tools with advanced ray tracing capabilities, allowing for realistic light simulation and photorealistic effects. Evaluated rendering speed and the ability to handle complex scenes, large textures, and large-scale models. Considered real-time rendering support, which is crucial for interactive experiences, design reviews, and virtual production. Examined integration capabilities with other 3D modeling, simulation, and CAD tools for smoother workflows. Factored in post-production tools and cloud rendering to ensure tools can meet the needs of distributed teams. Looked at ease of use and the learning curve, especially for those new to rendering or requiring fast workflows. Considered license models and cost-effectiveness, making sure these tools meet both the needs of large studios and smaller teams or freelance creators. Top 10 3D Rendering & Ray Tracing Tools
#1 — V-Ray
Short description: V-Ray is one of the most widely used rendering engines in the professional 3D production pipeline. Known for its quality and versatility, it is widely used in industries like architecture, VFX, and product design.
Key Features
Advanced ray tracing for photorealistic lighting, reflections, and shadows Real-time rendering with V-Ray RT for fast previews Support for GPU and CPU-based rendering High-quality materials and textures, including subsurface scattering Cloud rendering for faster output and scalability Integration with leading design and modeling tools, such as SketchUp, Rhino, and 3ds Max Pros
High level of realism in rendering results Excellent integration with popular modeling tools Reliable performance for both CPU and GPU rendering Cons
Expensive, especially for small teams and individual users Complex interface that may be difficult for beginners Render times can be long for highly detailed scenes Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
V-Ray integrates seamlessly with many 3D design and modeling tools like 3ds Max, Rhino, SketchUp, and Revit, allowing users to render directly from these environments.
Cloud-based rendering options for faster output Wide range of material and texture options Flexible support for custom shaders and plugins Support & Community
Extensive documentation, tutorials, and a large professional community for support.
#2 — OctaneRender
Short description: OctaneRender is a GPU-based rendering engine known for its speed and photorealism. It leverages the power of GPUs for fast rendering times and is often used in VFX and architectural visualization.
Key Features
GPU-accelerated rendering for faster processing times Real-time preview for quick iterations Full support for ray tracing, volumetric lighting, and advanced shading Seamless integration with popular modeling and animation tools like Cinema 4D and Blender Support for multi-GPU setups for even faster rendering times Advanced material systems with support for complex textures and shaders Pros
Fast rendering times thanks to GPU acceleration High-quality photorealistic output Real-time preview and interactivity during the creation process Cons
Requires high-end GPU hardware for optimal performance Limited support for CPU-based rendering Can be expensive, especially for high-end hardware setups Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
OctaneRender supports integrations with tools like Cinema 4D, Blender, and Maya. It also offers plugins for popular software packages.
Supports multi-GPU setups for larger-scale renders Easy-to-use interface for both beginners and professionals Real-time interactive rendering for fast feedback Support & Community
Active community and frequent updates. Support depends on licensing.
#3 — Redshift
Short description: Redshift is a powerful GPU-based renderer designed to work efficiently with complex 3D scenes. It is widely used in production pipelines for VFX, animation, and motion graphics.
Key Features
GPU-accelerated rendering for faster results with complex scenes High-quality ray tracing for reflections, shadows, and light interactions Deep integration with major 3D modeling and animation tools like Maya, Cinema 4D, and Houdini Advanced material and texture support for realistic results Optimized for large-scale production with memory management tools Supports multi-GPU configurations for even faster rendering Pros
Fast rendering speeds thanks to GPU acceleration Excellent scalability for larger projects Seamless integration with major software packages Cons
GPU requirements can be high for large-scale scenes Can be expensive depending on the licensing model Limited CPU rendering support Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Redshift integrates with popular design and animation tools, including Maya, Cinema 4D, and Houdini, making it ideal for VFX studios and production environments.
Optimized for large-scale production with memory management and multi-GPU support Supports a range of plugins and custom shaders Real-time previewing options for quick scene iteration Support & Community
Active user base with many tutorials and documentation. Support depends on licensing.
#4 — Corona Renderer
Short description: Corona Renderer is known for producing photorealistic images with a simple, intuitive user interface. It’s used widely in architectural visualization, interior design, and product rendering.
Key Features
Path-tracing engine for high-quality photorealistic rendering Real-time rendering for quicker previews Simple, user-friendly interface for easy setup Advanced lighting and shadow controls Strong support for textures and materials, including subsurface scattering Integration with Autodesk 3ds Max and Cinema 4D for seamless workflows Pros
Easy to use with a low learning curve High-quality results with minimal setup Excellent for architectural visualization and product rendering Cons
Lacks the flexibility and speed of GPU-based renderers for heavy scenes Limited support for animations and large-scale VFX work Rendering speed may not meet the needs of high-end production studios Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Corona Renderer integrates seamlessly with 3ds Max and Cinema 4D, making it a strong choice for architecture and product design workflows.
Efficient CPU rendering with high-quality results Support for plugins and third-party tools to extend functionality Strong materials library and pre-built assets Support & Community
Active community with frequent updates and support resources available through forums and documentation.
#5 — KeyShot
Short description: KeyShot is a powerful real-time rendering tool that is widely used for product visualization. It excels at creating high-quality, photorealistic renderings with an easy-to-use interface.
Key Features
Real-time rendering with instant feedback Advanced lighting and material presets for fast setup High-quality ray tracing for photorealistic effects Integration with major CAD programs such as SolidWorks, Rhino, and Autodesk Inventor Support for complex materials and textures, including glass, metal, and liquids Cloud-based rendering for additional power and scalability Pros
Extremely fast render times with real-time previewing Easy to use with minimal setup for high-quality results Excellent for product design and marketing visuals Cons
Lacks advanced VFX capabilities compared to more specialized tools Primarily focused on product and industrial design, not ideal for animation-heavy work High license cost for advanced features Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
KeyShot integrates easily with various CAD tools and supports a wide variety of file formats.
Real-time previewing and render control Cloud-based rendering for larger scenes and faster outputs Extensive material and texture library Support & Community
Strong user base and robust documentation. Paid support is available for enterprise customers.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid)Standout FeaturePublic RatingV-RayHigh-quality, photorealistic renderingWindows / macOSSelf-hostedAdvanced ray tracing and realismN/AOctaneRenderGPU-accelerated photorealismWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedFast, GPU-based renderingN/ARedshiftHigh-end GPU renderingWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedHigh-speed rendering with multi-GPU supportN/ACorona RendererPhotorealistic architectural renderingWindows / macOSSelf-hostedEasy-to-use interface for quality resultsN/AKeyShotProduct visualization and industrial designWindows / macOSSelf-hostedReal-time rendering and ease of useN/A Evaluation & Scoring of 3D Rendering & Ray Tracing Tools
The scoring below is a comparative model intended to help shortlisting. Each criterion is scored from 1–10, then a weighted total from 0–10 is calculated using the weights listed. These are analyst estimates based on typical workflow fit, not public ratings.
Weights:
Core features – 25% Ease of use – 15% Integrations & ecosystem – 15% Security & compliance – 10% Performance & reliability – 10% Support & community – 10% Price / value – 15% Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted Total (0–10)V-Ray9.57.29.06.38.58.76.58.28OctaneRender9.08.18.66.09.08.57.08.16Redshift9.47.58.76.29.28.77.18.27Corona Renderer8.68.58.06.08.47.96.38.05KeyShot8.29.07.86.07.87.86.07.85 How to interpret the scores:
A higher weighted total suggests a better fit for most workflows, but niche needs may require a lower-rated option. Security and compliance reflect access control features and governance fit because certifications are not always publicly stated. Actual performance may vary depending on hardware, scene complexity, and individual user setups. Which 3D Rendering & Ray Tracing Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
For solo creators, you need a fast, versatile tool with robust community support and affordability.
Choose KeyShot for ease of use and real-time rendering in product visualization. Choose OctaneRender for high-quality GPU rendering with minimal setup. SMB
Small teams need strong integration with design tools, scalability, and reliable performance.
Choose V-Ray for high-quality render output and integration with common modeling software. Choose Corona Renderer for fast, photorealistic results with an easy-to-learn interface. Mid-Market
Mid-market teams benefit from tools with deep integration, large-scale rendering options, and collaborative features.
Choose Redshift for GPU-accelerated rendering with multi-GPU support. Choose V-Ray for comprehensive lighting, textures, and rendering tools with support for complex scenes. Enterprise
Enterprise environments require scalability, security, and maximum rendering power for large-scale production.
Choose V-Ray or Redshift for large-scale production pipelines and high-end rendering quality. Choose OctaneRender for quick iterations and real-time feedback during production. Budget vs Premium
If budget is a concern, Corona Renderer and KeyShot offer solid features at a reasonable price. For premium needs, Redshift and V-Ray provide top-tier rendering capabilities with more extensive control over the final output. Feature Depth vs Ease of Use
Maximum feature depth: V-Ray, Redshift Ease of use: Corona Renderer, KeyShot Integrations & Scalability
If you need to integrate with multiple design tools and scale across large teams, V-Ray and Redshift are optimal. For quick, focused rendering workflows, KeyShot and Corona Renderer are strong choices. Security & Compliance Needs
Ensure strong file handling, permissions, and export management if you’re working with proprietary designs or in regulated industries. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is ray tracing, and why is it important?
Ray tracing simulates the behavior of light to create realistic reflections, shadows, and refractions in 3D scenes. It’s crucial for achieving photorealistic results in high-end VFX and product visualizations.
Can I use GPU-based rendering for complex scenes?
Yes, GPU-based rendering tools like OctaneRender and Redshift handle complex
scenes by offloading processing to the GPU, allowing for faster rendering times.
What is the difference between path tracing and ray tracing?
Path tracing is a more complex rendering technique that traces the path of light as it interacts with surfaces, offering even more realistic results than traditional ray tracing.
How long does rendering take for large 3D scenes?
Rendering time can vary based on the complexity of the scene, resolution, and the rendering engine used. Tools like V-Ray and Redshift are optimized for larger scenes.
How can I reduce rendering times?
You can reduce rendering times by optimizing scene details, reducing resolution for previews, or using GPU-based rendering for faster output. Some tools also support cloud rendering to offload processing.
Are there any free ray tracing tools?
Free tools like Blender offer ray tracing capabilities for 3D rendering, but more advanced features and optimizations are often found in paid software.
Can I use ray tracing for animations?
Yes, ray tracing is used for rendering animations, especially in high-end VFX and cinematics where lighting and reflections need to be consistent across frames.
How do I choose the right tool for my team?
Consider factors like budget, scene complexity, ease of use, and integration with your pipeline tools. For smaller teams, KeyShot and Corona Renderer are good entry points, while larger studios may benefit from the power of V-Ray or Redshift.
Can I switch tools later in the project?
Switching tools can be complex due to differences in workflows, settings, and compatibility. It’s best to choose the tool that fits your project early on and stick with it.
How do I manage a team with different skill levels using 3D rendering software?
Choose software that balances ease of use with advanced features, allowing novice users to get up to speed quickly while offering expert tools for advanced users. Corona Renderer and KeyShot are great for beginners, while V-Ray and Redshift are powerful for experts.
Conclusion
The right 3D rendering and ray tracing software depends on your team’s needs, project complexity, and budget. V-Ray and Redshift stand out for high-quality output in complex production pipelines, while OctaneRender offers incredible speed for GPU-powered rendering. For simpler workflows and product visualization, KeyShot and Corona Renderer are excellent choices. By evaluating these tools based on your production requirements, you can select the software that will help you achieve stunning, realistic visuals while optimizing your work.
View the full article
reporter

Top 10 3D Printing Workflow Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
3D Printing Workflow Software is a centralized management layer designed to orchestrate the end-to-end additive manufacturing process. Unlike a simple “slicer” that only prepares a file for a printer, workflow software oversees the entire lifecycle: from initial design intake and file repair to automated scheduling, real-time fleet monitoring, and post-production quality assurance.
In 2026, as 3D printing transitions from a prototyping novelty to a high-volume production reality, these tools have become the “operating system” for modern factories. Organizations no longer manage individual printers; they manage digital inventories and automated production queues. This software ensures that a part printed in a New York lab is identical to one produced in a Mumbai factory, providing the traceability and repeatability required for industrial-grade output.
Real-World Use Cases
Medical Device Manufacturing: Tracking patient-specific implants through design, sterilization, and delivery. Aerospace Service Bureaus: Managing high-priority metal print jobs with full audit trails for regulatory compliance. Educational Innovation Labs: Coordinating student print requests and material quotas across hundreds of desktop machines. Automotive Spare Parts: Maintaining a “digital warehouse” to print parts on-demand, reducing physical storage costs. Mandatory Evaluation Criteria
Multi-Printer Interoperability: Support for various hardware brands and technologies (FDM, SLA, SLS, Metal). Fleet Scalability: The ability to manage 5 to 500+ printers from a single dashboard. Security & IP Protection: End-to-end encryption for proprietary design files. Integration Depth: Native connections with CAD (Fusion 360, SolidWorks) and ERP/MES systems. Automation Capabilities: AI-driven nesting, support generation, and failure detection. User Management: Role-based access control (RBAC) and departmental quota tracking. Key Trends in 3D Printing Workflow Software
AI-Driven Failure Detection: Real-time computer vision integrated into workflow dashboards now identifies “spaghetti” prints or warping mid-job, automatically pausing the printer to save material. Distributed Manufacturing Grids: Software now allows companies to “load balance” print jobs across global locations based on local material availability and electricity costs. Blockchain for IP Traceability: Some high-end platforms utilize decentralized ledgers to ensure that proprietary CAD files are only printed the authorized number of times. Sustainability Analytics: Modern tools calculate the carbon footprint and material waste per part, helping firms meet 2026 ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) targets. Zero-Trust Security Models: Shifting away from local SD cards toward secure, encrypted streaming of G-code directly from the cloud to the printer. Digital Twin Integration: Real-time synchronization between the physical printer’s sensors and the software’s virtual dashboard for predictive maintenance. Automated Post-Processing Orchestration: Workflow tools are expanding to manage not just the print, but the automated washing, curing, and polishing stations. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
To identify the top 10 3D printing workflow solutions , we employed a rigorous selection process focused on industrial viability and technical maturity:
Market Adoption: Prioritized tools with a proven track record in aerospace, automotive, and healthcare sectors. Hardware Agnosticism: Favored platforms that support a wide range of printer manufacturers rather than locked-down proprietary ecosystems. Feature Completeness: Evaluated the presence of “must-have” features like AI optimization and automated scheduling. Security Posture: Screened for enterprise-grade security features such as SSO, encryption-at-rest, and compliance certifications. Developer Ecosystem: Checked for robust API documentation and the ability to integrate with third-party PLM and ERP software. Customer Feedback: Analyzed reliability signals from professional user communities and industrial case studies. Top 10 3D Printing Workflow Software Tools
#1 — 3DPrinterOS
Short description: A cloud-based “operating system” for 3D printing that allows organizations to manage users, printers, and files across global locations from a single web interface.
Key Features
Cloud-based slicing and file preparation. Centralized user management with detailed permission levels. Real-time remote monitoring via camera feeds. Extensive API for custom enterprise integrations. Support for over 1,500 different 3D printer models. Automated reporting on material usage and print success rates. Pros
Extremely easy to scale from one printer to hundreds. Reduces IT overhead by centralizing drivers and software updates. Cons
Requires a stable internet connection for full cloud functionality. Can be expensive for smaller organizations compared to local alternatives. Platforms / Deployment
Web / Windows / macOS / Linux / iOS / Android Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SSO/SAML, MFA, and end-to-end encryption. SOC 2 compliance (Not publicly stated for all tiers). Integrations & Ecosystem
3DPrinterOS provides a robust API that allows it to plug directly into educational Learning Management Systems (LMS) and corporate ERPs.
Autodesk Fusion 360 Onshape Google Workspace / Microsoft Azure (SSO) Support & Community
Strong documentation and dedicated account managers for enterprise clients. Active community forums for educational users.
#2 — Materialise Magics / CO-AM
Short description: The industry standard for data and build preparation, now evolved into the CO-AM platform for full manufacturing execution.
Key Features
Advanced mesh repair and STL optimization. Automated nesting and support generation for all technologies. Integrated simulation to predict build failures. End-to-end MES (Manufacturing Execution System) capabilities. Traceability for regulated industries (medical/aerospace). Connectivity to a wide range of industrial metal and polymer printers. Pros
Unrivaled precision in file repair and build preparation. Deeply integrated into industrial manufacturing standards. Cons
High cost of entry; strictly professional/enterprise pricing. Steep learning curve for new users. Platforms / Deployment
Windows Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, GDPR compliant. Supports ITAR-compliant workflows for defense. Integrations & Ecosystem
Materialise offers a highly extensible platform designed to be the backbone of an additive factory.
Siemens NX SAP / Oracle ERP Ansys Simulation Support & Community
Premium support tiers including on-site training and 24/7 technical assistance for global operations.
#3 — Autodesk Fusion (Additive)
Short description: An all-in-one CAD/CAM/CAE tool that integrates design with advanced additive manufacturing workflow management.
Key Features
Unified workspace for design and print preparation. Generative design tools optimized for 3D printing. Support for complex metal additive workflows. Cloud-based collaboration and version control. Automated orientation and support generation. Direct connectivity to a growing list of industrial printers. Pros
Seamless transition from design to production without file exports. Powerful simulation tools to reduce wasted prints. Cons
Monthly subscription model can be costly over time. Heavy reliance on cloud processing for advanced tasks. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS Cloud-based Security & Compliance
SSO, MFA, and AES-256 encryption. SOC 2 Type II certified. Integrations & Ecosystem
As part of the Autodesk suite, it integrates natively with the world’s most popular engineering tools.
Autodesk Vault Ansys Microsoft Teams / Slack Support & Community
Massive global community, extensive YouTube tutorials, and professional certification programs.
#4 — Ultimaker Digital Factory
Short description: A management platform tailored for Ultimaker hardware but designed to facilitate professional team collaboration.
Key Features
Remote print job submission and queuing. Real-time fleet monitoring and maintenance alerts. Library for storing and versioning approved print files. Detailed analytics on material consumption. Roles and permissions for team-based projects. Seamless integration with Ultimaker Cura slicer. Pros
Extremely user-friendly interface. Included for free with most professional Ultimaker hardware. Cons
Optimized specifically for Ultimaker; limited third-party printer support. Lacks some advanced MES features found in specialized software. Platforms / Deployment
Web / Windows / macOS / Linux Cloud Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, SSO support for Enterprise tiers. Encrypted cloud storage. Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrates with CAD software to streamline the “Design to Print” button.
SolidWorks Autodesk Fusion Siemens NX Support & Community
Excellent documentation and a massive global user base providing peer-to-peer support.
#5 — Markforged Eiger & Eiger Fleet
Short description: A cloud-first workflow tool optimized for high-strength composite and metal printing.
Key Features
Automated fiber reinforcement (CFF) pathing. Real-time part inspection and quality validation. Fleet management with centralized job queuing. “Digital Forge” ecosystem for consistent global production. Role-based access for large engineering organizations. Batch analytics and production reporting. Pros
High level of automation; “it just works” philosophy. Unmatched quality control for high-strength industrial parts. Cons
Strictly proprietary; only works with Markforged hardware. Requires cloud access for most advanced features. Platforms / Deployment
Web / Windows / macOS Cloud / On-prem (Enterprise only) Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001. Optional “Offline” Eiger for high-security facilities. Integrations & Ecosystem
Focuses on ensuring design data flows securely from CAD to the printer.
Onshape SolidWorks (via plugin) MS Azure AD Support & Community
Professional support through a global reseller network and direct engineering assistance.
#6 — 3YOURMIND
Short description: An enterprise-grade platform focused on identifying AM (Additive Manufacturing) candidates and managing the production floor.
Key Features
AM Part Identifier (AI-driven ROI analysis). Automated order management and pricing. Digital inventory for on-demand production. Real-time machine scheduling and shop floor management. Full production traceability and documentation. Multi-site and multi-vendor coordination. Pros
The most comprehensive tool for “business-side” 3D printing management. Excellent for scaling distributed manufacturing. Cons
High complexity; requires significant setup and training. Price point is geared toward large industrial players. Platforms / Deployment
Web Cloud / Self-hosted / Hybrid Security & Compliance
GDPR, ISO 27001. Role-based access and audit logs. Integrations & Ecosystem
Built to sit between the design phase and the physical production.
SAP ERP Stratasys / Ultimaker Hardware Authentise Support & Community
Dedicated enterprise support with custom implementation services.
#7 — Authentise aMES
Short description: A data-driven Manufacturing Execution System (MES) specifically for additive manufacturing.
Key Features
Real-time data capture from over 100 printer types. Automated status updates and job tracking. Digital “Traveler” for quality assurance. Dynamic scheduling based on machine availability. Material and powder lifecycle management. Customizable dashboards for shop-floor visibility. Pros
Excellent data transparency and real-time monitoring. Vendor-neutral approach allows for diverse fleets. Cons
UI can feel industrial and less “polished” than design-led tools. Requires technical expertise to maximize data utility. Platforms / Deployment
Web Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
SOC 2, ISO 27001 (Not publicly stated for all versions). Meets aerospace and medical traceability standards. Integrations & Ecosystem
Integrates with simulation and design tools to close the feedback loop.
Materialise Magics Ansys Microsoft Power BI Support & Community
Targeted toward professional manufacturing engineers with robust technical documentation.
#8 — AstroPrint (Enterprise)
Short description: A fleet management solution that prioritizes ease of use and mobile accessibility.
Key Features
Cloud-based slicing with manufacturer-suggested profiles. Remote printer control via mobile app. Multi-printer management and queuing. Public API for custom dashboarding. Analytics on print performance and material usage. Secure “AstroBox” hardware for non-connected printers. Pros
Very intuitive for non-technical users. Great mobile experience for monitoring on the go. Cons
Features are more basic compared to industrial MES tools. Slicing options are less granular than desktop software. Platforms / Deployment
Web / iOS / Android Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
TLS encryption and secure user authentication. Compliance: Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Focused on connecting desktop workflows to the cloud.
Thingiverse / MyMiniFactory Google Drive / Dropbox AstroPrint API Support & Community
Strong support for small businesses and a friendly community forum.
#9 — GrabCAD Print (by Stratasys)
Short description: A free-to-use professional workflow tool designed for Stratasys and some third-party printers.
Key Features
Native CAD file support (no STL required). Automatic tray nesting and material estimation. Mobile and web monitoring of print jobs. GrabCAD Shop for managing work orders. Cloud-based collaboration for engineering teams. Detailed reports on printer utilization. Pros
Simplifies the workflow by eliminating the need to export STLs. Free for Stratasys users, providing high value. Cons
Primary focus is on Stratasys hardware. Limited advanced mesh editing compared to Magics. Platforms / Deployment
Windows / iOS / Android Cloud / Hybrid Security & Compliance
Standard enterprise security protocols. Compliance: Varies / Not publicly stated. Integrations & Ecosystem
Deeply integrated into the Stratasys hardware line and GrabCAD community.
SolidWorks PTC Creo Siemens NX Support & Community
One of the largest 3D printing communities (GrabCAD) with millions of users and professional tutorials.
#10 — Oqton (by 3D Systems)
Short description: An AI-powered manufacturing operating system that automates the end-to-end production workflow.
Key Features
AI-driven automated support generation and nesting. Intelligent scheduling that optimizes machine uptime. Seamless management of both additive and CNC workflows. Cloud-based production tracking across sites. High-fidelity simulation for metal builds. Traceability for medical and dental applications. Pros
AI significantly reduces the manual labor of build prep. True multi-technology support (Additve + Subtractive). Cons
Can be overkill for organizations only doing basic plastic printing. Premium pricing model. Platforms / Deployment
Web Cloud Security & Compliance
ISO 27001, SOC 2 (Not publicly stated). Designed for highly regulated dental and medical sectors. Integrations & Ecosystem
Aims to be the “brain” of the factory, connecting all hardware.
3D Systems hardware Most industrial CNC machines ERP/PLM via API Support & Community
High-touch professional support with specialized consultants for specific industries.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeploymentStandout FeaturePublic Rating3DPrinterOSGlobal Fleets / EducationWeb, Win, Mac, MobileCloud / HybridCross-brand hardware supportN/AMaterialise MagicsIndustrial Build PrepWindowsHybridProfessional-grade file repairN/AAutodesk FusionIntegrated Design & PrintWin, MacCloudGenerative design tools8.1 / 10Ultimaker Digital FactorySMB Engineering TeamsWeb, Win, MacCloudSeamless hardware integration10 / 10Markforged EigerHigh-Strength CompositesWeb, Win, MacCloud / On-premAutomated fiber reinforcementN/A3YOURMINDEnterprise Order ManagementWebCloud / HybridAI Part identificationN/AAuthentise aMESData-Driven FactoriesWebCloud / HybridReal-time sensor data trackingN/AAstroPrintSmall Business / MobileWeb, iOS, AndroidCloudSuperior mobile experienceN/AGrabCAD PrintStratasys Users / PrototypingWin, iOS, AndroidCloud / HybridNative CAD file processingN/AOqtonAI-Powered AutomationWebCloudAI-based build optimizationN/A Evaluation & Scoring of 3D Printing Workflow Software
The following scores represent a comparative analysis of each tool against its peers in the 2026 market landscape.
Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted Total3DPrinterOS99889898.65Materialise Magics1069910978.60Autodesk Fusion981099988.85Ultimaker Digital810889998.65Markforged Eiger9971010988.703YOURMIND961099878.15Authentise aMES97999888.30AstroPrint7107687107.70GrabCAD Print898898108.45Oqton1079910978.65 How to Interpret the Scores
Weighted Total: A higher score indicates a more versatile, reliable, and “future-proof” solution for the average buyer. Core (25%): Measures the depth of technical 3D features (slicing, repair, nesting). Value (15%): Considers the feature-to-price ratio; free/low-cost tools for their niche score higher here. Comparison Note: A score of 6 in “Ease of Use” for an industrial tool like 3YOURMIND is not necessarily a failure; it simply reflects the high complexity of the enterprise processes it manages. Which 3D Printing Workflow Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
If you are an individual maker or a freelancer, Ultimaker Cura (with the free Digital Factory tier) or AstroPrint are your best bets. They offer the essential remote monitoring and file management tools without the heavy enterprise price tag.
SMB (Small-to-Medium Business)
For small engineering firms or machine shops, GrabCAD Print (if using Stratasys) or 3DPrinterOS offer the best balance. They allow you to manage a small fleet with minimal IT setup while providing professional-grade file preparation.
Mid-Market
Growing companies with diverse fleets should look at Autodesk Fusion. The integration of design, simulation, and additive management in one package reduces software bloat and streamlines the engineering-to-production pipeline.
Enterprise
Large-scale manufacturers in regulated industries require Materialise Magics/CO-AM or Oqton. These tools offer the deep traceability, AI automation, and security (ITAR/NIST compliance) necessary for mission-critical parts in aerospace or medical sectors.
Budget vs. Premium
Budget: GrabCAD Print and Ultimaker Digital Factory provide massive value for free to users of their respective hardware. Premium: 3YOURMIND and Authentise are high-cost, high-ROI investments designed to optimize million-dollar factories. Feature Depth vs. Ease of Use
If you need absolute control over every laser path or support beam, Materialise Magics is the depth leader. If you need a “push-button” experience for a non-expert team, Markforged Eiger is the gold standard for usability.
Security & Compliance Needs
Organizations handling defense or medical data must prioritize tools with On-prem deployment options (like Eiger Enterprise or Materialise) and verified SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the average cost of 3D printing workflow software?
Pricing varies wildly. Basic fleet management like AstroPrint starts around $10/month. Enterprise MES solutions like 3YOURMIND can cost tens of thousands annually, often tailored to the number of machines or users.
Does workflow software replace a slicer?
Not always. While tools like 3DPrinterOS have built-in slicers, many professional workflows use the software as a management layer that “wraps around” or integrates with high-performance slicers like Cura or Magics.
Can I manage different printer brands in one software?
Yes, tools like 3DPrinterOS, Authentise, and 3YOURMIND are “hardware agnostic” and designed to manage heterogeneous fleets including FDM, SLA, and Metal printers.
Is cloud-based software safe for proprietary designs?
Yes, provided the tool uses AES-256 encryption and has passed SOC 2 audits. For high-security defense work, look for “Air-gapped” or “On-premise” versions of the software.
How long does it take to implement enterprise workflow software?
Cloud-based tools like AstroPrint take minutes. Full MES implementations (e.g., Authentise) can take 3 to 6 months to integrate with your existing ERP and train the staff.
Can these tools help with 3D printing sustainability?
Yes, modern platforms track material waste and energy consumption per print, providing data for ESG reporting and helping optimize nesting to reduce resin or powder waste.
Do I need a dedicated server for this software?
Most modern solutions are cloud-based (SaaS). However, industrial players often offer hybrid or self-hosted options if your company policy prohibits storing IP on external servers.
Can I integrate this with my existing ERP like SAP?
Enterprise-focused tools like 3YOURMIND and Oqton offer robust APIs specifically designed to connect with SAP, Oracle, and other major ERP/PLM systems.
What happens if the internet goes out?
For cloud-only tools, you may lose the ability to start new jobs or monitor prints. Professional tools often include a “local bridge” or “offline mode” to ensure the factory floor keeps running during outages.
Conclusion
The 3D printing landscape in 2026 is no longer just about the hardware; it is about the digital thread that connects design to a finished, high-quality part. Whether you are a small lab looking for the convenience of AstroPrint or a global manufacturer requiring the AI-driven power of Oqton, the right workflow software is the key to unlocking true production scale.

View the full article
reporter

How Top CISOs Solve Burnout and Speed up MTTR without Extra Hiring

Why do SOC teams keep burning out and missing SLAs even after spending big on security tools? Routine triage piles up, senior specialists get dragged into basic validation, and MTTR climbs, while stealthy threats still find room to slip through. Top CISOs have realized the solution isn’t hiring more people or stacking yet another tool onto the workflow, but giving their teams faster, clearerView the full article
Hacker News

Top 10 3D Modeling Tools: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
3D modeling tools are essential for creating digital representations of physical objects in three dimensions. These tools allow designers, engineers, and artists to create detailed models that can be used in everything from product design and animation to simulation and printing. At its core, 3D modeling involves building digital structures that can be visualized and tested for real-world applications. The goal is to generate accurate geometry, materials, and details that will ultimately make the model fit for production or presentation.
3D modeling tools matter because they are crucial in industries ranging from engineering and architecture to entertainment and gaming. As demand for high-quality models increases across different sectors, teams need tools that allow for quick iterations, precise control, and a smooth integration into larger workflows. The right tool can help reduce errors, streamline collaboration, and support innovation with powerful design capabilities.
Real-world use cases include:
Product design and prototyping for manufacturing Architecture and interior design visualization Character and environment modeling for games and animation Simulation models for virtual testing and training 3D printing models for rapid prototyping Medical and scientific modeling for research and education What buyers should evaluate:
Modeling flexibility: polygonal, NURBS, or parametric modeling options Interface usability: ease of learning and efficiency for the team Rendering capabilities: quality of rendered images and animations Performance on large models: speed and reliability with complex scenes Tool extensions: availability of plugins and customizability Collaboration support: version control, sharing, and team workflows Interoperability: compatibility with other CAD, animation, or simulation tools File compatibility: support for common 3D file formats and exporting capabilities Learning resources: access to tutorials, community support, and documentation Security and data handling: controlled access to models and project management Mandatory paragraph
Best for: industrial designers, 3D artists, animators, architects, engineers, product designers, and game developers who need robust 3D modeling capabilities. Not ideal for: those who require basic 2D sketches, quick renderings, or non-technical modeling tasks, as the software in this category tends to focus on precision and complexity. Key Trends in 3D Modeling Tools and Beyond
AI-powered modeling assistance: tools are incorporating AI to speed up tasks like mesh repair, topology optimization, and texture generation. Real-time collaboration: more teams are relying on cloud-based modeling tools that allow designers to work simultaneously on the same project. Virtual Reality (VR) integration: VR is increasingly being used to create and visualize models in a 3D space, offering designers a more immersive way to view their work. Parametric modeling adoption: parametric modeling tools allow for greater flexibility and iteration, especially in engineering and product design. Performance optimization: larger and more complex models are becoming more manageable thanks to faster hardware and improved software optimizations. Simulation-ready modeling: more tools are enabling testing within the modeling environment, allowing for stress testing, motion simulation, and lighting adjustments in real-time. Cross-discipline collaboration: tools that enable collaboration between designers, engineers, and manufacturers are gaining traction to bridge the gap between creative and technical work. Cloud rendering and storage: increased reliance on cloud services for rendering, storage, and even real-time feedback loops is growing among remote and distributed teams. 3D scanning and modeling integration: advancements in 3D scanning technology are being integrated into modeling software, allowing designers to quickly import and modify real-world objects. Customization and automation: custom scripting, plugin ecosystems, and automation for repetitive tasks are increasingly important for optimizing the design process. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
Based on market adoption and widespread use across various design disciplines including engineering, animation, architecture, and 3D printing. Focused on tools that offer flexibility in modeling styles, from polygonal to NURBS to parametric designs. Prioritized feature completeness, including modeling, texturing, rendering, and file export capabilities. Considered performance and reliability signals: handling large-scale models without significant slowdowns or crashes. Examined ecosystem support, including plugins, add-ons, and customization options for extending functionality. Factored in collaboration and version control tools for team-based workflows. Evaluated learning resources, availability of community support, and training content. Security considerations such as data integrity, model storage, and access control were taken into account when applicable. Top 10 3D Modeling Tools
#1 — Blender
Short description: A fully-featured, open-source 3D modeling tool that excels in modeling, sculpting, animation, rendering, and even video editing. Best for those looking for an all-in-one tool with a growing community and feature set.
Key Features
Powerful polygonal modeling and sculpting tools Advanced texturing and shading workflows with procedural and node-based systems Animation and rigging tools for character work Integrated rendering engines (Cycles and Eevee) for quick previews and high-quality results Simulation tools for fluid, cloth, and smoke effects Python scripting support for automation and customization Strong community-driven plugin ecosystem Pros
Completely free and open-source with no hidden costs Highly versatile for almost every aspect of 3D creation Active community and frequent updates Cons
Steep learning curve for beginners Large scenes and complex rigs can slow down performance Less specialized support compared to paid software Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Blender is integrated into various pipelines through its file import/export capabilities and Python API. It is compatible with many rendering engines and asset managers.
Plugin ecosystem for additional features and file compatibility API for pipeline automation and tool creation Works well in small to medium-sized production teams with proper standards Support & Community
Large and growing community with extensive resources, including tutorials, forums, and third-party plugins.
#2 — Autodesk Maya
Short description: One of the most recognized 3D modeling and animation tools, often used for character animation and high-end VFX work. Best for large-scale professional studios and animation teams.
Key Features
Advanced polygonal modeling tools and retopology Rigging system with advanced skinning and deformation control Complex animation tools for keyframing, motion graphics, and character animation Integration with VFX tools for particle systems and simulations High-end rendering options (Arnold, V-Ray, etc.) Custom scripting for automation and production needs Seamless integration with other Autodesk products like 3ds Max Pros
Extremely robust for character and animation workflows Industry standard in film, TV, and game production Extensive support for high-end rendering and VFX Cons
Expensive licensing, which can be prohibitive for smaller teams Steep learning curve for newcomers Performance can degrade with large scenes or insufficient hardware Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Maya integrates seamlessly into large production pipelines, particularly in the film and game industries. It supports a range of plugins and industry-standard formats.
Scripting and plug-ins to extend functionality Commonly used in conjunction with other Autodesk products for comprehensive workflows Robust pipeline management and integration tools for VFX and animation Support & Community
Extensive support options with Autodesk’s customer service. Large user community and numerous tutorials and training resources available.
#3 — Autodesk 3ds Max
Short description: A 3D modeling tool widely used for architectural visualization, game design, and product modeling. Known for its intuitive interface and fast scene building capabilities.
Key Features
Polygonal and spline modeling tools for rapid scene building Real-time rendering with support for high-quality output Procedural workflow tools for texturing and animation Strong support for architectural and product design workflows Rich material editor and shader tools Extensive library of pre-built assets and textures Strong support for rendering engines like V-Ray and Arnold Pros
Ideal for architectural visualization and product design Faster iteration for scenes with large asset libraries Strong support for rendering and post-production Cons
Lacks the in-depth animation tools of Maya Limited support for high-end character modeling and rigging Can become resource-heavy with complex scenes Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
3ds Max works well with architectural, product, and visualization workflows, and is often used in conjunction with rendering engines and visualization tools.
Commonly integrates with rendering and simulation engines Supports plugins for specialized workflows (animation, VFX, rendering) Compatible with a wide range of file formats Support & Community
Strong professional user base, particularly in architectural and game design. Extensive documentation and training content available.
#4 — Cinema 4D
Short description: A versatile 3D tool popular for motion graphics, product animations, and design-focused projects. It’s often used in creative industries for its ease of use and rapid iteration.
Key Features
Fast, efficient polygonal modeling and sculpting tools Powerful motion graphics capabilities with timeline-based animation Advanced rendering with both CPU and GPU-based engines Strong integration with Adobe After Effects for post-production Node-based material and texture creation for procedural workflows Extensive library of presets and templates for quick results Pros
Fast and efficient for motion graphics and product animations User-friendly interface that’s easy to learn Great integration with design and post-production software Cons
Not as feature-rich for traditional character modeling Lacks some of the more advanced rigging tools needed for complex character animation Best suited for design and graphics, rather than engineering Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Cinema 4D integrates easily with creative toolchains, especially in the motion graphics and post-production spaces.
Integrates well with Adobe After Effects and other design tools Common plugins and add-ons for rendering and animation Strong ecosystem of motion graphics templates and assets Support & Community
Large community with a focus on creative industries. Numerous tutorials, templates, and community resources available.
#5 — ZBrush
Short description: ZBrush is a 3D sculpting software known for its advanced modeling and detailing tools, used primarily for character and creature design in games, movies, and VFX.
Key Features
Advanced digital sculpting tools for organic shapes Powerful brushes and textures for detailed models High-resolution mesh support for detailed designs Polygroups and subdivision controls for complex modeling Integration with other animation and rendering software Supports retopology for creating production-ready meshes Offers hybrid sculpting and painting workflows Pros
Best for detailed, high-resolution sculpting and organic modeling Used in top-tier movie studios and game development Ideal for character and creature creation Cons
Not designed for full CAD or engineering workflows Can be complex for beginners to learn Limited rigging and animation features Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
ZBrush works alongside traditional animation and VFX tools, often feeding into other programs for rigging and animation.
Integrates with Maya, 3ds Max, and other animation tools Supports exporting models in common 3D formats Commonly used in conjunction with rendering engines like V-Ray Support & Community
Large user base, with many tutorials and resources from professional artists and hobbyists alike.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid)Standout FeaturePublic RatingBlenderAll-in-one 3D modeling and animationWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedOpen-source, highly versatileN/AAutodesk MayaCharacter animation and riggingWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedRigging and animation polishN/AAutodesk 3ds MaxVisualization-centric modelingWindowsSelf-hostedFast scene assemblyN/ACinema 4DMotion graphics and product animationWindows / macOSSelf-hostedQuick motion graphics iterationN/AZBrushDigital sculpting for charactersWindows / macOSSelf-hostedAdvanced detailing and sculptingN/A Evaluation & Scoring of 3D Modeling Tools
The scoring is based on common buyer needs for various 3D modeling tasks. Each tool is evaluated for:
Core features (25%): modeling tools, rendering, animation, and more Ease of use (15%): how easy it is to learn and use the tool Integrations & ecosystem (15%): compatibility with other tools and pipelines Security & compliance (10%): data handling and file security Performance & reliability (10%): handling large models and complex scenes Support & community (10%): available resources and help Price / value (15%): cost relative to features and capabilities Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted Total (0–10)Blender9.57.58.06.07.59.510.08.43Autodesk Maya9.66.59.06.38.28.75.57.93Autodesk 3ds Max8.07.07.56.07.87.56.07.30Cinema 4D7.88.07.56.07.57.86.27.38ZBrush9.56.58.06.08.07.56.57.60 Which 3D Modeling Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
You need a fast, versatile tool with a strong community.
Choose Blender for an all-in-one solution with full capability at no cost. Choose Cinema 4D for motion-centric visuals and quick scene assembly. Choose ZBrush if your focus is on detailed sculpting, especially characters. SMB
Small teams need predictable output and collaboration tools.
Choose Blender for flexibility and community resources. Choose Autodesk Maya for character-heavy production. Choose Cinema 4D for creative product and motion animation. Mid-Market
Mid-market teams typically use more specialized software with clear integration across departments.
Use Autodesk Maya for animation-heavy workflows. Add Cinema 4D for fast iteration and product animation. Use Blender for flexibility and full control. Enterprise
Enterprise teams need scalability and strong governance.
Use Autodesk Maya for complex character workflows and pipeline control. Use ZBrush for high-end sculpting needs in large-scale production. Add Autodesk 3ds Max if scene assembly and visualization are central. Budget vs Premium
If budget is a concern, prioritize Blender for its free and open-source nature. If premium investment is possible, focus on tools like Maya for high-end workflows and industry compatibility. Feature Depth vs Ease of Use
Autodesk Maya and ZBrush are best for depth and control. Cinema 4D is best for ease of use with motion-heavy projects. Integrations & Scalability
If assets move across departments, make sure your tool integrates well with the rest of the pipeline. For scaling teams, ensure the tool supports automated versioning, consistent file naming, and stable exports. Security & Compliance Needs
Most 3D tools do not openly provide security certifications, but it’s crucial to manage assets with version control, access restrictions, and secure sharing processes.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Which 3D modeling software is best for beginners?
Blender is a great starting point due to its flexibility and abundant learning resources. Cinema 4D is also a good choice for creative-focused teams due to its easy interface.
Do I need a powerful GPU for 3D modeling?
A strong GPU improves performance in rendering and viewport preview. For large-scale models, CPU and RAM are also critical factors.
Can one tool handle both modeling and animation?
Some tools, like Blender and Autodesk Maya, can handle both, but more complex pipelines may require specialized tools for different stages (e.g., ZBrush for sculpting).
How do I improve collaboration in 3D modeling?
Using cloud-based tools or ensuring consistent file export standards and versioning systems helps reduce collaboration issues across teams.
What is the biggest challenge in 3D modeling?
Ensuring that files are easily sharable and that there’s a smooth handoff between design and final output, especially in collaborative settings.
Can I switch between different 3D tools?
Switching tools can be challenging but possible, especially if your workflow supports standard file formats and your team has the skills to adapt to new software.
How do I optimize 3D models for performance?
Focus on low-poly modeling where possible, use instances for repeating objects, and keep your textures optimized. Avoid high-poly meshes unless absolutely necessary.
Are there any free 3D modeling tools?
Blender is a powerful free tool that offers nearly everything you need for 3D modeling, rendering, and animation.
What should I test in
a pilot before committing to a 3D modeling tool?
Test export/import workflows, scene handling for large models, performance under load, and team collaboration processes before fully committing.
How do I reduce rework in 3D modeling?
Establish modeling standards early, use templates, enforce clean topology, and ensure proper naming conventions for efficient asset management.
Conclusion
Choosing the right 3D modeling software depends on your team’s specific needs, budget, and the complexity of your projects. Blender offers broad capability and flexibility for no cost, making it ideal for solo artists or small teams. Autodesk Maya and ZBrush stand out for high-end animation and sculpting, while Cinema 4D excels in creative motion graphics work. By evaluating these tools through the lens of your workflow needs, team size, and future scalability, you can make a more informed decision for your next project.
View the full article
reporter

Never settle: How CISOs can go beyond compliance standards to better protect their organizations

The start of a new year means a fresh start for everyone, including cybersecurity teams. With budgets and plans now finalized, it’s time for CISOs and their teams to execute their strategies. But that doesn’t mean that innovation stops when the plan is finalized.
In 2026, CISOs should focus on going beyond cybersecurity compliance standards to keep their organizations resilient to emerging threats. Historically, these standards, such as HIPAA, SOC2, ISO 27001 and others, have set the baseline for security procedures and controls. Done correctly, these can be valuable tools for CISOs to justify investments. But they’re a double-edged sword: Companies that rely solely on compliance can miss important and emerging risks.
Here’s how CISOs can leave the compliance checklist mentality in 2025, where it belongs.
Compliance standards: Necessary, not sufficient
Compliance standards have historically served as the baseline for most cybersecurity programs and are often well-intentioned. PCI-DSS emerged from a consortium of payment processors who had implemented duplicative and inconsistent controls, complicating network integration and increasing costs. HIPAA’s privacy and security rules evolved in response to concerns over privacy and the digitization of electronic medical records.
These standards give a baseline of controls to keep them protected. However, these standards typically cover well-known threats and may not keep pace with current architectures or threats. They can also be subject to different interpretations. For example, most compliance standards have vague requirements for active monitoring of a company’s vendors. A CISO running a compliant program may only review a vendor once a year or after significant system changes. Compliance standards haven’t caught up to the best practice of continuously monitoring vendors to stay on top of third-party risk.
This highlights one of the most unfortunate incentives any CISO who manages a compliance program knows: It is often easier to set a less stringent standard and exceed it than to set a better target and risk missing it. The latter leads to audit findings and sometimes political ill will. But what does the former lead to?
It leads to complacency and systemic under-resourcing of security programs. Right or wrong, CISOs justify 78% of their budget needs using compliance, according to a 2025 Hitch Partners survey. This number is the backbone, and may be even higher in highly regulated industries with more prescriptive compliance standards. But if this approximate 80% is interpreted as 100% of your program’s needs, you will fall short of what’s required to run a forward-looking security program.
This is where you, as a CISO, are most crucial to your security team’s mission. And luckily, many compliance standards give you some levers you can use to your advantage.
The new North Star for CISOs: Accounting for emerging risk
We’ve established that it’s no longer good enough to overfit into a compliance standard, but you can still use compliance to your advantage.
Most compliance programs mandate an information security risk assessment and, at a larger company, you may already have a dedicated enterprise risk management function. As a CISO, you influence the scope of that information security risk assessment, the methodology and, perhaps most importantly, the time horizon. Three key strategies you should consider:
Extend the time horizon
Ideally, you want to be considering scenarios as far as 3–5 years down the road so you can get ahead of them. We’re already seeing evolving threats from AI, more breaches stemming from vulnerable third-party vendors and the risk of harvest-now-decrypt-later threats from quantum computing within the decade. None of the controls for these risk scenarios can be turned on overnight, so preparing for them and other emerging risks is paramount.
Use risk- or scenario-based methodologies wherever possible
What is the situation you are attempting to prevent? Compliance based on assets or controls is where the checkbox label comes from. This may be important at the outset of a security program to ensure you have proper coverage, but you will confront the previously mentioned 80% mentality. \
With scenarios, you start with a broader view of the risk and map associated controls. You can also define custom risk scenarios, which allow you to formally introduce requirements beyond existing compliance routines. They can also be more specific than you may find in control statements or standard scenarios.
Quantify the loss
One of the most common shortfalls of compliance-driven risk assessments is simplistic math around likelihood and impact. Many of the emergent risks mentioned above have a lower likelihood but an extremely high impact and even a fair amount of uncertainty around timeframes. Using this simplistic math, these tail risks do not often bubble up organically; instead, they have to be pulled up from the batch of lower frequency-x-impact scoring. Defining that impact in dollars and cents cuts through the noise. $250k versus $18M might both rate a “5” for impact in the traditional sense, but one is clearly more impactful than the other.
Practically, these can be difficult if your program is newer and they are highly dependent on both your security organization’s stature and risk culture. Just remember that even if you succeed in starting the discussion on these items, you are building awareness and setting the stage for future investments.
How to get buy-in from the board
The financial leaders who approve a CISO’s cybersecurity plan live in the area of risk. Every day, they make calculated bets on what will pay off for the business. The board will want to know what compliance standards you aren’t accounting for and the likelihood and impact in financial terms.
CISOs can assure them that a clean audit that checks all of the compliance boxes may be safe enough to show prospective clients, but resting there sets a standard of “good enough that doesn’t account for risks that may not be a part of the compliance standard for 2–3 more years. While these might sound like extras to the board, quantifying risk, comparing to competitors and calculating cost-optimal controls are key. For example, an awareness campaign, approval process or training module might be cheaper than adding additional software or point solutions around generative AI security and bring risk down to an acceptable level.
If your budget has already been approved without these focus areas in mind, now is the time to start weaving a risk-first approach into discussions with your board. You should be talking about this year-round, not only during budget season when it’s time to present your plan. It will position security as a way to protect revenue, improve capital efficiency, preserve treasury integrity and optimize costs, rather than a cost center.
The beginning of the year is a great time for CISOs to start shifting their organization’s mindset on cybersecurity risk. Take a risk-first approach that goes beyond compliance standards and focuses on becoming resilient to emerging threats.

This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?
View the full article
CSOonline

Bloody Wolf Targets Uzbekistan, Russia Using NetSupport RAT in Spear-Phishing Campaign

The threat actor known as Bloody Wolf has been linked to a campaign targeting Uzbekistan and Russia to infect systems with a remote access trojan known as NetSupport RAT. Cybersecurity vendor Kaspersky is tracking the activity under the moniker Stan Ghouls. The threat actor is known to be active since at least 2023, orchestrating spear-phishing attacks against manufacturing, finance, and ITView the full article
Hacker News

Top 10 3D Animation Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
3D animation software helps you create moving 3D content—characters that perform, products that assemble, environments that feel alive, and camera shots that communicate a story clearly. In practical terms, it’s where you take 3D objects and make them move with intent: you pose, keyframe, refine motion curves, control timing, and build believable transitions. Depending on the tool, you can also rig characters, simulate cloth and hair, generate particles, and render the final output for film-quality visuals or real-time playback.
This category matters because 3D animation is no longer limited to big studios. Teams across games, advertising, product marketing, architecture, education, and training rely on animation to explain complex ideas faster. At the same time, production expectations are tougher: faster turnaround, more revisions, higher visual quality, and smoother collaboration. Buyers now look for tools that reduce rework—especially around rig stability, motion cleanup, scene performance, and predictable export pipelines.
Real-world use cases include:
Character animation for film, episodic content, and brand storytelling Game cinematics, trailers, and in-engine sequences Product animations for demos, onboarding, and interactive explainers Architectural walkthroughs and environment flythroughs Training simulations for safety, medical, and industrial scenarios What buyers should evaluate:
Character workflow depth: rigs, constraints, deformation quality Animation editing tools: curves, layers, non-linear editing, retargeting Preview speed: viewport performance, playblast workflows, caching options Simulation needs: cloth, hair, particles, fluids, destruction Rendering approach: offline quality vs real-time iteration Pipeline fit: file exchange reliability, naming rules, version control habits Extensibility: plugins, scripting, automation for repeat tasks Review workflow: approvals, shot iteration, feedback capture habits Team readiness: training curve and hiring availability Security expectations: safe plugin use, controlled access, governed storage Mandatory paragraph
Best for: animators, 3D artists, technical artists, VFX teams, game studios, creative agencies, product marketing teams, and training/simulation teams that need repeatable animation pipelines. Not ideal for: teams that only need simple motion graphics, basic video edits, or light 2D animation; those workflows are usually faster in dedicated video and motion tools. Key Trends in 3D Animation Software and Beyond
Faster character setup: more reliance on reusable rigs, auto-rigging helpers, and consistent retargeting so teams can animate sooner. Real-time preview becoming normal: teams want to see lighting and camera intent early, not only at final render. Procedural workflows expanding: node-based systems increasingly support motion systems, environments, and effects, not just heavy simulations. More emphasis on motion cleanup speed: better curve tools, layered editing, and assisted workflows reduce time spent polishing. Pipeline discipline matters more: stable naming, caching, versioning, and exports are a bigger differentiator than “more features.” Interoperability pressure: fewer broken rigs and fewer shading surprises on import/export are now core buying requirements. Simulation becoming more art-directable: teams want cloth and hair that can be controlled creatively, not only physically “correct.” Collaboration expectations rising: shot review loops, approvals, and consistent handoffs matter as teams become more distributed. Automation as a standard practice: batch exports, validation scripts, and publishing tools reduce human error and save time. Governance expectations increasing: controlled plugin lists and safer asset sharing practices are becoming normal in professional teams. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
Chosen based on broad recognition across film, VFX, games, visualization, and training workflows. Balanced the list across generalist DCC suites, specialized animation tools, and real-time engines used in modern pipelines. Prioritized animation capability and rigging depth, not only modeling popularity. Considered workflow practicality: blocking, polish, caching, simulation control, and review iteration speed. Considered pipeline fit, including scripting, extensibility, and predictable interchange patterns. Considered typical performance signals, especially on complex rigs and heavy scenes. Included tools that serve different segments: solo creators, SMB teams, mid-market studios, and enterprise pipelines. Considered ecosystem strength: plugins, learning content, community support, and hiring availability. Top 10 3D Animation Software Tools
#1 — Blender
Short description: A flexible all-in-one 3D suite used for modeling, rigging, animation, simulation, and rendering. Strong choice for creators and teams that want broad capability with deep customization.
Key Features
Full animation toolkit with timeline, dope sheet, graph editor, and non-linear editing Rigging with constraints, drivers, custom controls, and deformation workflows Strong character workflow for blocking, refining, and polishing motion Simulation tools for common needs such as cloth and particles Caching and scene organization options for smoother playback Large add-on ecosystem for pipeline utilities and specialized workflows Scripting support for automation, exports, and validation checks Pros
Excellent value for broad 3D and animation work Highly customizable for different production styles Massive learning ecosystem and community resources Cons
Large-team collaboration typically needs extra pipeline tooling Some advanced workflows rely on add-ons and team conventions Results depend heavily on standards, templates, and file discipline Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Blender works well in multi-tool environments when you enforce consistent scale, naming, and export rules. It is often used upstream for asset creation and downstream for rendering or interchange.
Add-ons for rigging helpers, pipeline tools, and export automation Python scripting for batch tasks, publishing, and checks Common interchange workflows supported through disciplined standards Strong community tooling for niche production needs Support & Community
Very strong community and documentation. Professional support varies by vendor and service provider.
#2 — Autodesk Maya
Short description: A widely adopted tool for character animation and rigging in many professional pipelines. Best for teams that need deep rig control and precise motion polish.
Key Features
Advanced rigging workflows with constraints and deformation systems Strong curve editing tools for high-quality animation polish Animation layers and non-linear workflows for complex shot iteration Scene referencing patterns commonly used in production pipelines Scripting and tool-building support for internal workflow automation Large ecosystem for renderers, rig tools, and pipeline utilities Reliable character animation workflow from blocking to final refinement Pros
Excellent for complex character work and motion polish Mature studio pipeline fit with strong hiring availability Broad ecosystem and established production practices Cons
Steep learning curve for new users Tooling and productivity depend on rig standards and discipline Total cost depends on licensing and pipeline needs Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Maya often acts as the character and animation hub, feeding downstream rendering, compositing, and real-time engines through controlled exports.
Scripting for automation, publishing, and asset checks Plugin ecosystem for rigging, animation utilities, and pipeline tooling Motion capture workflows supported through pipeline practices Interchange stability depends on studio standards and conventions Support & Community
Large professional community, extensive training resources, and established support options depending on licensing.
#3 — Autodesk 3ds Max
Short description: A popular tool for visualization-heavy workflows where scene building, assets, and rendering are central. Often used for object animation, camera work, and design-led storytelling.
Key Features
Strong scene building and asset management patterns for visualization Object and camera animation tools for motion-centric sequences Mature scripting for automation and repeatable export workflows Large plugin ecosystem supporting visualization pipelines Look development workflows depending on rendering choices Effective workflows for archviz-style animations and presentations Useful for teams working with large visualization scenes Pros
Efficient for visualization-centric production and scene assembly Strong ecosystem for rendering and workflow extensions Well known in design and visualization industries Cons
Not always the first choice for character-heavy pipelines Workflow quality can depend on plugins and renderer selection Total cost can vary with required add-ons Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
3ds Max is commonly used in visualization-to-post workflows. It performs best when teams standardize materials, naming, and export presets.
Plugins for rendering, materials, and pipeline utilities Scripting to automate exports, scene checks, and repetitive tasks Interchange workflows supported through consistent standards Often paired with compositing and post-production pipelines Support & Community
Strong community in visualization segments. Support tiers vary by licensing.
#4 — Cinema 4D
Short description: A creator-friendly tool widely used for motion graphics, product animation, and design-led 3D visuals. Known for fast iteration and approachable workflows.
Key Features
Smooth animation workflow with strong timeline and keyframe tools Procedural-style systems for repeating patterns and setups Fast scene assembly for motion and product-focused storytelling Character tools suitable for many common animation needs Rendering workflows depending on chosen rendering approach Plugin ecosystem for workflow extensions and pipeline utilities Strong fit for teams blending 3D with design and post-production Pros
Approachable for creative teams and designers Fast iteration for motion and product visuals Practical daily usability for production workflows Cons
Advanced character pipelines can require careful setup Heavy simulation needs may require complementary tools Licensing costs may not fit every small team Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Cinema 4D is commonly used in pipelines that blend 3D visuals with editing and compositing. It works best with consistent scene organization and export standards.
Plugins for rendering, workflow acceleration, and utilities Interchange workflows depend on pipeline standards Extensibility varies by plugin choices and team needs Strong fit for design-to-post workflows Support & Community
Strong creator community and training availability. Support depends on licensing.
#5 — Houdini
Short description: A node-based procedural tool used for effects, simulations, and technical animation systems. Best for teams that want reusable setups and scalable workflows.
Key Features
Procedural node-based workflows designed for reuse Advanced simulation capabilities for effects-heavy production Technical animation tools for rule-driven motion systems Scales well for complex scenes, caches, and heavy computation Supports building internal tools and standardized libraries Strong for destruction, particles, smoke, and fluids Great for multi-shot consistency through procedural reuse Pros
Outstanding for simulation and procedural effects pipelines Reusable setups can save major time across many shots Powerful for technical teams and scalable production Cons
Steep learning curve for non-technical artists Overkill for simple character-only needs Best outcomes require strong conventions and planning Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Houdini often serves as the effects and procedural stage, producing caches and assets that move downstream into other tools.
Export workflows for caches and generated assets Strong pipeline utility through procedural libraries Interchange depends on production standards Commonly used as a specialized stage rather than a single-suite solution Support & Community
Strong professional community and deep learning content. Support depends on licensing.
#6 — Unreal Engine
Short description: A real-time engine used for cinematics, previs, and interactive experiences. Best when fast iteration, real-time lighting, and quick shot assembly matter.
Key Features
Real-time rendering for quick iteration and previews Sequencing tools for shots, cameras, and timing Real-time lighting and camera workflows for rapid look validation Performance tools for stable playback and optimization Large asset ecosystem and extensibility options Strong fit for previs and rapid review loops Useful for final delivery when content must run in real time Pros
Very fast iteration with real-time preview Strong for cinematic assembly and camera-driven workflows Useful when the final output is interactive or real time Cons
Not a replacement for deep rigging and modeling tools Pipeline setup can be complex for production teams Output quality depends on optimization and standards Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Unreal typically consumes assets from DCC tools and becomes a real-time stage for iteration, review, and delivery.
Plugin ecosystem for extensions and production utilities Import pipelines depend on clean standards and asset discipline Often used with version control and build workflows when configured Best used with consistent naming, scale, and skeleton rules Support & Community
Very large community and extensive learning resources. Support options vary.
#7 — Unity
Short description: A real-time engine used for interactive delivery, training simulations, and runtime animation systems. Best when animation must ship inside an application.
Key Features
Runtime animation systems for interactive character control Timeline and sequencing workflows for cutscenes and assembly Multi-platform delivery patterns depending on project needs Strong fit for training, simulation, and XR workflows Large ecosystem of packages and extensibility options Developer-friendly environment for scaling interactive projects Useful when interactivity and animation are tightly connected Pros
Strong for interactive simulation and product-driven animation Large ecosystem and extensibility for developers Good fit for cross-platform delivery strategies Cons
Not a replacement for DCC creation tools Production pipelines require engineering discipline Workflow speed depends on setup quality and team skill Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Unity usually sits downstream in a pipeline, consuming assets and enabling runtime animation, logic, and deployment.
Package ecosystem for runtime features and tools Asset import depends on pipeline standards Works well with version control when configured properly Strong developer community and add-on ecosystem Support & Community
Large global community and many training paths. Support tiers vary.
#8 — Reallusion iClone
Short description: A character animation tool designed for speed, quick previs, and motion editing. Useful when you want character output quickly without heavy technical overhead.
Key Features
Timeline-based character animation optimized for fast iteration Motion editing workflows and reusable motion libraries Facial animation and lip-sync workflows for character performance Real-time style preview for quicker decision-making Tools designed to reduce setup time for common tasks Export workflows to other tools and engines through defined standards Useful for prototyping and short-cycle content production Pros
Fast character animation and previs productivity Approachable for teams that prioritize speed Helpful for prototyping and content iteration Cons
Not a full replacement for advanced studio rigging pipelines Export planning is critical in multi-tool workflows Deep customization may be limited compared to full DCC suites Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
iClone is often used as a motion creation stage that feeds into other tools for final assembly, rendering, or delivery.
Motion libraries and character content ecosystem Motion capture workflows depend on your hardware and setup Export pipelines depend on skeleton and naming discipline Plugin and content ecosystem varies by workflow needs Support & Community
Active creator community and learning resources. Support tiers vary.
#9 — Autodesk MotionBuilder
Short description: A specialized tool for motion capture editing, cleanup, and retargeting. Best for pipelines where mocap is a frequent input and needs consistent processing.
Key Features
Motion capture cleanup for stable, usable motion data Retargeting tools for mapping motion across rigs Layer-based motion editing for corrections and enhancements Real-time playback focus for quick evaluation Useful as a dedicated pipeline stage for motion processing Helps reduce mocap rework when standards are consistent Best results with stable skeleton and naming rules Pros
Efficient mocap cleanup and retargeting workflows Useful bridge stage between capture and final animation Strong fit when mocap is frequent and standardized Cons
Not an all-in-one creation tool Value depends on how much mocap the team uses Requires clean rig standards to avoid retargeting issues Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
MotionBuilder typically sits between capture systems and the main animation tool, producing cleaned motion for further refinement.
Interchange depends on pipeline standards Often paired with character animation suites for final shot work Integration depth depends on internal tooling and conventions Best used with stable skeleton standards Support & Community
Specialized professional community. Support depends on licensing.
#10 — Cascadeur
Short description: A character animation tool focused on physically believable action using assisted workflows. Often used to improve motion quality and reduce manual cleanup in action sequences.
Key Features
Assisted workflows for believable body mechanics and action motion Tools that help refine balance, arcs, and dynamic transitions Faster blocking for action poses and timing Useful as a refinement stage in a broader pipeline Motion editing designed to reduce manual curve cleanup Strong fit for jumps, falls, and physically driven action Import/export motion workflows based on clean standards Pros
Helps create realistic action movement faster Useful companion stage for blocking and cleanup Strong fit for action-heavy sequences Cons
Not a full production suite across all 3D stages Works best with consistent rig standards and exports Fit depends on animation style and pipeline discipline Platforms / Deployment
Not publicly stated
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Cascadeur is most effective as a focused stage for motion refinement, feeding improved motion back into a larger pipeline.
Complements DCC tools and real-time engines as a motion stage Interchange depends on skeleton, scale, and naming discipline Best used with consistent export presets Ecosystem depth varies by workflow needs Support & Community
Growing community and learning resources. Support tiers vary.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid)Standout FeaturePublic RatingBlenderEnd-to-end 3D creation and animationWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedBroad suite plus deep customizationN/AAutodesk MayaCharacter animation and riggingWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedDeep motion polish and rig controlN/AAutodesk 3ds MaxVisualization-centric animationWindowsSelf-hostedScene assembly with extensibilityN/ACinema 4DMotion graphics and product visualsWindows / macOSSelf-hostedFast iteration for creative teamsN/AHoudiniSimulations and procedural effectsWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedNode-based procedural systemsN/AUnreal EngineReal-time cinematics and previsWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedReal-time iteration and sequencingN/AUnityInteractive animation and simulationsWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedRuntime animation inside applicationsN/AReallusion iCloneFast character animation and previsWindowsSelf-hostedSpeed-first character workflowN/AAutodesk MotionBuilderMocap cleanup and retargetingWindows / macOSSelf-hostedEfficient retargeting workflowsN/ACascadeurAssisted action animation refinementNot publicly statedSelf-hostedPhysics-aware motion refinementN/A Evaluation & Scoring of 3D Animation Software
The scoring below is a comparative model intended to help shortlisting. Each criterion is scored from 1–10, then a weighted total from 0–10 is calculated using the weights listed. These are analyst estimates based on typical workflow fit and common buyer priorities, not public ratings.
Weights:
Core features – 25% Ease of use – 15% Integrations & ecosystem – 15% Security & compliance – 10% Performance & reliability – 10% Support & community – 10% Price / value – 15% Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted Total (0–10)Blender9.07.68.26.27.69.510.08.43Autodesk Maya9.66.59.26.38.28.75.67.96Autodesk 3ds Max8.07.18.16.07.67.75.77.20Cinema 4D7.88.67.66.07.47.86.27.41Houdini9.35.88.76.08.77.85.67.61Unreal Engine8.46.98.86.09.19.29.08.24Unity7.97.29.06.08.58.87.67.88Reallusion iClone6.98.36.95.67.17.37.27.05Autodesk MotionBuilder6.96.67.35.68.16.85.66.67Cascadeur6.67.66.65.27.26.87.06.62 How to interpret the scores:
Use the weighted total to shortlist tools, then validate with a pilot project. A lower score can reflect specialization, not weakness. Security and compliance scores reflect governance fit because certifications are often not publicly stated. Actual results vary based on scene complexity, rig quality, hardware, and pipeline standards. Which 3D Animation Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
If you work alone, you want broad capability, fast learning, and minimal tool switching.
Choose Blender for an end-to-end workflow and strong community learning. Choose Cinema 4D if your work is design-led and motion-heavy with fast delivery cycles. Add Cascadeur if your content is action-focused and you want help making movement feel grounded and believable. SMB
Small teams need repeatable output, predictable exports, and quick iteration.
Choose Blender for flexibility and value across multiple content types. Choose Autodesk Maya if character animation quality and rig control are the main deliverables. Choose Cinema 4D for motion graphics-heavy pipelines and product visuals. Add Unreal Engine when real-time preview and quick reviews reduce approval cycles. Mid-Market
Mid-market teams typically run multi-tool pipelines with clear division of responsibilities.
Use Autodesk Maya as the character animation hub for consistent rig and polish workflows. Add Houdini when procedural effects and simulations are a regular part of output. Use Unreal Engine for previs, shot assembly, and faster iteration on cameras and lighting. Use Unity when the final output must run as an interactive training or simulation application. Enterprise
Enterprise teams prioritize standardization, scalability, and governance.
Use Autodesk Maya + Houdini for character plus effects pipelines with repeatable standards. Use Unreal Engine as a real-time stage for rapid iteration when it fits the production style. Add Autodesk MotionBuilder if motion capture is a frequent input and needs consistent cleanup and retargeting. Budget vs Premium
Budget-focused teams often benefit from tools that reduce tool switching and cover more stages in one place, especially during early growth. Premium investment typically pays off when character complexity, volume of shots, or simulation-heavy output increases production risk. Feature Depth vs Ease of Use
Maximum technical depth: Houdini, Autodesk Maya Faster onboarding and creative iteration: Cinema 4D, Reallusion iClone Balanced end-to-end coverage: Blender Integrations & Scalability
If assets move across many departments, build consistent standards early: naming rules, skeleton conventions, export presets, and cache policies. If you deliver in real time, treat engines as downstream delivery tools and keep creation upstream in DCC suites. As team size grows, pipeline automation and review workflow often matter more than one extra feature. Security & Compliance Needs
Most 3D tools are installed locally and formal compliance claims are often not publicly stated in a SaaS-style checklist format.
Treat security as a pipeline practice: controlled access, approved plugins, governed storage, and clear release rules. Maintain consistent project structures to reduce accidental leakage or asset confusion. Document who can publish, who can approve, and where final outputs are stored. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Which 3D animation software is best for beginners?
Blender is a common starting point because it covers many workflows and has extensive learning resources. Cinema 4D can feel approachable for design-led teams.
Do I need a strong GPU for 3D animation work?
A good GPU helps viewport speed and real-time engines. For simulations and heavy scenes, CPU, RAM, and fast storage are equally important.
What is the difference between a DCC tool and a real-time engine?
A DCC tool is where you create and refine animation with deep controls. A real-time engine is often used for fast preview, shot assembly, and interactive delivery.
Can one tool handle a full production pipeline?
Sometimes, but many teams use multiple tools for best results. A single-tool approach can work for smaller pipelines if the tool covers your main needs.
How important is rig quality in production?
Rig quality is critical. A weak rig creates broken deformations, slow animation, and rework. Good rig standards save time across every shot.
Is motion capture required for professional character animation?
No. Motion capture helps with realism and speed, but hand-keyed animation is still essential for style, clarity, and precise performance.
What is the biggest mistake teams make when choosing animation software?
Skipping a pilot project. A short test with real assets reveals export issues, performance limits, and workflow friction quickly.
How do teams reduce time spent polishing curves?
They use clean rigs, good blocking practices, layered workflows, and consistent timing standards. They also build repeatable cleanup practices for common motion issues.
What should I test in an animation software pilot?
Test one short shot end-to-end: blocking, polish, any simulation needs, preview workflow, export pipeline, and review loop. Track rework time and iteration speed.
Can I switch tools later if my team grows?
Yes, but switching costs come from retraining and pipeline changes. A phased transition is usually safer than changing everything at once.
What helps most when scaling a studio pipeline?
Consistent naming, stable skeleton conventions, automated checks, and a reliable publishing workflow. These reduce human error more than any single feature.
Conclusion
The “best” 3D animation software depends on your output type, team size, pipeline maturity, and how fast you need to iterate. Blender is a strong end-to-end option for broad capability and flexibility. Maya is a proven backbone for character-heavy pipelines where motion polish matters. Houdini stands out for procedural effects and simulations. Unreal Engine and Unity become essential when real-time preview or interactive delivery is part of the workflow. Specialized tools like iClone, MotionBuilder, and Cascadeur can add real value when used for the right stage in a pipeline.
View the full article
reporter

Schrödinger’s cat and the enterprise security paradox

Most security leaders quietly live with a paradox they rarely name out loud. Until you truly look inside the box of your environment, your organization is both secure and compromised. The dashboards might be green and the audit reports reassuring, but the uncomfortable reality is that you do not know your actual state until you observe it directly and often.
Meeting the cat — a paradox with teeth
Many readers will have heard of Schrödinger’s cat in passing, but the details blur over time, so it is worth revisiting what the analogy means before applying it to security. It is a thought experiment in quantum physics that illustrates how strange the rules of the microscopic world seem when applied to everyday objects, such as a cat in a box.
In the classic setup, a cat is placed in a sealed box with three components: a tiny radioactive source, a detector that can sense whether an atom decays and a vial of poison that will be released if the detector triggers. As long as the box stays closed, quantum mechanics describes the radioactive atom as being in the superposition of both decayed and not decayed at the same time.
From the outside, the cat appears to be both alive and dead until someone opens the box and checks. The instant an observer looks, the uncertainty collapses into a single outcome: alive or dead, but not both. Schrödinger proposed this not because he believed in half-dead cats, but to criticize simplistic interpretations of quantum theory and force people to confront how odd it is to treat unobserved systems as if they occupy multiple states at once.
That structure, a system that exists in multiple possible states until observed, then collapses into a single real state, is exactly what makes Schrodinger’s cat such a powerful way to talk about modern cybersecurity.
The two companies every leader runs
When I first moved into security consulting, I realized many leaders were effectively running two different companies at once: one that looked safe in audits, dashboards and policy documents and another that attackers were probing and learning to exploit beneath the surface. In board papers, the organization appeared controlled, compliant and orderly in logs and incident reviews, but in practice, it looked messy, improvised and full of blind spots.
Over time, I began to describe these two states as the “paper company” and the “real company.” The paper company is defined by controls. It is the version of the organization that appears in frameworks, policies, architecture diagrams and maturity assessments, with named owners, mapped processes and reassuring traffic-light reports.
The real company is defined by behavior. It is the version that appears in telemetry, threat intelligence, red team findings and post-incident reviews. It is shaped by how people actually work, by shortcuts embedded in processes, by legacy systems nobody wants to touch and by integrations that were never fully documented.
The paradox is that leadership conversations usually assume only the paper company exists. When a board asks, “Are we secure?”, the answer typically references policies, certifications and tool coverage, all attributes of the paper company, while attackers interact only with the real one. Until leaders can see the real company clearly and regularly, they are effectively managing a cat-in-a-box: they must act as if they are both secure and compromised, without knowing which state is currently true.
Security as an observation problem, not just a control problem…
Most security strategies still treat protection primarily as a control problem: deploy more controls, map more requirements and close more findings. Controls matter and as an adviser, it would be irresponsible to downplay them. Yet major incidents keep reminding us that controls can be in place on paper while attackers move laterally through gaps in visibility, misconfigurations and exceptions that nobody has examined closely for months.
Thinking in Schrodinger’s terms reframes this security issue as also and increasingly an observation problem. In physics, measurement collapses a quantum system from many possible states into one observed reality. In security, detection plays the same role. Until there is a concrete signal, such as an alert, a log correlation, an anomaly investigation or a third-party notification, you cannot categorically state whether an attacker is present. You can discuss probabilities and expectations, but not current facts.
Seen through that lens, three truths emerge:
1. The absence of evidence (alerts) is not evidence of absence (safety)
It may simply mean your tools cannot see where the attacker is or that signals are not being correlated and interpreted effectively. A quiet SIEM can indicate resilience or complete blindness; without deeper observation, you do not know which.
2. Dwell time is a measure of unobserved reality
Every day an attacker remains undetected is a day when leadership operates under a false assumption about the system state. The longer the detection gap, the longer your organization lives in a “secure and compromised” superposition.
3. External discovery is a symptom of observation failure
When regulators, customers or partners are the first to tell you something is wrong, it is a strong signal that the box has been opened only from the outside.
Once you see security as an observation problem, the question “Are we secure?” starts to feel like the wrong question. A better set of questions sounds more like:
How quickly would we know if a high-value identity or system were compromised? Which parts of our environment are effectively unobserved, from a telemetry or logging perspective? Advising leaders through the paradox
As a consultant, the goal isn’t to embarrass organizations for their uncertainty but to normalize and systematically reduce it. Complex environments have blind spots and risks arise from ignoring them.
The work involves three shifts in thinking and action:
Change the questions in the boardroom. Instead of asking “Are we secure?”, ask “Where do we have strong evidence and where are we guessing?” This honesty aligns decisions with reality and clarifies investment needs. Measure certainty, not just controls. Include metrics such as telemetry coverage, detection speed and red team findings to assess how well the organization uncovers threats. Cognitive biases among practitioners exacerbate these gaps. Reward the surfacing of ambiguity rather than punishing uncertainty and encourage teams to admit gaps and improve observation, fostering trust over time. Bringing the paradox down to earth
Collapsing the paradox in a real enterprise is not about finding a single magic control that proves you are safe; it is about building habits of observation that continually narrow the gap between the paper company and the real one. In practical terms, a few patterns make an outsized difference. What does the transition from superposition to observation entail within an enterprise environment? From a consultant’s perspective, certain patterns significantly influence the process:
Treat threat hunting as routine, not heroic. Many organizations treat hunts as occasional special projects, often driven by a specific concern or regulatory pressure. A more effective model is to operationalize them as a standing function, a way to continuously test assumptions about where attackers could hide and to validate that existing detections still work as expected. Design telemetry with questions in mind. Instead of starting with “what logs can we capture easily?”, start with “what questions would we want to answer after an incident and what would we want to observe in real time?”. Work backward from those questions to determine the required telemetry and analytics. That keeps the focus on understanding behavior, not just filling storage. Integrate external observation into your picture of reality. Bug bounties, penetration tests, independent assessments and sector information-sharing are all ways to let others open the box from different angles. The key is to fold those observations back into your own narrative, rather than treating them as disconnected exercises. Over time, these practices narrow the gap between the paper company and the real company. Leaders still need policies, controls and reports, but those artefacts begin to reflect observed behavior much more closely than aspirations.
Leading in a world of half-open boxes
The most honest statement a security leader can make is not “we are secure” but “here is what we know, here is what we do not know yet and here is how quickly we are closing that gap.” That is essentially a commitment to continuous observation. It also reframes security from a static state to a dynamic practice, which aligns with how modern digital businesses operate.
Schrödinger’s cat reminds us that unobserved systems can exist in multiple states simultaneously. In cybersecurity, this means a quiet environment can be both resilient and deeply compromised until proven otherwise. The job of security leaders and their advisers is not to pretend the paradox does not exist, but to build the technical, organizational and cultural capabilities that enable the organization to open the box early and often and to be ready to act on whatever is found when it is.
This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?

View the full article
CSOonline

Top 10 3D CAD Software: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
3D CAD software is the toolset engineers and designers use to create precise digital models of real products—parts, assemblies, mechanisms, and manufacturable geometry. Instead of drawing only in 2D, you build a 3D model with dimensions, constraints, and design intent, then generate drawings, exploded views, bill of materials, or manufacturing outputs from that same source.
A strong CAD platform does more than make shapes. It helps you reduce costly mistakes by validating fit, motion, and clearances early. It also improves teamwork by standardizing how parts are named, versioned, reviewed, and released. For many teams, CAD is the “single definition” that connects engineering, manufacturing, procurement, and service documentation.
Common use cases include:
Mechanical part design, assemblies, and mechanisms Sheet metal enclosures, frames, and weldments Plastic parts with manufacturable features and draft-aware shapes Product design for industrial equipment and consumer devices CNC machining preparation and CAM workflows Technical drawings, GD&T, exploded views, and BOM creation What buyers should evaluate:
Modeling approach: parametric, direct, or hybrid Assembly capability: mates, constraints, performance on large assemblies Drawing quality: detailing, GD&T workflows, documentation outputs Manufacturing readiness: CAM ecosystem, export stability, tolerancing workflows Interoperability: how well it exchanges files with suppliers Collaboration: versioning, review, approvals, change tracking Extensibility: plugins, APIs, macros, automation potential Performance: stability under heavy geometry and complex constraints License practicality: cost predictability and team scaling Security expectations: access control and safe sharing practices Mandatory paragraph
Best for: mechanical engineers, product designers, manufacturing teams, R&D groups, startups building hardware, and enterprises managing complex assemblies and formal change processes. Not ideal for: teams that only need lightweight concept sketches or simple visualization; for those, a simpler modeling tool or visualization-first workflow may be faster. Key Trends in 3D CAD Software and Beyond
Collaboration-first CAD: more teams expect built-in sharing, review, and version history so they can stop emailing files back and forth. Hybrid modeling becoming normal: combining parametric history with direct edits helps teams move faster without losing control. More “design-to-manufacture” emphasis: CAD is expected to connect smoothly to CAM, simulation, and documentation rather than living in isolation. AI-assisted workflows: features that speed up repetitive modeling tasks, help detect common mistakes, and improve search across parts and assemblies. Better change traceability: clearer “what changed, who changed it, and why” is becoming a requirement even for smaller teams. Interoperability pressure: suppliers and distributed manufacturing force better translation and fewer broken features on import/export. Model-based definition growth: more manufacturing notes and tolerances are tied directly to the 3D model rather than only in 2D drawings. Large-assembly performance focus: faster open times, stable constraints, lightweight representations, and better handling of massive BOMs. Security expectations rising: controlled access, safe sharing, and governance become more important as collaboration expands. Ecosystem expectations: teams want mature add-ons for simulation, CAM, PDM/PLM, and automation without heavy custom development. How We Selected These Tools (Methodology)
Selected tools with strong industry recognition and wide usage in engineering workflows. Balanced the list across enterprise platforms, mainstream mechanical CAD, and accessible options for smaller teams. Prioritized tools that support complete workflows: parts, assemblies, drawings, and release-ready outputs. Considered manufacturing reality: export stability, supplier compatibility, and the availability of downstream tools. Included tools with strong ecosystems for CAM, simulation, and data management. Considered collaboration fit, including versioning patterns and review workflows. Evaluated typical performance signals, especially for constraint-heavy assemblies. Considered support and community strength for onboarding, troubleshooting, and hiring. Top 10 3D CAD Software Tools
#1 — SOLIDWORKS
Short description: A widely used mechanical CAD platform for parametric modeling, assemblies, and manufacturing documentation. Often chosen when supplier compatibility and production drawings are a daily requirement.
Key Features
Feature-based parametric part modeling with design intent Assembly mates, interference checks, and motion validation tools Mature drawing workflows for detailing and documentation Sheet metal and weldment tools for common fabrication needs Configurations for variants and product families Large ecosystem of add-ons for simulation and manufacturing workflows Common exchange workflows across suppliers and production partners Pros
Strong for manufacturing-ready mechanical design Large hiring pool and widespread industry familiarity Proven ecosystem for extensions and specialized workflows Cons
Large assemblies require disciplined modeling practices Collaboration and release control often require structured governance Add-ons can increase total cost for advanced needs Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
This tool commonly sits at the center of manufacturing pipelines and pairs well with data management, simulation, and downstream manufacturing tools when teams define consistent standards.
Works well with structured data management approaches Strong partner ecosystem for simulation and manufacturing workflows Macro and automation options for repeatable tasks Common supplier compatibility patterns in mechanical industries Support & Community
Very large community, broad training content, and strong third-party support availability. Support tiers depend on licensing and reseller arrangements.
#2 — Autodesk Inventor
Short description: A mechanical CAD tool focused on parametric modeling, assemblies, and drawing-driven documentation. Often used in engineering organizations that want a strong mechanical workflow and predictable outputs.
Key Features
Parametric parts and assemblies with feature history Drawing workflows for documentation and manufacturing handoff Sheet metal and frame design workflows for common mechanical needs Assembly constraints and interference checking patterns Content libraries and reuse workflows depending on setup Integration potential with broader design and manufacturing toolchains Customization options through rules and automation patterns Pros
Solid mechanical CAD coverage for many engineering teams Strong documentation workflows for production outputs Familiar workflow style for teams used to parametric CAD Cons
Large-assembly performance depends on modeling practices Collaboration and governance depend on team processes and tooling Total cost can vary based on add-ons and licensing needs Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Commonly used in mechanical design environments where drawings and controlled documentation matter. Works best when teams define standards for file structure and release.
Often used alongside manufacturing and documentation toolchains Automation support for repeatable design rules and templates Export workflows depend on supplier and shop standards Ecosystem fit depends on how you connect downstream processes Support & Community
Large community and training availability. Support options depend on licensing tier.
#3 — Autodesk Fusion
Short description: A connected CAD platform designed for product teams that want modeling plus collaboration-friendly workflows. Often selected when a team wants a practical toolset without a heavy infrastructure burden.
Key Features
Parametric modeling with flexible editing workflows Component-based design for assemblies and product structures Collaboration-friendly project workflows for team sharing Drawing outputs for documentation needs Manufacturing-oriented workflows depending on plan and setup Visualization and rendering capabilities depending on workflow Add-ins and extensions for specialized needs Pros
Practical for fast iteration and small-to-mid product teams Easier collaboration compared to purely file-based workflows Useful when design and manufacturing preparation are close together Cons
Enterprise-grade governance may need additional systems Complex assemblies require careful structure and discipline Feature availability may depend on licensing tier Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Hybrid
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Often used as an “all-in-one” environment for product development teams. Best results come from clear project structure and consistent naming and release habits.
Add-ins and extensions to expand workflows Connected collaboration workflows for teams Export pipelines depend on supplier requirements Works well when you want fewer disconnected tools Support & Community
Strong online learning resources and active community. Support depends on plan.
#4 — Onshape
Short description: A cloud-native CAD tool built around collaboration, version history, and controlled sharing. Often chosen by distributed teams that want to reduce file confusion and improve traceability.
Key Features
Browser-based CAD with real-time collaboration Built-in versioning and history-style workflows for change tracking Centralized storage model that reduces duplicate files Assembly modeling with sharing-first workflows Review and approval-friendly collaboration patterns Controlled access and sharing concepts for teams API and extensibility options depending on plan Pros
Strong collaboration and reduced “file chaos” Easier access for distributed teams and partners Version history patterns help avoid accidental overwrites Cons
Works best with reliable connectivity Governance depends on permission discipline and team habits Some specialized workflows may require careful planning Platforms / Deployment
Web
Cloud
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Often used when collaboration and traceability are the priority. Works best when the team treats the tool as a single source of truth rather than exporting files as the “real master.”
Integrates via APIs and workflow connections depending on setup Export/import pipelines depend on supplier requirements Designed to reduce manual file management Ecosystem strength depends on the team’s downstream stack Support & Community
Good documentation and an active learning community. Support levels depend on subscription tier.
#5 — Siemens NX
Short description: An enterprise-grade CAD platform built for complex products, large assemblies, and structured engineering processes. Often used in organizations with mature governance and multi-team product development.
Key Features
Advanced parametric and hybrid modeling workflows High-performance handling of large assemblies and complex structures Mature drafting and documentation capabilities Advanced surfacing and complex geometry workflows Customization and automation potential for enterprise standards Fits into controlled engineering environments and structured processes Designed for large organizations and complex product definitions Pros
Strong for complex products and large assemblies Built for structured engineering processes and scale Useful when governance and standardization are essential Cons
Requires training and structured onboarding Implementation can be heavy in large organizations Costs and operational overhead can be significant Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Commonly used in enterprise engineering ecosystems where CAD must align with change control, data management, and downstream manufacturing processes.
Strong enterprise workflow integration patterns Customization to enforce company standards and templates Downstream integration depends on organizational toolchain Best suited for mature engineering governance Support & Community
Enterprise-focused training and support availability. Community resources exist, but most value comes from structured enablement.
#6 — CATIA
Short description: A high-end CAD platform used for complex industries where advanced surfacing, assemblies, and multi-discipline workflows are central. Often adopted in environments with strict engineering processes.
Key Features
Advanced surfacing and shape creation workflows Large-assembly design patterns for structured products Documentation workflows designed for controlled environments Supports multi-discipline engineering processes Strong fit for high-complexity product development Customization options for enterprise standards Designed for rigorous design methodologies Pros
Excellent for complex surfaces and advanced product design Strong enterprise fit with structured processes Useful in demanding engineering environments Cons
Steep learning curve for new users Significant governance overhead for smaller teams Total cost can be high depending on scope Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Often used as part of broader enterprise engineering systems where data governance and structured release processes are central.
Fits into enterprise engineering ecosystems and structured governance Integrations depend on organizational standards and tooling Customization to enforce internal workflows Best for environments that value standardization and control Support & Community
Enterprise-centric support and training. Community materials exist but are less beginner-focused than mainstream CAD tools.
#7 — PTC Creo
Short description: A mechanical CAD tool known for strong parametric modeling and manufacturing-focused workflows. Often chosen by teams that want disciplined design intent and predictable outputs.
Key Features
Feature-based parametric modeling with robust design intent Assembly workflows with structured constraints and checks Drawing and documentation workflows for manufacturing Tools for common mechanical workflows such as sheet metal Variant handling workflows depending on environment and setup Customization and automation options for company standards Strong fit for manufacturing-driven product development Pros
Strong parametric discipline and controlled modeling patterns Good fit for manufacturing-focused engineering teams Works well with structured standards and templates Cons
Requires training for best productivity Collaboration depends on external processes and governance Ecosystem fit depends on your manufacturing toolchain Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Often used where predictable outputs and controlled change processes matter. Best results come from strict modeling standards and reusable templates.
Works with downstream manufacturing workflows through defined exports Automation support depends on environment and licensing Integrations depend on the organization’s broader stack Strong fit for standard-driven engineering teams Support & Community
Professional user base and training availability. Support options vary by agreement.
#8 — Solid Edge
Short description: A mechanical CAD tool known for combining parametric and direct modeling approaches in practical workflows. Often used by teams that want flexibility for late-stage changes without rebuilding entire models.
Key Features
Hybrid approach that supports parametric and direct edits Assembly modeling for mechanical product structures Drafting and documentation workflows for production outputs Sheet metal and fabrication-oriented workflows Tools for managing revisions through disciplined processes Extensibility and customization options depending on setup Performance focus for practical mechanical assemblies Pros
Flexible editing approach for change-heavy designs Strong mechanical CAD coverage for many teams Useful for teams that value speed without losing control Cons
Ecosystem depth depends on the environment and add-ons Team consistency requires strong standards and templates Enterprise governance may require additional systems Platforms / Deployment
Windows
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Often used in mechanical engineering environments that value hybrid modeling and practical documentation outputs.
Downstream integration depends on organizational toolchains Customization options for templates and repeatable exports Works well with disciplined file and release practices Ecosystem fit depends on your manufacturing stack Support & Community
Professional support availability and established user community. Depth varies by region and partner ecosystem.
#9 — Rhinoceros 3D
Short description: A flexible 3D modeling tool widely used for industrial design, concept development, and complex surfaces. Often chosen when form exploration and surfacing are more important than strict mechanical parametrics.
Key Features
Strong surface and curve-based modeling workflows Effective for industrial design and complex shape exploration Plugin ecosystem for specialized workflows and fabrication outputs Works well as a bridge between concept and engineering stages Export workflows commonly used for downstream steps Scripting and automation options depending on workflow Good fit for design teams iterating on form Pros
Excellent for freeform surfaces and complex geometry Useful for fast concept iteration and design exploration Strong extension ecosystem for niche workflows Cons
Not a full mechanical CAD replacement for strict parametric assemblies Manufacturing documentation may require complementary tools Collaboration and versioning depend on external processes Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Often paired with mechanical CAD tools, renderers, or fabrication workflows depending on the team’s needs and handoff style.
Strong plugin ecosystem for design and fabrication tasks Export pipelines depend on downstream tools and suppliers Scripting options for repeatable modeling approaches Useful in early-stage design pipelines Support & Community
Strong design community and extensive learning resources. Support options depend on licensing.
#10 — FreeCAD
Short description: An open-source CAD tool used for parametric modeling and learning-focused engineering workflows. Often chosen by individuals, educators, and cost-sensitive teams that prefer open toolchains.
Key Features
Parametric modeling with feature history workflows Modular workbench approach for different tasks Community-driven add-ons and extensions Suitable for many engineering and maker projects Export/import workflows used for multi-tool pipelines Scripting and customization options depending on environment Useful for learning parametric fundamentals and cost-sensitive work Pros
No license cost and open workflow flexibility Good for learning and prototyping parametric design concepts Community-driven development and extensions Cons
Enterprise-scale collaboration features are limited Advanced workflows may require more manual setup Support depends heavily on community resources Platforms / Deployment
Windows / macOS / Linux
Self-hosted
Security & Compliance
Not publicly stated.
Integrations & Ecosystem
Often used in open, file-based toolchains and paired with other tools for downstream manufacturing or documentation depending on needs.
Workbenches and add-ons expand capabilities Export workflows depend on your production pipeline Best used with clear templates and modeling conventions Community ecosystem depth varies by use case Support & Community
Active community and documentation. Formal support tiers are not publicly stated.
Comparison Table (Top 10)
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedDeployment (Cloud/Self-hosted/Hybrid)Standout FeaturePublic RatingSOLIDWORKSManufacturing-focused mechanical CADWindowsSelf-hostedMature assemblies, drawings, and ecosystemN/AAutodesk InventorParametric mechanical design and drawingsWindowsSelf-hostedStrong documentation workflows for productionN/AAutodesk FusionConnected product design workflowsWindows / macOSHybridPractical collaboration-friendly workflowN/AOnshapeCollaboration and version historyWebCloudBuilt-in versioning mindset and sharingN/ASiemens NXEnterprise-scale complex productsWindowsSelf-hostedLarge-assembly performance and enterprise fitN/ACATIAAdvanced surfacing and complex industriesWindowsSelf-hostedHigh-end surfacing and structured processesN/APTC CreoDisciplined parametric design intentWindowsSelf-hostedRobust feature-based modeling patternsN/ASolid EdgeHybrid modeling for change-heavy designsWindowsSelf-hostedParametric plus direct editing flexibilityN/ARhinoceros 3DIndustrial design and freeform surfacesWindows / macOSSelf-hostedStrong surfacing and concept explorationN/AFreeCADOpen-source parametric projectsWindows / macOS / LinuxSelf-hostedOpen toolchain and modular workbenchesN/A Evaluation & Scoring of 3D CAD Software
The scoring below is a comparative model intended to help shortlisting. Each criterion is scored from 1–10, then a weighted total from 0–10 is calculated using the weights listed. These are analyst estimates based on typical fit and common workflow requirements, not public ratings.
Weights:
Core features – 25% Ease of use – 15% Integrations & ecosystem – 15% Security & compliance – 10% Performance & reliability – 10% Support & community – 10% Price / value – 15% Tool NameCore (25%)Ease (15%)Integrations (15%)Security (10%)Performance (10%)Support (10%)Value (15%)Weighted Total (0–10)SOLIDWORKS9.27.49.16.38.29.26.08.11Autodesk Inventor8.67.68.46.27.88.66.67.82Autodesk Fusion8.08.28.06.37.48.28.27.87Onshape7.88.17.96.47.57.97.47.68Siemens NX9.66.39.16.39.08.15.48.05CATIA9.56.08.76.38.97.65.07.79PTC Creo8.76.98.16.28.17.56.07.51Solid Edge8.37.27.86.17.87.46.67.45Rhinoceros 3D7.78.28.05.87.38.67.67.75FreeCAD6.86.46.85.66.67.09.87.05 How to interpret the scores:
Use the weighted total to shortlist candidates, then validate with a pilot. A lower score can mean specialization, not weakness. Security and compliance scores reflect controllability and governance fit, because certifications are often not publicly stated. Actual outcomes vary with assembly size, team skills, templates, and process maturity. Which 3D CAD Software Tool Is Right for You?
Solo / Freelancer
You need fast modeling, stable exports, and a workflow that does not interrupt your momentum.
Choose Autodesk Fusion if you want an accessible workflow that supports product iteration and practical outputs. Choose Rhinoceros 3D if your work is form-driven and surfacing is a core requirement. Choose FreeCAD if budget and openness matter most and you can invest time in templates and conventions. SMB
Small teams need predictable output and easy collaboration without heavy governance overhead.
Choose SOLIDWORKS if supplier compatibility, drawings, and manufacturing workflows are central. Choose Onshape if collaboration and version confusion are frequent pain points and you want built-in history. Choose Autodesk Fusion if you want a connected workflow and quick iteration across a small team. Mid-Market
Mid-market teams often need structured standards, repeatable documentation, and reliable supplier exchange.
Choose SOLIDWORKS for mechanical design environments with common manufacturing handoffs. Choose Autodesk Inventor for drawing-heavy workflows and parametric mechanical design. Choose Solid Edge if late-stage change flexibility is common and hybrid edits help reduce rework. Enterprise
Enterprise environments prioritize governance, scale, performance, and controlled change processes.
Choose Siemens NX for complex assemblies and structured engineering organizations. Choose CATIA for advanced surfacing and high-complexity product environments. Choose PTC Creo for disciplined parametric design intent and standard-driven modeling practices. Budget vs Premium
If budget is tight, prioritize tools that cover core needs without requiring many paid add-ons. FreeCAD can be useful for open workflows and learning-driven adoption. If premium investment is possible, it often pays off when large assemblies, strict documentation, and formal change control are central requirements. Feature Depth vs Ease of Use
Maximum depth for complex engineering: Siemens NX, CATIA, SOLIDWORKS Faster onboarding and practical iteration: Autodesk Fusion, Onshape Form exploration and surfacing focus: Rhinoceros 3D Open and cost-sensitive learning path: FreeCAD Integrations & Scalability
If you rely on CAM, simulation, or formal data management, ecosystem maturity matters as much as modeling tools. If you work across suppliers, test translation using your real parts and assemblies. If you scale team size, versioning and release processes become as important as modeling features. Security & Compliance Needs
Most CAD tools are installed locally or rely on collaboration workflows where certifications are not publicly stated in a simple checklist format.
Plan security at the pipeline level: identity, permissions, storage governance, and controlled sharing. Define where master models live and how releases are approved. Limit plugins and automation scripts to trusted and approved sources. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between parametric and direct modeling?
Parametric modeling uses a feature history and constraints to preserve design intent. Direct modeling is faster for certain edits but can reduce traceability unless you enforce standards.
Is cloud CAD better than desktop CAD?
Cloud CAD is often better for collaboration and version history. Desktop CAD can be preferable when offline work, strict IT control, or heavy local performance requirements dominate.
What should I look for in CAD if manufacturing is my priority?
Prioritize drawings, tolerancing workflows, export stability, and supplier compatibility. Also check how easily the CAD connects to downstream manufacturing preparation.
Do I need PDM or PLM with my CAD tool?
If you have multiple designers, frequent revisions, or formal releases, structured data management becomes important. Without it, teams lose time to file confusion and uncontrolled changes.
How do I evaluate interoperability with suppliers?
Test exchange using your real models, not sample files. Confirm that geometry, assemblies, and key features survive translation without major rework.
How important is hardware for CAD performance?
Very important for large assemblies and complex constraints. CPU, RAM, storage speed, and GPU all matter, and the right balance depends on your workload.
Can one tool cover CAD and CAM needs?
Some platforms offer connected workflows, but depth depends on plan and modules. Many teams use a primary CAD tool plus specialized CAM tools for advanced needs.
What is the biggest mistake teams make during CAD selection?
They skip a real pilot. A small project with real assemblies reveals performance, workflow friction, training needs, and translation risk quickly.
How do I reduce rework in CAD projects?
Use templates, enforce naming rules, keep sketches and constraints clean, and validate interferences early. Establish a release process so “draft” and “final” are clearly separated.
Are security certifications available for these tools?
Often not publicly stated in a simple way. Many organizations achieve compliance through IT governance, controlled storage, and access management rather than tool certifications alone.
What should a good CAD pilot include?
Test your largest assembly, create drawings, export to supplier formats, and run a basic change cycle with two or more users. Track time-to-change and rework volume.
Conclusion
3D CAD is not only about modeling parts; it is about creating a reliable product definition that survives collaboration, revisions, and manufacturing constraints. The right choice depends on your team size, supplier ecosystem, governance needs, and how complex your assemblies and documentation requirements are. Some teams value deep enterprise scale, others value collaboration-first workflows, and many prioritize supplier compatibility and drawing-driven manufacturing handoff.
View the full article
reporter

Gartner-Prognose: Die sechs wichtigsten Cybersicherheits-Trends für 2026

Who is Danny – shutterstock.com
Auch im Jahr 2026 bleibt die Cybersicherheitslage angespannt. Doch was sind die wichtigsten Themen, Risiken und Chancen, mit denen sich Security-Entscheider aktuell befassen sollten?
Das Marktforschungsunternehmen Gartner hat dazu folgende sechs Trends ermittelt:
Trend 1: Agentic AI erfordert Cybersicherheitsüberwachung


KI-Agenten werden zunehmend von Mitarbeitern und Entwicklern genutzt, wodurch neue Angriffsflächen entstehen. No-Code-/Low-Code-Plattformen und Vibe-Coding verstärken diesen Trend noch und führen zu einer unkontrollierten Verbreitung von Agentic AI, unsicherem Code und potenziellen Verstößen gegen gesetzliche Vorschriften.
„Während KI-Agenten und Automatisierungs-Tools für Unternehmen immer zugänglicher und praktischer werden, bleibt eine strenge Governance unerlässlich“, betont Alex Michaels, Analyst bei Gartner. „Führungskräfte im Bereich Cybersicherheit müssen sowohl genehmigte als auch nicht genehmigte KI-Agenten identifizieren. Für beide Varianten sollten sie strenge Kontrollen durchsetzen und Playbooks für die Reaktion auf Vorfälle entwickeln, um potenzielle Risiken zu bewältigen.“
Trend 2: Globale regulatorische Volatilität treibt Bemühungen um Cyberresilienz voran


Veränderte geopolitische Landschaften und sich weiterentwickelnde globale Vorschriften haben Cybersicherheit zu einem kritischen Geschäftsrisiko mit direkten Auswirkungen auf die Resilienz von Organisationen gemacht. Da Regulierungsbehörden Vorstände und Führungskräfte zunehmend für Compliance-Verstöße haftbar machen, kann Untätigkeit zu erheblichen Strafen, Geschäftsverlusten und irreversiblen Reputationsschäden führen.
Gartner empfiehlt Führungskräften im Bereich Cybersicherheit, die Zusammenarbeit zwischen Legal-, Business- und Beschaffungsteams zu formalisieren, um eine klare Verantwortlichkeit für Cyberrisiken zu schaffen. Die Anpassung von Kontrollrahmen an anerkannte Standards und die Berücksichtigung von Datenhoheitsfragen tragen dazu bei, Compliance-Lücken zu schließen.
Trend 3: PostQuantum-Computing wird zum Aktionsplan


Gartner prognostiziert, dass Fortschritte im Bereich des Quantencomputing die asymmetrische Kryptografie, auf die Unternehmen zur Sicherung ihrer Daten und Systeme setzen, bis 2030 unsicher machen werden. Um potenzielle Datenverstöße, rechtliche Haftungsrisiken und finanzielle Verluste durch Angriffe nach dem Prinzip „jetzt sammeln, später entschlüsseln“ zu vermeiden, müssen jetzt Alternativen zur Post-Quantum-Kryptografie eingeführt werden.
„Die Post-Quanten-Kryptografie verändert die Cybersicherheitsstrategien. Sie veranlasst Unternehmen dazu, traditionelle Verschlüsselungsmethoden zu identifizieren, zu verwalten und zu ersetzen und gleichzeitig der kryptografischen Agilität Vorrang einzuräumen“, so Michaels. „Indem man jetzt schon in diese Fähigkeiten investiert und die Migration vorantreibt , werden Assets gesichert, wenn Quantenbedrohungen Realität werden.“
Trend 4: Identitäts- und Zugriffsmanagement passt sich KI-Agenten an


Der Aufstieg von KI-Agenten stellt traditionelle Identitäts- und Zugriffsmanagementstrategien (IAM) vor neue Herausforderungen, insbesondere in den Bereichen Identitätsregistrierung und -verwaltung, Automatisierung von Anmeldedaten und richtliniengesteuerte Autorisierung für maschinelle Akteure. Werden diese Probleme nicht angegangen, steigt das Risiko von Cybersicherheitsvorfällen im Zusammenhang mit Zugriffen, da autonome Agenten immer mehr Verbreitung finden.
Gartner rät zu einem gezielten, risikobasierten Ansatz, bei dem dort investiert wird, wo die Lücken und Risiken am größten sind, und Automatisierung genutzt wird. Dies ist unerlässlich, um Innovationen zu ermöglichen, die Einhaltung von Vorschriften zu gewährleisten und kritische Ressourcen in KI-zentrierten Umgebungen zu schützen.
Trend 5: KI-gesteuerte SOC-Lösungen destabilisieren betriebliche Normen


Angetrieben durch Kostensparmaßnahmen und das wachsende Interesse an KI führt das Aufkommen von KI-gestützten Security Operations Centern (SOCs) zu einer neuen Komplexität. Dies trägt zu Personalengpässen, erhöhten Anforderungen an die Qualifizierung und sich wandelnden Kostenüberlegungen für KI-Tools bei, auch wenn diese Technologien die Arbeitsabläufe bei der Alarmierung und Untersuchung verbessern.
„Um das volle Potenzial von KI in Sicherheitsabläufen auszuschöpfen, müssen Cybersicherheitsverantwortliche Menschen ebenso priorisieren wie Technologie“, erklärt der Gartner-Analyst. „Die Stärkung der Fähigkeiten der Belegschaft, die Implementierung von Human-in-the-Loop-Frameworks in KI-gestützte Prozesse und die Ausrichtung auf klare strategische Ziele werden entscheidend sein, um die Widerstandsfähigkeit bei der Weiterentwicklung von SOCs aufrechtzuerhalten.“
Trend 6: GenAI bricht mit traditionellen Strategien zur Sensibilisierung für Cybersicherheit


Laut Gartner reichen bestehende Maßnahmen zur Sensibilisierung für Cybersicherheit nicht aus, um Cyberrisiken zu reduzieren, da die Einführung von GenAI immer schneller voranschreitet. Bei einer Umfrage, die das Analystenhaus zwischen Mai und November 2025 unter 175 Mitarbeitern durchführte, gaben mehr als 57 Prozent an, persönliche GenAI-Accounts für berufliche Zwecke zu nutzen. 33 Prozent der Befragten gaben zu, sensible Informationen für nicht genehmigte Tools zu verwenden.
Gartner plädiert dafür, von allgemeinen Awareness-Trainings zu adaptiven Verhaltens- und Schulungsprogrammen überzugehen, die KI-spezifische Aufgaben umfassen. „Durch die Stärkung der Governance, die Verankerung sicherer Praktiken und die Festlegung von Richtlinien für die autorisierte Nutzung lassen sich Datenschutzverletzungen und der Verlust geistigen Eigentums reduzieren“, so die Analysten.

 
View the full article
CSOonline

Mastering the Modern Ecosystem: A Complete Guide to MDE (Training & Certification)

Software development and IT operations have merged into a single, powerful force. In the past, companies handled these as separate departments. Consequently, this created silos that slowed down progress. Today, the world moves too fast for that old way of working. Therefore, the Master in DevOps Engineering (MDE) has become a vital path for anyone wanting to lead in the modern tech landscape. This guide provides everything you need to know about this certification and how it can transform your career.
Defining the Tools of the Trade
Before we dive into the certification details, we must understand the core tools. DevOps is not just one tool; rather, it is a collection of practices and technologies. For instance, Docker and Kubernetes handle containerization and orchestration. Meanwhile, Terraform and Ansible allow you to manage infrastructure as code. Additionally, Jenkins and GitLab CI automate the building and testing of software. Finally, monitoring tools like Prometheus and Grafana provide the data needed to keep systems healthy. Mastering these tools through a structured program like the MDE is the best way to ensure you are ready for high-level engineering roles.
Why Choose the Master in DevOps Engineering (MDE)?
Many engineers wonder if they should focus on a single cloud or a specific tool. While that is helpful, a master-level program offers a much broader perspective. Specifically, the MDE program teaches you how to connect all these tools into a seamless pipeline. Because of this holistic approach, you become more than just a technician; you become an architect. This certification is designed to prove that you can handle enterprise-grade challenges.
Master in DevOps Engineering (MDE)
What it is
The Master in DevOps Engineering (MDE) is an elite certification program. It focuses on end-to-end automation, cloud-native architecture, and advanced delivery patterns. Furthermore, it bridges the gap between basic automation and complex system design.
Who should take it
This program is perfect for software engineers, system administrators, and technical managers. Specifically, if you are an engineer in India or working globally and want to move into a leadership or senior architect role, this is for you. Managers who want to understand the technical depth of their teams will also find immense value here.
Skills you’ll gain
Designing multi-cloud infrastructure strategies. Implementing advanced CI/CD pipelines with automated security. Mastering Kubernetes for large-scale production environments. Developing infrastructure as code that is scalable and reusable. Setting up comprehensive observability and alerting systems. Optimizing cloud costs through advanced FinOps practices. Real-world projects you should be able to do after it
Building a fully automated software factory that handles code from commit to production. Migrating a large-scale legacy application to a microservices architecture on the cloud. Creating a self-healing infrastructure that automatically responds to system failures. Setting up a global delivery network that serves users across different continents with low latency. Preparation plan
7–14 days: Focus on refreshing your Linux and networking basics. Understand the fundamentals of Git and basic shell scripting. 30 days: Dive into containerization. Practice building Docker images and managing them. Start working with basic CI/CD tools to automate small tasks. 60 days: This is the deep-dive phase. Focus on Kubernetes, Terraform, and advanced security integration. Spend most of your time building the real-world projects mentioned above. Consistent practice is the key to success here. Common mistakes
Ignoring the cultural side of DevOps and focusing only on tools. Trying to learn too many tools at once without mastering the core concepts. Skipping the manual steps before trying to automate them. Neglecting security until the final stages of the project. Best next certification after this
Once you have mastered the MDE, you should look toward specialized paths. For example, the Certified SRE Architect or a specialized Cloud Security Professional certification would be excellent choices.
Comparison Table: MDE vs. Other Tracks
TrackLevelWho it’s forPrerequisitesSkills CoveredRecommended OrderDevOpsFoundationBeginners, CodersLinux BasicsGit, Jenkins, Docker1stSREAdvancedOps EngineersDevOps BasicsGrafana, SLOs, Uptime2ndDevSecOpsSpecialtySecurity ProsDevOps KnowledgeSAST, DAST, Vault2ndMDEMasterLeads & ArchitectsWork ExperienceAll-in-One MasteryFinal Choose Your Path: 6 Specialized Learning Paths
1. DevOps Path
This is the standard path. It focuses on speed and quality. You learn how to make the development and operations teams work as one unit. Consequently, software is released faster and with fewer bugs.
2. DevSecOps Path
Security is no longer an afterthought. In this path, you learn how to “shift left.” This means you integrate security checks into the very beginning of the development cycle. Therefore, your applications are secure by design.
3. SRE (Site Reliability Engineering) Path
If you love stability and performance, this is your path. SREs use software engineering principles to solve operational problems. They focus on reliability and scalability, ensuring that systems stay up even during high traffic.
4. AIOps/MLOps Path
The future is automated through intelligence. This path teaches you how to use AI to monitor systems and manage machine learning models. It is a highly specialized and rapidly growing field.
5. DataOps Path
Data is the lifeblood of modern companies. This path focuses on the automated delivery of data. It ensures that data scientists and analysts have the information they need, when they need it, without manual delays.
6. FinOps Path
Cloud costs can spiral out of control. FinOps is about bringing financial accountability to the cloud. You learn how to balance speed, cost, and quality so the business stays profitable while scaling.
Role → Recommended Certifications Mapping
DevOps Engineer
You should focus on the MDE as your primary goal. Additionally, getting a professional-level cloud certification from AWS or Azure will complement your skills perfectly.
SRE (Site Reliability Engineer)
After the MDE, you must focus on the Certified SRE Architect program. Mastering Kubernetes is also a non-negotiable requirement for this role.
Platform Engineer
Your focus should be on Infrastructure as Code and Kubernetes. The MDE provides the perfect foundation for building the internal platforms that other developers use.
Cloud Engineer
Start with the MDE to understand the pipeline. Then, move into specialized cloud networking and security certifications to become a true cloud expert.
Security Engineer
You need the MDE to understand how modern apps are built. Afterward, you should pursue the Certified DevSecOps Professional path to apply your security knowledge to the pipeline.
Data Engineer
The MDE will help you automate your data pipelines. Following this, look into specialized DataOps training to handle large-scale data architecture.
FinOps Practitioner
Start with the MDE to understand how resources are used. Then, take the FinOps Certified Practitioner exam to focus on the financial side of cloud management.
Engineering Manager
The MDE is vital for you to understand what your team is doing. It gives you the technical authority to lead effectively and make better architectural decisions.
Next Certifications to Take
Based on industry standards and top recommendations for software engineers, here are your three best options after completing the MDE:
Same Track (Expert Level): Certified DevOps Architect. This pushes your MDE knowledge into the realm of high-level strategy and organizational design. Cross-Track (Specialization): Certified DevSecOps Professional. Because security is the biggest challenge in tech today, this adds a massive layer of value to your profile. Leadership Track: Engineering Management & Agile Leadership. If you want to move from doing the work to leading the people who do the work, this is the logical next step. Top Institutions for Training and Certification
DevOpsSchool
This is the primary provider for the MDE program. They offer deep, hands-on training that is respected globally. Their focus is on real-world application rather than just theory.
Cotocus
Cotocus is known for its high-end consulting and technical training. They help engineers master complex cloud environments and specialized DevOps workflows with great precision.
Scmgalaxy
This institution has a very strong community and a wealth of resources. They specialize in configuration management and build automation, which are core parts of the DevOps ecosystem.
BestDevOps
As the name suggests, they focus on the best practices in the industry. Their training is designed to make you productive from day one in any enterprise environment.
devsecopsschool
If your goal is security, this is the place to be. They provide specialized training that integrates security tools directly into the CI/CD pipeline.
sreschool
This school focuses entirely on reliability. They teach you how to build systems that don’t break and how to manage them using advanced SRE principles.
aiopsschool
For those looking at the cutting edge, this institution covers the intersection of AI and operations. They are leaders in teaching how to automate the future.
dataopsschool
This school is dedicated to the data community. They teach you how to apply DevOps speed to the world of big data and analytics.
finopsschool
Focusing on the economics of the cloud, this institution helps you master the art of cloud cost optimization and financial management.
General FAQs
Is the MDE certification hard to pass?It is a master-level exam, so it requires effort. However, if you follow the 60-day plan and do the hands-on projects, you will be well-prepared. How long does the certification last?Most certifications are valid for two to three years. This ensures that you stay up to date with the latest technology changes in the industry. Do I need to be a programmer to do DevOps?You do not need to be a master coder, but you must be comfortable with scripting. Understanding logic is more important than knowing every syntax. Is this certification recognized in India and abroad?Yes, the MDE is designed for a global audience. Companies in India, the US, and Europe all look for the skills covered in this program. What is the sequence of learning?Start with Linux, move to Docker, then CI/CD, and finally Kubernetes and Terraform. The MDE program follows this exact logical flow. Does MDE help in career growth?Absolutely. It moves you from a junior or mid-level role into senior, lead, or architect positions. Can a manager take this course?Yes, many managers take it to better understand the technical challenges their teams face. It helps them lead with more confidence. What is the value of MDE compared to others?MDE is a comprehensive program. While other certs focus on one tool, MDE focuses on the entire ecosystem, which is what employers actually want. Are there any prerequisites?You should have a basic understanding of IT operations or software development. A little bit of curiosity and a drive to learn are the biggest requirements. What are the career outcomes?Most graduates see improved job titles, higher salaries, and the ability to work on more interesting, high-scale projects. How much time should I spend daily?About one to two hours a day is usually enough to make steady progress without getting burnt out. Is it better than a university degree?For technical roles, industry certifications are often more relevant because they focus on the specific tools and practices used in the real world today. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on MDE
What makes the MDE certification unique?It focuses on the integration of multiple tools into a single ecosystem. It is not just about a tool; it is about the entire engineering journey. Who is the official provider of MDE?The official provider is DevOpsSchool. You can find all the details on their official website. Is there a specific URL for the MDE certification?Yes, you can find the official information at: https://www.devopsschool.com/certification/master-in-devops-engineering.html. Does the MDE cover cloud platforms?Yes, it is cloud-agnostic but teaches you how to apply principles across all major providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. What kind of training is provided for MDE?The training is highly practical. You get access to labs, real-world scenarios, and expert guidance to help you master the material. Can I take the MDE exam online?Yes, the program is designed to be accessible to professionals all over the world through online platforms. What is the focus of the MDE curriculum?The core focus is on automation, scalability, reliability, and security within the software delivery lifecycle. How do I get started with MDE?The best way is to visit the official provider’s website, review the syllabus, and sign up for a training session that fits your schedule. Conclusion
The path to becoming a Master in DevOps Engineering is both challenging and rewarding. By following a structured guide and choosing the right certification, you position yourself at the top of the engineering talent pool. Therefore, do not wait for the future to happen; instead, go out and build it. The MDE program is your roadmap to success in the modern world of technology.
View the full article
reporter

TeamPCP Worm Exploits Cloud Infrastructure to Build Criminal Infrastructure

Cybersecurity researchers have called attention to a "massive campaign" that has systematically targeted cloud native environments to set up malicious infrastructure for follow-on exploitation. The activity, observed around December 25, 2025, and described as "worm-driven," leveraged exposed Docker APIs, Kubernetes clusters, Ray dashboards, and Redis servers, along with the recently disclosedView the full article
Hacker News

NIS2: Supply chains as a risk factor

Many companies today invest significant resources to secure their internal IT. Firewalls, monitoring, incident response plans, and awareness programs are well-established. At the same time, a dangerous illusion is growing: the assumption that risks can be controlled within the boundaries of one’s own system.
The reality is quite different. Modern business models are virtually inconceivable without external IT service providers, cloud services, software vendors, and specialized subcontractors. This is precisely where the greatest uncertainties arise.
NIS2 addresses this development and clarifies that cybersecurity doesn’t end at the company’s own firewall. The guideline compels companies to reassess their supply chains not only technically, but also strategically. It makes external dependencies an integral part of the security architecture and thus a management responsibility.
NIS2 shifts the focus of systems to dependencies.
At its core, NIS2 follows a clear approach: Risks should be addressed where they originate. Statistics and incident analyses have shown for years that attacks are increasingly carried out via third parties. Software updates, maintenance access, or outsourced services serve as entry points.


NIS2 addresses this by explicitly including supply chains in its scope. Companies are obligated to assess risks related to their direct service providers as well as downstream subcontractors. The decisive factor is no longer whether an incident originates internally or externally, but rather its impact on critical services.


This marks a departure from a purely technical understanding of security in the regulatory framework. It demands a structured management of dependencies that makes risks visible and manageable.
Why supply chains are particularly vulnerable
The supply chain is an attractive target for attackers for several reasons. External partners often have privileged access, work with sensitive data, or are deeply integrated into operational processes. At the same time, they are often not subject to the same security standards as large organizations.


Furthermore, there is a structural lack of transparency. Companies often don’t know which other service providers their partners use or how access is technically implemented. This lack of visibility leads to a fragmented security landscape in which risks are known but remain unquantifiable.


NIS2 addresses this issue directly and requires transparent processes for identifying, assessing, and monitoring these risks.
The break with traditional compliance
Many organizations are accustomed to formally fulfilling regulatory requirements. Questionnaires are sent out, certificates are filed, checklists are ticked off. This approach generates documentation, but not security.
NIS2 makes it clear that formal compliance is not enough. The directive requires the effective implementation of security measures and verifiable monitoring of their effectiveness. This also applies to, and especially applies to, external partners.


A security concept that relies solely on self-reported information no longer meets the requirements. A realistic picture of the actual security maturity along the supply chain is needed.
What NIS2 specifically expects from companies
NIS2 does not specify detailed technical requirements but defines clear objectives. Companies must identify, prioritize, and appropriately manage risks. For supply chains, this entails several key tasks:
First, dependencies must be systematically identified. Which service providers are essential for operations? What data do they process? What access rights do they have? Secondly, appropriate security requirements must be defined. These must be commensurate with the risk and contractually stipulated. Third, NIS2 requires continuous monitoring. Risks change. Business models, threat landscapes, and technical architectures evolve. Security assessments must therefore not be a one-off project. The role of the CISO under NIS2
For CISOs, NIS2 represents a significant expansion of their responsibilities. Technical excellence alone is no longer sufficient. Communication skills, risk assessment, and the ability to enforce security requirements across the organization are now essential.


The CISO becomes the intermediary between technology, management, procurement, and legal. They must explain why certain requirements are necessary, what risks exist, and what the consequences of inaction might be. NIS2 strengthens this role by defining clear responsibilities and anchoring the importance of cybersecurity at the board level.
Why many supply chain assessments go wrong
In practice, supply chain assessments often fail for the following three reasons:
Lack of prioritization: Companies try to treat all partners equally and lose focus on the truly critical dependencies. Lack of enforceability: Safety requirements are formulated but not checked or consistently enforced in case of deviations. Organizational silos: Purchasing, IT, and legal departments operate separately. As a result, security risks are viewed in a fragmented way and not managed holistically. NIS2 makes it clear that these approaches are no longer sufficient. An integrated risk management system is required.
Control mechanisms with substance
Effective control does not mean maximum bureaucracy. The quality of the measures is crucial. For critical partners, this could include regular technical assessments, structured audits, or clearly defined escalation processes.


It is important that companies retain the ability to assess risks independently and do not completely outsource them to third parties. NIS2 requires taking responsibility, not delegating it.


Control mechanisms must also be scalable. Not every partner requires the same level of effort. The potential impact of a security incident is crucial.
Supply chains as a strategic resilience factor
Companies that view NIS2 as a purely compliance-related task are missing out on potential. A realistic assessment of supply chains not only strengthens their regulatory position but also increases operational stability. Transparent dependencies, clear security requirements, and effective control processes reduce the risk of disruption and improve responsiveness in emergencies. Supply chains are thus transformed from a weak point into a strategic resource.
Conclusion: NIS2 forces honesty
NIS2 confronts companies with an uncomfortable truth: Cybersecurity doesn’t end at the boundaries of their own systems. Those who outsource critical processes remain responsible.


The directive calls for an honest assessment of dependencies, risks, and the ability to control them. For CISOs, this presents both a challenge and an opportunity. Supply chains are no longer a side issue under NIS2. They are the touchstone for effective cybersecurity and sustainable resilience. 
View the full article
CSOonline

Behörden warnen vor Hackerangriffen auf Politik und Militär

nikkimeel – shutterstock.com
Mit gefälschten Chatnachrichten vor allem im Messengerdienst Signal nehmen Hacker zurzeit hochrangige deutsche Politiker, Soldaten, Diplomaten und auch Journalisten ins Visier – davor warnen die Bundesämter für Verfassungsschutz und für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik. Ziel des “wahrscheinlich staatlich gesteuerten” Angriffs sei es, unbemerkt Zugriff auf Einzel- und Gruppenchats sowie Kontaktlisten der Betroffenen zu bekommen, heißt es in einem gemeinsamen Sicherheitshinweis, der der Deutschen Presse-Agentur vorliegt. Zuerst berichtete der “Spiegel” darüber.
Die Angreifer geben sich demnach unter anderem als offizielles Signal-Support-Team aus, senden eine Sicherheitswarnung und bitten um die geheime Sicherheits-Pin. Damit übernehmen sie dann das ganze Konto und verlagern es auf eine von ihnen kontrollierte Handynummer. Bei der zweiten Methode machen sich die Angreifer den Angaben zufolge die Standardfunktion zur Kopplung eines weiteren Handys zunutze. Die Freigabe erfolgt durch das Scannen und Bestätigen eines QR-Codes auf dem Primär-Handy.
Keine Schadprogramme, keine Schwachstellen 
Wichtig: In beiden Fällen werden keine Schadprogramme eingesetzt oder technische Schwachstellen ausgenutzt, sondern allein die Arglosigkeit der Benutzer. Die Behörden stellen klar: Der Kundendienst von Signal meldet sich niemals direkt per Nachricht. Zudem sollten Nutzer niemals ihre Pin als Textnachricht eingeben. Wegen ähnlicher Funktionsprinzipien seien solche Attacken auch bei WhatsApp denkbar. 
Signal gilt als besonders sicherer Messengerdienst und bietet eine wirksame Ende-zu-Ende-Verschüsselung. Er wird deshalb besonders gerne von Personen eingesetzt, die potenziell gefährdet sind, darunter Journalisten, Politiker, Menschenrechtsaktivisten und andere.
Erst Ende Januar hatte Innenminister Alexander Dobrindt beklagt, Deutschland erlebe ständig Cyberangriffe – auf Institutionen, Infrastruktur und Unternehmen. Oft gingen die Attacken von Gruppen aus, die Verbindungen zu staatlichen Geheimdiensten hätten und von diesen finanziert würden, so der CSU-Politiker mit Blick auf hybride Angriffe aus Russland und anderen Teilen der Welt. Um die Abwehr besser zu koordinieren, plane das Innenministerium ein Abwehrzentrum gegen hybride Gefahren, das derzeit vom Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz vorbereitet werde und im Laufe dieses Jahres seine Arbeit aufnehmen solle.
“Kompromittierung ganzer Netzwerke” möglich 
Die Behörden stufen die laufende Angriffskampagne via Signal im Hinblick auf hochrangige Zielpersonen als sicherheitsrelevant ein, wie es in dem Hinweis heißt. Ein erfolgreicher Zugriff auf Messenger-Konten ermöglicht demnach “nicht nur die Einsicht in vertrauliche Einzelkommunikation, sondern potenziell auch die Kompromittierung ganzer Netzwerke über Gruppen-Chats”. Überdies ließen sich sensible Kontaktstrukturen rekonstruieren. (dpa/jm)

View the full article
CSOonline

Behörden warnen vor Hackerangriffen auf Politik und Militär

nikkimeel – shutterstock.com
Mit gefälschten Chatnachrichten vor allem im Messengerdienst Signal nehmen Hacker zurzeit hochrangige deutsche Politiker, Soldaten, Diplomaten und auch Journalisten ins Visier – davor warnen die Bundesämter für Verfassungsschutz und für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik. Ziel des “wahrscheinlich staatlich gesteuerten” Angriffs sei es, unbemerkt Zugriff auf Einzel- und Gruppenchats sowie Kontaktlisten der Betroffenen zu bekommen, heißt es in einem gemeinsamen Sicherheitshinweis, der der Deutschen Presse-Agentur vorliegt. Zuerst berichtete der “Spiegel” darüber.
Die Angreifer geben sich demnach unter anderem als offizielles Signal-Support-Team aus, senden eine Sicherheitswarnung und bitten um die geheime Sicherheits-Pin. Damit übernehmen sie dann das ganze Konto und verlagern es auf eine von ihnen kontrollierte Handynummer. Bei der zweiten Methode machen sich die Angreifer den Angaben zufolge die Standardfunktion zur Kopplung eines weiteren Handys zunutze. Die Freigabe erfolgt durch das Scannen und Bestätigen eines QR-Codes auf dem Primär-Handy.
Keine Schadprogramme, keine Schwachstellen 
Wichtig: In beiden Fällen werden keine Schadprogramme eingesetzt oder technische Schwachstellen ausgenutzt, sondern allein die Arglosigkeit der Benutzer. Die Behörden stellen klar: Der Kundendienst von Signal meldet sich niemals direkt per Nachricht. Zudem sollten Nutzer niemals ihre Pin als Textnachricht eingeben. Wegen ähnlicher Funktionsprinzipien seien solche Attacken auch bei WhatsApp denkbar. 
Signal gilt als besonders sicherer Messengerdienst und bietet eine wirksame Ende-zu-Ende-Verschüsselung. Er wird deshalb besonders gerne von Personen eingesetzt, die potenziell gefährdet sind, darunter Journalisten, Politiker, Menschenrechtsaktivisten und andere.
Erst Ende Januar hatte Innenminister Alexander Dobrindt beklagt, Deutschland erlebe ständig Cyberangriffe – auf Institutionen, Infrastruktur und Unternehmen. Oft gingen die Attacken von Gruppen aus, die Verbindungen zu staatlichen Geheimdiensten hätten und von diesen finanziert würden, so der CSU-Politiker mit Blick auf hybride Angriffe aus Russland und anderen Teilen der Welt. Um die Abwehr besser zu koordinieren, plane das Innenministerium ein Abwehrzentrum gegen hybride Gefahren, das derzeit vom Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz vorbereitet werde und im Laufe dieses Jahres seine Arbeit aufnehmen solle.
“Kompromittierung ganzer Netzwerke” möglich 
Die Behörden stufen die laufende Angriffskampagne via Signal im Hinblick auf hochrangige Zielpersonen als sicherheitsrelevant ein, wie es in dem Hinweis heißt. Ein erfolgreicher Zugriff auf Messenger-Konten ermöglicht demnach “nicht nur die Einsicht in vertrauliche Einzelkommunikation, sondern potenziell auch die Kompromittierung ganzer Netzwerke über Gruppen-Chats”. Überdies ließen sich sensible Kontaktstrukturen rekonstruieren. (dpa/jm)

View the full article
CSOonline

BeyondTrust Fixes Critical Pre-Auth RCE Vulnerability in Remote Support and PRA

BeyondTrust has released updates to address a critical security flaw impacting Remote Support (RS) and Privileged Remote Access (PRA) products that, if successfully exploited, could result in remote code execution. "BeyondTrust Remote Support (RS) and certain older versions of Privileged Remote Access (PRA) contain a critical pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability," the companyView the full article
Hacker News

Software developers: Prime cyber targets and a rising risk vector for CISOs

Threats against corporate software developers are increasing and diversifying, challenging security leaders to develop more agile defenses against this growing attack vector.
Attackers are increasingly targeting the tools, access, and trusted channels used by software developers rather than simply exploiting application bugs. The threats blend technical compromise — malicious packages, development pipeline abuse, etc. — with social engineering and AI-driven attacks.
“Attackers are no longer just trying to break into the network; they are trying to break into the workflow,” says Chris Wood, principal application security SME at cybersecurity firm Immersive. “By compromising the tools developers trust implicitly, like extensions and package registries, they can poison the well before a single line of code is written.”
The tokens, API keys, cloud credentials, and CI/CD secrets held by software developers unlock far broader access than a typical office user account, making software engineers a prime target for cybercriminals.
“They [developers] hold the keys to the kingdom, privileged access to source code and cloud infrastructure, making them a high-value target,” Wood adds.
Security experts quizzed by CSO said the threat against software developers can be broken into several categories, including: malicious extensions, IDE plugins, and tools; supply chain and dependency attacks; credential theft and environment compromise; social engineering; and AI risks in software development workflows.
Malicious utilities poison the ecosystem
Darren Meyer, security research advocate at application security firm Checkmarx, sees most attacks targeting developers as “low-effort” and untargeted.
For example, attackers plant tainted open-source packages on typosquatting domains to trick developers into installing malicious versions of popular utilities.
But spray-and-pray efforts are only part of the story. More targeted attacks are also in play, such as the Shai-Hulud worm hack against GitHub and other software development platforms, a recent assault against npm package Chalk, and attempts to compromise the Visual Studio Code plugin ecosystem, Meyer warns.
Meyer’s warning about tainted open-source packages is backed up by recent study by DevSecOps firm Sonatype that identified 1.233 million malicious packages.
Known vulnerable components also pose a massive risk. Four years after the vulnerability was patched, versions of Log4j vulnerable to the Log4Shell vulnerability were downloaded 42 million times last year, according to Sonatype’s latest State of the Software Supply Chain report.
Credential theft and environment compromise
Attackers aren’t just looking for flaws in code — they’re looking for access to software development environments.
Common security shortcomings, including overprivileged service accounts, long-lived tokens, and misconfigured pipelines, offer a ready means for illicit entry into sensitive software development environments.
“Improperly stored access credentials are low-hanging fruit for even the most amateur of threat actors,” says Crystal Morin, senior cybersecurity strategist at cloud-native security and observability vendor Sysdig.
Malicious insider threats
Attackers are also looking for ways to infiltrate targeted enterprises by posing as software development contractors or remote hire workers.
Fake worker schemes, a popular tactic spearheaded by North Korean threat actors, rely on using technically skilled individuals with falsified identities who use social engineering trickery to fool victims into hiring them. Once inside, these moles steal data and sensitive secrets that serve as collateral for blackmail scams, among other ruses.
“We’ve also seen threat actors pretend to be maintainers and commit malicious code to open-source projects with the goal of infecting users of popular packages, which was the case with the XZ Utils backdoor (CVE-2024-3094),” says Sysdig’s Morin.
Software supply chain risks
A compromised dependency such as a shared software library can taint the code of any developer that relies on it, leading to a large and growing software supply chain risk.
Gavin Millard, VP of intelligence at exposure management company Tenable, says threats from the software supply chain have supplanted exploits to become the greatest systemic cybersecurity risk.
Software supply chain risks mean the attack surface has expanded beyond traditional vulnerabilities and stolen credentials to the hijacking of maintainer accounts on platforms such as npm or PyPI.
“As evidenced by the recent S1ngularity and npm maintainer hijacks, a single poisoned update in a common library can achieve more in minutes than a year spent sending targeted phishing messages or scanning the internet for exposed systems,” Millard tells CSO.
Abusing the supply chain offers a “force multiplier” for any adversary, he adds.
“For a mainstream user, a breach is a data leak, but for a developer, it’s a poisoned well that could infect every application they develop and every user of their products downstream,” Millard explains.
Concerns about the resilience of supply chains against cyberattacks are growing. The World Economic Forum’s latest annual Global Cybersecurity Outlook report shows that 65% of large enterprises report that third-party and supply chain vulnerabilities are their greatest challenge, a figure that has risen from 54% in 2025.
“Developers routinely pull code from public registries, install third-party dependencies, grant automation broad permissions and publish artefacts that downstream systems implicitly trust,” says Christopher Jess, senior R&D manager at application security firm Black Duck.
“Attackers are exploiting that reality by shifting left into the developer toolchain by poisoning open-source packages, typosquatting popular libraries, publishing malicious extensions into IDE marketplaces, and targeting build systems where a single compromised pipeline can affect every environment,” he adds.
Blended threat model
Attackers have also begun blending technical compromise with social engineering to increase the potency of their attacks, Jess notes.
“A malicious package may be seeded with subtle backdoors, then amplified through convincing outreach with fake maintainer messages, urgent security-fix pull requests, or impersonation of trusted collaborators to accelerate adoption,” Jess explains.
“AI is raising the scale and precision of these attacks: phishing and pretexting can be more contextual — matching repo names, commit history, and team roles — and adversaries can generate plausible code changes or documentation that reduce suspicion during review,” he says.
AI-assisted development increases exposure
AI-assisted development and “vibe coding” are increasing exposure to risk, especially because such code is often generated quickly without adequate testing, documentation, or traceability.
Jamie Beckland, chief product officer at cybersecurity firm APIContext, warns that as software development teams adopt AI agents and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, a new, growing risk is tool sprawl with opaque permissions.
“MCP servers can be modified by adding tools designed to exfiltrate data from internal APIs, data stores, or SaaS systems,” Beckland says. “The risk isn’t just the LLM model, it’s the tooling surface area and what those tools can reach.”
“Monitoring MCP servers for changes in the tool infrastructure, and the data access rights of the server, is critical to verify changes in tools and requests.”
Pieter Danhieux, CEO and co-founder of cybersecurity education firm Secure Code Warrior, adds that MCPs and AI agents are fertile ground for attackers because it is easy to “purposely introduce an insecure prompt or insert AI-augmented malicious code.”
“Additionally, we’ve seen threat actors exploit user identity in new ways, namely with the confused deputy vulnerability where threat actors will fool AI agents into taking unauthorized actions on behalf of the user,” Danhieux says.
Sonatype’s analysis of 37,000 recommendations shows that GPT-5 hallucinated 27.8% of component versions and even suggested actual malware packages in some cases, a statistic that emphasises the need for human code review.
According to BaxBench, 62% of the solutions generated even by the best large language model (LLMs) are either incorrect or contain a security vulnerability, highlighting that LLMs cannot yet generate deployment-ready code.
CISOs need to “stop obsessing over individual vulnerabilities and start mastering their total exposure, including the provenance of the shared libraries automatically pulled in via AI code assistants,” Tenable’s Millard says.
Countermeasures
For CISOs, hardening software development environments requires a blend of technical controls, security education and creating a security-aware culture.
Tighter identity verification checks, credential hygiene and least-privilege access to data offer steps to building greater security maturity into software development practices.
“Well-known solutions to these problems include isolating workspaces in containers, centralizing image and secret management, and enforcing regular audits and procedure logging, all of which can effectively reduce the danger,” says Eric Paulsen, CTO for EMEA at software development platform provider Coder.
Best practice has always been to pin workflow actions against immutable SHA hashes stored on tamper-proof hardware modules, according to David Sugden, head of engineering at digital transformation consultancy Axiologik.
“Similarly, allow lists, secrets scanning, and software composition analysis continue to form DevSecOps baselines that increase protection,” Sugden says. “Gating direct access to external dependencies offers protection against malicious packages and versions, as well as preventing downloads for older, insecure packages.”
Michael Burch, application security advocate at cybersecurity training firm Security Journey, emphasizes the importance of offering software developers continuous, hands-on training.
“Developers need realistic exercises that demonstrate impact. Allow them to see how systems fail and empower them to fix issues themselves,” Burch advises.
View the full article
CSOonline

Customer Identity & Access Management: Die besten CIAM-Tools

Jackie Niam | shutterstock.com
Customer Identity & Access Management (CIAM) bildet eine Unterkategorie von Identity & Access Management (IAM). CIAM wird dazu eingesetzt, die Authentifizierungs- und Autorisierungsprozesse von Applikationen zu managen, die öffentlich zugänglich sind, beziehungsweise von Kunden bedient werden.
Geht es darum, die für Ihr Unternehmen passende CIAM-Lösung zu ermitteln, gilt es, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit mit einer langen Liste von Geschäftszielen und -anforderungen ins Gleichgewicht zu bringen:
Marketingverantwortliche wollen Daten über Kunden und deren Geräte sammeln.
Datenschutzbeauftragte wollen sicherstellen, dass alle Prozesse mit den Datenschutzbestimmungen in Einklang stehen.
Security- und Risiko-Entscheider wollen die Integrität der Konten sicherstellen und die betrügerische Nutzung von Anmeldedaten so weit wie möglich verhindern.
Um Sie bei diesem heiklen Balanceakt zu unterstützen, haben wir die derzeit besten Lösungen, die der Markt für Customer Identity & Access Management zu bieten hat, für Sie zusammengestellt.
Empfehlenswerte Customer Identity & Access Management Tools
Die folgenden CIAM-Plattformen und -Lösungen werden von Analysten und Kunden aufgrund ihres Funktionsumfangs, ihrer Erweiterbarkeit und ihrer Benutzerfreundlichkeit bevorzugt.
IBM Security Verify
Im Enterprise-Bereich erhält IBMs Security Verify gute Noten für seine robuste Infrastruktur, die durch eine containersierte Multi-Cloud-Architektur gestützt wird. Diese ist nicht nur skalierbar, sondern bietet Unternehmen auch die Möglichkeit, isolierte Kundeninstanzen zu managen. Dabei bietet die IBM-Lösung Support für eine Vielzahl von Authentifizierungsstandards, inklusive FIDO 2 Server-Zertifizierung. Um Marketing-Analysen oder BI-Funktionen zu integrieren, können die Kunden entweder das IBM-eigene Ökosystem oder Drittanbieter über ein ausgedehntes Konnektoren-Portfolio ins Boot holen.
Ein wichtiges Alleinstellungsmerkmal des IBM-Produkts: Während viele andere CIAM-Produkte in Sachen risikobasierte Authentifizierung und Betrugsbekämpfung nur Integrationsoptionen anbieten können, bringt Security Verify diese Funktionen nativ mit: Die “Trusteer”-Funktionen nutzen Analysefunktionen, um Betrug mit Hilfe von KI-gestütztem, adaptivem Zugriff zu reduzieren. Das System nutzt eine Kombination aus Anomalieerkennung, Erkennung von Betrugsmustern und anderen passiven Verhaltensanalysen, um die Vertrauenswürdigkeit eines Kontos zu bewerten und die Authentifizierungsanforderungen entsprechend anzupassen.
Darüber hinaus bietet die IBM-Lösung auch ein Self-Service-Portal für die Benutzer, um Einwilligungen zu managen sowie eine Low-Code/No-Code-Management-Funktion, die Datenschutzbeauftrage und Business-Entscheidern ermöglicht, Datenschutzrichtlinien und -anforderungen ohne die Hilfe von Softwareentwicklern festzulegen und zu optimieren.
LoginRadius
Wenn Sie in Sachen CIAM eine schlüsselfertige Lösung suchen, die für ihre einfache Implementierung und Bedienung bekannt ist, sollten Sie einen Blick auf das Angebot von LoginRadius werfen: Sie bringt umfassenden API-Support mit und lässt sich in vielfacher Hinsicht an ihre Bedürfnisse anpassen. Allerdings handelt es sich hierbei nicht um eine Plattform, die für umfangreiche Code-Anpassungen unter der Haube gedacht ist. Vielmehr adressiert sie als No-Code-Lösung Unternehmen, die wenig bis gar keine Entwicklungsarbeit leisten wollen oder können.
Onboarding-Workflows werden über eine grafische Benutzeroberfläche abgewickelt, Richtlinien über Dropdown-Listen erstellt. Zu Integrationszwecken steht ein Marktplatz mit vordefinierten Konnektoren zur Verfügung. Darüber hinaus enthält die CIAM-Plattform auch eine integrierte Analyse-Engine mit Dutzenden von Reportings für Marketing- und Identitätsanalysen. Um Datenschutz- und Compliance-Anforderungen gerecht zu werden, stehen grundlegende Consent-Management- und Self-Service-Funktionen zur Verfügung – zudem wird etwa Social Login unterstützt.
Für die einfache Bedienung und die Deployment-Vorzüge opfern Unternehmen ein gewisses Maß an Kontrolle: So verfügt das Tool zwar über eine Authentifizierungs-Risiko-Engine, bietet aber nur wenig Kontrolle über dessen Priorisierung. Für Betrugserkennungs-Funktionen von Drittanbietern stehen nicht besonders viele Konnektoren zur Verfügung und Geräteattribute werden für Risikobewertungen und -analysen zwar untersucht, allerdings nur in begrenztem Umfang.
Microsoft Entra
Microsoft ist zwar ein wichtiger Akteur auf dem breiteren IAM-Markt, arbeitet sich in Sachen CIAM aber immer noch auf der Reifegradskala nach oben. Im Rahmen ihrer letzten großen Access-Management-Analyse argumentierten die Marktforscher von Gartner, die CIAM-Funktionen von Azure AD seien im Vergleich zu den Konkurrenzangeboten unausgereift, weswegen die meisten Kunden das Produkt nur für Workforce-Szenarien verwendeten. Seitdem ist allerdings viel passiert: Microsoft hat mit Nachdruck in sein gesamtes Identity-Portfolio investiert und sich mit einer neuen Produktlinie namens Entra positioniert. Diese umfasst nun das komplette Azure-AD-Paket, inklusive der CIAM-Funktionalitäten von Azure AD External Identities – zudem wurde auch die Open-Standard-Plattform Verified ID in den Mix aufgenommen. Microsoft setzt auf dieses dezentrale Identitätsnachweis-Ökosystem in erster Linie für Mitarbeiterszenarien und setzt damit einen langfristigen strategischen Schwerpunkt, der sich vermutlich auch auf externe Anwendungsfälle erstrecken wird.
Trotz einiger großer Funktionslücken – etwa fehlende Consumer Privacy Dashboards oder der eher rudimentären Adaptive-Authentication-Policy-Konstruktion – hat Azure AD External Identities Vorteile: Es ist extrem skalierbar, einfach zu bedienen und verfügt über einige starke Account-Takeover-Schutzmechanismen. Zudem lässt es sich gut mit Microsofts BI- und CRM-Plattformen für erweiterte Analysen integrieren und bietet ein kontinuierlich wachsendes Integrations-Ökosystem.
Okta / Auth0
Nach der Übernahme von Auth0 will Okta das CIAM-Produkt von Auth0 als eigenständiges Angebot neben den hauseigenen CIAM-Funktionen beibehalten, um Kunden maximale Flexibilität bei der Implementierung zu bieten. Nichtsdestotrotz wird es zu Überschneidungen und Integrationen kommen – Okta hat bereits mehrere Funktionen kombiniert, um die Fähigkeit zu Zusammenarbeit und Innovation zu beschleunigen.
Auth0 bietet zwar einige Workforce-IAM-Funktionen an, aber diese Plattform ist mit CIAM-Anwendungsfällen groß geworden – entsprechend stark ausgeprägt ist der Fokus auf diesen Bereich. Laut den Analysten von Gartner eignet sich die CIAM-Lösung von Auth0 vor allem dann, wenn Entwickler Access Management für Verbraucher in individuell entwickelte, API-lastige Anwendungen einbauen müssen. Dazu kombiniert die Plattform “großartige UX-Flows und UI-Anpassungsfähigkeiten” mit “umfassenden Entwickler-Tools und vollständiger API-Unterstützung”, heißt es in Gartners Magic Quadrant.
Das gesamte Okta-CIAM-Portfolio verfügt über eine Reihe von Konnektoren für Business Intelligence, CRM, Marketing-Analytics und -Automatisierung, andere IAM-Plattformen, beliebte SaaS-Anwendungen und Plattformen zur Betrugsbekämpfung. Raum nach oben gibt es bei diesem Produkt, wenn es darum geht, Geräteintelligenz und Verhaltensbiometrie in die nativen Funktionen der Plattform zu integrieren.
OneLogin
Der Identity-as-a-Service (IdaaS)-Anbieter OneLogin gehört in Gartners Magic Quadrant für Access Management zur Spitzengruppe und bietet einige abgespeckte, entwicklerfreundliche CIAM-Funktionen. Die könnten speziell für Unternehmen, die eine erschwingliche Option für den Aufbau einer stärkeren Kundenauthentifizierung suchen, hilfreich sein. Laut Gartner liegt die Stärke von OneLogin auch in den erschwinglichen Preisen, die das Unternehmen für externe Zugriffsmanagement-Anwendungen aufruft.
Die Lösung selbst zeichnet sich dabei durch seine flexible Erweiterbarkeit mit umfangreicher Entwicklerunterstützung und seine robusten APIs aus. Die Serverless Smart-Hooks-API-Funktion soll Entwickler dabei unterstützen, CIAM-Workflows und -Richtlinien anzupassen, um möglichst nahtlose und sichere Benutzererfahrungen während der Anmeldung zu gewährleisten. Entlastung gibt es auch, wenn es um Single-Sign-On geht – auch hier unterstützt das Tool dabei, entsprechende Funktionen in Consumer-Apps einzubauen.
Im Gegensatz zu vielen anderen CIAM-Lösungen in dieser Übersicht, gehören allerdings keine Out-of-the-Box-Funktionen für Consent Management oder geschäftsorientierte Funktionen wie Marketing-Analysen und Automatisierung zum Paket – es handelt sich in erster Linie um eine Authentifizierungs- und Autorisierungslösung.
Nach der Übernahme durch One Identity war erwartet worden, dass sich das Portfolio stärker in Richtung Workforce IAM entwickeln wird. Davon ist ein Jahr später allerdings noch nichts zu sehen.
Ping Identity
Ping Identity ist einer der ersten Enterprise-IAM-Anbieter, der in CIAM-Gewässer abtaucht. Dabei überzeugt er vor allem in Sachen Identitäsnachweise, -orchestrierung und Analytics-Funktionen – auch der Umfang der unterstützten Authentifikatoren sowie die Dokumentation und Sicherheit der API-Konnektoren sind positiv hervorzuheben. Ein “Fraud”-Modul spürt darüber hinaus mit Hilfe von Echtzeit-Verhaltensnavigation, Verhaltensbiometrie, Geräte- und Netzwerkattributen potenzielle, betrügerische Angriffe auf. Auch die Integration mit externen Betrugserkennungs-Plattformen ist möglich. Ping Identity hebt sich von anderen Anbietern zudem dadurch ab, dass es den FIDO-2-Standard nicht nur unterstützt, sondern einen entsprechend zertifizierten Server betreibt.
Die Analysten von KuppingerCole sehen auch Schwachpunkte, etwa die nur rudimentäre Verwaltung von Berechtigungen für Verbraucher, die in den meisten Fällen zusätzliche Entwicklungs- und Integrationsarbeit erfordern. Auch die noch in der Entwicklung befindlichen Out-of-the-Box-Konnektoren für erweiterte Business Intelligence, Customer Relationship Management und Marketing-Analytics bemängeln die Analysten – bewerten das Ping-Identity-Offering aber dennoch sehr positiv. Laut Gartner gehört Ping Identity zu den “erschwinglicheren Optionen auf dem CIAM-Markt”.
Im August 2023 übernahm der Ping-Identity-Mutterkonzern Thoma Bravo den Sicherheitsanbieter Forge Rock – und integrierte dessen Potfolio in Ping Identity. (fm)
Sie wollen weitere interessante Beiträge rund um das Thema IT-Sicherheit lesen? Unser kostenloser Newsletter liefert Ihnen alles, was Sicherheitsentscheider und -experten wissen sollten, direkt in Ihre Inbox.
View the full article
CSOonline

iOS 27 to Focus on Bug Fixes, Performance, and Design Tweaks

Apple's new software updates to be previewed at 2026's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) could be relatively modest, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman claims.


In today's "Power On" newsletter, Gurman said that iOS 27 will be unveiled at WWDC this year, and while it will deliver further Apple Intelligence improvements, the event will be "a fairly muted affair this year." The headline new software features will apparently be a "more personalized Siri with a chatbot interface," as previously rumored, but the software platforms will generally focus on performance improvements, bug fixes, and fine-tuning the design.

Gurman added that the first beta version of iOS 26.4 will release to developers during the week of February 23, featuring "some components" of the long-anticipated improvements to ‌Siri‌.

WWDC 2026 is likely to be announced toward the end of March and take place in the first or second week of June. The major new software updates unveiled at the event will probably be available to developers in beta immediately after the keynote address, and release to the public in the fall.

Tags: iOS 27, WWDC 2026
This article, "iOS 27 to Focus on Bug Fixes, Performance, and Design Tweaks" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

The Future of Apple Fitness+ Remains 'Under Review'

The future of Apple Fitness+ remains "under review," according to the latest word from Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. However, he did not share any specific details.


"If I were to guess, Apple will ultimately meld its Health app with Fitness+ in some fashion — perhaps offering it as a combined subscription," said Gurman.

Gurman recently reported that Apple has scaled back plans for a separate Apple Health+ subscription service, which would have provided AI-powered health recommendations. However, he said some of the features that would have been part of Apple Health+ will be repurposed and rolled out individually.

Launched in 2020, Apple Fitness+ offers a library of trainer-led workout and meditation videos in Apple's Fitness app, across the iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV. In the U.S., the service costs $9.99 per month or $79.99 per year. Apple Fitness+ is also included in the Apple One Premier bundle for $37.95 per month.

Tag: Apple Fitness Plus
This article, "The Future of Apple Fitness+ Remains 'Under Review'" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Here Are Tim Cook's Full Remarks About Apple's 50th Anniversary Plans

In a recent all-hands meeting, Apple CEO Tim Cook told employees to "stay tuned" about the company's plans for its upcoming 50th anniversary. Apple was founded on April 1, 1976, so the company will turn 50 in a few more months.


Following a snippet last week, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has since shared Cook's full remarks:While it is likely that Cook was referring to a celebration for Apple employees, the company will almost certainly honor the occasion in a big way publicly too.

Apple went from flirting with bankruptcy in the late 1990s to becoming the world's most valuable public company in the early 2010s. It has introduced many iconic products, including the Macintosh in 1984, the iPod in 2001, the iPhone in 2007, and the Apple Watch in 2015. The company reported an all-time revenue record last quarter, driven by all-time high iPhone sales, so the company is still peaking financially.

Tag: Tim Cook
This article, "Here Are Tim Cook's Full Remarks About Apple's 50th Anniversary Plans" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Amazon Discounts Anker's Newest Prime Chargers

Earlier this week, Anker debuted its new Prime 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station with a launch discount on Amazon. If ordered this week, you can clip the on-page coupon on Amazon to get the accessory for $119.99, down from $149.99.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with Amazon. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

The Prime 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station features Qi2.2 support, which lets a compatible MagSafe ‌iPhone‌ charge at up to 25W. It's the same speed as Apple's ‌MagSafe‌ charger, and it is 10W faster than the standard Qi2 ‌MagSafe‌ chargers. You can also simultaneously charge an Apple Watch and AirPods with the device.

Note: You won't see the deal price until checkout.
$30 OFFAnker Prime 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station for $119.99

There are plenty of other Anker discounts happening on Amazon this week, including the Prime 14-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Dock back at its all-time low price of $339.99, down from $399.99. You can find this accessory and more on sale in the lists below, and note that as of writing only the new Prime 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station requires an on-page coupon.

$60 OFFAnker Prime 14-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Dock for $339.99

Wall Chargers

6-in-1 USB-C Power Strip - $79.99, down from $109.99
140W 4-Port GaN USB-C Charger - $89.99, down from $99.99
6-in-1 Prime USB-C Charging Station - $79.99, down from $109.99
14-in-1 Prime Thunderbolt 5 Dock - $339.99, down from $399.99
Wireless Chargers

Qi2 MagSafe-Compatible Wireless Charger 2-Pack - $25.98, down from $39.99
3-in-1 MagSafe-Compatible Charging Station - $89.99, down from $109.99
3-in-1 MagSafe-Compatible Charging Cube - $99.98, down from $149.95
3-in-1 Prime Wireless Charging Station (NEW) - $119.99 with on-page coupon, down from $149.99
Portable Chargers

MagGo Nano Power Bank 5,000 mAh - $45.99, down from $54.99
MagGo Power Bank 10,000 mAh - $63.99, down from $79.99
SOLIX C300 Power Station with Lantern - $169.99, down from $249.00
SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 Portable Power Station - $469.00, down from $799.00
SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 Portable Power Station - $849.00, down from $1,499.00

If you're on the hunt for more discounts, be sure to visit our Apple Deals roundup where we recap the best Apple-related bargains of the past week.



Deals Newsletter

Interested in hearing more about the best deals you can find in 2026? Sign up for our Deals Newsletter and we'll keep you updated so you don't miss the biggest deals of the season!




Related Roundup: Apple Deals
This article, "Amazon Discounts Anker's Newest Prime Chargers" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

How to Stream Super Bowl For Free Today on iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV

Super Bowl LX is today (Sunday, February 8), and there is a way for U.S. viewers to watch for free. Our instructions below are focused on the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV, but this method will of course work across a variety of devices.


2026's Super Bowl has the New England Patriots facing the Seattle Seahawks at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, California, with the kickoff time scheduled for 3:30 p.m. Pacific Time / 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time. These two teams already met in the 2015 Super Bowl, which ended in a Patriots championship.

The big game is airing on NBC and streaming on Peacock Premium today.

One way to stream the 2026 Super Bowl for free on the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV in the U.S. is to sign up for a free 30-day trial to Walmart+, which includes free access to Peacock Premium's ad-supported tier.

You can sign up for a Walmart+ trial online.

Next, here is how to activate free, ad-supported Peacock Premium via Walmart+:
Sign into your Walmart account.
Go to your Account page.
Select Walmart+.
Find Peacock Premium in the Benefits Hub.
Select Get Peacock.
Log in or create your streaming service account.
Follow the on-screen steps to finish setting up your account.
Build your profile and start streaming.Then, you can sign in to your Peacock account tied to Walmart+ in the Peacock app on the iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV. On the Mac, you can sign in on the Peacock website. As mentioned, these are Apple-focused instructions, but they apply to many other devices too.

In addition to the Super Bowl itself, you can watch the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show, featuring Puerto Rican singer Bad Bunny.

Do not forget that a Walmart+ subscription automatically renews after the 30-day free trial.Tag: Super Bowl
This article, "How to Stream Super Bowl For Free Today on iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

New MacBook Pros Could Now Arrive in March

New MacBook Pro models with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips could arrive as soon as Monday, March 2, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.


In today's "Power On" newsletter, Gurman said that the release of new ‌MacBook Pro‌ models is tied to the release of macOS Tahoe 26.3. The launch is said to be slated for as early as the week of March 2. He added that the M4 Pro and M4 Max models on sale today remain in short supply, indicating that the launch of new models is close.

Updated Mac Studio models "shouldn't arrive too long after the spring Mac refresh," according to Gurman. A new Studio Display and Mac mini continue to be on Apple's roadmap for this year, along with an all-new low-cost MacBook powered by an iPhone chip. The most significant Mac launch this year will be overhauled ‌MacBook Pro‌ models with OLED displays and touch support.

Related Roundup: MacBook ProTags: Bloomberg, Mark GurmanBuyer's Guide: MacBook Pro (Caution)Related Forum: MacBook Pro
This article, "New MacBook Pros Could Now Arrive in March" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Report Reveals iOS 26.4 Beta Release Date

Apple is set to release the first beta version of iOS 26.4 later this month, providing the first real-world look at the Apple Intelligence features promised at WWDC 2024, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman claims.


Gurman revealed the timing in his "Power On" newsletter. Barring further delays, the first beta version of iOS 26.4 is apparently set to release to developers during the week of February 23. The update will "include some components" of the long-anticipated improvements to Siri.

Gurman added that iOS 27 will deliver further ‌Apple Intelligence‌ improvements, but WWDC will be "a fairly muted affair this year." The main new features will be a "more personalized ‌Siri‌ with a chatbot interface." Apple is said to be focused on improving performance, fixing bugs, and fine-tuning the design of its software platforms this year.

Related Roundups: iOS 26, iPadOS 26Tags: Apple Intelligence, Bloomberg, Mark Gurman, SiriRelated Forum: iOS 26
This article, "Report Reveals iOS 26.4 Beta Release Date" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

iPad 12 and iPad Air 8 Reportedly Coming Soon

Apple is planning to launch new iPad and iPad Air models in the near future, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports.


Writing in today's "Power On" newsletter, Gurman explained that updated iPads are "coming soon," including a new entry-level ‌iPad‌ and a new ‌iPad Air‌. Both devices are not expected to feature design changes or major enhancements, instead focusing on new chips. The 12th-generation ‌iPad‌ is set to feature the A18 chip, while the eighth-generation ‌iPad Air‌ will apparently feature the M4 chip. The iPad mini is said to be the only new ‌iPad‌ set to get a bigger upgrade this year, moving to an OLED display.

The new chip is perhaps most significant for the ‌iPad‌, which will facilitate Apple Intelligence support on the device for the first time. Apple announced the 11th-generation ‌iPad‌ in March 2025 with the A16 chip, which does not support ‌Apple Intelligence‌, despite the technology being widely available across Apple's other devices at that time.

The ‌iPad‌ saw strong sales over the holidays, largely driven by the entry-level model. Apple purportedly plans to market the new model heavily to enterprise customers.

Related Roundup: iPadTags: Bloomberg, Mark GurmanBuyer's Guide: iPad (Don't Buy)Related Forum: iPad
This article, "iPad 12 and iPad Air 8 Reportedly Coming Soon" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Gurman: iPhone 17e Launch 'Imminent' With Four New Features

Apple's iPhone 17e is set to launch "imminently" with at least four new features, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.


In the latest edition of his "Power On" newsletter, Gurman said that the new lost-cost ‌iPhone‌ will feature the A19 chip first introduced with the iPhone 17 last year. The device will also address one of the most glaring omissions from the current generation and add MagSage connectivity. The device is also apparently set to feature Apple's latest cellular modem, the C1X chip, as well as its N1 chip for Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and Thread connectivity.

Gurman added that the device is set to be sold at the same $599 starting price as the iPhone 16e, proposing to offer more features for the same cost. Apple is said to be planning to market the ‌iPhone‌ 17e heavily to users in emerging markets and enterprises, and could benefit from weakened competition in the segment from competitors like Google and Samsung.

Tags: Bloomberg, Mark Gurman
This article, "Gurman: iPhone 17e Launch 'Imminent' With Four New Features" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

OpenClaw Integrates VirusTotal Scanning to Detect Malicious ClawHub Skills

OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot and Clawdbot) has announced that it's partnering with Google-owned VirusTotal to scan skills that are being uploaded to ClawHub, its skill marketplace, as part of broader efforts to bolster the security of the agentic ecosystem. "All skills published to ClawHub are now scanned using VirusTotal's threat intelligence, including their new Code Insight capability,"View the full article
Hacker News

Apple Testing Two Major iPhone 18 Pro Camera Upgrades

Apple is actively testing two major rear camera improvements for the iPhone, according to a reputable leaker.


The Weibo user known as "Digital Chat Station" claims that Apple is testing a new main camera for the ‌iPhone‌ with a variable aperture. A variable aperture allows the camera to adjust the amount of light that reaches the sensor. This means that in dark environments, the aperture can be opened to receive more light, while in light environments, it can be closed to prevent over-exposure. It also should provide users with greater control over depth of field, which refers to how sharp a subject appears in the foreground compared to the background.

The claim corroborates a multitude of previous rumors that the iPhone 18 Pro and ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro Max will feature an upgraded main camera with a variable aperture. In December 2024, Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo was first to say that that the main rear camera on both ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro models will offer variable aperture. A more recent report from October 2025 said Apple was moving ahead with plans to bring the technology to next-generation iPhones and was discussing components with suppliers.

Apple has never used a variable aperture on an ‌iPhone‌ camera before. The main cameras on all of the ‌iPhone‌ 14 Pro through iPhone 17 Pro models have a fixed aperture of ƒ/1.78, and the lens is always fully open and shooting with this aperture. Samsung Electronics previously brought a variable aperture camera to its Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S10 models in 2018 and 2019, but due to increased thickness and high price, it dropped the feature in 2020.

Secondly, the leaker reiterated their claim that that Apple is testing a new telephoto camera with a larger aperture for the ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro. The ‌iPhone 17 Pro‌ models feature a telephoto camera with an ƒ/2.8 aperture. While the camera was upgraded to a 48-megapixel sensor, which was a substantial improvement over the 12-megapixel sensor used on previous generations, it retained the same aperture size. A larger aperture on the ‌iPhone‌'s telephoto camera would primarily improve light gathering, noise performance, shutter speed, and background separation.

Other rumors suggest that the ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro models could also gain a teleconverter to increase effective focal length and improve zoom reach, as well as a 24-megapixel front-facing camera. They are expected to launch in the fall alongside the first foldable ‌iPhone‌. Related Roundup: iPhone 18Tag: Digital Chat StationRelated Forum: iPhone
This article, "Apple Testing Two Major iPhone 18 Pro Camera Upgrades" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Docker in the Datacenter: Enterprise Orchestration + Security (What I Actually Do in Production)

I’ll be blunt from 20+ years of shipping systems: Docker is not “the platform” in an enterprise datacenter. Docker is the developer experience + image packaging standard that feeds an orchestration platform (usually Kubernetes or OpenShift) and a security program (supply chain + runtime controls). If you treat Docker like the whole story, you end up with snowflake hosts, unpatchable images, and “it worked on my laptop” outages.
Below is how I design, implement, and operate Docker-based container platforms end-to-end in real datacenters—small setups to regulated enterprises—focusing on orchestration and security with practical gates and failure modes.
1) What / Why / When / Where / How
What “Docker at the Datacenter” really means
In enterprise terms, Docker typically shows up in four places:
Build & packaging: Dockerfiles, BuildKit/buildx, image tagging, multi-arch builds. Developer runtime: Docker Desktop / Linux Docker Engine for local dev. Distribution: Pushing images to a registry (Harbor / Artifactory / ECR / ACR / GCR, etc.). Security controls: SBOMs, vulnerability scanning, policy evaluation, signing/attestations. And in production orchestration:
Kubernetes does not use Docker Engine as its runtime anymore (dockershim is gone). Production clusters run containerd / CRI-O and pull OCI images built by Docker tooling. () Why enterprises standardize on Docker images
Because images give you:
Consistent deployment units (app + deps) Faster environment parity Repeatable CI/CD A base for supply-chain security (SBOM/provenance/signing) When containers (and Docker images) are the right choice
Good fit
Stateless microservices, APIs, batch jobs CI runners/build agents Standardized packaging for polyglot stacks Repeatable, immutable deployments Be careful / not ideal
Stateful systems without a mature storage strategy Ultra-low-latency workloads where kernel noise matters Legacy apps that assume mutable hosts and in-place upgrades Where this runs in a datacenter
Bare metal (best performance, best isolation control) VMware / private cloud (common, operationally familiar) Hybrid (on-prem + public cloud) Air-gapped segments for regulated workloads How you make it work
You need an end-to-end method:
Build discipline (repeatable, minimal, signed) Registry discipline (private, governed, replicated) Orchestrator discipline (K8s/OpenShift + policies) Security discipline (supply chain + runtime + incident response) 2) Core Concepts & Mental Models (How I Teach Senior Engineers)
Mental Model A: “Image Supply Chain = Software Factory”
Think of every image as a manufactured artifact:
Inputs: base image + source code + dependencies Process: build steps, tests, scanners, SBOM/provenance generation Outputs: immutable image + metadata + signatures Quality gates: policy checks, vulnerability thresholds, provenance requirements Modern Docker-native tooling increasingly bakes this in (SBOM + policies). For example, Docker Scout Policy Evaluation adds explicit rules for artifact quality and supply-chain requirements. ()
Mental Model B: “Orchestration is about intent, not containers”
In enterprise, we don’t “run containers”—we run desired state:
replicas, rollout strategy, health checks resource guarantees/limits network identity and access secrets and config injection policy enforcement Docker helps you package. Orchestrators help you operate.
Mental Model C: “Security has layers—if one layer fails, another catches it”
Container security is never a single tool. I always split it into:
Build-time security (SBOM, scanning, provenance, signing) Registry security (admission rules, immutability, replication) Deploy-time security (admission controls, pod standards) Runtime security (behavior detection, syscall policies, eBPF) Host & network security (kernel hardening, segmentation) NIST’s container security guidance still frames the risk areas well (image, registry, orchestrator, host, runtime). ()
3) Orchestration Choices in Enterprise (Decision Matrix I Actually Use)
The short version
Compose: single-host, dev/test, small internal tooling Swarm: simple clustering, smaller ops teams, but fewer enterprise patterns Kubernetes: default for serious enterprise orchestration OpenShift: enterprise Kubernetes with strong governance & platform features Nomad: viable in some orgs (Hashi ecosystem), fewer K8s-native tools Docker still documents Swarm mode as a clustering/orchestration option.
Decision matrix
OptionWhere I use itStrengthsWeaknesses / hidden costsDocker ComposeSingle-node apps, dev, PoCsSimple, fastNot a platform; no multi-node HADocker SwarmSmall/medium internal platformsEasy to operate vs K8sSmaller ecosystem; fewer policy/security primitivesKubernetesMost enterprise platformsBest ecosystem, policy, observabilitySteeper learning curve; platform engineering requiredOpenShiftRegulated/large enterpriseBuilt-in governance + enterprise workflowsCost + platform complexityNomadMixed workloads, Hashi shopsSimpler than K8s for someSmaller cloud-native ecosystem My rule: if you expect multi-team scale, multi-tenancy, strong policy enforcement, or regulated controls, you almost always land on Kubernetes/OpenShift.
4) Security: What I Enforce (and Why)
4.1 Build-time: reduce risk before runtime
What I enforce as “non-negotiable” gates:
Pin base images by digest (not mutable tags like latest) Generate SBOM for every build Sign images (keyless or key-based) Attach provenance/attestations (SLSA-style) Fail builds on critical issues (policy-driven) Docker is pushing hard on hardened bases and supply-chain metadata. Their Docker Hardened Images emphasize reduced vulnerabilities plus SBOMs and provenance signals. ()
For image signing, I use Sigstore cosign in many pipelines because it’s practical and widely supported. ()
4.2 Deploy-time: stop bad workloads from entering the cluster
In Kubernetes, I align workloads to Pod Security Standards (Privileged / Baseline / Restricted) and enforce with admission. ()
What I’ve learned the hard way:
If you don’t enforce at admission time, you’ll end up trying to “hunt and fix” risky workloads later—painful, political, and slow.
4.3 Runtime: detect what slipped through
Even with strong build gates, you need runtime coverage:
syscall monitoring (Falco / eBPF-based tools) container escapes and suspicious child processes unexpected network egress crypto-mining behaviors privilege escalation patterns 4.4 Desktop/Dev environment security matters too
Enterprises often forget dev endpoints are part of the attack surface. Docker provides Enhanced Container Isolation for Docker Desktop to harden isolation on developer machines. ()
5) Reference Architecture (Enterprise Datacenter)
Here’s the reference architecture I use (conceptually) for most enterprises:
Dev Workstations - Docker Desktop / Docker Engine - Local policies + ECI (where applicable) | (git push / PR) v CI System (Jenkins/GitLab/GitHub Actions) - BuildKit/buildx - Unit/integration tests - SBOM generation - Vulnerability scan - Policy evaluation - Sign + attest | (push OCI image + metadata) v Enterprise Registry (Harbor/Artifactory/ECR/ACR) - Immutable tags / retention - Replication (DC1 <-> DC2) - Access control (RBAC) - Admission policies (only signed images) | (pull) v Orchestrator (Kubernetes / OpenShift) - containerd/CRI-O runtime - Admission (PSS + OPA/Kyverno) - Network policies (CNI like Cilium/Calico) - Secrets (Vault / external secrets) - Observability (Prometheus + logs + traces) | (telemetry) v Security + Operations - SIEM/SOAR integration - Runtime detection - Incident response playbooks - SLOs + DORA + cost KPIs 6) End-to-End Methodology (Phases, Gates, Decision Points)
Phase 0 — Platform decision gate (don’t skip this)
Decisions I force early:
Orchestrator: K8s vs OpenShift vs Swarm Tenant model: single-tenant vs multi-tenant clusters Registry: on-prem vs managed vs hybrid replication Compliance: air-gap requirements? audit trails? retention? Gate: You don’t start migrating apps until you can answer:
“How do I patch base images and roll changes fleet-wide in <30 days?”
Phase 1 — Build standardization
Standard Dockerfile patterns Base image policy (approved bases only) Tagging standard: app:semver, app:gitsha, plus digests Multi-arch builds if needed Gate: every image must be reproducible and traceable to a commit.
Phase 2 — Supply-chain security pipeline
SBOM generation and storage Vulnerability scanning Policy evaluation (fail builds on policy) Signing + provenance This is where tooling like Docker Scout policy evaluation can fit if your org is Docker-centric. ()
Gate: cluster only pulls images that pass policy + are signed.
Phase 3 — Registry hardening
Private registry + RBAC Immutable tags for releases Replication across datacenters Garbage collection + retention (avoid registry turning into a trash heap) Gate: image availability survives a datacenter outage (DR tested).
Phase 4 — Orchestrator foundation
Cluster lifecycle management Ingress/LB patterns Storage classes & backup Node hardening + runtime choice (containerd/CRI-O) Gate: you can do a safe canary rollout + rollback under load.
Phase 5 — Workload onboarding
Start with:
stateless, low-risk services clear health checks clear resource envelopes (requests/limits) Then move to:
stateful workloads with well-tested storage and backup Gate: app teams must meet operational SLO definitions before production cutover.
Phase 6 — Operations + incident response
golden signals + SLOs runtime security playbooks CVE patch SLAs disaster recovery exercises 7) Best Practices vs Anti-Patterns (Stuff I’ve Seen Blow Up)
Best practices I insist on
Rootless where possible (or at least non-root containers) Distroless/minimal images for runtime Multi-stage builds (builder image ≠ runtime image) No shell in production images unless justified Read-only root filesystem where feasible Explicit egress controls (deny-by-default in regulated zones) Admission control is mandatory for enterprise scale (PSS + policy-as-code) Anti-patterns I block in reviews
latest tags in production Mounting /var/run/docker.sock into containers (instant privilege escalations) Running privileged containers “because it’s easier” Baking secrets into images Treating the registry like a dumping ground (no retention/GC) “Scan once, deploy forever” (no rebuild cadence) 8) Tooling Map (What to Use, and When)
Build & packaging
NeedTools I pickNotesFast, modern Docker buildsBuildKit / buildxDefault choice in most Docker-based shopsRootless builds in CIbuildah / kanikoUseful in restricted CI environmentsMulti-arch buildsbuildxStandard approach for AMD64/ARM64 Registry
NeedToolsOn-prem governed registryHarborArtifact + repo ecosystemJFrog Artifactory / Sonatype NexusCloud-nativeECR / ACR / GCR Scanning & SBOM
NeedToolsQuick vuln scanningTrivy / GrypeSBOM generationSyft / CycloneDX toolsPolicy-driven postureDocker Scout policies, OPA-based checks (Docker Scout has explicit policy evaluation support you can build gates around. ())
Signing & provenance
NeedToolsKeyless signingcosign (Sigstore) ()Attestations/provenancecosign attest / SLSA-aligned provenanceEnterprise trust distributionintegrate with registry + admission policies Kubernetes policy & governance
NeedToolsEnforce Pod Security StandardsPod Security Admission ()Policy as codeOPA Gatekeeper / KyvernoCompliance checkskube-bench, CIS benchmarks () 9) Real-world Use Cases (Small → Enterprise; Regulated vs Non)
Small (1–10 services)
Docker Compose or a small K8s distro Simple private registry Basic scanning + rebuild cadence
Main risk: no discipline → images drift, secrets leak, patching never happens. Medium (10–100 services)
Kubernetes with a strong platform baseline Central CI templates for Docker builds Standard observability stack
Main risk: platform becomes “DIY PaaS” with no ownership model. Enterprise (100+ services, many teams)
Kubernetes/OpenShift with multi-tenancy controls Strong admission control Artifact governance + signing required Runtime detection integrated into SOC/SIEM
Main risk: governance fights (“security slows us down”) unless you automate gates and provide paved roads. Regulated environments (finance/health/gov)
What changes:
Air-gapped or controlled connectivity Private registry replication + strict retention/audit Mandatory SBOM + provenance + signing Strong egress restrictions + audit logging Formal exception process (time-boxed) 10) Pros, Cons, Hidden Costs, Failure Modes
Pros
Faster deploy cycles with immutable artifacts Better reproducibility than “golden VM images” Strong foundation for DevSecOps automation Cons / hidden costs
Image sprawl (storage and retention pain) Patch pressure: you must rebuild often Policy complexity: misconfigured admission breaks deployments Skills cost: platform engineering is real engineering Observability noise: you need good signal design Failure modes I see repeatedly
Registry outage blocks deploys (no replication, no caching strategy) Base image CVE storms (no rebuild cadence) Over-permissive policies (easy now, breach later) Over-restrictive policies (breaks prod, teams bypass controls) 11) Checklists (My go/no-go lists)
Pre-implementation checklist
Orchestrator decision finalized (K8s/OpenShift/other) Registry selected + replication plan defined Base image policy defined (allowed images, pinned digests) CI templates agreed (build, scan, SBOM, sign) Incident ownership model agreed (who is on-call for platform?) Implementation checklist
SBOM generated and stored per build Vulnerability scanning enforced with thresholds Signing + provenance in place Admission policies active (PSS + org policies) Namespace tenancy model implemented Network policies baseline applied Secrets management integrated (no plaintext secrets in manifests) Rollout checklist
Canary strategy proven under load Rollback tested and timed Runbooks written (deploy, rollback, incident triage) DR test: registry + cluster restore Exception process defined (time-boxed) Operations checklist
CVE patch SLA defined (e.g., critical within X days) Image rebuild cadence implemented Policy drift monitoring (who changed what?) DORA metrics tracked per team/service Runtime alerts wired into SOC/on-call 12) Metrics & Success Criteria (KPIs I Track)
Delivery (DORA)
Deployment frequency Lead time for changes Change failure rate MTTR Reliability/SLOs
Availability SLO per service Error rate + latency (p95/p99) Saturation (CPU/mem throttling, disk IO, network) Security
Mean time to remediate critical CVEs in base images % of workloads running as non-root % images signed + with provenance Admission denials trend (are teams fighting policies?) ROI indicators
Reduced outage hours from configuration drift Reduced mean deploy time Fewer “hotfix-in-prod” events Lower audit effort due to automated evidence (SBOM/provenance) 13) Common Challenges + Fix Patterns (How I Troubleshoot)
“Works locally, fails in cluster”
Patterns I check:
missing env vars/config maps filesystem assumptions (read-only rootfs) wrong CPU arch (multi-arch build issue) DNS/service discovery differences Container crash loops
I look for:
bad health checks (too strict, too soon) OOMKilled → fix requests/limits + memory leaks dependency readiness (DB not ready; add init containers or backoff) Registry pain
Pull throttling / slow pulls → add caching proxies, tune concurrency Tag chaos → enforce immutability for release tags, promote via digest Security policies blocking teams
Start with baseline, then ratchet to restricted Provide “paved road” templates so teams don’t write YAML from scratch
Pod Security Standards give you clear policy levels to graduate through. () 14) Future Trends (Next 12–24 Months, and AI Impact)
Here’s what I expect to matter most soon:
Stronger supply-chain enforcement becomes normal
SBOM + provenance + signing won’t be “nice to have”; it’ll be procurement and audit baseline. Docker’s push toward hardened images and policy-driven evaluation is aligned with this direction. () “Hardened by default” base images grow
More teams adopt curated minimal bases to cut CVE noise and reduce attack surface. () Runtime isolation options expand
gVisor/Kata/Confidential Containers will be used more for multi-tenant and regulated workloads (especially where “container escape” risk is unacceptable). Policy-as-code becomes productized
Instead of tribal knowledge, orgs codify deployment rules and compliance evidence. AI/AIOps helps with triage, not with responsibility
AI will accelerate: log summarization, anomaly detection, “why did rollout fail?” clustering, and CVE prioritization. But ownership still matters—AI doesn’t fix broken SLOs or messy governance. A final practitioner note (how I keep this from becoming bureaucracy)
If you want this to succeed enterprise-wide: make the secure path the easiest path.
Provide build templates Provide approved base images Provide golden Helm charts/manifests Automate evidence collection Keep exceptions rare, time-boxed, and visible If you want, I can also provide:
a sample enterprise policy set (build gates + admission rules) in human-readable form, and a rollout plan tailored to your environment (VMware/on-prem, air-gapped, regulated, etc.).
View the full article
reporter

DevOps engineer skills needed for continuous deployment

A step-by-step blueprint of tools, techniques, processes, and practices (from a “20 years in the trenches” lens)
1) First, get the terms right (because teams lose months here)
In my experience, most “CD” confusion starts with language:
Continuous Delivery means every change can be deployed safely at any time (pipeline keeps the system deployable). Continuous Deployment means every change that passes the pipeline automatically goes to production, often many times per day. That distinction matters because continuous deployment is not a switch you flip—it’s the outcome of disciplined engineering, guardrails, and measurement.
2) What “continuous deployment-ready” actually looks like
When a team is truly doing continuous deployment, a few things are always true:
Main is always releasable (small changes, frequent merges). Deployments are routine, boring, and reversible (rollbacks are standard, not heroic). Risk is managed by automation (tests + progressive rollout + observability). Performance is measured (you can prove if you’re improving or getting worse).
DORA’s four key metrics are the simplest common language I’ve seen work across organizations: deployment frequency, lead time for changes, change failure rate, MTTR. () 3) The DevOps skill map for continuous deployment
Here’s the skills stack I expect a DevOps engineer (or platform/SRE in many orgs) to be strong in.
A. Version control & integration discipline
Trunk-based development (or close to it): short-lived branches, frequent merges, reduce integration hell. () Pull request hygiene: review standards, small PRs, ownership Release-friendly practices: feature flags, backward-compatible schema changes B. Pipeline engineering (CI as a product)
Pipeline as code, repeatable builds, caching strategy Artifact immutability: “build once, promote many” Secret handling: ephemeral credentials, least privilege, no secrets in logs C. Automated testing strategy (gating without slowing teams to death)
Test pyramid thinking (unit → integration → e2e), contract testing where relevant Ephemeral preview environments for PR validation Deterministic builds + deterministic tests (flake reduction is a real skill) D. Deployment & release engineering
Rolling updates vs canary vs blue/green Health checks and readiness/liveness correctness (Kubernetes teams: this is life) Automated rollback strategies Progressive delivery + safe experimentation Kubernetes natively supports rolling update patterns in Deployments, and the mechanics matter if you want safe automation. ()
E. GitOps & environment state management (modern default for K8s)
GitOps basics: desired state in Git + reconciler applies it Tools like Argo CD / Flux for cluster delivery and drift control () Understanding push vs pull deployment models, RBAC implications F. Observability & release validation
If you can’t “see” what changed in production, continuous deployment becomes reckless.
Metrics, logs, traces as first-class signals (not an afterthought) Standardized instrumentation approach (OpenTelemetry is the most broadly adopted open framework here). () SLOs / error budgets: release decisions tied to reliability signals (even if lightweight at first) G. Security & supply chain integrity (DevSecOps is not optional anymore)
Pipeline hardening and access control (CI/CD is a juicy target). () Software supply chain security: provenance, trusted builds, signing, SBOM Align to recognized guidance like NIST SP 800-204D for securing DevSecOps CI/CD pipelines (especially cloud-native). () Understand frameworks like SLSA security levels to mature integrity guarantees over time. () 4) Step-by-step approach to build continuous deployment (the blueprint I use)
Step 1 — Define “release policy” and a realistic deployment target
Before tools, decide:
What is “production” (single region? multi-region? active-active?) Allowed risk profile (B2B internal tool ≠ consumer payments system) “Definition of Done” for a change to be auto-deployed Rollback expectations (time to rollback, blast radius limits) Then commit to measuring with DORA metrics; otherwise “CD progress” becomes a debate, not a fact. ()
Step 2 — Make the main branch releasable (this is the real foundation)
Continuous deployment collapses if your integration model is “merge at the end”.
Practices
Trunk-based development (short-lived branches, frequent merges) () Enforce fast PR checks: lint + unit tests + minimal integration tests Feature flags for incomplete work (ship code dark, enable later) Tools
GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket Feature flags: LaunchDarkly / Unleash / Split / Cloud provider equivalents (choose based on scale & governance) Step 3 — Build once, produce immutable artifacts, and store them properly
If you rebuild the same commit for dev/stage/prod, you’ll eventually deploy something you never tested.
Practices
One artifact per commit (immutable) Semantic versioning or commit-based tags Artifact repository becomes part of your supply chain Tools
Container registry: ECR / GCR / ACR / Harbor / Artifactory Artifact repos: Nexus / Artifactory SBOM generation (if you’re serious about security posture): CycloneDX tooling, Syft (ecosystem choice) Step 4 — Engineer the CI pipeline as a product (speed + trust)
This is where many teams create slow, flaky pipelines that become bypassed.
Practices
Pipeline as code Parallelize test stages Cache dependencies Fail fast; don’t run expensive tests if build already failed Treat flaky tests as incidents (because they destroy trust) Tools (common choices)
GitHub Actions / GitLab CI / Jenkins / CircleCI / Azure DevOps For Kubernetes-native CI: Tekton (when you want pipelines running inside clusters) Step 5 — Standardize environments using IaC and configuration discipline
Continuous deployment dies when environments drift or are hand-patched.
Practices
Infrastructure as Code (everything repeatable) Separate config from code, but keep config versioned Use the same deployment mechanism across environments Tools
Terraform / OpenTofu / Pulumi / CloudFormation / Bicep Config delivery: Helm / Kustomize Secrets: Vault / cloud secrets managers + workload identity patterns Step 6 — Choose a deployment control plane: Push CD or GitOps CD
This is a key architecture decision:
Option A: Push-based CD
CI system pushes deployments to the target environment. Works, but can lead to access sprawl.
Option B: GitOps (common for Kubernetes)
Cluster reconciler pulls desired state from Git and applies it; Git is the source of truth. CNCF highlights the Argo CD vs Flux ecosystem as the dominant GitOps toolkit for Kubernetes. ()
My bias (from experience):
If you’re on Kubernetes and you care about auditability + drift control, GitOps is usually the cleanest operational model.
Step 7 — Implement safe rollout strategies (progressive delivery)
This is where “continuous deployment” becomes safe enough to be automatic.
Core strategies
Rolling updates (baseline for many services) () Blue/Green (fast rollback by switching traffic) () Canary (small % traffic first, verify, then expand) () Feature flags (deploy code, control exposure without redeploy) Progressive delivery is widely recommended because it reduces blast radius and makes rollbacks routine. ()
Tools
Kubernetes-native: Argo Rollouts (blue/green, canary) () Service mesh (when needed): Istio / Linkerd for traffic shaping Feature flags: LaunchDarkly / Unleash, etc. Step 8 — Observability and automated release validation (don’t deploy blind)
If you automate deployments, you must automate confidence.
Practices
Instrument services with metrics/logs/traces Define “release health” signals: error rate, latency, saturation, key business KPIs Gate canary promotion on telemetry trends Keep rollback automatic for known bad states OpenTelemetry is explicitly designed as a vendor-neutral way to generate and export telemetry (traces/metrics/logs). ()
Tools
Metrics: Prometheus + Grafana (or cloud-native equivalents) Tracing: Jaeger / Tempo / vendor backends Logging: Loki / ELK / cloud logging OTel Collector for consistent enrichment and exporting () Step 9 — Secure the pipeline and the supply chain (because attackers love CI/CD)
I’ve seen orgs spend millions on app security and forget the pipeline—until a breach proves CI/CD is part of prod.
Practices
Least privilege for CI runners, short-lived credentials, isolated build environments Dependency scanning, container scanning, IaC scanning Artifact signing and provenance (especially for regulated/high-risk systems) Protect against pipeline tampering: approvals for workflow changes, restricted secrets, segregated environments OWASP provides CI/CD security best practices and also maintains a “Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks” project—use those as a checklist. ()
NIST SP 800-204D is directly focused on software supply chain security in DevSecOps CI/CD pipelines for cloud-native systems. ()
SLSA levels provide a practical maturity path for integrity guarantees. ()
Step 10 — Close the loop with metrics (continuous deployment without measurement is theater)
Track:
Deployment frequency Lead time Change failure rate MTTR DORA defines these metrics and they’ve become the common language across engineering leadership. ()
Then run a monthly “pipeline retrospective”:
What slowed us down? What caused rollbacks? What’s noisy/flaky? Which guardrail prevented an incident? That’s how you mature without burning out teams.
5) Toolchain reference architecture (practical, not dogmatic)
LayerWhat you’re solvingTypical toolsSCM + PRsmall merges, reviews, traceabilityGitHub / GitLab / BitbucketCIbuild/test/packageGitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOpsArtifactsimmutable build outputsECR/GCR/ACR, Harbor, Artifactory, NexusIaCreproducible infraTerraform/OpenTofu, Pulumi, CloudFormation/BicepCDdeploy + promoteArgo CD / Flux (GitOps) (), Spinnaker, Harness, OctopusProgressive deliveryreduce rollout riskArgo Rollouts (), service mesh, feature flagsObservabilityrelease confidenceOpenTelemetry (), Prometheus, Grafana, ELK/LokiSecuritypipeline + supply chainOWASP CI/CD guidance (), NIST 800-204D (), SLSA () 6) Common failure patterns (I see these repeatedly)
“We want continuous deployment” but main isn’t releasable → long-lived branches, huge PRs, merge conflicts. Trunk-based fixes most of this. () Pipelines are slow and flaky → engineers bypass them; quality collapses. No progressive delivery → every deploy is a big bang; fear grows; CD rolls back to “monthly release”. No observability gating → you deploy blind and notice failures via customers. OpenTelemetry-first approach helps standardize signals. () Security bolted on late → attackers target CI/CD; supply chain risk spikes. Use OWASP + NIST guidance early. () 7) Skill checklist (what to learn, in the right order)
If you’re a DevOps engineer aiming to be “continuous deployment strong,” here’s the order I’d follow:
Git + trunk-based development fundamentals () CI pipeline design (fast, repeatable, secure) Artifacts + versioning + registries IaC basics + environment parity Kubernetes deployment mechanics + rollout strategies () GitOps (Argo CD or Flux) () Progressive delivery (canary/blue-green/flags) () Observability with OpenTelemetry + SLO thinking () CI/CD security + supply chain maturity (NIST, OWASP, SLSA) () DORA metrics + continuous improvement loop () 8) A realistic maturity ladder (so you know where you are)
Level 0: Manual deployments, tribal knowledge Level 1: CI + scripted deploys, basic rollback Level 2: Strong test gates + immutable artifacts + IaC parity Level 3: GitOps or structured CD control plane + progressive delivery Level 4: Automated promotion/rollback based on telemetry + measured improvements via DORA () Closing: the mindset that makes continuous deployment work
Tools matter—but the engineering habits matter more. Continuous deployment happens when teams treat the pipeline like production software, reduce risk with progressive delivery, validate with observability, and measure with DORA metrics. The moment you do those consistently, “deploying to production” stops feeling like an event and starts feeling like a routine. ()

View the full article
reporter

The Integration of DevOps and Cybersecurity-Maximizing Risk Management

Twenty years in the industry is a serious milestone. You’ve lived through the transition from physical rack-and-stack to the “everything-as-code” era, which gives you the perfect vantage point to teach others that security isn’t a “gate”—it’s an ingredient.
Since a full 10-page document is quite extensive, I have structured a comprehensive blueprint and the foundational content for your tutorial. You can use this as the “Source of Truth” for your document.
The Integration of DevOps and Cybersecurity: Maximizing Risk Management
1. Introduction: The Evolution of Risk
In the legacy model, security was a “Point in Time” check. In a DevSecOps world, risk is managed through Continuous Assurance. The goal is to shift security “Left” (into development) and “Right” (into production monitoring).
2. The Core Pillars of DevSecOps
To maximize risk management, we focus on four key areas:
Visibility: You cannot secure what you cannot see. Automation: Manual security checks are the enemy of velocity. Immutable Infrastructure: Reducing configuration drift. Shared Responsibility: Culture shift where “security is everyone’s job.” 3. The Process: A Risk-Based Lifecycle
A robust DevSecOps process integrates specific security checkpoints into the standard CI/CD pipeline:
PhaseSecurity ActionRisk MitigatedPlanThreat ModelingDesign flaws and logic errors.CodePre-commit hooks & IDE PluginsSecret leaks (API keys) and poor syntax.BuildSAST & Dependency ScanningVulnerable libraries (Log4j style risks).TestDAST & IASTRuntime vulnerabilities and injection flaws.DeployIaC ScanningMisconfigured S3 buckets or open ports.OperateRASP & SIEMZero-day exploits and active intrusions. 4. The Essential Toolstack
As a veteran, you know tools don’t solve problems—processes do. However, these are the industry standards for 2026:
A. Static Analysis (SAST)
Tools: SonarQube, Snyk, Checkmarx. Focus: Scanning source code for vulnerabilities without executing it. B. Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Tools: GitHub Advanced Security, Black Duck. Focus: Managing Open Source Software (OSS) risk and License compliance. C. Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Security
Tools: Checkov, Terrascan, tfsec. Focus: Ensuring Terraform/CloudFormation scripts follow the “Least Privilege” principle. D. Container & Cloud Security
Tools: Aqua Security, Prisma Cloud, Trivy. Focus: Image scanning and Kubernetes admission controllers. 5. Step-by-Step Implementation Guide
Step 1: Governance and Threat Modeling
Before writing code, identify the “Crown Jewels.” Use the STRIDE model to evaluate threats to your architecture.
Step 2: Securing the CI/CD Pipeline
Harden your runners. Ensure that your Jenkins, GitLab Runner, or GitHub Actions use ephemeral environments and encrypted secrets.
Step 3: Integrating Automated Gates
Set “Break the Build” policies. If a high-severity vulnerability is detected during the SCA or SAST phase, the pipeline must stop. This prevents technical debt from reaching production.
Step 4: Continuous Monitoring and Feedback Loop
Integrate your production logs into a SIEM (like Splunk or ELK). Use the data to feed back into the Plan phase for the next sprint.
6. Advanced Practices for Risk Maximization
Policy as Code (PaC): Use Open Policy Agent (OPA) to enforce compliance automatically. Chaos Security Engineering: Purposefully injecting security failures to test resilience. Zero Trust Architecture: Never trust, always verify, regardless of whether the request comes from inside or outside the network. 7. Conclusion: The Roadmap to Maturity
Risk management is not about achieving zero risk—it’s about informed acceptance of risk. By automating the mundane, your security team can focus on complex architectural threats.
Next Steps for your 10-page Doc

View the full article
reporter

Apple Shows Off a Key Reason to Upgrade to the iPhone 17

Apple today shared an ad that shows how the upgraded Center Stage front camera on the latest iPhones improves the process of taking a group selfie.


"Watch how the new front facing camera on iPhone 17 Pro takes group selfies that automatically expand and rotate as more people come into frame," says Apple. While the ad is focused on the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, the regular iPhone 17 and the iPhone Air have the same Center Stage front camera with this functionality.

Apple provided more details in its iPhone 17 press releases last year:All four of the latest iPhone models are equipped with an 18-megapixel Center Stage front camera with a square image sensor.Related Roundups: iPhone 17, iPhone 17 ProTag: Apple AdsBuyer's Guide: iPhone 17 (Neutral), iPhone 17 Pro (Neutral)Related Forum: iPhone
This article, "Apple Shows Off a Key Reason to Upgrade to the iPhone 17" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Get $100 Off Apple Watch Series 11 on Amazon, Available From $299

Amazon this weekend has all-time low prices on the Apple Watch Series 11, with $100 discounts across numerous models of the smartwatch. This time around, we're tracking these record low prices on nearly every aluminum model.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with Amazon. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

You can get the 42mm GPS Apple Watch Series 11 for $299.00, down from $399.00, and the 46mm GPS model for $329.00, down from $429.00. On Amazon, you'll find four of the 42mm GPS models on sale at this all-time low price, and four of the 46mm GPS models on sale as well.

$100 OFFApple Watch Series 11 (42mm GPS) for $299.00
$100 OFFApple Watch Series 11 (46mm GPS) for $329.00

If you're shopping for cellular models, you can find record low prices on multiple models this week on Amazon. The 42mm cellular Apple Watch Series 11 has hit $399.00, down from $499.00, and the 46mm cellular model has hit $429.00, down from $529.00.

$100 OFFApple Watch Series 11 (42mm Cell) for $399.00
$100 OFFApple Watch Series 11 (46mm Cell) for $429.00

Head to our full Deals Roundup to get caught up with all of the latest deals and discounts that we've been tracking over the past week.



Deals Newsletter

Interested in hearing more about the best deals you can find in 2026? Sign up for our Deals Newsletter and we'll keep you updated so you don't miss the biggest deals of the season!




Related Roundup: Apple Deals
This article, "Get $100 Off Apple Watch Series 11 on Amazon, Available From $299" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Top Stories: iOS 26.3 and 26.4 Features, Foldable iPhone Details, and More

The iOS 26.3 release looks to be right around the corner with a highly anticipated iOS 26.4 update following right behind, so Apple software rumors were big in the news this week.


Hardware wasn't left out, however, as we're still awaiting a few early-year launches like the M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pro, while we're also looking further down the road at major new products coming later in the year like the first foldable iPhone, so read on below for all the details on these stories and more!

Top Stories

iOS 26.3 and iOS 26.4 Will Add These New Features to Your iPhone

While the iOS 26.3 Release Candidate is now available to beta testers ahead of a public release, the first iOS 26.4 beta is likely still at least a week away. Following beta testing, iOS 26.4 will likely be released to the general public in March or April.


Be sure to check out our recap of known or rumored iOS 26.3 and iOS 26.4 features so far so you're ready for the updates!

First Foldable iPhone Design Details Revealed

Apple's first foldable iPhone will feature relocated volume buttons, an all-black camera plateau, a smaller Dynamic Island, and more, according to design leaks from a known Weibo leaker.


A separate leaker has indicated the foldable iPhone could feature the biggest-ever iPhone battery and eclipse rival devices, checking in at over 5,500 mAh in size. That would make it the largest capacity of any current or previous ‌iPhone‌, as the iPhone 17 Pro Max has the biggest battery to date at 5,088 mAh.

Apple's CarPlay Ultra to Expand to These Vehicle Brands Later This Year

Last year, Apple launched CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of its CarPlay software system for vehicles. Nearly nine months later, CarPlay Ultra is still limited to Aston Martin's latest luxury vehicles, but that should change fairly soon.


In May 2025, Apple said many other vehicle brands planned to offer CarPlay Ultra, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis, and in his Power On newsletter this week, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said he was told that CarPlay Ultra will come to at least one major new Hyundai or Kia vehicle model "in the second half of this year."

It is unclear if he is referring to Hyundai's upcoming IONIQ 3, as previously reported, or if it will be a different model.

Apple Changes How You Order a Mac

Apple recently updated its online store with a new ordering process for Macs, including the MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio, and Mac Pro.


There used to be a handful of standard configurations available for each Mac, but now you must configure a Mac entirely from scratch on a feature-by-feature basis. In other words, ordering a new Mac now works much like ordering an iPad.

New MacBook Pros Reportedly Launching Alongside macOS 26.3

Apple is planning to launch new MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips alongside macOS 26.3, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.


"Apple's faster MacBook Pros are planned for the macOS 26.3 release cycle," wrote Gurman, in his Power On newsletter this week. "I'm told the new models — code-named J714 and J716 — are slated for the macOS 26.3 software cycle, which runs from February through March," he explained.

This comes as third-party retailers are seeing stock of the existing models dwindle.

Apple Gives Final Warning to Home App Users

In 2022, Apple introduced a new Apple Home architecture that is "more reliable and efficient," and the deadline to upgrade and avoid issues is fast approaching.


In an email this week, Apple gave customers a final reminder to upgrade their Home app by February 10, 2026. Apple says users who do not upgrade may experience issues with accessories and automations, or lose access to their smart home in the app entirely. In addition, users who do not upgrade will miss out on newer features like robot vacuum cleaner support, and they will not receive important security fixes and performance improvements.

MacRumors Newsletter

Each week, we publish an email newsletter like this highlighting the top Apple stories, making it a great way to get a bite-sized recap of the week hitting all of the major topics we've covered and tying together related stories for a big-picture view.

So if you want to have top stories like the above recap delivered to your email inbox each week, subscribe to our newsletter!Tag: Top Stories
This article, "Top Stories: iOS 26.3 and 26.4 Features, Foldable iPhone Details, and More" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

German Agencies Warn of Signal Phishing Targeting Politicians, Military, Journalists

Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (aka Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz or BfV) and Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) have issued a joint advisory warning of a malicious cyber campaign undertaken by a likely state-sponsored threat actor that involves carrying out phishing attacks over the Signal messaging app. "The focus is on high-ranking targets inView the full article
Hacker News

The DevOps Certified Professional Roadmap

The technology landscape has moved far beyond the era of manual deployments and siloed teams. Today, the demand for high-velocity software delivery has made the DevOps framework the backbone of modern engineering. For software engineers, system administrators, and technical managers, staying relevant means moving beyond basic coding or scripting—it requires a deep understanding of the entire engineering ecosystem.
The DevOps Certified Professional (DCP) program is the industry standard for those looking to master the intersection of development, operations, and security. This guide provides a comprehensive roadmap for anyone looking to transition into or excel within the DevOps, SRE, and DevSecOps domains.
Master Certification Landscape
Navigating the various tracks in the “Ops” world can be overwhelming. The following table provides a clear view of the most impactful certifications currently available under the DevOps Certified Professional ecosystem.
TrackLevelWho it’s forPrerequisitesSkills CoveredRecommended OrderDevOpsAssociateSoftware EngineersBasic LinuxCI/CD, Docker, Git1stDevSecOpsProfessionalSecurity EngineersDevOps BasicsSAST/DAST, Vault2ndSREProfessionalSREs / OpsDevOps BasicsSLIs/SLOs, Error Budgets2ndAIOps/MLOpsSpecialistData/ML EngineersPython + DevOpsML Pipelines, Model Ops3rdDataOpsSpecialistData EngineersSQL + DevOpsData Pipelines, ELT/ETL3rdFinOpsManagementManagers/FinOpsCloud BasicsCloud Billing, Unit Costs2nd Deep Dive: The DevOps Certified Professional (DCP)
1. DevOps Certified Professional (DCP)
What it is: The DCP is a comprehensive certification focused on the “Golden Path” of automation. It validates a professional’s ability to design, build, and manage end-to-end software delivery pipelines using the latest industry tools.
Who should take it: It is designed for Software Engineers, System Administrators, Cloud Engineers, and Quality Assurance professionals who want to lead the automation efforts within their organizations.
Skills you’ll gain:
Mastery of the CALMS framework. Advanced Infrastructure as Code (IaC) with Terraform and Ansible. Containerization and Orchestration with Docker and Kubernetes. Design of complex CI/CD pipelines using Jenkins, Git, and GitHub Actions. Real-world projects you should be able to do:
Deploy a multi-tier microservices application on a Kubernetes cluster. Build a self-healing pipeline that automatically triggers rollbacks on failure. Implement full infrastructure provisioning on AWS or Azure using Terraform. Preparation plan (30 days):
Days 1–7: Linux Internals, Shell Scripting, and Advanced Git workflows. Days 8–14: Docker containerization and Kubernetes cluster management. Days 15–21: Mastering Jenkins pipelines and Ansible playbooks. Days 22–30: Terraform for Cloud and final Capstone project. Common mistakes:
Learning the tools without understanding the underlying DevOps philosophy. Neglecting the importance of security within the pipeline. Ignoring Linux-level troubleshooting skills. Best next certification after this: Certified DevOps Architect (CDA).
2. DevSecOps Certified Professional (DSOCP)
What it is: This program focuses on integrating security into every stage of the DevOps lifecycle. It teaches how to “shift-left” security, making it a shared responsibility rather than a final checkpoint.
Who should take it: Security Engineers, DevOps Engineers, and Security Analysts who want to automate compliance and security scanning within modern cloud environments.
Skills you’ll gain:
Automated Vulnerability Scanning (SAST/DAST). Secrets Management using HashiCorp Vault. Container Image Scanning and Runtime Security. Compliance as Code (CaC). Real-world projects you should be able to do:
Integrate automated security gating in a Jenkins pipeline. Implement automated credential rotation for cloud services. Design a zero-trust network architecture for a Kubernetes environment. Preparation plan (14 days):
Days 1–5: Security fundamentals and OWASP Top 10 for DevOps. Days 6–10: Hands-on with scanners (Trivy, SonarQube, Snyk). Days 11–14: Final project: End-to-end secured CI/CD pipeline. Common mistakes:
Viewing security as a “blocker” rather than an “enabler.” Failing to include development teams in security discussions. Best next certification after this: Certified Cloud Security Professional (CCSP).
3. Site Reliability Engineering Certified Professional (SRECP)
What it is: SRE applies software engineering mindsets to IT operations problems. This certification focuses on system stability, reliability, and the operational excellence required for high-availability systems.
Who should take it: Operations Engineers, Backend Developers, and SREs who want to master the Google-pioneered principles of reliability.
Skills you’ll gain:
Defining and measuring SLIs, SLOs, and SLAs. Managing Error Budgets to balance speed and stability. Automated Incident Management and Toil reduction. Chaos Engineering principles. Real-world projects you should be able to do:
Design a monitoring dashboard that tracks real-time error budgets. Conduct a chaos experiment to test system resilience during regional cloud failures. Automate post-mortem reporting and action item tracking. Preparation plan (30 days):
Week 1: Theoretical foundations of SRE and Reliability metrics. Week 2: Advanced Observability and Monitoring (Prometheus/Grafana). Week 3: Toil reduction and Automation strategies. Week 4: Incident Response simulations and mock exams. Common mistakes:
Treating SRE as just another name for “Ops” without changing the methodology. Focusing solely on uptime while ignoring the developer experience. Best next certification after this: Master in SRE Engineering.
4. AIOps / MLOps Certified Professional
What it is: This track brings DevOps agility to the world of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. It focuses on the deployment, monitoring, and scaling of ML models in production.
Who should take it: Data Scientists, ML Engineers, and DevOps Engineers moving into the AI/ML space.
Skills you’ll gain:
Building ML Pipelines (Kubeflow/MLflow). Model Versioning and Data Lineage. Monitoring model drift and performance in real-time. Real-world projects you should be able to do:
Automate the retraining of a model based on performance degradation. Deploy a high-scale LLM application using Kubernetes. Preparation plan (60 days):
Month 1: Python for Data Science and ML fundamentals. Month 2: MLOps toolsets and automated model deployment. Best next certification after this: AIOps Architect.
5. DataOps Certified Professional (DOCP)
What it is: DataOps aims to improve the quality and reduce the cycle time of data analytics. This certification focuses on the automated management of data pipelines.
Who should take it: Data Engineers, DBAs, and Analytics professionals.
Skills you’ll gain:
Automated Data Pipeline Orchestration (Airflow). Data Quality Testing and Validation as Code. Version Control for Data and Schemas. Real-world projects you should be able to do:
Build an automated ELT pipeline with built-in data quality checks. Implement automated database migrations within a CI/CD flow. Preparation plan (30 days):
Focus on Data Orchestration tools and testing frameworks for large datasets. Best next certification after this: Certified Data Architect.
6. FinOps Certified Professional
What it is: FinOps is the practice of bringing financial accountability to the variable spend model of the cloud. This certification focuses on cloud cost optimization and unit economics.
Who should take it: Managers, Finance professionals, and Cloud Architects.
Skills you’ll gain:
Cloud Billing and Cost Allocation. Rate Optimization and Usage Optimization. Implementing FinOps lifecycle (Inform, Optimize, Operate). Real-world projects you should be able to do:
Perform a cloud cost audit and identify 20% savings on infrastructure. Design a tagging strategy for multi-cloud cost transparency. Preparation plan (14 days):
Deep dive into AWS/Azure/GCP billing structures and the FinOps Framework. Best next certification after this: Certified DevOps Manager.
Choose Your Path: 6 Learning Roadmaps
The DevOps Path: Start with DCP → Kubernetes Specialist → DevOps Architect. This is the core path for all engineering professionals. The DevSecOps Path: Start with DCP → DSOCP → Cloud Security Expert. For those specializing in compliance and cybersecurity. The SRE Path: Start with DCP → SRECP → Observability Specialist. The path for those focused on high-availability and system resilience. The AIOps/MLOps Path: Start with DCP → MLOps Professional → AI Architect. For engineers bridging the gap between DevOps and AI. The DataOps Path: Start with DCP → DOCP → Data Engineer. Best for those managing large-scale data lakes and warehouses. The FinOps Path: Start with Cloud Fundamentals → FinOps Professional → IT Director. The ideal path for leadership and financial management. Role → Recommended Certifications Mapping
If your role is…You should take…DevOps EngineerDCP + CKA (Certified Kubernetes Administrator)SREDCP + SRECP + Prometheus SpecialistPlatform EngineerDCP + Certified DevOps ArchitectCloud EngineerDCP + AWS/Azure Certified DevOps EngineerSecurity EngineerDCP + DSOCP + Certified Security SpecialistData EngineerDCP + DOCPFinOps PractitionerFinOps Professional + Cloud ArchitectEngineering ManagerDCP + Certified DevOps Manager (CDM) Next Certifications to Take (Advanced Levels)
Once you have completed the DevOps Certified Professional (DCP), you should look toward one of these three advancement paths to further your career:
Same Track (Expertise): Certified DevOps Architect (CDA). This is for those who want to design global-scale systems and lead digital transformation projects. Cross-Track (Broadening): Certified DevSecOps Professional (DSOCP). Broadening your skills into security ensures you are indispensable in the current “secure-by-default” market. Leadership (Management): Certified DevOps Manager (CDM). Focuses on the cultural and people side of DevOps, including budgeting, hiring, and team scaling. Top Institutions for Training & Certification
DevOpsSchool: The primary provider for the DCP. They offer an extensive curriculum with over 250 hours of training and specialized internships. Their focus is on high-quality, project-based learning. Cotocus: A specialized consulting and training firm focused on enterprise upskilling. They provide high-level mentorship for senior engineers looking to transition into architectural roles. Scmgalaxy: A leading community platform that provides technical resources and hands-on training labs. They are particularly known for their deep-dive courses in Git and Configuration Management. BestDevOps: Known for their fast-track bootcamps designed for working professionals. They focus on delivering the maximum practical knowledge in the shortest possible timeframe. devsecopsschool / sreschool / aiopsschool / dataopsschool / finopsschool: These are niche-focused specialized institutions that offer deep domain expertise in their respective fields, led by industry veterans. General Career & Certification FAQs
Q1: How difficult is the DCP exam?
The exam is moderately difficult and highly practical. It requires a solid understanding of both theory and hands-on tool usage.
Q2: How much time is needed to prepare?
Most working professionals find that 30 to 45 days of consistent study (2 hours a day) is sufficient.
Q3: Are there any prerequisites?
Basic knowledge of Linux and at least one programming or scripting language (like Python or Bash) is highly recommended.
Q4: In what order should I take these certifications?
Always start with the DCP. It provides the foundation upon which all other tracks (SRE, SecOps, etc.) are built.
Q5: What is the market value of these certifications?
Certified professionals often see a significant increase in salary and are prioritized for senior engineering and leadership roles.
Q6: Can I take the training while working full-time?
Yes, most providers offer weekend batches and self-paced options specifically for working engineers.
Q7: Do these certifications expire?
Most are valid for 2–3 years, after which you may need to take a bridge exam to stay current with new technologies.
Q8: Will I get job placement assistance?
Institutions like DevOpsSchool offer career support and internship opportunities to help you transition into new roles.
Q9: Is there a focus on specific cloud providers like AWS or Azure?
The DCP is cloud-agnostic, focusing on principles that apply to all major providers, though labs usually use AWS or Azure for practice.
Q10: What kind of projects are included?
Projects include building CI/CD pipelines, automating cloud infrastructure, and setting up monitoring stacks.
Q11: How do I handle the high cost of exams?
Many employers offer reimbursement for certifications. Additionally, look for group discounts from the training providers.
Q12: Can I move into management after DCP?
Yes, the DCP is the first step toward the Certified DevOps Manager (CDM) path.
FAQs: DevOps Certified Professional (DCP)
Q1: What is the official certification name?
DevOps Certified Professional (Training & Certification).
Q2: Who provides the official certification?
It is provided by DevOpsSchool .
Q3: Where can I find the official syllabus?
The official link is: DevOps Certified Professional
Q4: Is the DCP exam theoretical or practical?
It is a mix, but heavily emphasizes practical skills through a mandatory Capstone Project.
Q5: Are the trainers experienced?
Yes, courses are led by mentors with over 20 years of global experience in the software industry.
Q6: What is the format of the training?
Training is available via live interactive online sessions, self-paced videos, and corporate classroom settings.
Q7: Does the DCP cover Kubernetes?
Yes, Kubernetes and Docker are core modules within the DCP curriculum.
Q8: Can a Software Engineer benefit from DCP?
Absolutely. It allows developers to understand the production environment, leading to better code and faster releases.
Conclusion
The path to becoming a DevOps Certified Professional is more than just a credential—it is a commitment to a new way of engineering. By mastering the tools of automation, the principles of reliability, and the culture of security, you position yourself at the very top of the technical talent pool.
Whether you are looking to secure your first role as a DevOps engineer or you are a manager looking to modernize your team’s workflow, the DCP program provides the structure and the skills necessary to succeed. The future of engineering is automated, secure, and reliable. With the right training and certification, you can lead that future.
View the full article
reporter

Complete Guide to Certified DevOps Manager

Transitioning from an individual contributor to a leadership role is one of the most significant shifts in a technical career. While engineering is about solving logic problems, management is about solving people and process problems. This guide is designed to help you navigate that transition by mastering the Certified DevOps Manager (CDM) program.
Whether you are based in India or working globally, the demand for leaders who understand the “Ops” spectrum—from SRE to FinOps—has never been higher. This master guide provides a roadmap for engineers and managers to validate their expertise and lead high-performing teams.
Choose Your Path: 6 Specialized Learning Journeys
Modern IT operations are no longer a single lane. Depending on your interest and the needs of your organization, you should align your management goals with one of these six specialized paths.
1. The DevOps Path
This is the core journey. It focuses on the CALMS framework (Culture, Automation, Lean, Measurement, and Sharing). As a manager here, you focus on breaking down silos between developers and operations to speed up delivery without sacrificing quality.
2. The DevSecOps Path
Security is now everyone’s responsibility. In this path, you learn how to “Shift Left.” You lead teams in integrating security audits, compliance checks, and vulnerability scanning directly into the automated CI/CD pipeline.
3. The SRE (Site Reliability Engineering) Path
Born from the need to manage massive scale, SRE focuses on using software engineering disciplines to solve operations problems. Your focus as a manager will be on Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and managing “error budgets” to balance innovation with stability.
4. The AIOps & MLOps Path
This path is for those leading data-driven organizations. AIOps uses artificial intelligence to automate IT operations and incident response. MLOps focuses on the specialized lifecycle of machine learning models, ensuring they move from a notebook to production reliably.
5. The DataOps Path
Data pipelines are complex. DataOps applies DevOps rigor to data management. As a manager, you ensure that data is high-quality, flows seamlessly from source to consumer, and that the infrastructure supporting it is automated and scalable.
6. The FinOps Path
Cloud costs are often the second-largest expense for a company. FinOps (Cloud Financial Management) is the practice of bringing financial accountability to the variable spend of the cloud. Managers here bridge the gap between Engineering, Finance, and Business.
Role → Recommended Certifications Mapping
To help you decide where to start, here is a quick reference guide based on your current professional role.
Current RoleRecommended CertificationsDevOps EngineerCertified DevOps Engineer (CDE), Certified DevOps Professional (CDP)SRE (Site Reliability Engineer)SRE Certified Professional (SRECP), Certified SRE ArchitectPlatform EngineerCertified DevOps Architect (CDA), Kubernetes MasterCloud EngineerCDE Professional, Cloud-Specific Expert (AWS/Azure/GCP)Security EngineerDevSecOps Professional (DSOCP), Security LeadData EngineerDataOps Professional (DOCP), Certified DataOps EngineerFinOps PractitionerCertified FinOps Manager, CDE FoundationEngineering ManagerCertified DevOps Manager (CDM), Certified SRE Manager Master Table of Certifications
This table outlines the essential certifications across various tracks to help you plan your career progression.
TrackLevelWho it’s forPrerequisitesSkills CoveredRecommended OrderDevOpsFoundationBeginners/EngineersBasic IT knowledgeCI/CD, Git, Linux, Docker1DevOpsProfessionalMid-level EngineersCDE FoundationK8s, Terraform, Monitoring2DevOpsManagerSenior/Lead/Managers5+ years expStrategy, ROI, Governance3DevSecOpsProfessionalSecurity/DevOps EngBasic DevOpsSAST, DAST, Vault, Compliance1SREProfessionalOps/SysAdminLinux/CodingSLOs, SLIs, Error Budgets1MLOpsProfessionalData/ML EngineersPython, DevOpsModel Registry, Pipelines1AIOpsProfessionalIT Ops LeadsMonitoring ExpPredictive AI, Log Analytics1DataOpsProfessionalData EngineersSQL, ETLData Quality, Pipeline Auto1 Deep Dive: Certified DevOps Manager (CDM)
The Certified DevOps Manager is the gold standard for those who want to lead the cultural and technical transformation of an organization. It is not just about using tools; it is about designing the systems that allow tools and people to work together.
What it is
The Certified DevOps Manager (CDM) is a management-level certification that focuses on the strategic implementation of DevOps. It covers the leadership required to manage cross-functional teams, the financial logic behind tool selection, and the governance needed to maintain security and compliance at speed.
Who should take it (Provider: DevOpsSchool)
DevOpsSchool is the leading provider for this program. It is designed for:
Technical Leads transitioning into management. Project Managers who need to understand modern engineering lifecycles. IT Directors responsible for digital transformation. Senior Engineers who want to influence organizational strategy. Skills you’ll gain
Strategic Roadmap Design: Learn to create a multi-year DevOps transformation plan. Metric Management: Master DORA metrics (Lead Time, Deployment Frequency, MTTR, Change Failure Rate). Cultural Leadership: Techniques to reduce “silo” mentality and foster collaboration. Governance & Compliance: Managing risk in a world of automated deployments. Budget & ROI: Justifying the cost of tools and cloud infrastructure to executive leadership. Incident Management: Leading high-pressure teams through outages and post-mortems. Real-world projects you should be able to do
Toolchain Audit: Evaluate an existing stack and propose a migration plan to save costs or improve speed. SLA/SLO Definition: Work with business stakeholders to define reliability targets for a product. Pipeline Governance: Design a “Policy as Code” framework for all company deployments. Talent Strategy: Build a hiring and upskilling plan for a new DevOps or SRE department. Preparation plan
7–14 days (Accelerated): Focus on the exam objectives, governance frameworks, and management case studies. Best for existing Leads. 30 days (Recommended): Spend 1 hour daily reviewing core modules. Focus on the integration of culture, process, and tools. 60 days (Comprehensive): Includes deep-dive labs on DORA dashboards and strategic planning workshops. Best for those new to the Ops world. Common mistakes
Focusing Only on Tools: Thinking that buying a tool like Kubernetes solves management problems. Ignoring the “Human” Factor: Forgetting that DevOps is 80% culture and 20% technology. Poor Metric Selection: Tracking “vanity metrics” (like number of commits) instead of business outcomes. Lack of Stakeholder Alignment: Failing to explain the value of DevOps to the Finance or Product teams. Best next certification after this
Master in DevOps Engineering (MDE): To maintain your technical edge while leading. Certified SRE Manager: If your organization prioritizes high-availability and reliability. Top Training and Certification Institutions
Choosing the right partner for your certification journey is critical. These institutions are recognized for their quality of instruction and industry-aligned curriculums.
DevOpsSchool: The premier choice for the Certified DevOps Manager program. They offer extensive instructor-led training, real-world projects, and a global community of experts to support your career growth. Cotocus: Highly regarded for its hands-on approach. They focus on lab-based learning where you can practice management scenarios in real-world environments. Scmgalaxy: A massive repository of knowledge and community support. They are excellent for those looking for deep technical insights and long-term mentorship in the SCM domain. BestDevOps: Known for tailored, fast-track coaching. They help senior professionals clear certifications by focusing on the most critical exam topics and leadership skills. DevSecopsschool: The specialist in security integration. If your management goal is to build secure-by-default pipelines, this is the institution to follow. Sreschool: Focuses exclusively on the Site Reliability Engineering domain. They offer specialized tracks for managers who need to handle massive scale and uptime. Aiopsschool: Leading the way in AI-driven operations. Their programs help you understand how to use machine learning to manage complex IT environments. Dataopsschool: The destination for data management professionals. They help you master the lifecycle of data pipelines and ensure high data quality across the board. Finopsschool: Specializes in the financial side of the cloud. They provide the training needed to manage cloud budgets and optimize spending for engineering teams. Next Certifications to Take: 3 Options
After completing your CDM, you should look toward one of these three paths to further your executive or technical presence:
Same Track (Leadership Depth): Master in DevOps Engineering (MDE). This provides the ultimate technical authority for a manager, ensuring you can oversee even the most complex architectures. Cross-Track (Functional Breadth): Certified DevSecOps Manager. As cyber threats increase, a manager who can lead security-first engineering is highly valuable. Leadership (Executive Path): Certified SRE Architect. This prepares you for a CTO or VP of Engineering role, focusing on the architectural stability of the entire enterprise. FAQs: General DevOps Career & Sequence
1. How difficult is the Certified DevOps Manager exam?
It is challenging because it focuses on decision-making. You must understand how one choice (like tool selection) impacts the whole organization.
2. Is there a specific order I should follow?
Yes. Ideally, start with CDE Foundation, move to CDE Professional, and conclude with the Certified DevOps Manager (CDM).
3. What are the prerequisites for the Manager level?
We recommend at least 5 years in IT and a solid understanding of the software development lifecycle (SDLC).
4. How much time do I need to study?
Most working professionals find 30 days of consistent, daily study (1 hour) is sufficient to pass.
5. Are these certifications recognized globally?
Yes. The standards taught are universal, making these certifications valid for roles in India, the US, Europe, and beyond.
6. Do I need to be a coding expert to be a DevOps Manager?
You don’t need to write production code daily, but you must understand the logic and architecture to guide your team effectively.
7. How do these certifications impact salary?
Certified managers often command 25% to 40% higher salaries than their non-certified peers because they bring validated leadership skills.
8. Can I take the training and exam online?
Yes, all recommended institutions offer flexible online, instructor-led training and remote proctored exams.
9. What is the value of the CDM over a standard PMP?
While PMP is general project management, CDM is specific to the high-velocity, technical world of DevOps, making it more relevant for tech leaders.
10. How long is the certification valid?
The certification is typically valid for 2-3 years. You can stay current by participating in bridge programs or advanced workshops.
11. Is there a community for certified professionals?
Yes, institutions like DevOpsSchool and Scmgalaxy provide access to exclusive alumni networks and job boards.
12. Can I switch from a non-technical role to DevOps Management?
It is possible, but we highly recommend completing the CDE Foundation track first to gain the necessary technical vocabulary.
FAQs: Certified DevOps Manager (CDM) Specific
1. What is the official URL for the CDM program?
You can find all details at: https://www.devopsschool.com/certification/certified-devops-manager.html
2. Who is the primary provider for this certification?
The official provider is DevOpsSchool.
3. Does the CDM exam cover DORA metrics?
Yes, understanding and implementing DORA metrics (Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, etc.) is a core part of the curriculum.
4. What is the exam format?
It consists of multiple-choice questions that are scenario-based, testing how you would handle real-world management challenges.
5. Is there a hands-on component?
The training includes hands-on labs focused on strategic tool selection, dashboard creation, and roadmap planning.
6. What is the cost of the CDM certification?
The fee varies by region, but it typically ranges around INR 24,999 / USD 350.
7. Can I skip the Professional level and go straight to Manager?
If you have 10+ years of experience and a strong technical background, you may skip, but the Professional level is highly recommended for context.
8. Why is DevOpsSchool considered the best for this?
They provide trainers who are industry veterans and offer a curriculum that is continuously updated to reflect the latest trends like AIOps and FinOps.
Conclusion
The role of a Certified DevOps Manager is to be the “glue” that holds an engineering organization together. It requires a unique blend of technical oversight, financial acumen, and people leadership. By following this guide and choosing the right certification path, you are not just getting a certificate—you are gaining the tools to lead the next generation of software delivery.
The industry is moving fast. Don’t just keep up; lead the way.
Would you like me to draft a custom 30-day study roadmap or a sample DevOps Roadmap project to help you get started with the CDM program?
View the full article
reporter

Why Apple's iOS 26.4 Siri Upgrade Will Be Bigger Than Originally Promised

In the iOS 26.4 update that's coming this spring, Apple will introduce a new version of Siri that's going to overhaul how we interact with the personal assistant and what it's able to do.


The iOS 26.4 version of ‌Siri‌ won't work like ChatGPT or Claude, but it will rely on large language models (LLMs) and has been updated from the ground up.

Upgraded Architecture

The next-generation version of ‌Siri‌ will use advanced large language models, similar to those used by ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Apple isn't implementing full chatbot interactions, but any upgrade is both better than what's available now and long overdue.

Right now, ‌Siri‌ uses machine learning, but it doesn't have the reasoning capabilities that LLM models impart. ‌Siri‌ relies on multiple task-specific models to complete a request, going from one step to another. ‌Siri‌ has to determine the intent of a request, pull out relevant information (a time, an event, a name, etc), and then use APIs or apps to complete the request. It's not an all-in-one system.

In iOS 26.4, ‌Siri‌ will have an LLM core that everything else is built around. Instead of just translating voice to text and looking for keywords to execute on, ‌Siri‌ will actually understand the specifics of what a user is asking, and use reasoning to get it done.

LLM Improvements

‌Siri‌ today is usually fine for simple tasks like setting a timer or alarm, sending a text message, toggling a smart home device on or off, answering a simple question, or controlling a device function, but it doesn't understand anything more complicated, it can't complete multi-step tasks, it can't interpret wording that's not in the structure it wants, it has no personal context, and it doesn't support follow-up questions.

An LLM should solve most of those problems because ‌Siri‌ will have something akin to a brain. LLMs can understand the nuance of a request, suss out what it is someone actually wants, and take the steps to deliver that information or complete the requested action.

We already know some of what LLM ‌Siri‌ will be able to do because Apple described the Apple Intelligence features it wants to implement when iOS 18 debuted.

Promised Siri Apple Intelligence Features

Apple described three specific ways that ‌Siri‌ will improve, including personal context, the ability to see what's on the screen to know what the user is talking about, and the capability to do more in and between apps.

‌Siri‌ will understand pronouns, references to content on the screen and in apps, and it will have a short-term memory for follow-up requests.

Personal Context

With personal context, ‌Siri‌ will be able to keep track of emails, messages, files, photos, and more, learning more about you to help you complete tasks and keep track of what you've been sent.

Show me the files Eric sent me last week.
Find the email where Eric mentioned ice skating.
Find the books that Eric recommended to me.
Where's the recipe that Eric sent me?
What's my passport number?

Onscreen Awareness

Onscreen awareness will let ‌Siri‌ see what's on your screen and complete actions involving whatever you're looking at. If someone texts you an address, for example, you can tell ‌Siri‌ to add it to their contact card. Or if you're looking at a photo and want to send it to someone, you can ask ‌Siri‌ to do it for you.

Deeper App Integration

Deeper app integration means that ‌Siri‌ will be able to do more in and across apps, performing actions and completing tasks that are just not possible with the personal assistant right now. We don't have a full picture of what ‌Siri‌ will be capable of, but Apple has provided a few examples of what to expect.

Moving files from one app to another.
Editing a photo and then sending it to someone.
Get directions home and share the ETA with Eric.
Send the email I drafted to Eric.

Bigger Than Promised Update

In an all-hands meeting in August 2025, Apple software engineering chief Craig Federighi explained the ‌Siri‌ debacle to employees. Apple had attempted to merge two separate systems, which didn't work out.

There was one system for handling current commands and another based on large language models, and the hybrid approach was not working due to the confines of the current ‌Siri‌ architecture. The only way forward was to upgrade to the second-generation architecture built around a large language model.

In the August meeting, Federighi said Apple had successfully revamped ‌Siri‌, and that Apple would be able to introduce a bigger upgrade than it promised in iOS 18.

"The work we've done on this end-to-end revamp of ‌Siri‌ has given us the results we needed," Federighi told employees. "This has put us in a position to not just deliver what we announced, but to deliver a much bigger upgrade than that we envisioned."

Adopting Google Gemini

Part of Apple's problem was that it was relying on AI models that it built in-house, and that were not able to match the capabilities of competitors. Apple started considering using a third-party model for ‌Siri‌ and other future AI features shortly after delaying ‌Siri‌, and in January, Apple announced a multi-year partnership with Google.

For the foreseeable future, Apple's AI features, including the more personalized version of ‌Siri‌, will use a custom model Apple built in collaboration with Google's Gemini team. Apple plans to continue work on its own in-house models, but for now, it will rely on Gemini for many public-facing features.

‌Siri‌ in iOS 26.4 will be more similar to Google Gemini than ‌Siri‌ today, though without full chatbot capabilities. Apple plans to continue to run some features on-device and use Private Cloud Compute to maintain privacy. Apple will keep personal data on-device, anonymize requests, and continue to allow AI features to be disabled.

What's Not Coming in iOS 26.4

‌Siri‌ is not going to work as a chatbot, so the updated version will not feature long-term memory or back-and-forth conversations, plus Apple plans to use the same voice-based interface with limited typing functionality.

Apple's Embarrassing Siri Delay

In what became an infamous move, Apple went all-in showing off a smarter, Apple Intelligence-powered version of ‌Siri‌ when it introduced iOS 18 at the 2024 Worldwide Developers Conference. Apple said these features would come in an update to iOS 18, but right around when launch was expected, Apple admitted that ‌Siri‌ wasn't ready and would be delayed until spring 2026.



Apple executives went on a press tour to explain the ‌Siri‌ shortcomings after WWDC 2025, promising bigger and better things for iOS 26, and explaining what went wrong. The ‌Apple Intelligence‌ ‌Siri‌ features we saw at WWDC 2024 were actually implemented and weren't faked, but ‌Siri‌ wasn't working as well as expected behind the scenes and Apple was dealing with quality issues.

Since Apple advertised the new ‌Siri‌ features with the iPhone 16, some people who bought the iPhone because of the new functionality were upset about the delay and sued. Apple was able to quietly settle the case in December 2025, so most of the ‌Siri‌ snafu has been resolved.

Internal Restructuring

The misstep with ‌Siri‌'s debut and the failure of the hybrid architecture led Apple to restructure its entire AI team. Apple AI chief John Giannandrea was removed from the ‌Siri‌ leadership team, with Vision Pro chief Mike Rockwell taking over instead.

Apple CEO Tim Cook was no longer confident in Giannandrea's ability to oversee product development, and Giannandrea is set to retire in spring 2026. Rockwell reports to Federighi, and Federighi told employees that the new leadership has "supercharged" ‌Siri‌ development. Federighi has apparently played an instrumental role in changing Apple's approach to AI, and he is making the decisions that will allow the company to catch up to rivals.

Apple has struggled with retaining AI employees amid the ‌Siri‌ issue and recruitment strategies from companies like Meta. Meta poached several key AI engineers from Apple, offering pay packages as high as $200 million. At Apple's August all-hands meeting, Cook and Federighi aimed to reassure employees that AI is critically important to the company. "There is no project people are taking more seriously," Federighi said of ‌Siri‌.

Cook said that Apple will "make the investment" to be a leader in AI.

iOS 26.4 Siri Launch Date

Apple has promised that the new version of ‌Siri‌ is coming in spring 2026, which is when we're expecting iOS 26.4. Testing on iOS 26.4 should begin in late February or early March, with a launch to follow around the April timeframe.

LLM Siri Compatibility

The new version of ‌Siri‌ will presumably run on all devices that support ‌Apple Intelligence‌, though Apple hasn't explicitly provided details. Some new ‌Siri‌ capabilities may come to older devices as well.

iOS 27 Chatbot Upgrade

Apple plans to upgrade ‌Siri‌ even further in the iOS 27 update, turning Siri into a chatbot. ‌Siri‌ will work like Claude or ChatGPT, able to understand and engage in back and forth conversation.

Details about the ‌Siri‌ interface and how a chatbot version of ‌Siri‌ will work are still in short supply, but iOS 26.4 will be a stop on the path to a version of ‌Siri‌ able to actually function like products from Anthropic and OpenAI.
This article, "Why Apple's iOS 26.4 Siri Upgrade Will Be Bigger Than Originally Promised" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Six more vulnerabilities found in n8n automation platform

Six more vulnerabilities have been discovered in the n8n workflow platform used for building LLM-powered agents to connect business processes. Four of the six are rated as critical, carrying CVSS severity scores of 9.4.
“These vulnerabilities span multiple attack classes, from remote code execution and command injection to arbitrary file access and cross-site scripting, all targeting a platform that is frequently deployed with access to secrets, credentials, internal APIs, and business-critical logic,” noted Amit Genkin, a security researchers at Israel-based cloud security provider Upwind, who blogged about the vulnerabilities this week.
Johannes Ullrich, dean of research at the SANS Institute, said the vulnerabilities affect how n8n sandboxes the processes created by different users, and how the host is protected from users with access to n8n.
“This is less of an issue for a single user system,” he said in an email, “but n8n is often installed in shared environments. Given the number and severity of the vulnerabilities, it is fair to assume that this is more or less just the ‘tip of the iceberg’. At this point, multi user n8n deployments should be treated with care.”
The discovery is the second major revelation of issues in the n8n platform this year. Four weeks ago, researchers at Cyera published details of a critical vulnerability, after it had been patched, that would allow unauthenticated attackers to completely take over n8n deployments.
Also last month, it was learned that threat actors are targeting n8n by planting malicious packages on the npm registry that claim to be legitimate n8n add-ons.
CSOs with n8n in their environments and developers using the platform should update to the latest version of the application to close the newly-found holes.
The vulnerabilities are:
CVE-2026-21893, a command injection hole in the community edition of n8n. An unauthenticated user with administration permission could execute arbitrary system commands on the n8n host.
“The risk is amplified by the trust typically placed in community extensions,” Upwinds said in its commentary, “making this a high-impact attack path that directly bridges application-level functionality with host-level execution.
It carries a CVSS vulnerability score of 9.4; CVE-2026-25049, which carries a CVSS score of 9.4. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows could abuse crafted expressions in workflow parameters to trigger unintended system command execution on the host running n8n.
“Because workflow expressions are a core and commonly used feature in n8n, this flaw significantly lowers the barrier to exploitation and enables full compromise of the underlying host,” commented Upwind in its blog; CVE-2026-25052, which carries a CVSS score of 9.4. A vulnerability in the file access controls allows authenticated users with permission to create or modify workflows to read sensitive files from the n8n host system. This can be exploited to obtain critical configuration data and user credentials, leading to complete account takeover of any user on the instance; CVE-2026-25053, which carries a CVSS score of 9.4. This is a vulnerability in the Git node that allows execution of system commands or arbitrary file access; CVE-2026-25051, a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the handling of webhook responses and related HTTP endpoints. It carries a CVSS score of 8.5.
Under certain conditions, the n8n Content Security Policy (CSP) sandbox protection intended to isolate HTML responses may not be applied correctly. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows could abuse this to execute malicious scripts with same-origin privileges when other users interact with the crafted workflow. This could lead to session hijacking and account takeover. CVE-2025-61917, which carries a CVSS score of 7.7. This is an information disclosure vulnerability caused by unsafe buffer allocation in n8n task runners. During an interview, Moshe Hassan, Upwind’s vice-president of research and innovation, estimated that 83% of his firm’s customers use the n8n platform. But, he added, less than 25% use it in production and/or may have it exposed to the web. The rest, he said, are testing it.
However, he said those who are evaluating the platform could be at risk if the users enter identity tokens for cloud platforms such as AWS and others as part of their testing. And the fact that large numbers of developers are testing the latest AI-related applications makes it hard for security pros to contain the blast radius of potential vulnerabilities in IT environments, he added.
Generally, to contain vulnerabilities, CSOs have to understand the business logic and data flow of any applications in their environments, Hassan noted. However, risk can be lowered through network segregation, he said, and in addition, engineering should be allowed to create sandboxes for thorough testing of applications before they go into production.
View the full article
CSOonline

iPhone Air Review: Four Months Later, is Apple's Thinnest iPhone Worth $999?

It's been four months since the iPhone Air came out, and it hasn't exactly been a resounding success. Sales are reportedly so low that Apple is delaying the next-generation model. MacRumors videographer Dan Barbera shares what it's been like using Apple's thinnest and lightest iPhone on a daily basis over the last few months.

Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos.
With its super thin design, the ‌iPhone Air‌ still impresses even months later. It's much lighter than the other ‌iPhone‌ models, and a pleasure to use because of it. The ‌iPhone Air‌ is Apple's best one-handed smartphone, plus it impresses everyone who tries it out.

The frosted glass texture is attractive, and thanks to that titanium frame, it's durable. The glass resists fingerprints, plus it's not slippery, so it can be used without a case. That's a good thing, since a case tends to ruin the ultra thin feel. The ‌iPhone Air‌ is all glass, though, so it's still breakable if dropped and AppleCare+ is recommended.

The ‌iPhone Air‌ has the smallest battery in the iPhone 17 lineup, and there was a lot of concern that it wouldn't last all day. As long as you're not using it for high-end gaming, the battery is totally fine. Dan hasn't had a problem with battery life for day-to-day activities like browsing social media, YouTube, navigating, and using CarPlay.

If you're someone who only uses the Wide camera on the ‌iPhone‌, you might not miss the Ultra Wide or Telephoto lenses, but having only a single-lens rear camera is one of the ‌iPhone Air‌'s major downsides. You get 1x and 2x zoom, but no 0.5x mode, no macro lens, and no 5x telephoto lens. It's definitely a dealbreaker for some people.

There's also only a single speaker, and while it's fine for use in quiet rooms, if you like to use your ‌iPhone‌ for things like listening to music in the shower, it might not be good enough.

The biggest thing wrong with the ‌iPhone Air‌ is the price tag. Sure, it's light, thin, and has an impressive design, but it's $999. For $200 less, you can get the standard ‌iPhone 17‌ with two cameras and near identical performance, and for $100 more, you can get the iPhone 17 Pro, which has three cameras and faster performance. The only sacrifice is thinness, and it's clear that most people aren't willing to pay more to lose features for a thin and light design.

At this point, it's not entirely clear when a new ‌iPhone Air‌ is coming out. Rumors originally suggested we'd get the second-generation model in the fall of 2026, but sales were below expectations, so Apple is holding back on a new model to make some changes.

The next ‌iPhone Air‌ could have a second camera and display improvements like a smaller Dynamic Island to make it more appealing, with a potential launch happening in spring 2027.Related Roundup: iPhone AirBuyer's Guide: iPhone Air (Buy Now)
This article, "iPhone Air Review: Four Months Later, is Apple's Thinnest iPhone Worth $999?" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Apple to Allow ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in CarPlay

Apple is planning to bring new AI features to CarPlay, reports Bloomberg. Apple will allow third-party chatbot apps to integrate with ‌CarPlay‌, so AI services like Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT will be accessible in the car for the first time.


‌CarPlay‌ already supports third-party apps, but the types of apps that are supported are limited. Companies like Anthropic and OpenAI aren't currently able to create ‌CarPlay‌ apps, so users are limited to using Siri voice controls in the vehicle.

With the change, ‌CarPlay‌ users will be able to access apps like ChatGPT to ask questions hands-free, though the apps won't be able to control vehicle or iPhone functions. Third-party AI voice apps will not be accessible via a wake word and won't replace ‌Siri‌, so users will need to open an app to get access to a chatbot. App developers will be able to design in-car experiences that will launch a voice-based chat mode when the app is opened, which will streamline the process.

Apple is planning to support third-party AI apps "within the coming months," which could align with when the company's smarter version of ‌Siri‌ is set to launch. With iOS 26.4, Apple is debuting a more personalized version of ‌Siri‌ that uses large language models.

‌Siri‌ will be able to answer complex questions, complete multi-step tasks, maintain continuity, and do more in and between apps. The personal assistant is also set to gain a World Knowledge Answers feature, allowing it to search the web and summarize information from websites.

Later in iOS 27, ‌Siri‌ will get full chatbot capabilities, allowing it to better compete with Gemini, Claude, and ChatGPT.Related Roundup: CarPlayRelated Forum: HomePod, HomeKit, CarPlay, Home & Auto Technology
This article, "Apple to Allow ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in CarPlay" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

MacRumors Giveaway: Win an iPhone 17 and Fresh Coat Screen Protector From Astropad

For this week's giveaway, we've teamed up with Astropad to offer MacRumors readers a chance to win an iPhone 17 and one of Astropad's anti-reflective Fresh Coat screen protectors to go along with it.


Fresh Coat is a new kind of screen protector that Astropad designed with an optical-grade anti-reflective coating to reduce glare and provide a better iPhone viewing experience. The technology that Astropad is using cuts reflections by 75 percent, while improving contrast and keeping colors vibrant. Unlike other anti-reflective screen protectors on the market, Fresh Coat has adds no haze or distortion.


Priced at $30, Fresh Coat is made from a scratch-proof tempered glass that also provides protection for the ‌iPhone‌'s display in addition to cutting down on glare and reflections. It's slim and won't add any bulk to the ‌iPhone‌ even though there are five layers of technology at work. From the top down, there's an anti-reflective coating, an oleophobic and hydrophobic coating, a layer of tempered glass, a dust barrier, and an impact-resistant "airbag" bonding.


If you have an ‌iPhone 17‌, it comes with an anti-reflective coating added by Apple. What you might not know, though, is that you can't use just any screen protector with the ‌iPhone 17‌. If you put a regular screen protector without an anti-reflective coating on, it nullifies the anti-reflective properties of that added coating.


Since Fresh Coat has its own anti-reflective coating, it actually improves upon Apple's included anti-reflective layer, reducing glare even further. With Fresh Coat, the ‌iPhone‌'s screen is easy to see in any lighting conditions, there's less eye strain, and if you use Dark Mode, it looks even darker.


If you don't have an ‌iPhone 17‌, Fresh Coat can provide an ‌iPhone‌ 17-style display upgrade, mirroring Apple's own reflection-reducing display coating. Fresh Coat is available for all ‌iPhone 17‌ models, the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max, and the ‌iPhone‌ 15 Pro and Pro Max.


Astropad designed an installation process that's impossible to mess up, so you get perfect alignment on your ‌iPhone‌ without hassle.

We have an ‌iPhone 17‌ in white and a Fresh Coat screen protector for one lucky MacRumors reader. To enter to win, use the widget below and enter an email address. Email addresses will be used solely for contact purposes to reach the winner(s) and send the prize(s). You can earn additional entries by subscribing to our weekly newsletter, subscribing to our YouTube channel, following us on Twitter, following us on Instagram, following us on Threads, or visiting the MacRumors Facebook page.

Due to the complexities of international laws regarding giveaways, only U.S. residents who are 18 years or older, UK residents who are 18 years or older, and Canadian residents who have reached the age of majority in their province or territory are eligible to enter. All federal, state, provincial, and/or local taxes, fees, and surcharges are the sole responsibility of the prize winner. To offer feedback or get more information on the giveaway restrictions, please refer to our Site Feedback section, as that is where discussion of the rules will be redirected.



Astropad Giveaway

The contest will run from today (February 6) at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time through 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on February 13. The winner will be chosen randomly on or shortly after December 26 and will be contacted by email. The winner will have 48 hours to respond and provide a shipping address before a new winner is chosen.
This article, "MacRumors Giveaway: Win an iPhone 17 and Fresh Coat Screen Protector From Astropad" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Best Apple Deals of the Week: Apple Watch Series 11 Get $100 Discounts Amid Valentine's Day and Super Bowl Sales

This week we began tracking big savings thanks to Valentine's Day and Super Bowl sales, which include discounts on everything from iPhone 17 cases to monitors and TVs. You'll also find deals below on Apple Watch Series 11 and AirPods 4, with the best prices of the year so far on each.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with some of these vendors. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

Valentine's Day Deals


We're just one week away from Valentine's Day, which falls on Saturday, February 14 this year. Similar to years past, many third-party Apple resellers and accessory companies have opened up notable discounts on Apple products and accessories to coincide with the holiday, and you can find the best in our list below.

Best Buy - Save up to 50% on select TVs
Nomad - Save 49% in Nomad's overstock sale
OtterBox - Save 30% on cases, 50% on charging accessories, and more
Anker - Save up to 40% on essential accessories
Sonos - Save up to 20% off soundbars, speakers, and subwoofers
AT&T - iPhone 17 Pro at no cost with eligible trade-in
Samsung - Save on Samsung monitors and TVs
ZAGG - Save up to 75% during clearance event
Casely - Save 10% sitewide with code LOVE10
Casetify - Buy 2 get 20% off with code LOVE2026

Super Bowl Sales


What's the deal? Save on home audio equipment, TVs, and more
Where can I get it? Sonos and Samsung
Where can I find the original deal? Right here
UP TO 20% OFFSonos Super Bowl Sale
$600 OFF65-inch The Frame for $1,199.99
$1,200 OFF75-inch The Frame Pro for $1,999.99

This week we began tracking Super Bowl themed sales at retailers including Samsung and Sonos, with some of the year's best prices so far on popular TVs, sound bars, speakers, and much more.

Apple Watch Series 11


What's the deal? Take $100 off Apple Watch Series 11
Where can I get it? Amazon
Where can I find the original deal? Right here
$100 OFFApple Watch Series 11 (42mm GPS) for $299.00
$100 OFFApple Watch Series 11 (46mm GPS) for $329.00

Amazon this week has all-time low prices on the Apple Watch Series 11, with $100 discounts across numerous models of the smartwatch. This is only the second time so far in 2026 that we've tracked $100 markdowns on the Series 11, and nearly every aluminum model is on sale right now.

AirPods 4


What's the deal? Take $30 off AirPods 4
Where can I get it? Amazon
Where can I find the original deal? Right here
$30 OFFAirPods 4 for $99.00

Apple's AirPods 4 returned to $99.00 this week, down from $129.00. This is the base model of the AirPods 4 without Active Noise Cancellation, and it's the best price we've seen on this model so far in 2026.

Anker


What's the deal? Save on Anker accessories
Where can I get it? Amazon
Where can I find the original deal? Right here
Note: You won't see the deal price until checkout.
$30 OFFAnker Prime 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station for $119.99
$60 OFFAnker Prime 14-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Dock for $339.99

Earlier this week, Anker debuted its new Prime 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station with a launch discount on Amazon. If ordered this week, you can clip the on-page coupon on Amazon to get the accessory for $119.99, down from $149.99.

For even more Anker discounts, be sure to check out our original post.

If you're on the hunt for more discounts, be sure to visit our Apple Deals roundup where we recap the best Apple-related bargains of the past week.



Deals Newsletter

Interested in hearing more about the best deals you can find in 2026? Sign up for our Deals Newsletter and we'll keep you updated so you don't miss the biggest deals of the season!




Related Roundup: Apple Deals
This article, "Best Apple Deals of the Week: Apple Watch Series 11 Get $100 Discounts Amid Valentine's Day and Super Bowl Sales" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

How to Watch 2026 Super Bowl LX For Free on iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV

Super Bowl LX is this Sunday, February 8, and there is a way for U.S. viewers to watch for free. Our instructions below are focused on the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV, but this method will of course work across a variety of devices.


2026's Super Bowl has the New England Patriots facing the Seattle Seahawks at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, California, with the kickoff time on Sunday scheduled for 3:30 p.m. Pacific Time / 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time. These two teams already met in the 2015 Super Bowl, which ended in a Patriots championship.

The big game is airing on NBC and streaming on Peacock Premium this year.

One way to stream the 2026 Super Bowl for free on the iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV in the U.S. is to sign up for a free 30-day trial to Walmart+, which includes free access to Peacock Premium's ad-supported tier.

You can sign up for a Walmart+ trial online.

Next, here is how to activate free, ad-supported Peacock Premium via Walmart+:
Sign into your Walmart account.
Go to your Account page.
Select Walmart+.
Find Peacock Premium in the Benefits Hub.
Select Get Peacock.
Log in or create your streaming service account.
Follow the on-screen steps to finish setting up your account.
Build your profile and start streaming.Then, you can sign in to your Peacock account tied to Walmart+ in the Peacock app on the iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV. On the Mac, you can sign in on the Peacock website. As mentioned, these are Apple-focused instructions, but they apply to many other devices too.

In addition to the Super Bowl itself, you can watch the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show, featuring Puerto Rican singer Bad Bunny.

Do not forget that a Walmart+ subscription automatically renews after the 30-day free trial.Tag: Super Bowl
This article, "How to Watch 2026 Super Bowl LX For Free on iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple TV" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

NASA Now Allowing Astronauts to Bring Their iPhones on Space Missions

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman on Wednesday announced that NASA astronauts will soon be permitted to fly with "the latest smartphones," beginning with the SpaceX Crew-12 and Artemis II missions over the next few months.


In an email, an Apple spokesperson said this will mark the first time the iPhone has been fully qualified for extended use in orbit and beyond.

NASA astronauts were previously not allowed to carry their own personal smartphones on space flights, but they did allow some approved DSLR cameras and other equipment. With smartphones, Isaacman said astronauts will be able to "capture special moments for their families and share inspiring images and video with the world."

It is unclear exactly which iPhone models have been qualified.Tag: NASA
This article, "NASA Now Allowing Astronauts to Bring Their iPhones on Space Missions" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

The MacRumors Show: All the New Macs Coming This Year

We discuss all of the new Macs Apple is expected to release this year, starting with the M5 Pro and M5 Max MacBook Pro, on this week's episode of The MacRumors Show.

Subscribe to The MacRumors Show YouTube channel for more videos
Following the release of the M5 ‌MacBook Pro‌ last year, Apple is expected to launch refreshed high-end ‌MacBook Pro‌ models with the M5 Pro and M5 Max chips. They are rumored to arrive alongside macOS Tahoe 26.3 in the next few weeks. Stock of the current M4 Pro and M4 Max models is dwindling, suggesting that the announcement is now impending.

After that release, we are expecting M5-series chips to come to the MacBook Air, Mac mini, and Mac Studio at the very least. Whether the iMac and the Mac Pro will get an M5 chip remains an open question.

Apple is also rumored to launch an all-new low-cost MacBook this year, featuring the A18 Pro chip for comparable performance to the M1 chip. It is expected to feature a 13-inch LCD display, USB-C connectivity only, and a price point somewhere between $699 and $899. iPad-like Silver, Blue, Pink, and Yellow color options are also rumored.

Toward the end of the year, Apple is expected to launch significantly upgraded ‌MacBook Pro‌ models. The new machines are rumored to feature M6-series chips, a cellular connectivity option, OLED touchscreen displays, a hole-punch in the screen for the front-facing camera, and a thinner, lighter design.

The MacRumors Show has its own YouTube channel, so make sure you're subscribed to keep up with new episodes and clips.

Subscribe to The MacRumors Show YouTube channel!

You can also listen to ‌The MacRumors Show‌ on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, or other podcast apps. You can also copy our RSS feed directly into your player.



If you haven't already listened to the previous episode of The MacRumors Show, catch up to hear our discussion about Apple's newly launched AirTag 2 and Apple Creator Studio.

Subscribe to ‌The MacRumors Show‌ for new episodes every week, where we discuss some of the topical news breaking here on MacRumors, often joined by interesting guests such as Kayci Lacob, Kevin Nether, John Gruber, Mark Gurman, Jon Prosser, Luke Miani, Matthew Cassinelli, Brian Tong, Quinn Nelson, Jared Nelson, Eli Hodapp, Mike Bell, Sara Dietschy, iJustine, Jon Rettinger, Andru Edwards, Arnold Kim, Ben Sullins, Marcus Kane, Christopher Lawley, Frank McShan, David Lewis, Tyler Stalman, Sam Kohl, Federico Viticci, Thomas Frank, Jonathan Morrison, Ross Young, Ian Zelbo, and Rene Ritchie.

‌The MacRumors Show‌ is on X @MacRumorsShow, so be sure to give us a follow to keep up with the podcast. You can also email us at [email protected] or head over to The MacRumors Show forum thread. Remember to rate and review the podcast, and let us know what subjects and guests you would like to see in the future.Tag: The MacRumors Show
This article, "The MacRumors Show: All the New Macs Coming This Year" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Swift Student Challenge Submissions Now Open Ahead of WWDC 2026

Apple today announced that submissions for the 2026 Swift Student Challenge are now open through Saturday, February 28.


The annual Swift Student Challenge gives eligible student developers around the world the opportunity to showcase their coding capabilities by using the Swift Playground or Xcode apps to create an interactive "app playground."

Apple said winners will be selected based on submissions that "demonstrate excellence in innovation, creativity, social impact, or inclusivity." A subset of Distinguished Winners with "truly exceptional" submissions will be invited to visit Apple in Cupertino, California for three days in summer 2026, with travel and lodging included.

Distinguished Winners are typically invited to attend Apple's annual developers conference WWDC, at the company's Apple Park headquarters. Apple has yet to announce WWDC 2026 dates, but the weeklong conference is typically held in June.

WWDC 2026 is where Apple will announce iOS 27, iPadOS 27, macOS 27, watchOS 27, tvOS 27, visionOS 27, and other software updates.

Apple outlined key things to know on its developer news page.Tags: Swift Student Challenge, WWDC 2026
This article, "Swift Student Challenge Submissions Now Open Ahead of WWDC 2026" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Claude AI finds 500 high-severity software vulnerabilities

Anthropic only released its latest large language model, Claude Opus 4.6, on Thursday, but it has already been using it behind the scenes to identify zero-day vulnerabilities in open-source software.
In the trial, it put Claude inside a virtual machine with access to the latest versions of open source projects, and provided it with a range of standard utilities and vulnerability analysis tools, but no instructions on how to use them nor how specifically to identify vulnerabilities.
Despite this lack of guidance, Opus 4.6 managed to identify a 500 high-severity vulnerabilities. Anthropic staff are validating the findings before reporting the bugs to their developers to ensure the LLM was not hallucinating or reporting false positives, according to company blog post.
“AI language models are already capable of identifying novel vulnerabilities, and may soon exceed the speed and scale of even expert human researchers,” it said.
Anthropic may be keen to improve its reputation in the software security industry, given how its software has already been used to automate attacks.
Other companies are already using AI to handle bug hunting and this is further evidence of the possibilities.
But some software developers are overwhelmed by the number of poor-quality AI-generated bug reports, with at least one shutting its bug-bounty program because of abuse by AI-accelerated bug hunters.
View the full article
CSOonline

Pretend Disk Format: PDFs harbor new dangers

A particularly insidious phishing campaign is disguising malware pretending to be ordinary PDF documents behind links to virtual hard disks. Because workers are used to receiving purchase orders or invoices in the PDF format, they are likely to open the malicious files unthinkingly, enabling the malware they contain — in this case AsyncRAT, a remote-access Trojan — to take control of company computers.
The emails in this phishing campaign don’t attach a document directly but include links to a file hosted on IPFS (InterPlanetary File System), a decentralized storage network increasingly used by cybercriminals as it can be accessed through normal web gateways. Those files are virtual hard disks that, when opened, mount as a local disk, bypassing some Windows security features. Inside the disk is a Windows Script File (WSF) purporting to be the expected PDF: When the user opens it, Windows executes the code in the file thus leaving the computer open to exploitation by remote users.
To protect themselves, organizations and PC users should set Windows to show file extensions, MalwareBytes Labs advised in a blog post, crediting Securonix with discovering the Dead#Vax malware campaign.
This article first appeared on Computerworld.
View the full article
CSOonline

Apple CEO Tim Cook Asked About Retirement Again, Here's What He Said

In an all-hands meeting with employees on Thursday, Apple CEO Tim Cook briefly touched on the topic of retirement, but he remained coy about his plans.


"I spend a lot of time thinking about who's in the room five years from now, 10 years from now," said Cook, who was taking questions, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. "I am obsessed with this — who's in the room 15 years from now."

A few months ago, the Financial Times reported that Apple was preparing for Cook to step down as soon as early 2026. However, Gurman has previously said that this timeframe "seems unlikely," and that he would be "shocked" if Cook stepped down before the middle of this year. So, Cook may remain CEO through WWDC 2026 at the very least.

Apple's Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering, John Ternus, is widely viewed as Cook's most likely successor. Last month, Gurman reported that Cook gave oversight of Apple's design teams to Ternus at the end of last year, and he said this move makes it "crystal clear" that Ternus is the leading CEO candidate.

Whenever it happens, there has been speculation that Cook might become the executive chairman of Apple's board of directors after he steps down as CEO. In this position, Cook would retain some control over company decisions.

Cook has been Apple's CEO since August 2011, and he reached the typical retirement age of 65 last year. It is sounding more and more likely that his time in charge of the company is inching towards the end, but it still remains to be seen if he plans to step down in the coming months or if reports have jumped the gun.Tag: Tim Cook
This article, "Apple CEO Tim Cook Asked About Retirement Again, Here's What He Said" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

AirTag 1 Gets Major Discounts With 1-Pack at $17 and 4-Pack at $64

Apple's first-generation AirTag 4-Pack has dropped to $64.00 this week on Amazon, down from the original price of $99.00. Free shipping options have a delivery estimate around February 11, while Prime members should be able to get it delivered a few days sooner.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with Amazon. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

Overall, this is a solid second-best price on the AirTag 4-pack that's within $1 of the Amazon all-time low price. If you're shopping for a single AirTag, Amazon has the AirTag 1-Pack for $17.00, down from $29.00, a record low price.

$12 OFFAirTag 1-Pack for $17.00
$35 OFFAirTag 4-Pack for $64.00

Apple just debuted the all-new AirTag, featuring longer range for tracking items and a louder speaker. We haven't tracked any discounts on the new second generation models as of yet, so anyone who wants to save money should keep looking into the original models.

If you're on the hunt for more discounts, be sure to visit our Apple Deals roundup where we recap the best Apple-related bargains of the past week.



Deals Newsletter

Interested in hearing more about the best deals you can find in 2026? Sign up for our Deals Newsletter and we'll keep you updated so you don't miss the biggest deals of the season!




Related Roundup: Apple Deals
This article, "AirTag 1 Gets Major Discounts With 1-Pack at $17 and 4-Pack at $64" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

China-Linked DKnife AitM Framework Targets Routers for Traffic Hijacking, Malware Delivery

Cybersecurity researchers have taken the wraps off a gateway-monitoring and adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) framework dubbed DKnife that's operated by China-nexus threat actors since at least 2019. The framework comprises seven Linux-based implants that are designed to perform deep packet inspection, manipulate traffic, and deliver malware via routers and edge devices. Its primary targets seem toView the full article
Hacker News

CISA Orders Removal of Unsupported Edge Devices to Reduce Federal Network Risk

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has ordered Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to strengthen asset lifecycle management for edge network devices and remove those that no longer receive security updates from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) over the next 12 to 18 months. The agency said the move is to drive down technical debt and minimizeView the full article
Hacker News

iPhone 18 Pro Max Rumored to Deliver Next-Level Battery Life

The iPhone 18 Pro Max will feature a bigger battery for continued best-in-class battery life, according to a known Weibo leaker.


Citing supply chain information, the Weibo user known as "Digital Chat Station" said that the ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro Max will have a battery capacity of 5,100 to 5,200 mAh. Combined with the efficiency improvements of the A20 Pro chip, made with TSMC's 2nm process, the device could tout extremely impressive battery life. It is expected to be thicker than its predecessor to facilitate the larger battery.

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has the biggest ‌iPhone‌ battery to date at 5,088 mAh. Apple says it has a battery life of up to 39 hours. A recent test found that Apple devices lead the industry for battery life, with the ‌iPhone 17 Pro‌ Max ranking as the longest-lasting phone tested and Apple tied as the top overall brand. As a result, with a bigger battery and more efficient chip, the ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro Max should comfortably offer over 40 hours of battery life.

Meanwhile, the first foldable ‌iPhone‌, which is expected to debut alongside the ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro and ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro Max, is rumored to feature class-leading battery life. The foldable's battery could be over 5,500 mAh in size, which would make it the largest capacity of any ‌iPhone‌, as well as any rival foldable device‌.

The ‌‌iPhone 18‌‌ Pro and ‌‌iPhone 18‌‌ Pro Max are expected to launch later this year, featuring a smaller Dynamic Island, the C2 modem, a simplified Camera Control, a 24-megapixel front-facing camera, and an upgraded main camera with a variable aperture.


Related Roundup: iPhone 18Tag: Digital Chat StationRelated Forum: iPhone
This article, "iPhone 18 Pro Max Rumored to Deliver Next-Level Battery Life" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Ten career-ending mistakes CISOs make and how to avoid them

The Chief Information Security Officer role has become one of the most precarious positions in the C-suite. According to a Hitch Partners study, the average CISO tenure is 39 months — a timeframe that reflects the intense pressure and high stakes of the position. With 77% of CISOs fearing dismissal after a major breach, the margin for error continues to shrink.
The IANS/Artico Search CISO Compensation Report reveals that turnover rates hit 15% in 2025, up from 11% in 2024. Even a 6.7% compensation increase hasn’t slowed the exodus.
The CISO role has evolved from technical expert to strategic business executive — a shift many security leaders struggle to navigate. Rising personal liability under regulatory frameworks, persistent budget constraints, and an increasingly sophisticated threat landscape have converged to create an environment where even experienced CISOs find their positions at risk.
This article examines the ten most common reasons CISOs lost their jobs in 2025 and provides mitigation strategies to help security leaders protect their positions. The data comes from recent industry research, including surveys of 550+ CISOs, analysis of security budget trends, and interviews with executive recruiters who’ve witnessed countless CISO departures.
1. Failure to prevent or manage major breaches
The most direct path to dismissal remains the inability to prevent or effectively respond to significant cybersecurity incidents. Organizations operate under a “one-throat-to-choke” mentality, and when a breach occurs, the CISO becomes the obvious target for accountability. According to recent data , 77% of CISOs believe a major breach will cost them their position.
High-profile incidents consistently result in leadership changes, regardless of whether the CISO had adequate resources or executive support before the incident.
Mitigation strategy: A comprehensive incident response plan with clear communication protocols and regular tabletop exercises forms the foundation of effective breach management. Documented risk assessments shared with the board create a paper trail that demonstrates due diligence.
When leadership understands the risks flagged by the security team and the resources requested, they’re less likely to assign blame to the CISO when incidents occur.
2. Poor communication with the board and C-suite
Technical expertise alone no longer suffices in the modern CISO role. Security leaders who fail to translate cyber risks into business impact quickly lose credibility with decision-makers who control budgets and strategic direction.
When security leaders present endless technical details without connecting them to revenue loss, regulatory fines, or competitive disadvantage, boards tune out. This communication gap creates a dangerous disconnect where executives underestimate risks and underinvest in cybersecurity.
Lavonne Burke, VP of Legal, Global Security, IT & AI at Dell, succinctly framed the solution during the Cyber Risk Virtual Summit 2025: “CISOs must translate risk into a language the board understands. Instead of talking about encryption, explain how it prevents financial and reputational loss.”
Mitigation strategy: Effective CISOs frame every security discussion in business terms. Rather than reporting “critical vulnerabilities,” they explain potential financial impact, customer trust erosion, and regulatory consequences. Dashboards that show risk trends and tie security metrics to business objectives the board already tracks prove far more effective than technical reports.
3. Inadequate compliance and governance management
Based on research by Ponemon Institute and GlobalSCAPE, regulatory frameworks have evolved from guidelines to legal requirements with teeth. Non-compliance costs organizations 2.7 times more than maintaining compliance, and CISOs increasingly face personal liability under frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and emerging AI regulations.
Regulatory frameworks have evolved from guidelines to legal requirements with teeth. Non-compliance costs organizations 2.7 times more than maintaining compliance, and CISOs increasingly face personal liability under frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and emerging AI regulations.
The Meta (Facebook) €1.2 billion GDPR fine serves as a sobering reminder that regulators impose penalties that materially impact business operations — and no company, regardless of size or market position, is exempt from enforcement. CISOs who treat compliance as a checkbox exercise put both their organizations and careers at risk.
Mitigation strategy: A robust governance framework maps security controls to specific regulatory requirements. Detailed audit trails demonstrating due diligence, regular compliance assessments, and quarterly reports to the board on compliance posture create the documentation necessary to demonstrate organizational commitment to regulatory adherence.
Modern password management solutions like Passwork provide the audit trails and access logs that compliance frameworks demand, giving CISOs concrete evidence of credential governance during audits.
4. Lack of business acumen and strategic alignment
Security leaders who position themselves as cost centers rather than business enablers struggle to maintain executive support. In 2026, boards expect CISOs to understand how security decisions impact market share, customer acquisition, and competitive positioning.
Adam Fletcher, CISO, Blackstone: “Cybersecurity isn’t about avoiding risk — it’s about managing it intelligently. The future belongs to leaders who make cyber resilience a competitive advantage.”
When security becomes a barrier to business initiatives rather than a framework for safe innovation, executives start questioning the CISO’s value.
Leaders who can’t articulate how cybersecurity investments protect and enable revenue growth find themselves sidelined during strategic discussions.
Mitigation strategy: Successful CISOs develop a deep understanding of their organization’s business model, revenue streams, and competitive landscape. Early participation in product development discussions allows security leaders to offer guidance that accelerates rather than blocks initiatives.
Positioning security as a shared responsibility that enables business objectives transforms the function from cost center to strategic partner.
5. Weak password policies and credential management
Credential-based attacks remain one of the most common breach vectors, yet many organizations still rely on outdated password policies and inadequate credential management. When breaches trace back to compromised passwords, CISOs face difficult questions about why basic security hygiene wasn’t enforced.
Human error in password management creates cascading vulnerabilities. Employees reuse passwords across systems, share credentials through insecure channels, and store sensitive access information in plaintext documents. These practices create entry points that attackers exploit with alarming efficiency.
This is where modern enterprise password managers like Passwork become essential. By enforcing strong, unique passwords and providing a centralized vault, they directly address the root cause of many credential-based breaches. These solutions eliminate the friction that leads employees to adopt risky workarounds while giving security teams visibility into credential usage across the organization.
Mitigation strategy: Enterprise password management solutions that combine strong password generation, secure sharing capabilities, and comprehensive audit trails address the root cause of credential-based breaches. Pairing this technology with clear policies and regular training builds a culture where credential security becomes second nature.
6. High stress, burnout, and leadership fatigue
The 39-month average CISO tenure reflects more than just dismissals. Many security leaders resign under the weight of impossible expectations and relentless pressure. Research shows 84% of CISOs experience high stress levels, with 48% reporting significant mental health impacts.
Burnout degrades decision-making quality, reduces strategic thinking capacity, and damages relationships with colleagues. When exhausted leaders become reactive rather than proactive, their performance suffers in ways that eventually lead to dismissal or resignation.
Mitigation strategy: Establishing boundaries and delegating effectively protects against burnout. A strong security team capable of handling day-to-day operations allows the CISO to focus on strategic initiatives. Sustainable performance requires protecting mental health as vigilantly as protecting organizational systems.
7. Budget mismanagement and failure to demonstrate ROI
Security budgets face constant scrutiny, and CISOs who can’t build compelling business cases for investments struggle to secure necessary resources. When security spending appears disconnected from measurable outcomes, CFOs and boards question whether they’re getting value for their investment.
The challenge intensifies when CISOs request budget increases after incidents occur. Executives reasonably ask why previous investments didn’t prevent the breach, creating a credibility gap that’s difficult to overcome.
Mitigation strategy: A risk-based budgeting approach quantifies potential losses from different threat scenarios, creating compelling business cases for security investments. Tracking and reporting metrics that demonstrate how security investments reduce risk exposure, prevent incidents, and enable business growth establishes clear ROI that resonates with financial decision-makers.
When presenting budget requests, CISOs can point to concrete improvements like reduced credential-related incidents after implementing enterprise password management — measurable outcomes that CFOs understand.
8. Insufficient staff training and cybersecurity culture
Technology alone can’t secure an organization. When employees don’t understand their role in security or view it as someone else’s problem, even sophisticated defenses fail. CISOs who neglect culture-building create environments where security policies are circumvented rather than embraced.
A divided security culture where different departments operate under inconsistent standards creates gaps that attackers exploit. When security feels like an impediment rather than a shared responsibility, employees find workarounds that introduce vulnerabilities.
Mitigation strategy: Effective security awareness programs go beyond annual compliance training. Engaging, role-specific education helps employees understand threats relevant to their work. Security champions in each department who advocate for best practices within their teams create a distributed defense model that scales across the organization.
9. Overlooking insider threats
While external attacks dominate headlines, insider threats represent a significant and often underestimated risk. Whether malicious or accidental, employees with legitimate access can cause devastating damage that’s difficult to detect and prevent.
Robust password management solutions provide detailed audit trails that help identify unusual access patterns without invasive monitoring. When you can track who accessed what information and when, investigating potential insider incidents becomes significantly more efficient.
Mitigation strategy: Least-privilege access controls limit employee access based on role requirements, reducing the potential impact of both malicious and accidental insider actions. Behavioral analytics identify anomalous activity patterns that warrant investigation. Comprehensive logs of sensitive data access, coupled with transparency about monitoring practices, balance security needs with employee trust.
10. Resistance to change and lack of innovation
The threat landscape evolves constantly, and CISOs who cling to outdated methodologies quickly become ineffective. In 2025, AI-driven attacks, quantum computing threats, and sophisticated social engineering require security leaders who embrace innovation rather than resist it.
Organizations implementing Zero Trust architectures, AI-powered threat detection, and cloud-native security models need CISOs who understand these technologies and can guide their adoption. Leaders who view new approaches with skepticism or who lack curiosity about emerging threats lose relevance rapidly.
Mitigation strategy: Continuous learning about emerging threats and security technologies keeps security leaders relevant in a rapidly evolving landscape. Industry conferences, peer networks, and relationships with vendors provide insight into coming innovations. A culture of experimentation within the security team encourages adaptation and prevents organizational stagnation.
Building a sustainable security leadership career
The CISO role continues to evolve from a technical position into a strategic business function that requires equal parts security expertise, business acumen, and leadership capability. Success in 2026 requires thinking beyond traditional security operations to become a business leader who specializes in security.
The future belongs to security leaders who embrace proactive strategies, leverage modern tools like enterprise password managers to address foundational vulnerabilities, and position security as a business enabler.
Start with the basics: credential management remains one of the most exploited attack vectors, yet it’s also one of the most solvable problems. Passwork eliminates password-related risks while providing the audit trails and governance controls that compliance frameworks demand — giving CISOs both improved security posture and the documentation to prove it.
By addressing these ten common failure points systematically, you can build a sustainable career that survives the intense pressures of the modern CISO role.
Ready to address credential vulnerabilities in your organization? Passwork offers a zero-risk transition: free migration assistance and implementation, pay nothing while your current subscription runs — then get 20% off Passwork when you’re ready to switch. See how centralized password management, detailed audit logs, and secure credential sharing can strengthen your security posture.


View the full article
CSOonline

Asian State-Backed Group TGR-STA-1030 Breaches 70 Government, Infrastructure Entities

A previously undocumented cyber espionage group operating from Asia broke into the networks of at least 70 government and critical infrastructure organizations across 37 countries over the past year, according to new findings from Palo Alto Networks Unit 42. In addition, the hacking crew has been observed conducting active reconnaissance against government infrastructure associated with 155View the full article
Hacker News

CISA gives federal agencies 18 months to purge unsupported edge devices

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has given federal agencies 18 months to remove all end-of-support edge devices from their networks, escalating its response to what security researchers describe as a fundamental shift in nation-state attack tactics, where attackers exploit network infrastructure rather than endpoints.
The binding operational directive, BOD 26-02, requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to inventory, update where possible, and ultimately replace firewalls, routers, VPN gateways, load balancers, and network security appliances that no longer receive vendor security patches. CISA warned that the threat from these unsupported devices is “substantial and constant.”
“Unsupported devices pose a serious risk to federal systems and should never remain on enterprise networks,” CISA Acting Director Madhu Gottumukkala said in the directive.
The directive requires FCEB agencies to immediately update any edge device running outdated software to vendor-supported versions where possible.  Within three months, agencies must inventory all end-of-support devices using CISA’s EOS Edge Device List and report findings. Within 12 months, agencies must begin removing devices that have reached end-of-support dates. The 18-month deadline requires all unsupported edge devices to be permanently removed and replaced.
Why edge devices became prime targets
“Edge devices differ fundamentally from traditional IT assets, as they are often end of support, custom, OEM and process dependent,” Avinash Dev Nagumanthri, director analyst at Gartner, told CSO. “This makes discovery, patching, and replacement difficult under tight budgets while maintaining uptime.”
Network edge devices have become one of the top initial access vectors for state-affiliated cyberespionage groups and ransomware gangs. Research shows a dramatic increase in edge device exploitation, with network edge vulnerabilities seeing an 8x increase in exploitation activity. The 2025 Mandiant M-Trends report found that 21% of ransomware attacks featured vulnerability exploitation as the initial access vector.
CISA has documented nation-state campaigns targeting devices from Cisco, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Ivanti, Juniper, and other vendors. The agency noted that these devices have become attractive targets because of their position at the network boundary, integration with identity management systems, and privileged access for lateral movement. Once compromised, they enable threat actors to intercept network traffic, harvest credentials, and exfiltrate sensitive data while evading traditional endpoint detection.
Nagumanthri noted that edge devices protecting critical infrastructure can have physical impacts when compromised, putting high-value systems in sectors like water and transportation at risk. “Nation-state actors are increasingly exploiting edge devices as entry points into infrastructure, threatening critical private sector operations.”
The directive follows two recent emergency directives. In September, CISA issued Emergency Directive 25-03 after threat actors exploited zero-day vulnerabilities in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliances, deploying persistent malware that survived reboots. In October, another emergency directive followed the compromise of F5 Networks’ development environment, where attackers exfiltrated BIG-IP source code.
Implementation hurdles
Sunil Varkey, advisor at Beagle Security, warns of implementation complexities. “The operational reality of removing legacy systems is not straightforward,” Varkey said. “Legacy devices continue to exist not by design, but by necessity.”
He pointed to orphaned systems that remain live and embedded in workflows but lack clear ownership, and operational technology environments where newer hardware or software versions are not available, compatible, or certified. The process requires asset discovery, risk assessment, procurement, configuration redesign, data migration, testing, and managed cutovers to avoid service disruption.
“A common challenge will be the presence of ‘orphaned’ or ‘ghost’ systems — devices that are live, embedded in workflows, but no longer clearly owned,” Varkey said. “These systems often persist because ‘they’ve always worked,’ even when no one fully understands their function.”
Private sector implications
While the directive applies only to federal civilian agencies, CISA strongly encourages private sector organizations to adopt similar measures. The exploitation campaigns targeting federal networks pose equivalent risks to critical infrastructure and commercial enterprises.
Nagumanthri recommended that organizations treat edge and cyber-physical systems as Tier-0 assets, enforce strong authentication, implement network segmentation, require vendor-supported firmware updates, and centralize logging to limit blast radius. For the private sector, he advocated structured lifecycle management with secure-by-design hardware, continuous monitoring, and controlled updates with rollback capabilities.
Varkey saw the directive as a catalyst for modernization beyond compliance. “While the short-term impact will be challenging, the outcome is a more secure, accountable, and defensible infrastructure — one better aligned with today’s threat realities and tomorrow’s operational needs.”
View the full article
CSOonline

Zscaler extends zero-trust security to browsers with SquareX acquisition

Cloud security company Zscaler has announced the acquisition of SquareX, a Singapore-based browser detection and response (BDR) technology startup. The deal will enable Zscaler to extend its Zero Trust Exchange capabilities directly into standard web browsers, across both managed and unmanaged devices.
With Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), the company has been assisting enterprises adopt zero trust architecture using a lightweight agent. The SquareX acquisition is expected to further strengthen Zscaler’s ability to deliver security directly within commonly used browsers through lightweight extensions, eliminating the need for a separate enterprise browser.
The acquisition will assist in enabling posture-like security and protection against advanced spear-phishing and identity-based attacks right into the user’s existing workflow, stated Jay Chaudhry, CEO, chairman, and founder of Zscaler, in his LinkedIn post.
Browsers, the new frontier for attacks
Traditionally treated as a mere gateway to the internet, web browsers are now at the center of enterprise activity, being widely used for SaaS applications, cloud services, and increasingly for generative AI tools. As employees upload, copy, and share sensitive data through browser sessions, this growing reliance has also opened new avenues for security risks.
“Most security stacks protect either the application, the endpoint, or the network. The browser is, unfortunately, the blind spot in between. There are traditional ways of dealing with the issue, but often at too great a risk, or as a result of too limiting an approach,” said Devroop Dhar, co-founder and MD at Primus Partners.
SquareX assists by allowing any browser on any device to function more like a secure enterprise browser using a lightweight, extension-based approach. “This extension becomes a kind of runtime enforcement agent, offering session-specific controls such as browser-based DLP, dynamic content isolation, real-time monitoring of user behaviour, and targeted security enforcement depending on risk levels and session context,” said Sanchit Vir Gogia, CEO and chief analyst at Greyhound Research.
SquareX’s approach also blocks sensitive data from being pasted into public AI tools, flags suspicious prompts, or limits interactions based on user role and data sensitivity, Dhar said. This is so important because AI misuse is rarely malicious, it is accidental. Browser-native security is better suited to prevent mistakes before they turn into incidents.
SquareX extension-based security can be integrated with most commonly used web browsers, including Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari, allowing employees to continue using their preferred browser without requiring enterprises to deploy or manage yet another dedicated security tool.
A win-win for customers?
Zscaler has acknowledged that browser runtime behaviour was a missing piece in its zero-trust security, and having SquareX solution in its portfolio can help fill the gap, noted Gogia.
For Zscaler customers, this acquisition would mean browser security is no longer an afterthought or a separate tool to evaluate but a native part of the platform.
“It reduces reliance on legacy access methods like VPN and VDI, especially for external users. It also gives Zscaler the ability to unify policy enforcement across network access, app usage, and now browser behaviour. Zscaler customers will be able to apply in-session controls to activities that were previously invisible, such as clipboard actions, extension behaviour, or AI prompt submission. They also gain options for session isolation, file download inspection, and least-privilege app access via browser,” added Gogia.
On the other hand, for SquareX customers, this means scale and integration. Vivek Ramachandran, founder and CEO of SquareX, confirmed in a blog post that customer deployments and investments will be protected, and over time, they will benefit from tighter integration with Zscaler services, expanded analytics, and more robust, risk-based controls across managed and unmanaged devices.
In both instances, the customer benefits from improved alignment between access, behaviour, and enforcement approaches, stated Dhar.
Different roads to browser security
Of late, leading cybersecurity companies have been strengthening their product portfolios by investing in and acquiring specialized browser security firms. This is an indication that they now see browser-native security as strategic rather than optional. For instance, in January this year, CrowdStrike acquired Israel-based Seraphic Security, a browser runtime security company, which it plans to integrate into the Falcon platform.
For CISOs, the concern has shifted from the security of the browser to where the security of the browser should be located. Dhar explained in the case of Zscaler’s move with SquareX, the strategy is to integrate browser controls with its access component of Zscaler zero trust. That’s security beyond granting access. However, in the case of the acquisition by CrowdStrike involving Seraphic, the strategy falls under endpoint security as they extend the visibility of EDR solutions to include the browser.
View the full article
CSOonline

How Samsung Knox Helps Stop Your Network Security Breach

As you know, enterprise network security has undergone significant evolution over the past decade. Firewalls have become more intelligent, threat detection methods have advanced, and access controls are now more detailed. However (and it’s a big “however”), the increasing use of mobile devices in business operations necessitates network security measures that are specificallyView the full article
Hacker News

Compromised dYdX npm and PyPI Packages Deliver Wallet Stealers and RAT Malware

Cybersecurity researchers have discovered a new supply chain attack in which legitimate packages on npm and the Python Package Index (PyPI) repository have been compromised to push malicious versions to facilitate wallet credential theft and remote code execution. The compromised versions of the two packages are listed below - @dydxprotocol/v4-client-js (npm) - 3.4.1, 1.22.1, 1.15.2, 1.0.31&View the full article
Hacker News

KI als AWS-Angriffsturbo

khunkornStudio – shutterstock.com
Forscher des Sicherheitsanbieters Sysdig haben einen Angriff aufgedeckt, bei dem kriminelle Angreifer eine AWS-Umgebung in weniger als acht Minuten vollständig kompromittieren konnten. Laut den Threat-Spezialisten nutzten die Bedrohungsakteure dabei eine Cloud-Fehlkonfiguration mit der Hilfe von Large Language Models (LLMs) aus, um den gesamten Angriffs-Lebenszyklus zu komprimieren – von Stunden auf wenige Minuten.
„Sich gegen Angriffe dieser Art zu verteidigen, erfordert KI-fokussierte Technologien, die in der Lage sind Schlussfolgerungen zu ziehen und es ermöglichen, auf automatisierte Attacken mit der nötigen Geschwindigkeit zu reagieren“, meint Ram Varadarajan, CEO beim Plattformanbieter Acalvio.
Vom Public Bucket zur Privilege Escalation
Initial konnten sich die Cyberkriminellen laut den Sicherheitsforschern Zugriff verschaffen, indem sie gültige AWS-Anmeldedaten nutzten, die zuvor in öffentlichen S3Buckets offengelegt wurden. Diese enthielten auch KI-bezogene Daten, etwa Berechtigungen für die Interaktion mit Lambda und eingeschränkten Zugriff auf Amazon Bedrock.
„Dieser Benutzer wurde wahrscheinlich mit der Intention erstellt, Bedrock-Tasks mit Lambda-Funktionen in der gesamten Umgebung zu automatisieren“, erklären die Sysdig-Forscher.
Mit Lesezugriff auf die gesamte Umgebung hatten die Angreifer dann auch leichtes Spiel damit, sich einen Überblick über alle verfügbaren AWS-Dienste zu verschaffen und ihre Berechtigungen zu erweitern, indem sie eine existierende Lambda-Funktion modifizierten.  
Wie die Analyse der Sicherheitsforscher zeigt, weist der Lambda-Code Anzeichen auf, die darauf hindeuten, dass er per LLM generiert wurde , darunter ein umfassendes Exception Handling iterative Targeting-Logik und nicht-englische Kommentare.
Laterale Bewegung, LLMjacking und GPU-Missbrauch
Nachdem sich die Angreifer administrativen Zugriff verschafft hatten, bewegten sie sich lateral über 19 verschiedene AWS-Principals und erstellten neue Benutzerkonten, um ihre Aktivitäten auf verschiedene Identitäten zu verteilen. Dieser Ansatz ermöglichte den Angreifern Persistenz und erschwerte parallel die Detection, wie die Forscher in ihrem Bericht festhalten.
Anschließend verlagerten die Hacker ihren Fokus auf Amazon Bedrock, ermittelten die verfügbaren Modelle und deaktivierten die Protokollierung von Modellaufrufen. Laut den Forschern wurden dann mehrere Foundation-Modelle aufgerufen , entsprechend dem Muster von „LLMjacking“. Zudem verwies der Code in Teilen auch auf nicht existierende Repositories und Ressourcen, was Sysdig auf LLM-Halluzinationen zurückführt.
Im Anschluss missbrauchten die Angreifer schließlich auch noch Ressourcen. Demnach versuchten die Angreifer, High-End-GPU-Instanzen für Machine-Learning-Workloads zu starten. Während das bei den meisten Instanzen aufgrund von Kapazitätsbeschränkungen fehlschlug, konnten die Cyberkriminellen allerdings eine besonders kostspielige GPU-Instanz starten – inklusive Skripten, um CUDA zu installieren, Trainings-Frameworks bereitzustellen und ein öffentliches JupyterLab-Interface zu exponieren.
Experten zufolge ist das Beunruhigendste an diesem Angriff nicht, dass  KI eine neue Angriffstechnik ermöglicht hat.
 „Wenn man diesen Angriff auf das Wesentliche reduziert, ist das bahnbrechende nicht die Technik“, betont etwa Shane Barney, CISO bei Keeper Security. „Entscheidend ist die geringe Widerstandsfähigkeit der Umgebung, sobald der Angreifer legitimen Zugriff erhalten hat.“ Der Sicherheitsentscheider warnt davor, dass KI Reconnaissance,  Privilege Testing und laterale Bewegungen durch das Netzwerk in einer besonders schnellen Sequenz komprimiert. Hierdurch werde die Pufferzeit, auf die sich die Verteidiger bislang traditionell verlassen hätten, eliminiert.
Um das Risiko solcher Attacken zu verringern, empfehlen die Sysdig-Forscher, das Least-Privilege-Prinzip konsequent auf sämtliche IAM-Benutzer- und Lambda-Execution-Rollen anzuwenden. Darüber hinaus sollten sensible S3-Buckets niemals öffentlich zugänglich sein, warnt Sysdig.
Die Research-Experten legen Unternehmen außerdem ans Herz
die Lambda-Versionierung zu nutzen, die Protokollierung der Modellaufrufe in Bedrock zu aktivieren, und verdächtige, großangelegte Enumeration-Aktivitäten kritisch zu überprüfen.  (jm/fm)
View the full article
CSOonline

The blind spot every CISO must see: Loyalty

The longstanding assumption that tenure, performance metrics, or expressed commitment serve as reliable indicators of the trustworthiness of an employee persists across many sectors. Indeed, the great majority of personnel are loyal. But, while small, the percentage of those who aren’t is still well above zero.
Moreover, this conflation of loyalty and security overlooks a fundamental reality: Loyalty is not a static trait, but a dynamic human response shaped by perceived fairness, personal circumstances, and organizational alignment. When grievances go unaddressed or external pressures mount, what appears as steadfast allegiance can quietly shift toward disaffection, resentment, or deliberate breaking of trust.
A half-century of observed patterns
In my more than 50 years of government, private sector, and journalistic endeavors, I have seen this pattern play out repeatedly.
What begins as genuine commitment can erode under the weight of unmet expectations, financial strain, ideological differences, outside influences, or simply the passage of time in roles that demand constant vigilance.
The insider who once seemed beyond reproach becomes the very vector through which sensitive data, intellectual property, or operational integrity is compromised. These are not isolated failures of vetting or technology; they are failures to recognize that loyalty is relational and conditional, not absolute.
How the misread appears in practice
Recent examples illustrate the point. In the US federal sphere, abrupt terminations under workforce reduction initiatives have left former employees with lingering access to sensitive systems, amplifying the potential for data exposure or retaliation. Corporate cases show a similar dynamic: engineers or executives who have spent years building institutional knowledge suddenly depart with proprietary information, motivated not by espionage but by opportunity or resentment.
These incidents are not anomalies. They reflect a broader pattern in which subjective judgments of loyalty, what I have come to call “personal barometers,” exist. For example, colleague to colleague, “Janet loves this company, she’s been here 20 years” may be a consensus view, yet it is not accompanied by objective, consistent, and transparent measures.
Personnel history blind spots
Organizations have long operated under the belief that loyalty, once demonstrated, becomes a durable shield against insider risk. Extended tenure is rewarded with escalating access privileges, high performers are granted broader system rights without commensurate behavioral review, and verbal affirmations of commitment are taken at face value. Yet time and again patterns repeat.
What begins as mutual confidence weakens not through dramatic betrayal but through subtle realignments in personal commitment. An employee who once identified strongly with the mission may begin to feel undervalued, overlooked for advancement, or weighed down by outside pressures. The organization, relying on its subjective gauge of past performance, fails to notice the change until the cow has bolted from the barn.
These patterns are neither new nor rare. They reflect a systemic reluctance to treat loyalty as a living relationship that requires active maintenance and verification.
The blind spot becomes visible
Today we have a confluence of forces that will expose the limitations of assumptive loyalty models. Economic volatility, including persistent inflation, ongoing AI-driven job displacements, and workforce reductions, will heighten personal and professional stressors for employees at every level.
Compounding the human element is the rapid emergence of AI agents as autonomous insiders. These systems, granted privileged access to sensitive data and decision-making workflows, introduce risks at machine speed: prompt misdirection, goal misalignment, or unintended exfiltration without human intent or oversight. We know AI agents are among the fastest-growing insider vectors, with autonomous capabilities outpacing traditional controls.
Geopolitical tensions further amplify the threat. Nation-state actors and proxies increasingly exploit economic pressures and ideological divides to groom or coerce individuals, blurring the lines between personal discontent and hostile external influence.
In critical sectors (transportation, finance, medical, energy) where elevated roles already receive greater scrutiny, the model proves resilient. Yet in less regulated environments, the absence of universal, consensual standards leaves organizations exposed. What was once a subtle misalignment becomes systemic exposure when human volatility meets machine autonomy and geopolitical opportunism.
Parallels to AI poisoning and the dual crisis of trust
These themes extend directly from an earlier column of mine, “AI poisoning and the CISO’s crisis of trust.” That discussion examined how poisoned training data undermines the foundational integrity of artificial intelligence systems, creating a crisis of confidence in the tools organizations increasingly depend upon. The parallel to human loyalty is clear: Just as corrupted inputs erode the reliability of AI outputs, unexamined or misread human loyalties erode the reliability of the individuals who design, operate, protect, and rely on those systems.
In both domains, reactive remediation is insufficient. Trust must be rebuilt through deliberate, continuous verification rather than periodic assumptions. The CISO’s crisis of trust is therefore dual: architectural in the machine domain and relational in the human domain. Coherence across these domains, ensuring that human and machine behaviors remain aligned with organizational intent, then emerges as the essential principle for long-term resilience.
The path forward
The path forward lies in embracing consensual, tiered verification, where elevated responsibility demands greater scrutiny. Positions with access to crown jewels — sensitive data, financial systems, or personnel records — or executive ranks inherently require proportionately more oversight, as regulated sectors have shown. Professionals in these roles accept this as part of the terrain, with history demonstrating minimal talent loss when frameworks are transparent and supportive.
Federal Trusted Workforce 2.0 provides a vital blueprint for the private sector. By 2026, with full implementation across government agencies, this program enrolls millions in continuous vetting, using automated record checks to review a plethora of risks in real-time and reducing reliance on periodic reviews. Private adaptations are feasible and essential: secure releases from key personnel for ongoing monitoring, mirroring TW 2.0’s supportive ethos without federal mandates. These measures are far less expensive than the multimillion-dollar costs of a single malicious insider event ($4.9M to $13.9M per incident per IBM/Mimecast 2025 analyses).
Broader practices include pulse surveys and engagement tools to surface misalignment early, integrated HR reviews, and wellness interventions. Gartner indicates AI-integrated behavioral programs reduce employee-driven incidents by 40%. These investments are economical, scalable, and consensual, fostering mutual trust.
The folly of equating loyalty with security must end. Through verifiable, human-centric vigilance, including consensual scrutiny scaled to responsibility, organizations can earn trust, not assume it, transforming vulnerabilities into resilience. In the era of zero trust, there should be no pushback in the adoption of “trust but verify” personnel policies.
See also:
Insider risk in an age of workforce volatility Coherence: Insider risk strategy’s new core principle
View the full article
CSOonline

Claude Opus 4.6 Finds 500+ High-Severity Flaws Across Major Open-Source Libraries

Artificial intelligence (AI) company Anthropic revealed that its latest large language model (LLM), Claude Opus 4.6, has found more than 500 previously unknown high-severity security flaws in open-source libraries, including Ghostscript, OpenSC, and CGIF. Claude Opus 4.6, which was launched on Thursday, comes with improved coding skills, including code review and debugging capabilities, alongView the full article
Hacker News

Cybersicherheitsvorschriften: So erfüllen Sie Ihre Compliance-Anforderungen

Mit der Zunahme von Cyberbedrohungen steigt auch die Zahl der Compliance-Rahmenwerke. So können CISOs diese Herausforderung bewältigen.
Foto: Dapitart – shutterstock.com
Die Anforderungen von Cybersicherheitsvorschriften können je nach Unternehmensgröße, Region, Branche, Datensensibilität und Programmreifegrad sehr unterschiedlich sein. Ein börsennotiertes Unternehmen hat beispielsweise keine andere Wahl, als mehrere Vorschriften einzuhalten sowie Risikobewertungen und Pläne für Abhilfemaßnahmen zu erstellen. Regierungsbehörden oder Unternehmen, die an Regierungsbehörden verkaufen, müssen bestimmte Compliance-Anforderungen des öffentlichen Sektors erfüllen. Banken, Organisationen des Gesundheitswesens, Infrastrukturunternehmen, E-Commerce-Firmen und andere Unternehmen haben jeweils eigene branchenspezifische Compliance-Regeln zu befolgen.
Lesetipp: Sind Sie bereit fürs neue Kreditkarten-Regelwerk?
Sicherheit ist nicht gleich Compliance
Auch für Unternehmen, die nicht in eine dieser Kategorien fallen, kann es Gründe geben, warum sie bewährte Sicherheitspraktiken nachweisen müssen, zum Beispiel, wenn sie eine SOC-Zertifizierung anstreben oder eine Cyberversicherung beantragen. Umfassende Rahmenwerke für die Einhaltung von Cybersicherheitsvorschriften wie NIS-2 und ISO bieten allen Unternehmen Leitlinien, die sie befolgen können, sowie Strukturen für die Kommunikation der Ergebnisse.
Aber: Nur, weil man die Vorschriften einhält, heißt das noch lange nicht, dass man auch sicher ist. Erfahrene Sicherheitsexperten betrachten die Einhaltung von Vorschriften als das absolute Minimum und gehen in ihren Empfehlungen weit über die erforderlichen Komponenten zum Schutz ihrer Unternehmen hinaus.
Einhaltung der Vorschriften als Voraussetzung für Geschäftstätigkeit
Ein Sicherheitsmanager kann zwar Investitionen und Praktiken für die Cybersicherheit empfehlen, um die Compliance-Anforderungen zu erfüllen, aber er ist nicht der letzte Entscheidungsträger. Eine wichtige Aufgabe des CISO besteht daher darin, das Risiko der Nichteinhaltung von Vorschriften zu kommunizieren und gemeinsam mit anderen Unternehmensleitern zu entscheiden, welche Initiativen Vorrang haben sollen. Das Risiko umfasst in diesem Zusammenhang nicht nur das technische, sondern auch das Geschäftsrisiko. Um Reibungsverluste zu vermeiden, ist es daher sinnvoll, den Mitarbeitern auch den geschäftlichen Nutzen einer konformen Cybersicherheit aufzuzeigen.
Kosten-Nutzen-Abwägung
Die Unternehmensführung muss dabei die Kosten und den Nutzen der Einhaltung von Vorschriften gegen die potenziellen Kosten der Nichteinhaltung abwägen. Angenommen ein Unternehmen erfüllt eine Best Practice für die Verwaltung von Berechtigungen nicht vollständig: Bei Nichteinhaltung der Vorschriften können die zugrunde liegenden Schwachstellen neben möglichen Klagen von Anteilseignern noch größere Auswirkungen auf das Unternehmen haben, einschließlich Ausfallzeiten, Ransomware-Zahlungen und Umsatzeinbußen. Die Erfüllung der Compliance-Anforderungen könnte hingegen einen geschäftlichen Nutzen bringen, beispielsweise durch schnellere Verkäufe, stärkere Partnerschaften oder niedrigere Cyberversicherungsraten.
Wie CISOs Compliance-Rahmenwerke nutzen können
CISOs können vorhandene Compliance-Frameworks als Methodik für Techniken und Prozesse verwenden, um sie in ihr Cybersicherheitsprogramm einzubauen. Zu ihren Aufgaben gehört es im Wesentlichen, über die Programmprioritäten zu informieren und eine “Einkaufsliste” für Lösungen zu erstellen, die sie unbedingt benötigen und die mit dem Programm, das sie aufbauen wollen, übereinstimmen.
Aber es gibt auch einen Unterschied zwischen der Verwendung eines Compliance-Rahmenwerkes zur Steuerung eines fundierten Risikomanagements und der exakten Einhaltung von Vorschriften. Hier gilt es einen Balanceakt zu meistern und fallweise auch risikobasierte Entscheidungen zu treffen.
CISOs brauchen Partner bei der Einhaltung von Vorschriften
CISOs sitzen bei der Einhaltung von Vorschriften nicht allein im Boot. Sie müssen Partnerschaften mit Rechtsteams, Datenschutzbeauftragten und Prüfungs- oder Risikoausschüssen aufbauen, um die sich ändernden Compliance-Anforderungen zu verstehen und zu entscheiden, wie sie zu erfüllen sind.
Manchmal verlangen diese internen Partner von den Sicherheitsteams, dass sie stärkere Kontrollen einführen, aber sie können auch auf die Bremse treten. So würden manche CISOs gerne das Verhalten ihrer Mitarbeiter detailliert überwachen, aber die Datenschutzgesetze verbieten dies und die Rechtsabteilung sorgt dafür, dass diese Gesetze eingehalten werden.
Compliance-Teams erledigen viele Dinge für die Sicherheitsingenieure und -analysten, die weder die Zeit noch die Ressourcen dafür haben. Sie nehmen die Sicherheit in die Pflicht und überprüfen, ob die Kontrollen wie erwartet funktionieren. Sie fungieren quasi als Vermittler zwischen Sicherheitsteams, Aufsichtsbehörden und Prüfern, um die Einhaltung der Vorschriften nachzuweisen, sei es durch das Sammeln von Beweisen mittels manueller Sicherheitsfragebögen oder durch Technologieintegrationen.
Für eine Zertifizierung im öffentlichen Sektor müssen beispielsweise die Sicherheitskontrollen überwacht, protokolliert und die Daten mindestens sechs Monate lang aufbewahrt werden, um nachzuweisen, dass alle Vorgaben erfüllt wurden.
Lesetipp: Wie internationale Security Frameworks CISOs unterstützen
Tools und Ressourcen zur Unterstützung der Einhaltung von Vorschriften
Risikoregister sind hilfreich, um alle Beteiligten an einen Tisch zu bringen, indem sie alle Risiken dokumentieren und nach Prioritäten ordnen. Wenn alle Beteiligten die gleichen Informationen einsehen, können sie sich auf geeignete Maßnahmen einigen. Im Rahmen eines Risikomanagementprogramms werden Richtlinien, Standards und Verfahren regelmäßig überprüft und alle Änderungen vor ihrer Umsetzung genehmigt.
Mithilfe von Tools wie Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC)-Systemen und kontinuierlicher Überwachung der Einhaltung von Vorschriften wie NIS-2 und ISO können Unternehmen laufende Sicherheitsaktivitäten verfolgen und die Ergebnisse melden. GRC-Systeme lassen sich mit SIEM-Lösungen verknüpfen, um Protokolle zu sammeln, durch die Kombination mit Schwachstellen-Scannern kann man nachzuweisen, dass Prüfungen durchgeführt wurden.
Zusätzlich zu solchen Instrumenten verlassen sich viele Unternehmen auf Dritte, um die Einhaltung der Vorschriften zu bewerten. Diese können vor einer externen Prüfung ein internes Compliance-Audit durchführen, um sicherzustellen, dass es keine Überraschungen gibt, wenn die Aufsichtsbehörden vorbeikommen.
Einmal erfüllen, auf viele anwenden
Die meisten Unternehmen haben zahlreiche Compliance-Stellen, denen sie Rechenschaft ablegen müssen, sowie Cyberversicherungsanbieter, Kunden und Partner. Die Einhaltung von Vorschriften kann zwar eine Belastung sein, aber es gibt Techniken, um den Bewertungsprozess zu rationalisieren. Immerhin ist ein Großteil der gesetzlichen Anforderungen beinahe identisch. Orientieren sich CISOs beispielsweise an einem Rahmenwerk wie NIST, können sie überall die gleichen Verfahren anwenden. So sind zum Beispiel Anforderungen an das Privileged Access Management (PAM) wie Passwortmanagement, Multi-Faktor-Authentifizierung (MFA) und rollenbasierte Zugriffskontrollen in allen Compliance-Frameworks zu finden.
Ausblick
Letztlich ist die Einhaltung von Vorschriften ein fließender Bereich mit Anforderungen, die sich weiterentwickeln, um den sich ändernden Risikomustern und Geschäftsbedingungen Rechnung zu tragen. Es ist zu erwarten, dass die Sicherstellung der Compliance in Zukunft einen noch größeren Teil der Arbeit von CISOs ausmachen wird. Da die Branche mit immer größeren Bedrohungen konfrontiert ist, ist die Einhaltung von Vorschriften ein wichtiger Bestandteil eines strategischen und umfassenden Ansatzes für das Management von Cybersicherheitsrisiken. (jm)
Lesetipp: Das fordert das neue KRITIS-Dachgesetz
View the full article
CSOonline

Four new vulnerabilities found in Ingress NGINX

Four security vulnerabilities have been found in the open source Ingress NGINX traffic controller that is extensively used by organizations in Kubernetes deployments.
They can only be fixed by upgrading to the latest version.
Of the four holes, two are more serious, because they carry CVSS scores of 8.8:
CVE-2026-1580 is an improper input validation issue. If the Ingress NGINX controller is configured with a default custom-errors configuration that includes HTTP errors 401 or 403, and if the configured default custom-errors backend is defective and fails to respect the X-Code HTTP header, then an Ingress with the auth-url annotation may be accessed even when authentication fails.
CVE-2026-24512 is a configuration injection vulnerability where the rules.http.paths.path Ingress field can be used to inject configuration into nginx. This can lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the ingress-nginx controller, and disclosure of secrets accessible to the controller. 
“This is a serious vulnerability,” commented Kellman Meghu, CTO of Canada’s DeepCove Cybersecurity, who has experience with Ingress NGINX.  “If I could exploit it, I could get the Ingress gateway to create a path directly to internal resources. It’s like opening the insides that should never be exposed. Will that lead to further exposure or hacks? Probably, but in terms of impact, it’s a first step to gain access into the environment, and from there it could go further, the least of which would be disruption of services.”
NGINX is a reverse proxy/load balancer that generally acts as the front-end web traffic receiver and directs it to the application service for data transformation. Ingress NGINX is a version used in Kubernetes as the controller for traffic coming into the infrastructure. It takes care of mapping traffic to pods of containers running jobs without exposing the pods themselves.  Meghu says Ingress NGINX is the primary traffic entry point, and is effective due to its ability to reload its configuration on the fly, allowing it to adjust to changes inside a Kubernetes cluster.
These vulnerabilities only affect Ingress NGINX versions 1.13.7 and below, and 1.14.3 and below, if they are installed on a Kubernetes cluster.
The warning comes just weeks before, as announced at KubeCon in November, support for Ingress NGINX ends. Starting in March, the project will no longer receive active maintenance, security patches, or bug fixes.
Experts have been urging Kubernetes administrators to shift to a new controller ever since. They recommend Kubernetes Gateway API as the standard for traffic management. Meghu notes it is vendor neutral and widely used. Other options are controllers such as Cilium Ingress, Traefik, or HAProxy Ingress.
In addition to CVE-2026-24512, the other new vulnerabilities are CVE-2026-24513, considered by Meghu a low risk since an attacker needs to have a config containing specific errors to exploit, and CVE-2026-24514, which Meghu considers a medium risk. The controller could be subject to a denial of service if an attacker overwhelms it with requests.
These are just the most recent issues with Ingress NGINX. Just over a year ago, researchers at Wiz discovered a group of holes dubbed IngressNightmare. They can allow unauthenticated users to inject malicious NGINX configurations and execute malicious code into the Ingress NGINX pod, potentially exposing all cluster secrets and leading to cluster takeover.
Satnam Narang, senior staff research engineer at Tenable, told CSO that he considers the new holes less concerning than IngressNightmare, which he called a “toxic combination” that could result in cluster takeover.
“While there’s nothing novel about [the new vulnerabilities], they serve as a stark reminder to all admins that if they haven’t started migrating, they need to start immediately, before Ingres NGINX is retired next month. Given its upcoming retirement, migration is the best strategy to mitigate these vulnerabilities.” 
View the full article
CSOonline

Top 10 Sales Tax Software Tools in 2026: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
In 2026, managing sales tax is no longer just a back-office chore—it’s a crucial part of running a compliant and efficient business. With ever-evolving tax laws, varying rates across jurisdictions, and increasing scrutiny from regulatory authorities, businesses must adopt robust Sales Tax Software tools to stay ahead.
Sales tax software automates the process of calculating, collecting, reporting, and remitting sales tax. Whether you’re an e-commerce store owner, a large enterprise, or a SaaS business operating across multiple states or countries, the right tool can save you time, reduce errors, and help you avoid costly penalties.
When choosing the best sales tax software in 2026, consider features like real-time rate calculations, exemption certificate management, integration with e-commerce or ERP platforms, global compliance, and ease of use.
Top 10 Sales Tax Software Tools in 2026
1. Avalara
Short Description: Avalara is an industry leader in sales tax automation, supporting global tax compliance for businesses of all sizes.
Key Features:
Real-time tax rate calculations across 12,000+ jurisdictions Returns filing automation Exemption certificate management Seamless integrations (Shopify, QuickBooks, NetSuite, etc.) Global VAT & GST support Marketplace and cross-border support Pros:
Highly scalable for enterprise needs Excellent integration library Cons:
Can be expensive for smaller businesses UI could be more modern 2. TaxJar (a Stripe company)
Short Description: TaxJar offers simple, fast, and accurate sales tax management tailored for online sellers and growing businesses.
Key Features:
AutoFile: automated sales tax filing Real-time tax calculations Economic nexus tracking E-commerce integrations (Amazon, Shopify, WooCommerce, etc.) API for custom integrations Pros:
Easy for non-tech users Transparent pricing Cons:
Limited global tax support Some reporting features are basic 3. Sovos Compliance
Short Description: Sovos provides tax compliance solutions for large enterprises with complex global operations.
Key Features:
Global tax compliance (VAT, GST, sales tax) Automated reporting and filings Integration with ERP systems (SAP, Oracle) e-Invoicing compliance Real-time tax rate updates Pros:
Enterprise-grade capabilities Strong support for international taxes Cons:
Learning curve for smaller teams Price on request (not transparent) 4. Vertex
Short Description: Vertex delivers advanced tax technology to large-scale businesses needing end-to-end tax solutions.
Key Features:
Tax calculation engine Data accuracy and jurisdiction mapping Centralized compliance management ERP integrations (Oracle, SAP, Microsoft) Cloud or on-premise deployment options Pros:
Highly customizable Accurate and audit-ready Cons:
Overkill for small businesses Setup can be time-intensive 5. Quaderno
Short Description: A lightweight and modern solution for SaaS and e-commerce businesses with global tax needs.
Key Features:
Real-time tax calculations (VAT, GST, US sales tax) Compliant invoicing and receipts Automated tax reports Integrations with Stripe, PayPal, and Zapier Economic nexus alerts Pros:
Simple interface Great for startups and SaaS Cons:
Limited to digital and service-based businesses May lack depth for larger enterprises 6. Anrok
Short Description: A modern sales tax automation platform built specifically for SaaS companies.
Key Features:
SaaS-native economic nexus tracking Automatic tax rate updates Invoicing compliance with global tax rules Finance-friendly dashboard and reporting Integrates with Stripe, NetSuite, QuickBooks Pros:
Tailored for SaaS companies Easy to implement Cons:
Not suitable for physical goods sellers Limited offline support 7. TaxCloud
Short Description: A budget-friendly, U.S.-focused solution ideal for small retailers and e-commerce sellers.
Key Features:
Automated sales tax calculation Filing & remittance services Simple integration with online stores Nexus tracking Affordable plans for SMBs Pros:
Cost-effective U.S. state-certified Cons:
No support for international taxes UI could be improved 8. Xero + Avalara Integration
Short Description: Xero’s Avalara-powered integration provides seamless tax automation for small businesses and accountants.
Key Features:
Automatic sales tax calculation within Xero Sales tax tracking and filing Real-time rate updates Reporting and audit support Easy-to-use for accountants and bookkeepers Pros:
Built into Xero Smooth user experience Cons:
Avalara costs add up Not suitable without Xero subscription 9. SureTax by Wolters Kluwer
Short Description: SureTax is ideal for telecom, cloud communications, and other highly regulated industries.
Key Features:
Telecom-specific tax rules Complex jurisdiction mapping Real-time calculation APIs Strong reporting and audit capabilities Compliance across multiple verticals Pros:
Industry-specific expertise Reliable compliance engine Cons:
Niche use case Complex setup 10. LumaTax
Short Description: A smart audit-ready sales tax solution that’s built to be intuitive and fast.
Key Features:
Auto-generated tax returns Dashboard for nexus and risk visibility Digital audit preparedness Filing and remittance in multiple states QuickBooks and Xero integrations Pros:
Great for audit prevention Easy-to-navigate dashboard Cons:
Limited global tax support Still growing in market presence 🧾 Comparison Table
Tool NameBest ForPlatform(s) SupportedStandout FeaturePricingRating (G2)AvalaraEnterprises & globalWeb, ERP, APIGlobal compliance engineStarts at $50/mo4.5TaxJarE-commerce & SMBsWeb, APIAutoFile automationStarts at $19/mo4.6SovosMultinationalsCloud, ERPWorldwide tax complianceCustom4.4VertexLarge organizationsCloud, On-premERP integrationsCustom4.3QuadernoSaaS & FreelancersAPI, Stripe, PayPalSimplified invoicingStarts at $49/mo4.7AnrokSaaS-only companiesStripe, NetSuiteSaaS-native automationStarts at $80/mo4.6TaxCloudSMBs in the USWeb, Shopify, WooBudget-friendly complianceFree / Low-cost4.2Xero + AvalaraXero usersXero platformBuilt-in tax automationAdd-on pricing4.5SureTaxTelecom industryAPI, CloudTelecom tax complianceCustom4.4LumaTaxStartups & AccountantsWeb, QuickBooksAudit-prepared filingsStarts at $39/mo4.3 🧠 Which Sales Tax Software Tool is Right for You?
Here’s a simple guide to help you choose:
Startups & SMBs: Go with TaxJar, TaxCloud, or LumaTax for simplicity and affordability. SaaS Companies: Use Anrok or Quaderno for tailored SaaS support and global compliance. Large Enterprises: Avalara, Vertex, and Sovos are ideal for complex, multi-jurisdictional operations. Accountants/Bookkeepers: If you use Xero, the Avalara integration makes compliance seamless. Telecom & Specialized Industries: SureTax provides industry-specific compliance and automation. 🧾 FAQs
1. What is sales tax software?
Sales tax software automates the calculation, collection, reporting, and remittance of sales tax for businesses, ensuring accuracy and compliance.
2. Why do I need sales tax software in 2026?
Tax laws and nexus rules are more complex than ever. Automation saves time, reduces risk, and ensures your business stays compliant across regions.
3. Can I use sales tax software with my eCommerce store?
Yes, most tools integrate with platforms like Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, and Amazon.
4. Is sales tax software suitable for SaaS companies?
Yes. Tools like Anrok and Quaderno are purpose-built for SaaS, especially for handling digital services and global tax rules.
5. Which software is best for filing in multiple states?
Avalara, Sovos, and Vertex offer robust multi-state filing and remittance features.
📝 Conclusion
In the complex world of 2026 tax compliance, choosing the right Sales Tax Software tool can make the difference between smooth operations and regulatory headaches. Whether you’re a solo entrepreneur or a global enterprise, there’s a solution tailored to your needs.
Explore free trials or demo versions where available to ensure the tool fits your existing workflow and compliance requirements. Staying ahead of the tax curve has never been easier with these top-rated tools.
View the full article
reporter

Top 10 Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Tools in 2026: Features, Pros, Cons & Comparison

Introduction
In 2026, Robotic Process Automation (RPA) continues to revolutionize the way businesses handle repetitive, rule-based tasks. By using software bots to mimic human interactions with digital systems, RPA helps organizations streamline workflows, reduce operational costs, and improve efficiency. With AI integration, modern RPA tools now offer intelligent automation—combining machine learning, analytics, and natural language processing to manage complex processes across industries like banking, healthcare, e-commerce, and manufacturing.
Choosing the best RPA tool in 2026 depends on factors like scalability, AI capabilities, ease of integration, pricing, and analytics. This blog highlights the top 10 RPA tools, their features, pros, cons, and a detailed comparison to help you make an informed decision.
Top 10 Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Tools in 2026
1. UiPath
Best for enterprises seeking end-to-end automation
Short Description:
UiPath is one of the most popular RPA platforms, offering powerful automation solutions with AI integration and an intuitive interface for both developers and business users.
Key Features:
Drag-and-drop workflow designer AI-powered document understanding Multi-cloud deployment support Native integration with ERP and CRM systems Scalable bot management and orchestration Advanced analytics and reporting Pros:
Intuitive interface suitable for beginners and experts Strong AI capabilities for intelligent automation Excellent community support and learning resources Cons:
Pricing can be expensive for smaller teams Requires significant setup for large-scale deployments 2. Automation Anywhere
Best for cloud-native RPA deployments
Short Description:
Automation Anywhere provides a cloud-first RPA platform with cognitive automation, analytics, and AI-powered process discovery.
Key Features:
Bot Insight for real-time analytics AI-driven process automation Secure and scalable cloud architecture Low-code development environment Built-in cognitive services for unstructured data Pros:
Cloud-native, highly scalable solution Strong integration with AI and ML technologies Intuitive interface with low learning curve Cons:
Advanced features can be complex for beginners Limited offline functionality 3. Blue Prism
Best for enterprise-grade security and governance
Short Description:
Blue Prism is a leading RPA solution designed for enterprises needing high security, compliance, and scalability.
Key Features:
Intelligent process automation with AI Centralized management and governance Integration with popular enterprise applications Strong security protocols Extensive reusable automation library Pros:
Enterprise-level security and compliance Scalable architecture for global businesses Extensive partner ecosystem Cons:
Steeper learning curve compared to UiPath Less beginner-friendly for non-technical users 4. Microsoft Power Automate
Best for seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystem
Short Description:
Formerly Microsoft Flow, Power Automate enables organizations to automate repetitive tasks and integrate seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365.
Key Features:
Cloud-based automation workflows AI Builder for intelligent automation Pre-built connectors for hundreds of apps Robotic and digital process automation in one platform Strong analytics via Power BI integration Pros:
Ideal for organizations already using Microsoft products Affordable pricing options Wide range of templates for quick deployment Cons:
Limited advanced RPA features compared to competitors Performance may vary for large-scale automation 5. Kofax RPA
Best for document-heavy automation
Short Description:
Kofax RPA specializes in automating document-centric processes, making it a top choice for industries like banking and healthcare.
Key Features:
AI-powered data extraction and document processing Advanced analytics for process optimization Cloud and on-premise deployment options Integration with ERP, CRM, and custom apps Workflow orchestration capabilities Pros:
Excellent for businesses handling large document volumes Strong AI capabilities for unstructured data Flexible deployment options Cons:
Pricing can be on the higher side Limited pre-built integrations compared to UiPath 6. Pega Robotic Automation
Best for unified RPA and BPM solutions
Short Description:
Pega offers a combined RPA and Business Process Management (BPM) platform, enabling enterprises to automate and optimize end-to-end workflows.
Key Features:
AI-powered decision-making End-to-end process orchestration Low-code application development Integration with multiple enterprise systems Real-time analytics and monitoring Pros:
Combines RPA with BPM for holistic automation Ideal for enterprises seeking digital transformation Scalable and flexible Cons:
Complex setup for smaller businesses Requires technical expertise for advanced automation 7. Nintex RPA
Best for no-code workflow automation
Short Description:
Nintex RPA offers low-code and no-code automation tools, empowering business users to automate workflows without technical expertise.
Key Features:
Drag-and-drop workflow designer Robotic and document process automation Integration with Salesforce, SAP, and SharePoint Intelligent form and process builder Real-time process mapping and optimization Pros:
Beginner-friendly with no-code capabilities Strong integration ecosystem Affordable for SMEs Cons:
Limited AI-driven automation features Less suitable for enterprise-scale deployments 8. WorkFusion
Best for AI-powered automation
Short Description:
WorkFusion combines RPA with machine learning to enable intelligent process automation for data-rich industries.
Key Features:
Cognitive bots for unstructured data processing Pre-built ML models for faster deployment Built-in compliance and security frameworks Automated document classification and extraction Analytics dashboard for monitoring performance Pros:
Strong AI and ML capabilities Excellent for financial services and compliance-heavy sectors Automated governance features Cons:
Higher learning curve for small teams Pricing tailored mainly for mid to large enterprises 9. EdgeVerve AssistEdge
Best for scaling automation across enterprises
Short Description:
EdgeVerve AssistEdge, from Infosys, delivers scalable automation solutions optimized for enterprises needing AI-driven process discovery.
Key Features:
AI-powered bot discovery and deployment Seamless integration with legacy systems Hybrid automation (attended + unattended bots) Predictive analytics for process improvement Centralized bot orchestration Pros:
Great for enterprises scaling automation Robust analytics and monitoring tools Hybrid automation support Cons:
Limited beginner-friendly learning resources Requires significant setup effort 10. Electroneek RPA
Best for SMB-friendly automation
Short Description:
Electroneek offers a cost-effective RPA platform tailored for small and mid-sized businesses without compromising on AI capabilities.
Key Features:
Drag-and-drop automation builder Unlimited bots at no extra cost Integration with Google Workspace, Slack, and CRMs Cloud-native deployment Workflow templates for quick automation Pros:
Affordable pricing plans Easy to use for SMBs and startups Unlimited bots make scaling cost-effective Cons:
Fewer advanced AI features than top-tier tools Smaller ecosystem compared to UiPath or Automation Anywhere Comparison Table of Top 10 RPA Tools in 2026
Tool NameBest ForPlatforms SupportedStandout FeaturePricingRating (G2/Capterra)UiPathEnd-to-end automationWindows, Web, CloudAI-powered document processingStarts at $420/month4.8/5Automation AnywhereCloud-first automationWeb, Windows, CloudBot Insight analyticsStarts at $399/month4.7/5Blue PrismSecure enterprise automationWindows, CloudEnterprise-grade governanceCustom pricing4.6/5Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft ecosystem usersWeb, CloudPre-built templates & connectorsStarts at $15/user4.5/5Kofax RPADocument-centric automationWindows, CloudIntelligent document captureCustom pricing4.5/5PegaUnified RPA + BPMWindows, CloudAI-powered decisioningCustom pricing4.6/5Nintex RPANo-code workflowsWeb, Windows, CloudDrag-and-drop automationStarts at $20/user4.4/5WorkFusionAI-powered automationWeb, CloudPre-trained ML modelsCustom pricing4.5/5AssistEdgeEnterprise scalingWeb, Windows, CloudHybrid automation supportCustom pricing4.4/5Electroneek RPASMB-friendly automationWeb, CloudUnlimited botsStarts at $39/month4.3/5 Which RPA Tool Is Right for You?
For Large Enterprises: UiPath, Blue Prism, Pega For Small & Medium Businesses (SMBs): Electroneek RPA, Nintex RPA For Document-Heavy Workflows: Kofax RPA For Microsoft-Centric Organizations: Microsoft Power Automate For AI-Driven Automation: WorkFusion, Automation Anywhere For Hybrid Automation Needs: AssistEdge, UiPath Conclusion
In 2026, RPA tools are evolving rapidly, blending AI, ML, and advanced analytics to deliver intelligent automation at scale. From SMB-friendly platforms like Electroneek to enterprise giants like UiPath and Blue Prism, there’s an RPA solution for every business size and industry.
The best approach? Start with a free trial or demo, evaluate integration capabilities, scalability, and pricing, and select the tool that aligns with your automation goals.
FAQs
1. What is RPA, and why is it important in 2026?
RPA automates repetitive, rule-based tasks using software bots. In 2026, it’s essential for reducing costs, improving efficiency, and enabling digital transformation.
2. Which RPA tool is best for small businesses?
Electroneek RPA and Nintex RPA are great for SMBs due to their affordability and ease of use.
3. Do RPA tools require coding skills?
Not necessarily. Most RPA platforms, like UiPath and Nintex, offer low-code or no-code interfaces for non-technical users.
4. Are RPA tools AI-powered in 2026?
Yes, most modern RPA tools now integrate AI, ML, and NLP to enable intelligent automation.
5. How do I choose the right RPA tool?
Evaluate based on company size, process complexity, integration needs, and pricing. Always start with a trial version.
View the full article
reporter

Apple Reportedly Scaling Back This Long-Rumored iOS 27 Feature

iOS 27 will no longer include a new virtual health coach in the Apple Health app, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.


The feature was unofficially referred to as Apple Health+ within the company, the report said. Some of the components of this feature will be "repurposed and introduced as early as this year," the report said.Tags: Apple Health, iOS 27, Mark Gurman
This article, "Apple Reportedly Scaling Back This Long-Rumored iOS 27 Feature" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Reduce Vulnerability Noise with VEX: Wiz + Docker Hardened Images

Open source components power most modern applications. A new generation of hardened container images can establish a more secure foundation, but even with hardened images, vulnerability scanners often return dozens or hundreds of CVEs with little prioritization. This noise slows teams down and complicates security triage. The VEX (Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange) standard addresses the problem by providing information on whether a specific vulnerability actually impacts an organization’s application stack and infrastructure.
A new integration between Docker Hardened Images (DHI) and Wiz CLI now gives security and platform teams accurate reachability insights by analyzing VEX data. Wiz worked with Docker to tune its scanners to properly ingest and parse the VEX statements included with every one of the more than 1,000 DHI images in the catalog. The integration helps users cut through vulnerability noise with scan results that deliver clear, actionable insights.
When the Wiz scanner detects a Docker Hardened Image, it pulls from the image’s VEX documents and OSV advisories to filter out false positives. For organizations already using Wiz, this means a simpler path to adopting hardened images across their container fleet. Finally, for organizations pursuing FedRAMP or other compliance certifications that specify VEX coverage, the ability of Wiz to read DHI VEX statements can accelerate compliance, reducing time to deployment and consequently time to revenue.
TL;DR
Integrate Docker with Wiz to:
Minimize false positives using VEX and OSV data Identify base images and software components more accurately Provide security teams with clear visibility into software bills of materials (SBOMs) Reduce manual validation efforts by integrating detailed issue summaries into your remediation workflows Better image quality assurance with up-to-date package metadata and SPDX snippets Migrate to Docker Hardened Images with greater confidence Why VEX?
VEX (Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange) is a machine-readable way for software suppliers to state whether a known vulnerability actually affects a specific product. Instead of inferring risk from dependency lists alone, VEX explicitly declares whether a vulnerability is not affected, affected, fixed, or under investigation. This matters because many scanner findings are not exploitable in real products, leading to false positives, wasted effort, and obscured real risk.
VEX  enables transparent, auditable vulnerability status that security tools and customers can independently verify, unlike proprietary advisory feeds that obscure context and historical risk.
Before you begin
Ensure you have access to both your Docker and Wiz organizations; Confirm your are using a Docker Hardened Image Ensure you have SBOM export and scan visibility enabled in Wiz. Identifying Docker Hardened Images via the Integration on Wiz With the integration, Wiz automatically detects Docker Hardened Images. The integration consists of two main functionalities on the Wiz dashboard. First, we will verify how many resources and organizations are using Docker Hardened Images by following these steps:  Navigate to the Wiz Docker integration page and click connect You’ll be prompted to log in to your Wiz dashboard Once logged in, navigate to the “Inventory” section on the left side bar of your dashboard You’ll be redirected to the “Technology” dashboard, where Wiz detects all technologies running on customer environments. Now, look for “Docker Hardened Images” on the search bar Wiz automatically detects the specific operating systems running on each container mounts and flags them as hardened images Checking for vulnerabilities on the Wiz dashboard:
Once you’ve validated that Wiz can identify Docker Hardened Images, you will be able to check for vulnerabilities using Wiz’s security graph and Docker’s container metadata. In order to do that, follow these steps from the technologies tab:
Go to inventory/technologies page and filter by operating systems or search for specific technology Click on the OS/technology to view metadata and resource count Click to access the security graph view showing all resources running that technology Add a condition to filter for CVEs detected on those resources.  View all resources with their associated vulnerabilities in table or graph format Final Check
After setup, the vulnerabilities will appear according to your pre-set policies. You’ll be able to get a detailed overview on each CVE listed, including graph visualizations for dependency relationships, severity distribution, and potential exploit paths. These insights will help you prioritize remediation efforts, track resolution progress, and ensure compliance with your organization’s security standards.
Integrating Docker Hardened Images for better software supply chain visibility
The Docker-Wiz integration is more than just a checkbox in your security checklist. It provides:
Clarity: VEX documents and accurate base image identification eliminate guesswork, providing clear, contextual vulnerability data. Confidence: Minimized false positives through OSV advisories and Docker-provided metadata ensures security teams can trust what they see. Control: Enhanced visibility into SBOMs and technology usage empowers teams to prioritize and manage remediation effectively. Coverage: Full-stack integration with Wiz surfaces vulnerabilities across all Docker environments, including hardened images and source-built components.
This partnership helps DevSecOps teams move fast and remain proactive against container vulnerabilities, an essential capability for modern, lean teams managing fast-paced releases, open source risk, and complex cloud-native environments. Ready to Get Started?
If you’re already using Docker Hardened Images and Wiz, you’re just a few clicks away from reducing false positives, improving SBOM visibility, and making vulnerability data more actionable.
Check the Docker + Wiz solutions brief Visit the Docker + Wiz integration page Read more about VEX in our documentation
View the full article
reporter

New APT group breached gov and critical infrastructure orgs in 37 countries

A new cyberespionage group that operates out of Asia has compromised 70 government and critical infrastructure organizations across 37 countries over the past year using a sophisticated toolset that combines phishing, exploitation kits, custom malware, Linux rootkits, web shells, and a variety of other tunneling and proxy tools. Researchers believe the group is expanding its activities and is conducting active reconnaissance on even more targets.
“Between November and December 2025, we observed the group conducting active reconnaissance against government infrastructure associated with 155 countries,” researchers from security firm Palo Alto Networks said in a new report.
Palo Alto tracks the group as TGR-STA-1030 (aka UNC6619) and believes it is based in Asia based on language settings, its preference for regional tooling, GMT+8 operating hours, and targeting that aligns with events in the region. The researchers, who have been tracking the group since February 2025, believe it has ties to a nation state.
The group’s confirmed victims include national-level law enforcement and border control entities; ministries and departments of interior, foreign affairs, finance, trade, economy, immigration, mining, justice, and energy; elected officials and even a parliament’s infrastructure. The group has also targeted national telecommunications companies.
“While this group might be pursuing espionage objectives, its methods, targets, and scale of operations are alarming, with potential long-term consequences for national security and key services,” Palo Alto’s researchers said.
From phishing to exploits
Palo Alto started tracking the group a year ago following a series of phishing campaigns directed at European governments that the company dubbed the Shadow Campaigns.
The phishing emails posed as announcements about organizational changes in official institutions and were written in the language of their intended targets. The messages contained links that led to the download of a ZIP archive with a custom malware loader the researchers now call Diaoyu.
This loader performs various checks to detect the presence of certain antivirus programs and to ascertain whether it is running in a sandbox. It then proceeds to download the Cobalt Strike implant from a GitHub repository. Cobalt Strike is a commercial penetration testing tool that has grown popular among attackers over the years.
Although the group hasn’t been observed exploiting previously unknown vulnerabilities to gain access to networks, it has used exploits for known vulnerabilities (N-days) in a large number of software products, operating systems, and libraries, including: SAP Solution Manager, Microsoft Open Management Infrastructure, Microsoft Exchange Server, Pivotal Spring Data Commons, Struts2, Eyou Email System, Beijing Grandview Century eHR Software, Weaver Ecology-OA, Commvault CommCell CVSearchService, Zhiyuan OA, Microsoft Windows, networking products from Ruijieyi Networks and D-Link, and more.
“On one occasion, we observed the actor connecting to e-passport and e-visa services associated with a ministry of foreign affairs,” the researchers said. “Because the server for these services was configured with Atlassian Crowd software, the actor attempted to exploit CVE-2019-11580, uploading a payload named rce.jar.”
A complex toolset of implants
In addition to Cobalt Strike, the group uses various other malware payloads and command-and-control (C2) frameworks, including VShell, Havoc, SparkRat, and Sliver. On compromised web servers, the attackers deploy a variety of web shells, including Behinder, Neo-reGeorg, and Godzilla.
On Linux servers the group has been seen deploying a rootkit dubbed ShadowGuard, which leverages the Extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF), a powerful feature for running sandboxed code inside the Linux kernel.
“eBPF backdoors are notoriously difficult to detect because they operate entirely within the highly trusted kernel space,” the researchers said. “eBPF programs do not appear as separate modules. Instead, they execute inside the kernel’s BPF virtual machine, making them inherently stealthy. This allows them to manipulate core system functions and audit logs before security tools or system monitoring applications can see the true data.”
ShadowGuard appears to be a tool that’s unique to this group and allows them to hide processes, files, and directories.
To conceal outgoing network traffic from victim networks, the attackers use a variety of relay and proxy servers running tunneling software like the GO Simple Tunnel (GOST), Fast Reverse Proxy Server (FRPS), and IOX, but their C2 servers are typically hosted on virtual private servers (VPS) from the US, UK, and Singapore.
Increase in targeting
Palo Alto believes the group is expanding its operations because it has scanned networks of organizations from 155 countries for known vulnerabilities since October. The scans appear to be targeted on IP addresses belonging to government infrastructure and specific targets of interest.
For example, during the US government shutdown that began in October, the group started scanning the infrastructure of governments in the Americas, including in Brazil, Canada, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, and Trinidad and Tobago. The researchers believe the group has already compromised entities in Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Panama, and Venezuela.
The group seems to time its targeting to certain events. For example, when the president of Czechia met with the Dalai Lama in August, the group immediately started scanning the computer infrastructure belonging to the Czech Army, police, parliament, and presidency, as well as its ministries of interior, finance, and foreign affairs.
“TGR-STA-1030 remains an active threat to government and critical infrastructure worldwide,” Palo Alto said. “The group primarily targets government ministries and departments for espionage purposes. We assess that it prioritizes efforts against countries that have established or are exploring certain economic partnerships.”
The company’s report includes indicators of compromise, including IP addresses, domain names, and file hashes for the implants used by the group.
View the full article
CSOonline

Apple Releases watchOS 11.6.2 With an Important Fix

Apple today released watchOS 11.6.2 for the Apple Watch Series 6 through Series 10, Apple Watch SE 2, and Apple Watch Ultra and Ultra 2.


"This update provides important bug fixes and is recommended for all users," says Apple.

watchOS 11.6.2 will only appear on Apple Watch models that have not already been updated to watchOS 26 or later. There are no specific details available yet beyond Apple's vague release notes, so it is unclear what exactly the update includes.

Update: Apple says watchOS 11.6.2 "addresses a cellular network issue for Series 6, Series 7, Series 8, Series 9, Series 10, SE 2, Ultra, and Ultra 2 when establishing a connection to emergency services in Australia."Related Roundups: Apple Watch 11, Apple Watch SE 3, Apple Watch Ultra 3Buyer's Guide: Apple Watch (Neutral), Apple Watch SE (Buy Now), Apple Watch Ultra (Buy Now)Related Forum: Apple Watch
This article, "Apple Releases watchOS 11.6.2 With an Important Fix" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Substack data breach leaks users’ email addresses and phone numbers

Substack, a high-profile publishing platform widely used by academics, journalists, subject matter experts, and controversialists, has suffered a data breach affecting an unknown number of its creators and subscribers.
According to emails sent out this week to some users, on February 3 the company “identified evidence” that a third party had exploited an unspecified weakness in the company’s systems to gain access to user email addresses, phone numbers and, more vaguely, “other internal metadata.”
The breach happened in October 2025, which means that data, which the company said did not include credit card numbers, passwords, or financial information, has been exposed for up to four months.
“We have fixed the problem with our system that allowed this to happen. We are conducting a full investigation, and are taking steps to improve our systems and processes to prevent this type of issue from happening in the future,” said the email from Substack CEO Chris Best.
“We do not have evidence that this information is being misused, but we encourage you to take extra caution with any emails you receive that may be suspicious.”
No passwords to lose
At the time of publication, Substack had not yet made a web announcement about the breach, limiting itself to sending emails to users. This implies that the breach only affects a subset of its estimated 35 million active users.
Indeed, the language of the email alert downplays the incident, describing the exposed data as merely being “shared without your permission.”
However, the fact that the breach was only discovered this week, after a four-month delay, raises the possibility that its scope could yet grow as Substack conducts deeper forensics. A dark web source claimed the breach compromised 697,313 records, although this remains unconfirmed. It also reported that IDs from payment system Stripe, used by creators to receive payment from their subscribers, were compromised.
Based on the wording of the email alert sent by the company, the breach only affects users who have Substack accounts; anyone who subscribes to a Substack creator’s newsletter directly using an email address shouldn’t be affected.
The full extent of what was exposed is less clear. In addition to email addresses and phone numbers, the company mentioned “metadata,” a catch-all term. In its privacy policy, Substack describes a wide range of data this might include, depending on how the site is used, including user IDs, profile pictures, biographies, and IP addresses.
How should Substack users react? Normally, the advice after any data breach is to change the account password. However, Substack’s default access method is via email address, with authentication confirmed by sending a “magic link” to the user’s email address. This removes the problem of password compromise and phishing attacks by not having a password to phish. If optional multi-factor authentication is turned on, the user must additionally enter a onetime code from an app.
Passwords are still possible — users who signed up before 2023 might have one — but in 2026, the user must actively choose to create one. The company doesn’t mention whether this subset of users should consider changing their passwords as a precaution, but did offer the following statement:
“We cannot share specifics about our security systems and processes, but we can confirm that the issue has been resolved and safeguards have been put in place to help prevent this issue from happening again.”
Substack’s only other known security incident happened in 2020 when it accidentally exposed user email addresses by adding them to the “cc” (carbon copy) field instead of the “bcc” (blind carbon copy) of an email when sending out a policy update.
View the full article
CSOonline

EU Spares Apple Maps and Apple Ads

The European Commission today said it found that Apple Maps and Apple Ads should not be designated as "gateways" under the EU's Digital Markets Act.


In a press release, the European Commission said that Apple Maps and Apple Ads are not big enough individually to qualify as "important gateways between business users and end users," and therefore the platforms will not be subject to stricter regulations. This follows an investigation that began in late November.

"This assessment is based on a number of considerations, including that Apple Maps has a relatively low overall usage rate in the EU, and that Apple Ads has very limited scale in the online advertising sector in the EU," the European Commission said.

Apple as a whole is still considered a "gatekeeper" under the Digital Markets Act.

Apple Ads and Apple Maps will have more in common soon, as Apple reportedly plans to start showing ads within Apple Maps search results as soon as this year.Tags: Apple Ads, Apple Maps, European Commission
This article, "EU Spares Apple Maps and Apple Ads" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Tim Cook Teases Plans for Apple's Upcoming 50th Anniversary

Apple turns 50 this year, and its CEO Tim Cook has promised to celebrate the milestone. The big day falls on April 1, 2026.


"I've been unusually reflective lately about Apple because we have been working on what do we do to mark this moment," Cook told employees today, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. "When you really stop and pause and think about the last 50 years, it makes your heart sing. It really does. I promise some celebration."

Apple was founded on April 1, 1976, so the company will celebrate its 50th anniversary in a little less than two months from now.

From near-bankruptcy in the late 1990s to becoming the world's most valuable public company in the early 2010s, Apple has been through a series of highs and lows over the past half century. The company just reported an all-time revenue record last quarter, driven by all-time high iPhone sales, so the company has come a long way.

We will be sure to have in-depth coverage of whatever Apple has in store for its 50th.Tag: Tim Cook
This article, "Tim Cook Teases Plans for Apple's Upcoming 50th Anniversary" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

Apple CEO Tim Cook Promises to Lobby U.S. Government on Immigration

In an all-hands meeting with employees today, Apple CEO Tim Cook promised to lobby the U.S. government on immigration, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.


Cook said he is "deeply distraught" with the U.S. government's current approach to immigration, and he promised to make his voice heard on the matter, the report said.

"For as long as I can remember, we have been a smarter, wiser, more innovative company because we've attracted the best and brightest from all corners of the world," Cook told employees, according to the report. Cook ensured that he would "continue to lobby lawmakers on this issue" going forward, per the report.

Cook said immigration is especially important to Apple because the company has "team members across the U.S. on some form of visa," the report said.

Cook also reiterated his support for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy.

In a memo last month, Cook said he was "heartbroken" about recent events in Minneapolis, Minnesota, after two people were killed by U.S. federal immigration agents there. The killings stoked public outcry in the country.

"This is a time for deescalation," said Cook, in the memo. "I believe America is strongest when we live up to our highest ideals, when we treat everyone with dignity and respect no matter who they are or where they're from, and when we embrace our shared humanity. This is something Apple has always advocated for."Tag: Tim Cook
This article, "Apple CEO Tim Cook Promises to Lobby U.S. Government on Immigration" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter

iPhone 17e and iPad 12 Features and Release Date Rumors Surface in Two New Reports

Japanese blog Mac Otakara today shared some alleged details about the iPhone 17e and iPad 12, which are both expected to be released within the next few months.


According to the report, which cites "reliable sources," the iPhone 17e will have a similar overall design as the iPhone 16e. While some previous rumors indicated that the iPhone 17e would have a Dynamic Island, the report said this information is not true and that the device will continue to have a notch like the iPhone 16e.

In February 2025, Apple discontinued the iPhone SE and released a new entry-level iPhone 16e. The device features a 6.1-inch OLED display, an A18 chip, Apple Intelligence, a single 48-megapixel rear camera, an Action button, a USB-C port, and more. The iPhone 17e would be the follow-up, spec-bumped model.

The publication does expect three key upgrades for the iPhone 17e:A19 chip: This one is no big surprise, but the iPhone 17e is expected to be powered by Apple's A19 chip, up from the A18 chip in the iPhone 16e. This upgrade will result in faster performance and power efficiency improvements.
C1X modem: Apple says its second-generation C1X modem for 5G and LTE is up to twice as fast as its first-generation C1 modem in the iPhone 16e. Apple also says the C1X is the most power-efficient modem in an iPhone to date.
N1 chip: Like the iPhone Air, the report said the iPhone 17e will be equipped with Apple's N1 chip for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Thread. In the iPhone Air, the N1 chip supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6, and Apple says the chip improves the overall performance and reliability of features like Personal Hotspot and AirDrop.As for the iPad 12, the report said that device will likely have a similar design as the iPad 11, but with a newer A18 chip that supports Apple Intelligence. That means the iPad 12 would have 8GB of RAM, up from 6GB in the iPad 11.

A separate report from Macwelt, available in English on Macworld, cites a source who said that Apple plans to announce the iPhone 17e with a press release on an unusual date: Thursday, February 19. The publication agreed that the iPhone 17e will not have a Dynamic Island, but they do expect the device to feature MagSafe, as previously rumored.
MagSafe: Unlike the iPhone 16e, the iPhone 17e will reportedly feature MagSafe for up to 20W-25W magnetic wireless charging. The iPhone 16e is limited to Qi wireless charging at up to 7.5W speeds. You would also be able to magnetically attach accessories like Apple's MagSafe Wallet to the back of the iPhone 17e.Macwelt added that the iPhone 17e will still have a single rear camera.

No other major changes have been rumored so far, so the iPhone 17e's overall design and other specs should be similar to the iPhone 16e. In the U.S., the iPhone 16e starts at $599, but there is no word yet on how much the iPhone 17e will cost.Related Roundup: iPadTags: Mac Otakara, Macwelt, MacworldBuyer's Guide: iPad (Don't Buy)Related Forum: iPad
This article, "iPhone 17e and iPad 12 Features and Release Date Rumors Surface in Two New Reports" first appeared on MacRumors.com

Discuss this article in our forums

View the full article
reporter
OHC_logo_transparent_01.jpeg flags-medium.png OHC_logo_blue_square_small.jpeg

 

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.